fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
EDITORIAL: Another Lindsey Springer Update from jail. We didn't write this.
_________________________
Here are Lindsey's thoughts on understanding how the IRS operates:
================================================================================
Lindsey Springer writing some words of encouragement and wisdom as to how the IRS functions within each of the “several States.” This is properly entitled “Background Check of the IRS.”
The “system” of the United States is one of taxation and can appear to be more than complicated especially to those you perceive to know or should know how this “system” functions or works because most of those who you pay to know it actually no nothing about the actual system. They just know how to do the thing they are selling to you and go to the next client.
There is a reason why Attorneys will not make any system changing representations against the Department of Justice's promotion of the system, and its enforcement, and that is because the license is worth more to the Attorneys then any single clients money.
You must start somewhere. Usually the starting point is what gave rise to your situation which caused you to encounter the “system” in the first place. I will use the IRS as an example since everyone knows that part of the system exists at least in theory.
For the purpose of this email lets presupose you either did not file (“deliver”) a tax form containing the information sought by the IRS's “information collection request” “form” or you failed to pay (“deliver”) the correct amount the information collected by the IRS suggests you actually owed (W-2 or 1099).
To start, you must know who it is that you are dealing with. Lets call this the “background check”. The IRS is an “agency” but who created it? The Supreme Court and every Court to ever address this issue held the IRS was created by the Secretary of the Treasury (“SOTT”) pursuant to the SOTT's power at Title 26, Sec. 7805 to administer and enforce by regulation the internal revenue laws. This means the IRS is an “agency” created by “regulations” and not an agency created by Congress. See 26 CF
For example, the Department of the Treasury is created at Title 31, Sec. 301. The Department of Justice is created at Title 28, Sec. 501. Both of these “departments” are “at the seat of Government.” The seat of United States Government codified to be in the District of Columbia at Title 4, Sec. 71.
DOESN'T IT FEEL GOOD TO KNOW AS MUCH ABOUT THE UNITED STATSE GOVERNMENT AS THERE IS TO KNOW? This U.S. Government cannot act outside D.C. through its “offices” and “officers” except if “expressly provided by law.” See Title 4, Sec. 72
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Department of Justice has an “Attorney General,” See Title 28, Sec. 503, who has “functions” including those “of agencies…of the Department of Justice…” See Title 28, Sec. 509. What then are “agencies of the Department of Justice”?
In order to answer this question you must first understand the term “Bureau.” For example, the letters “FBI” is commonly known to stand for “Federal Bureau of Investigation” establsiehd by Title 28, Sec. 531 “in the Department of Justice.” BOP stand for Bureau of Prisons which actually is the FBOP.
For example, under the Federal Tort Claims Act Congress defines a “Federal Agency” to “include [the] executive departments….of the United States.” See Title 28, Sec. 2671. So, if the “Bureau” is in a “Department” then it is an agency of the United States. There are many other examples that support this explanation.
The simple way to understand “Agency” is one that acts or takes action upon the authority of another. In 2006, Congress established the “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and explosives” within the Department of Justice. See Title 28, Section 599A. Prior to this statutory enactment the SOTT defined “Bureau” at 27 CFR Part 447, Sub Chapter B at Chapter II “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of JUSTICE.” In Subpart B in a part Titled “Definitions” the meaning of terms define “Bureau” as “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, Department of TREASURY.”
So, to understand the Department of Justice has a Bureau of ATFE and the Depatment of Treasury as a Bureau of ATF. The difference of course is “explosive” and separate statutory existence. However, both are “agencies” of the United States but one is established by Congress and the Secretary's ATF is an agency created by regulation.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
There is no doubt the IRS is an “agency” of the Secretary of the Treasury. The IRS is established by regulation of the Secretary at 26 CFR 601.101. The regulations are known as “Part 600”. The Tenth Circuit found this in Lonsdale v. U.S. 919 F. 2d 1440, 1448 (10th Cir. 1990). In Snyder v. U.S. 596 F. Supp. 240, 247 (N.D. Ind. 1984) it was held the IRS owes its entire legal existence pursuant to 26 CFR 601.101. The Tenth Circuit cited to Section 601.101 in U.S. v. Dawes, 951 F. 2d 1189, 1193(N.3)(10th Cir. 1991).
