fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
So that gets us around to what to do should the Internet ever go down in the U.S.A. Our friends up at http://www.halfpasthuman.com sent us a little research you might want to be aware of:
“bunch of people getting nervous
heard from old friends in the switching biz that govt's all over are nervous http://openmesh.wordpress.com/
(snip)
“Providing local information during an “internet kill switch”.
Due to recent events in Egypt and the speed of the shutdown.
Most of these projects are open to contribution and further development.
B.A.T.M.A.N – http://www.open-mesh.org/
Roofnet | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roofnet
Netsukuku | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsukuku
Open Mesh Project | http://www.openmeshproject.org/
OLPC Mesh Network | http://wiki.laptop.o…Network_Details
There are others, too, and the OpenMesh site is where to find 'em…but we put a few up here from their site since dispersed information is more robust.
-
“Pete's latest message from Inside the Belly of the Beast”
WHY IGNORANCE-TAX PARASITES HATE AND FEAR CtC
(An Observation from with the Belly of the Beast)
Here's something you need to understand about the truth and the law, and something those who want to exploit and abuse you without interruption don't want you to understand:
The legal system that operates in America is a structure for the assertion and enforcement of claims. It is nothing else.
It is not a champion of justice; it is not a seeker of truth.
When the legal system compels performance, it is enforcing someone's (positive) claim of a duty owed. When the legal system thwarts or punishes behavior, it is enforcing someone's (negative) claim of a trespass against his rights.
The legal system doesn't know who has a legitimate claim to what. Knowing such a thing is neither in its nature, nor its purpose. The system is merely a claim-enforcement and conflicting-claim-resolution entity. It doesn't decide who has a claim to enforce; it simply makes itself available to claimants who have made that decision for themselves, and provides machinery designed to give both sides– claimant and defendant– a best shot at making their respective cases and arriving at a just and legitimate outcome (as long as everybody involved, especially the judge, competently and honestly plays by the rules).
In a nutshell, our legal system is claimant-driven– it is static unless and until someone makes a claim. When someone does make a claim, the legal system provides a format and venue for prosecuting that claim; and if the claimant is able to prove his case as provided-for by the rules of the process, the legal system will then help him enforce the claim.
Looking at it from another direction, even someone who has a legitimate cause will enjoy no support from the legal system unless and until his (positive or negative) claim is asserted. That forgotten bank account might really be the one YOU opened 30 years ago, but until you make your claim, that fact means nothing.
Partaking of the same principle, silence is worse than nothing in the face of someone else's untrue claim against you. Silence means his claim is unrebutted, and therefore deemed agreed-to and proven (as a matter of necessary legal principle). Being unrebutted, agreed-to and proven, the claim prevails– EVEN IF IT IS OBJECTIVELY UNTRUE. The mindless machinery of the legal system will move against you in support of the fiction on the claimant's behalf.
And you know what? This is precisely proper.
The legal system is blind. It doesn't know who is right, or who has rights, or what they are. Only you (and other claimants) know these things, and can assert these things (even while also being required to prove these things).
This brings us to CtC ('Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America'), and why it is so threatening to the exploitive parasites that infest the District of Corruption. You see, the income tax is a claim-based tax. The claims are that the one alleged to owe the tax has engaged in “taxable activities” by using federal property or privileges to acquire wealth. Because stuff belonging to the federal government was involved in the gains, it gets to claim a piece of the action. (The feds have given state and local governments permission to take a piece of this same action, too.)
Most of the millions of “taxable activities” claims made in America every year are false. The sorry fact is that due to decades of encouragement by hungry tax agencies, and precious little independent study of the law, lots of Americans are in the habit of sending the government signed forms ( “W-2s” and ” 1099s”) alleging federal connections to every payment they make to others, even while having no idea what they are really saying by doing so. A huge volume of government income tax claims are based solely on these allegations. But, like all claims, those that someone owes taxes to a government– even objectively false claims– can be enabled by agreement (either explicit agreement or by silence). When this happens, the claimant-government IS PUT IN THE RIGHT, in the eyes of the legal system and all others, and properly so.
No one will EVER be able to say that the subsequent enforcement of that tax-debt claim was improper– even if it's a complete fiction, and even if the very day after the target's property is seized, the government announces that the tax has never really applied to the sort of things that target had done. It's a simple legal formula: Someone said the target engaged in federal activity (meaning he became indebted to the government). The target didn't dispute this. What is fiction is now agreed by everyone involved to be “true”; and the feds took the money. No one's rights were violated; no fraud; no crime.