The Supreme Court has found the IRS is “organized to carry out” the Internal Revenue Laws. U.S. v. Euge 444 U.S. 707, 719 (N.3)(1980). The Supreme Court held in U.S. v. LaSalle, that Congress ONLY authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to administer and enforce the laws related to internal revenue. 437 U.S. 298, 308 (1978). The Courts have found the Secretary has the power to create a collection (collection of information and money) agency at Title 26, Section 7805.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
If you are blessed to read and understand how the power given the Secretary of the Treasury is different than any other Department or Agency you can then see by “background check” whether the U.S. District Court has “Jurisdiction” to enforce or adjuge any alleged transgression of laws realted to internal revenue. I realize those who deal with matters related to internal revenue will understand this explanation sooner than most others, but you can be the exception.
The Supreme Court said in LaSalle that No U.S. Attorney can pursue prosecution of offenses related to internal revenue (i.d. 7201, 7201, 7212 or conspiracy under 371) unless he is “authorized” by the Secretary of the Treasury. See 437 U.S. at 312 This is because Congress placed ALL the laws related to internal revenue in the exclusive hands of the Secretary [Department of the Treasury] the decision of which laws to enforce. See Section 7801, 7803 and 7805
If a U.S. Attorney could do a Grand Jury proceeding related to internal revenue offenses while the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate pursues institutional goals of the IRS, the 5th Amendment Grand Jury then becomes under the control of the United States' IRS which completely violates the reason for a Grand Jury explained in U.S. v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 47 (1992). A Grand Jury's purpose is to stand between the Government and people and that cannot happen when either the IRS becomes the Grand Jury's agency or the Grand Jury becomes an agency of the IRS. Hence, the indict a ham sandwhich theory.
The Supreme Court calls the “authorization” a “referral” to a local U.S. Attorney. LaSalle, 437 U.S. at 312. The United States Department of Justice has been aware the only way to have a person lawfully indicted by a 5th Amendment Grand Jury related to internal revenue laws, including banking laws under Title 31, since before 1978, and for some unknown reason refuses to obey LaSalle.
I guess the reason is that if the IRS had to stop doing a “criminal” investigation at the point a referral to a U.S. Attorney was lawfully made, the IRS Investigators, as Grand Jury Agents, would lose the sting they possess readily apparent when the Grand Jury and IRS become one flesh.
All the IRs must do is complete their institutional investigation and then if it unearths enough to make a referral the Grand Jury can hear the evidence. The U.S. Attorney may be able to use a Grand Jury to gather post referral evidence, not already gathered, in most cases, but not tax cases. In referral cases the “prophylactic rule” prohibits the U.S. Attorney to continue an IRS investigation of a certain calender year after referral is more than clear.
At the point an IRS Criminal Investigator testifies as to the evidence he learned of before referral he is called a “witness.” The point the Criminal Investigator's name appears on a Grand Jury subpoena he no longer is just a witness but now an agent of the Grand Jury which is unlawful. Just ask yourself where can a Grand Jury employ a witness who has testified before it to act on the Grand Jury's behalf?
The violation of the 5th Amendment is endless. Wouldn't a witness who testifies against a suspect, truthful or not, have motive to preserve his version of the facts? How this effects the District Court's Jurisdiction is also endless. A referral ends the IRS's institutional authority, civil or criminal, given it by the Secretary of the Treasury to enforce any provision of law related to internal revenue.
Look at it this way. The Secretary, by referral, takes his power from the IRS and hands it to the U.S. Attorney who then presents a case for Grand Jury indictment. Without the authorization from the Secretary of the Treasury, the U.S. Attorney would have no authority to consider prosecution under Title 28, Section 547(1) on “offenses” related to internal revenue. If a proper referral is made, no evidence obtained by the IRS through post referral enforcement statutes could ever be used to obtain an indictment or conviction because it was obtained without legal authority. Remember a subpoena or summons seeks the evidence by enforcement.