On the other hand, if claims of tax liability are rebutted, the claimants are PUT IN THE WRONG– unless and until they can and do somehow prove the claims right in a valid, adversarial contest in an impartial court. Unless and until that proof is forthcoming (which it cannot be, if the claim is objectively untrue), any enforcement of the alleged tax debt is illegal. But this alignment of the law on the side of the truth can only happen if the target of an invalid tax claim makes his or her own testimony, when and how it counts.
CtC teaches the reader how and why to switch from being an ignorant and helpless enabler of objectively untrue claims against him to being a claimant on his own behalf and/or a legally-effective defender against illegitimate claims made by others. CtC teaches the reader how to say, in a legally-meaningful manner, “You don't have a legitimate claim to any of my money, and what's more, I want back everything of mine that you are holding!”
THAT'S the problem for the parasites. Anyone who studies CtC learns what the law actually means by “income” (and what it doesn't). He learns how tax claims get made, how to rebut them when they're wrong, and how to make claims to recover withheld or paid-in amounts. Once that knowledge has been put to use, any parasite attempting to make and enforce a false claim against that educated, activated American does so without any protective legal justification.
FALSE CLAIMS PROPERLY REBUTTED CAN NEVER BE LEGITIMATED.
Unfortunately, the legal system is NOT really blind– at least, not reliably so. Those appointed to administer the system have their own views, and their own agendas, as do those who appoint them and advance them. The administrators are supposed to leave all this at the office door, but they're human. They will be objectively honest and faithful to their trust only in proportion to the articulation and sturdiness of those who wish it to be so. As a consequence, even asserting one's legitimate claims, or rebutting the illegitimate claims of others doesn't guarantee immediate and painless justice.
BUT…
NOT asserting one's legitimate claims and NOT rebutting the illegitimate claims of others DOES guarantee INJUSTICE, in the sense of an objectively wrong outcome. At the same time, this inaction leaves the legal system off the hook for any responsibility, and even though you may think everyone does or should know better, it also leaves the claimant “technically” IN THE RIGHT, and future study of the affair will unambiguously come to this conclusion.
On the other hand, ASSERTING one's legitimate claim, and/or REBUTTING the illegitimate claims of others, puts a legal system that tolerates or contributes to an illegitimate outcome AND the illegitimate claimant, IN THE WRONG, and future study of the affair will unambiguously come to THIS conclusion, with all the possible liability and recriminatory ramifications of that conclusion.
SO…
In the end, it is YOU who decides whether you're going to authorize the evil little totalitarian fiction that the state has an automatic claim to everyone's earnings, and gets to decide how much each person keeps for himself, for his family's needs, and for his own security. It is YOU who empowers the state as the arbiter of how much of your wealth and hard work gets handed over to the politically-connected class on Wall Street, or to the armaments industry, or to the prison industry, or to the welfare industry– and how much goes to pay for the hard work of handing out all that money to these cronies and clients. As long as YOU play along, that's how it goes, and when it goes that way, you've no right to even complain.
At the same time, of course, it is also YOU who can decide to step back up into the sunshine of respect for the truth and the rule of law, including the Constitutional limits on federal taxing power and practices. That's what the CtC Community is all about– courageous, committed individual Americans, actually taking meaningful steps to restore the republic.
Right now America is in another season of truth or lies. Right now, YOU have the chance to choose.
PLEASE. Use your power, make your choice, and honor the sacrifices made by your ancestors to give you the freedom to do so.
Or…, don't.
Keep hoping someone else is going to come along and fix everything, so that you don't have to pipe up or get up.
That's surely easier, and it seems safer, of course– as appeasement and conflict avoidance always do.
BUT, HOW'S THAT BEEN WORKING FOR YOU?
And is it going to be better or worse when you face this question again next year, if you do the wrong thing now? Are the bad guys going to be weaker, or stronger after you've given in to them for another year?
How about you? Stronger? Or weaker?
Give it some thought.
I hope you all understand that the seven-year assault on CtC and on me personally by the tax-feeders is for one purpose– to intimidate YOU into letting this year's brief opportunity for testifying freely, honestly and on your own behalf slip away. That is, those who can't win legitimately want to do so by scaring you into paralysis, or yet another year of “playing it safe” by “playing along”. That's how THEY win every time, even when they haven't got any real cards to play.
By the way, I'll answer the “weaker or stronger” question posed above: The more times you compromise your principles, the easier it gets to do so.
So, don't let them win this battle and gain control of your testimony. Speak your truth. Stand your ground, and keep your feet. Your dignity is worth it.
Besides, the worst they can do is accuse you of not believing what you say. This would be to browbeat you into saying what you don't believe…
I leave it to you to decide which is worse.
***
Get CtC at http://losthorizons.com/cc.htm , or download the .pdf version, with a documented history of government efforts to suppress the book included, at http://losthorizons.com/CtCforFree.pdf .
P. S. If you got this as a “forward”, you may not have any real idea of what I've been talking about! Ask your forwarding benefactor, who has thereby proven himself or herself to be one of the best friends you'll ever have, to tell you the liberating truth about the “income” tax.
Or visit http://losthorizons.com .
If you got this direct (you good Warrior for the Truth and the Law, you), be somebody's else's best friend, and forward this message. You may end up with a little explaining to do, but what are friends for, if not to help show each other the way out of the darkness of servitude and exploitation and into the light of liberty?
-
Great post! You're a stand up comedian this morning.
God offers PERMANENT protection and security. SATAN offers temporary indulgence and eternal injury. In the grand scheme of things, the longer term benefit ought to be perceived as superior by rational men. But of course, obviously there are no rational men left. As a culture, we have become little more than a herd of animals whose only instinct is to avoid pain and maximize pleasure, and to do so over the SHORT term rather than the LONG term. That's what happens when you take God out of schools and replace Him with evolutionism and government idolatry.
-
The vehicle is registered at the DMV until it lapses or the fee is no longer paid. To unregister the vehicle means to ask that the registration be terminated and the license plates are surrendered, just as you indicate. One can unregister the vehicle and sell it, without recording the new owner. The Certificate of Title is associated with the Registered owner, and hence, there would be no certificate of title for the new owner. The replacement for the certificate of title is a private bill of sale notarized by the seller and buyer.
Taxes on the sale only pertain to registered owners. Hence, unregistering BEFORE the sale avoids the taxes. Ask for a pro rata refund of the registration fees from the date of unregistration to the end of the registration period.
Like every other form of de facto government corruption, vehicle registration is a franchise. Exit the franchise and they can't do anything.
-
Stone83,
All of the forms used for common law pleading and practice are found in:
Sovereignty and Freedom Page, Section 8.3
http://famguardian.o…dom/Freedom.htm
This is how motions are prepared. Practice guides available to contemporary attorneys such as the link below are only for statutory citizens who are public officers:
http://www.ruttergro…om/cartfcte.htm
It is better to study common law pleading than statutory pleading, because statutory civil law is law for government and not private persons such as us.
-
lchesson,
The only forms and procedures approved for use by those who are members of this forum for correcting false and fraudulent IRS form 1099's are:
1. Correcting Erroneous Information Returns, Form #04.001
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/CorrErrInfoRtns/CorrErrInfoRtns.pdf
2. Correcting Erroneous IRS Form 1099's, Form #04.005
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/CorrErrInfoRtns/Form1099/CorrectingIRSForm1099.htm
For background on why they must be corrected that is admissible as evidence in court, see:
The “Trade or Business” Scam
DIRECT LINK: http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/TradeOrBusinessScam.htm
-
Anyone born or naturalized in this country can be:
1. A sovereign American
2. A non-citizen national
The procedure for doing so is documented in:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015, Section 2
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
-
“Thy Kingdom Come”A Morning Prayer
Our precious Lord taught us to pray, “Thy Kingdom Come.” It is part of the Lord's Prayer a.k.a. the “Disciples' Prayer.” Positively, it is a plea that all men and all man's institutions would surrender to be ruled by God's law; negatively, it is coup de'etat against godless authorities and de facto officials.
This is the rebel's prayer—a revolutionary's cry against the immorality of this age and the promotion of wickedness by men in rebellion against the Creator. This prayer is God's permission to resist evil, to take the high road, and swim against the stream; it allows men to shout “No King, but King Jesus.” It is permission to adopt the motto “one nation under one God and one absolute law.”
It is a prayer against the belief that man is god; that government is god; that mans' law or their constitutions are absolute.
It is a prayer against the status quo where ambitious men seek to advance the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and the pride of life. It is a prayer against abortion, oppression, homosexuality, pornography, and greed.
It is a prayer against secularism, atheism, humanism, socialism, Marxism and every other ism wherein secularists seek to build a city where man is the measure of all things.
It is a prayer against rulers in rebellion against “the LORD and His Anointed”—against governments who seek to enslave and control men through coercion, intimidation, and fear.
It is a prayer against governments hostile to the maxim that the Bible is the Source of all Law; and, it is a prayer against governments that break their own laws.
It is a prayer against unjust laws and legislators “who do mischief through law” by creating a system of man-made statutes and codes that enslave their citizenry [Ps. 94:20]; who seek to create a new world order through law; who promote alien laws that undermine the Ten Commandments and the virtues they advance: faithfulness, justice, and mercy.