If you are being pursued by the Grand Jury and IRS at the same time you are experiencing modern day tyranny. You are also experiencing violations of your rights to a Grand Jury being properly empaneled, only be prosecuted by referral, and your rights protected by the Tax laws themselves. If a search warrant was obtained after referral you have a 4th and 5th Amendment violation. After indictment you should demand to see and have an expert examine the alleged referral to determine if it really is a referral or the type of made up letter used in the case against me and Mr. Stilley.
The Bright Line establishes what evidence is to be excluded and establishes the District Court's Jurisdiction over the Grand Jury claims. Remember, without referral lawfully made, the U.S. Attorney has no authority to prosecute, the Grand Jury has no power to indict, and the District Court has no jurisdiction to enter judgment. Here is a quote from KOKKONEN V. GUARDIAN LIFE, 511 U.S. 375, 377, 128 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1994):
“Federal Courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statutes,
See Willy v. Coastal Corp. 503, U.S. 131, 136-37, 117 L.ED. 2d 280, 112 S.Ct. 1076 (1992), which is not to be expaned by
Judicial Decree. Fire & Casualty Co. v. Fin, 341 U.S. 6, 95 L.Ed. 702, 71 S.Ct. 534, 19 ALR 2d 738 (1951). It is presumed
that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, Turner v. Bank of North America, 4 Dall, 8,11, I L. Ed 718 (1799), and
the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction.” McNutt v. GMAC 298 U.S. 178, 182-
83, 80 L.Ed. 1135, 56 S. Ct. 780 (1936).
Taking all the case citations out of this quote:
'Federal Courts are courts of limited jurisdiction…which cannot be expaned by judicial decree…It is to be presumed that a
cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting
jurisdiction.”
The Party is the USA when a Grand Jury pursues or issues an indictment. So, when you are faced or know someone who was or is facing Grand Jury charges derived form laws related to internal revenue, consider that it is presumed the Government has not complied with the referral requirements and the District Court never had jurisdiction. If on the other hand a referral does exist for a specific calender year, any evidence obtained by the IRS after that date by enforcement proceedings will most likely be excluded, when claimed, by law, since it was obtained after referral in very bad faith.
Just do a background check and you will see for yourself.
I pray in jesus name you each are given understand of these words and those of you affected by IRS and Grand Jury are relieved based upon the discovery the U.S. Attorney and IRS violated LaSalle and its bright line rule of referral.
5.7.11 Lindsey Springer
================================================================================
Thank you for continuing to support our family and Dad's mission.
PayPal:
gnutella@mindspring.com or lindsey@mindspring.com.
Mailing address for donations or other inquiries:
Landon Springer (I can't cash checks made out to Lindsey)
5147 S. Harvard, #116, Tulsa, OK 74135
Letters to Lindsey directly (no donations or packages):
Lindsey Springer, 02580-063
FCI Big Spring
1900 Simler Ave
Big Spring, TX 79720
Thanks,
Landon Springer
-
SOURCE: http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/GrossErrors.html
EDITORIAL: Attorney Larry Becraft's rebuttal of the above post, in total.
___________
(Posted Labor Day Weekend, 2003)
THE WHOLE THING IS A PACK OF LIES.
Geesh, where do “they” keep coming up with this stuff?
That which is posted below in red was received via e-mail on the above date. Apparently, this message was designed to provide “very secret information” about a wide variety of sinister matters for the purpose of convincing the message's reader about the validity of certain legal positions. I can only comment about certain legal points raised in this message, and then not all of them because I am not going to waste a lot of time debunking this garbage. But this type of message is representative of what lots of people unfortunately believe.
3.) The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
This contention has been promoted by many who advocate UCC arguments. I provide here the above referenced pages from 41 Stat. ch. 214, which was an appropriations act for the federal government. These pages show that this act abolished some Treasury offices and also directed the deposit of government funds with various Federal Reserve Banks. I fail to detect how Treasury was abolished.
The truth is otherwise. The Department of the Treasury was created in September, 1789; see 1 Stat. 65. In 5 U.S.C. §101, Treasury is listed as an executive department. The establishment of Treasury is codified at 31 U.S.C. §301. We certainly have a federal Treasury today; see 31 U.S.C. §302.
Rather than being deceived by incorrect information like the above, if you wish to learn about the money issue, read this brief posted on this site, and you should also read Edwin Vieira's Pieces of Eight. Edwin is the foremost legal scholar regarding the money issue.
4.) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
For the above proposition, the message's author cites some pages from Presidential Documents, which are not posted on the Net. However, the author does cite “22 U.S.C. 285”, et seq., which sections are so posted; however, review of these laws shows this proposition to be without foundation. Here is 22 U.S.C. § 285:
The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the Asian Development Bank (hereinafter referred to as the ''Bank'') provided for by the agreement establishing the Bank (hereinafter referred to as the ''agreement'') deposited in the archives of the United Nations.
Here is 22 U.S.C. § 286:
The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the ''Fund''), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the ''Bank''), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State.
Both 22 U.S.C. §287 and 22 U.S.C. §288 are long and are not posted on this page but please follow the links to FindLaw. How does membership in the IMF make Treasury the IMF or any part of it?
6.) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the “US Government” held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
The Federal Communications Commission was created by Congress via the law codified at 47 U.S.C. §151. For the CIA, see 50 U.S.C. §403. The creation of the FBI involves old matters which I merely cite. Via an act of May 22, 1908, 35 Stat. 235, a Bureau of Investigation was created. This agency was consolidated with the Bureau of Prohibition, Division of Investigation, in the Department of Justice via E.O. 6166 of June 10, 1933. This agency was later designated as the FBI by an act of March 22, 1935, 49 Stat. 77. See 28 U.S.C. §531. I live in Huntsville, Alabama, where NASA was started; see 42 U.S.C. §2472. Pull out the United States Government Manual and one may easily find references to various statutes for the creation of federal agencies.
The author of the message cites United States v. Strang, 254 U.S. 491 (1921), which was a case where the “United States Shipping Board caused the Fleet Corporation to be organized ( April 16, 1917) under laws of the District of Columbia with $50,000,000 capital stock, all owned by the United States…” This case does not stand for the proposition that any particular agency was not a part of the government. The case of Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982) held that the Federal Reserve Banks were private corporations.
8.) There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
The case of Federal Radio Comm. v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930), simply deals with administrative procedures of federal agencies, and concerns nothing about the creation of any courts. 1 Stat. 138 was simply an act to pay the debts of the United States.
9.) There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
The reference to 1 Stat. 138, an act to pay debts of the United States, has nothing to do with judges.
Here in Alabama, our Alabama Constitution contains provisions regarding the establishment our courts, as does Alabama Code, Title 12. Federal courts are dealt with via 28 U.S.C.
14.) New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that “New York City was the capital of the World” and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 ( (2) (2)
Perhaps the best indicator that the author of the message discussed here was taking illicit drugs is this part. The reference to 22 C.F.R. §422.103 for the amazing proposition that New York is the capital of the world is pure fabrication; this regulation concerns solely Social Security Numbers.
20.) The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
The contention that we are Brits is fully discussed here. The foreign country that loaned money to us during the Revolution was France, not the King of England.
22.) America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
Please read my article, “We Ain't Brits.” You may also read the Articles of Association which are posted on the Net; those Articles do not support any contention other than at the time, we were on the eve of war with the King of England.
31.) ” The People” does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor &City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)
The case of Barron v. Baltimore dealt with the port at Baltimore and a “takings” issue. An attempt was made in this case to apply the 5th Amendment's “takings and just compensation clause” to the city.
32.) The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)
The above is not what the United States Supreme Court stated in Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 (1892): “and for this plain reason that the case assumes that we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity, and not upon the doctrines or worship of those impostors.' And in the famous case of Vidal v. Girard's Ex'rs, 2 How. 127, 198, this court, while sustaining the will of Mr. Girard, with its provisions for the creation of a college into which no minister should be permitted to enter, observed: 'it is also said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.'”