It is a prayer against those who defraud others; against rulers that steal from the people through color of law; against unlawful taxation that transfers power from the family to the State.
If you are angry at godless politicians, this prayer if for you: “Lord, Thy kingdom Come.”
B.S.
Retired Pastor
-
See also:
http://www.numbersusa.org/ 3 minutes
Best wishes, and may the love of our Heavenly Father guide you into all truth, and may the courage of His Son inspire you to tirelessly serve Him.
-
All sales taxes are based on the presumption that the sale occurred on federal territory within the exterior limits of the state. If the sale did NOT occur there, then no sales tax is due.
1. Buy the vehicle from a private party rather than a dealer.
2. If the previous owner registered the vehicle, then when you go to the DMV to record the sale, unregister the vehicle from the previous owner and don't reregister it. Say that:
2.1. It was never located in “the State of” ____
2.2. Was sold OUTSIDE the state
2.3. Is no longer registered in this or any other state
2.4. That it wasn't IN “the State of__” when sold.
In California, for instance, the Revenue and Taxation Code says in section 6017 that sales taxes only apply on federal territory. If the sale occurred outside of federal territory, then it was not “in this state” at the time of the sale and is NOT SUBJECT, but not EXEMPT from sales taxes.
http://www.leginfo.c…&file=6001-6024
-
YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS: Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number
THIS IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL
Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas – HB3200 highlighted pages most egregious
Please read this…….. especially the reference to pages 58 & 59
JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.
** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.
** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – ACORN).
** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)
** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.
** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an “end-of-life planning” seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)
** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on:
“Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future.”
Honorable David Kithil
Marble Falls, Texas
All of the above should give you the point blank ammo you need to support your opposition to Obama care. Please send this information on to all of your e-mail contacts.
-
The question you propose has already been answered by the U.S. Supreme Court. The language they use to describe state citizenship in relation to national citizenship is “derivative and dependent”. Here is the language that addresses that subject:
Quote:“In reviewing the subject we have hitherto considered [size size=”-1″][245 U.S. 366, 389] [/size]it as it has been argued from the point of view of the Constitution as it stood prior to the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. But to avoid all misapprehension we briefly direct attention to that amendment for the purpose of pointing out, as has been frequently done in the past,8 how completely it broadened the national scope of the government under the Constitution by causing citizenship of the United States to be paramount and dominant instead of being subordinate and derivative, and therefore operating as it does upon all the powers conferred by the Constitution leaves no possible support for the contentions made if their want of merit was otherwise not so clearly made manifest. “[ARVER v. U.S. , 245 U.S. 366 (1918)
SOURCE: http://caselaw.lp.fi…ol=245&page=366]
The subject of the above case was whether draft laws constituted involuntary servitude for those who were Fourteenth Amendment “citizens of the United States”. The above case was subsequently overruled.
Here is a similar cite:
Quote:“The first of these questions is one of vast importance, and lies at the very foundations of our government. The question is now settled by the fourteenth amendment itself, that citizenship of the United States is the primary citizenship in this country; and that State citizenship is secondary and derivative, depending upon citizenship of the United States and the citizen's place of residence. The States have not now, if they ever had, any power to restrict their citizenship to any classes or persons. A citizen of the United States has a perfect constitutional right to go to and reside in any State he chooses, and to claim citizenship therein, [83 U.S. 36, 113]and an equality of rights with every other citizen; and the whole power of the nation is pledged to sustain him in that right. He is not bound to cringe to any superior, or to pray for any act of grace, as a means of enjoying all the rights and privileges enjoyed by other citizens. And when the spirit of lawlessness, mob violence, and sectional hate can be so completely repressed as to give full practical effect to this right, we shall be a happier nation, and a more prosperous one than we now are. Citizenship of the United States ought to be, and, according to the Constitution, is, a surt and undoubted title to equal rights in any and every States in this Union, subject to such regulations as the legislature may rightfully prescribe. If a man be denied full equality before the law, he is denied one of the essential rights of citizenship as a citizen of the United States.”[Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872)]
The above case also stated the following:
Quote:“It would be the vainest show of learning to attempt to prove by citations of authority, that up to the adoption of the recent Amendments [the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment], no claim or pretense was set up that those rights depended on the Federal government for their existence or protection, beyond the very few express limitations which the Federal Constitution imposed upon the states—such as the prohibition against ex post facto laws, bill of attainder, and laws impairing the obligation of contracts. But with the exception of these and a few other restrictions, the entire domain of the privileges and immunities of citizens of the states, as above defined, lay within the constitutional and legislative power of the states, and without that of the Federal government. Was it the purpose of the 14th Amendment, by the simple declaration that no state should make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, to transfer the security and protection of all the civil rights which we have mentioned, from the states to the Federal government? And where it is declared that Congress shall have the power to enforce that article, was it intended to bring within the power of Congress the entire domain of civil rights heretofore belonging exclusively to the states?We are convinced that no such result was intended by the Congress which proposed these amendments, nor by the legislatures of the states, which ratified them. Having shown that the privileges and immunities relied on in the argument are those which belong to citizens of the states as such, and that they are left to the state governments for security and protection, and not by this article placed under the special care of the Federal government, we may hold ourselves excused from defining the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States which no state can abridge, until some case involving those privileges may make it necessary to do so.”
[Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1872) , emphasis added]
So the answer to your question is NO. You are a state citizen first and a constitutional citizen BECAUSE you are a state citizen. As has been the case since the founding of the republic, federal civil law has NO force and effect within the borders of a constitutional state and the only way it can is with your cooperation in mischaracterizing your status as that of a statutory citizen with a domicile on federal territory not protected by the Constitution.
-
Franklin,
You're funny! Couldn't have said it better. The following videos are along the same lines:
Would Jesus Wear a Rolex?
[url url=”http://www.youtube.c…h?v=miQQWA1zsbU”]http://www.youtube.c…h?v=miQQWA1zsbU[/url]
Praise the Lord and Send me the Money
-
Appeal brief filed by Pete Hendrickson documenting the corrupt, underhanded, criminal behavior of the government towards him in railroading him into an un-deserved prosecution for false returns.
Pete Hendrickson wrote his appeal brief personally without the aid of a lawyer. Bravo to him for being so involved in his own case and not trusting his fate to a lawyer with a criminal conflict of interest and allegience originating from his/her license to practice law.
The attached brief was downloaded from Pete's soon to be defunct website using a link provided at the end of his free, downloadable Cracking the Code book available through his website.
http://losthorizons.com/PostCrimAppealBrief.pdf
Below is a link to a similar document filed earlier in the same case:
http://defendindepen…6-2008/PH87.PDF
-
EDITORIAL: A public announcement sent out by Pete Hendrickson
_____________________
A Family of True Americans Needs Your Help
(and you need to know why, for your own sake and that of your children)
A brave whistleblower on a decades-old income-tax scam by tax agencies and “tax professionals”, who exploit widespread public ignorance of fine-print in the law, and have been fleecing the American people of trillions of dollars, languishes in prison after being railroaded in a corrupt trial by those eager to silence his voice and keep a lid on the liberating truth about the tax.
Learn about what has now been more than seven-years-and-counting of tens of thousands of Americans being set free from mis-application of the income tax (including Social Security and Medicare) by simple knowledge of the law, and more than seven years of increasingly intense government efforts to suppress that knowledge, at http://losthorizons.com/.
Learn how and why the man who presented this knowledge to the world now sits behind bars for the crime of inconveniencing the state and letting his fellow citizens know what's been being done to them for the benefit of the politically-connected on Wall Street, in big business, in the military-industrial complex, and in the ranks of the political hacks who have been making a nice living for themselves passing other people's money over to these special interests, and getting a fat share back in campaign contributions, pay, perks and benefits.
And then HELP.
Help this good man and his family, who are standing in the front lines of the battle for liberty and the rule of law– who are standing in YOUR front lines– make it through this assault.
Make your generous donation to Peter or Doreen Hendrickson at 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., Michigan 48382.
Then help spread the truth about the corrupt outrage these brave citizens are enduring, and help spread the liberating truth about the tax, as well.
Pete Hendrickson's books revealing the liberating truth about the tax can be ordered at http://losthorizons.com/cc.htm. His first book, 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America' can be downloaded as a .pdf at http://losthorizons.com/CtCforFree.pdf.
The fully-documented, millions-of-dollars-worth of complete refunds, levy releases, notice-of-deficiency “closing notices”, Treasury Department transcripts and more secured by readers of these books continuously for years and years now, even in the face of intense government resistance, can be seen in their hundreds and hundreds on dozens of pages starting at http://losthorizons….reVictories.htm and http://losthorizons….WayButLoose.htm.
The last weekly newsletter Pete posted to his million-hit-per-month website before being imprisoned can be seen at http://losthorizons.com/Newsletter.htm, along with the messages he has sent out to the world during his sojourn in the belly of the Beast.
Please read, learn and share with neighbors, friends and family.
And then again, please help Pete and his family.
Remember, the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.