How about these various Presidential Proclamations and the frequent references to “Almighty God”? The below links are to various Proclamations published in the United States Statutes at Large which are posted on the Net. Some of these are several pages long, so please remember to hit “next image” to flip the pages of the Stats when reading some of these proclamations.
11 Stat. 754 11 Stat. 756 11 Stat. 763 12 Stat. 1261
12 Stat. 1263 12 Stat. 1270 13 Stat. 733 13 Stat. 735
13 Stat. 743 13 Stat. 749 13 Stat. 755 13 Stat. 773
14 Stat. 817 15 Stat. 701 15 Stat. 711 16 Stat. 1129
16 Stat. 1137
P.T. Barnum was right!
Here is the full text of the subject e-mail:
THE WHOLE THING IS A PACK OF LIES.
This is the REAL MATRIX
1.) The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
2.) The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
3.) The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
4.) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
5.) The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganization. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy it's finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or shareholders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C.914
6.) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the “US Government” held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
7.) The UN through the IMF issues Social Security Numbers. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 ( (2) (2) Read the cites above)
8.) There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
9.) There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
10.) According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)
11.) We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System.
12.) The UN is a One World Super Government.
13.) No one on this planet has ever been free!!. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations.
14.) New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that “New York City was the capital of the World” and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 ( (2) (2)
15.) Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)
16.) Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF, which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)
17.) You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18.) The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)
19.) The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24)
20.) The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
21.) You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay &Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
22.) America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
23.) Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
24.) The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)
25.) A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)
26.) The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
27.) The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
28.) The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)
29.) We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 &73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
30.) Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)
31.) ” The People” does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor &City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)
32.) The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)
33.) It is not the duty of the police to protect you !. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.
34.) Everything in the “United States” is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath Lake? Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)
35.) We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)
36.) The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple.
37.) The good news is we don't have to fulfill “our” fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation.
38.) The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves “Kings,” “Prime Ministers,” and “Furor.”etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries, which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the “Bank of International Settlements” is located. Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of Government” in place.
39.) The “United States” did not declare Independence from Great Britian or King George.
40.) Guess who owns the UN?
END-
-
It is true – The first three digits of your Social Security number
designate the state where you lived when you apply for your Social
Security number?
_________________
Obama's SSN —
An investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) has been illegally used by Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 on or about March 1977. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. His SSN begins with the digits “042,” which are among several reserved for Connecticut residents. Obama never lived or worked in Connecticut, so there is no reason for his SSN to start with the digits “042.”
The key to understanding Obama's fraudulent use of Mr. Ludwig's Social Security number is this: Mr. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died. Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office of the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals whose probates were processed there. Because Mr. Ludwig never received Social Security benefits and there were no benefits to stop, the Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and no questions were raised. The implication, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. citizen (/either because he was born in Kenya, or because he became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro/), merely scoured the probate records until she found someone who died and who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and she selected that SSN for her grandson Barry.
Let's see what happens when Donald Trump gets past the fake birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term “natural born citizen,” there are very few who do not understand that if you are intentionally using someone else's SSN, it is a fraud.
The Obama fake birth certificate scandal is compounded by his illegal use of a stolen Social Security number. Yet another crime in the chain of crimes leading this imposter to the oval office. Don't take my word for it though. Check it out yourself. The evidence is clear that Mr. Obama is not qualified to sit as president.
What is more troubling than this however is the fact that the federal courts have dismissed no less than 8 different cases challenging Obama's bona fides, each dismissed on thin pretexts for “lack of standing,” thus proving once again the utter and total corruption of our federal judiciary. And as if the discovery that our judiciary is nothing more than a collection of political sycophants is not enough, our so-called “Republican” representatives and senators have done nothing whatsoever to address the ever mounting evidence that we have a communist impostor sitting in the White House.
-
Franklin,
The case to which you refer describing that the constitution attaches to the land and not the STATUS of the people on the land is Downes v. Bidwell:
Quote:“There could be no doubt as to the correctness of this conclusion, so far, at least, as it applied to the District of Columbia. This District had been a part of the states of Maryland and [182 U.S. 244, 261] Virginia. It had been subject to the Constitution, and was a part of the United States[***]. The Constitution had attached to it irrevocably. There are steps which can never be taken backward. The tie that bound the states of Maryland and Virginia to the Constitution could not be dissolved, without at least the consent of the Federal and state governments to a formal separation. The mere cession of the District of Columbia to the Federal government relinquished the authority of the states, but it did not take it out of the United States or from under the aegis of the Constitution. Neither party had ever consented to that construction of the cession. If, before the District was set off, Congress had passed an unconstitutional act affecting its inhabitants, it would have been void. If done after the District was created, it would have been equally void; in other words, Congress could not do indirectly, by carving out the District, what it could not do directly. The District still remained a part of the United States, protected by the Constitution. Indeed, it would have been a fanciful construction to hold that territory which had been once a part of the United States ceased to be such by being ceded directly to the Federal government.”[. . .]
“Indeed, the practical interpretation put by Congress upon the Constitution has been long continued and uniform to the effect [182 U.S. 244, 279] that the Constitution is applicable to territories acquired by purchase or conquest, only when and so far as Congress shall so direct. Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government' (art. 4, 4), by which we understand, according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme power resides in the whole body of the people, and is exercised by representatives elected by them,' Congress did not hesitate, in the original organization of the territories of Louisiana, Florida, the Northwest Territory, and its subdivisions of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Wisconsin and still more recently in the case of Alaska, to establish a form of government bearing a much greater analogy to a British Crown colony than a republican state of America, and to vest the legislative power either in a governor and council, or a governor and judges, to be appointed by the President. It was not until they had attained a certain population that power was given them to organize a legislature by vote of the people. In all these cases, as well as in territories subsequently organized west of the Mississippi, Congress thought it necessary either to extend to Constitution and laws of the United States over them, or to declare that the inhabitants should be entitled to enjoy the right of trial by jury, of bail, and of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, as well as other privileges of the bill of rights.”
[Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]
For further details, see Great IRS Hoax, Section 4.8
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
-
EDITORIAL: Here is a letter sent to Ann Barnhardt by Pastor Brooks. We didn't write this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xqtYkd2gCs
___________________
To Ann Barnhardt c/o Jo Lynn Stockton
Warm Greetings. I am an admirer of your work. You speak with such eloquence and simplicity on the subject of freedom and vileness of Islam. Your message is refreshingly stunning. I love your bacon book makers. Great illustration!! Your boldness empowered me also. Americans need to wake up out of the slumber of political correctness to the shameful and the Satanic origin of Islam. God is using you to do so. Praise God. You could not be more correct by calling the Koran a work of Satan!! It is, and you said it so well.
You nailed the problem with Christian as being too “nice.” Again, you hit the bulls eye. Niceness is killing us . . . and it is the cardinal virtue of the church. What happened to our belief in the sword and salt (Mt. 5:13 & 10:34)? Niceness is synonymous with holiness and love in the minds of most. Parents train their kids to be nice. Schools reward the nice kids. Employers hire nice people. The church hires nice pastors and it is all so syrupy sickening. Isaiah, Jeremiah, John the Baptist, and the Apostle Paul couldn't find a job in the American church because they would be considered extreme today. Would American accept a man that was “imprisoned frequently” as their pastor? Paul was!
I want to encourage you to take on some more related subjects and apply your God-given skills to expose the following:
1. Mohammed: Consider going after Mohammed, the first Moslem terrorist. He made his living as a raider of caravans. He terrorized around 57 caravans, murdered the males, boarded the young women as sex objects, sold the survivors into slavery, and stole the caravan commodities for his own gain. Why would any man name his kid “Mohammed?” It's kind of like naming your child “Judas.” American was founded on the values that we are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights: with life, liberty, and property. Mohammed was murderer, a slave trader, and a thief. Why is the U.S. Immigration agency letting Islalmic murders, bondage promoters, and robbers into this country? Expose the slob for who is and the ridiculousness of inviting Hamas into this country to live. What's wrong with Obama and modern administrations? Is it not because they are slobbering idealists?
2. Idealism: You took on the subject of being nice. Consider taking on the subject of “idealism.” Americans, particularly liberals, have an undefeatable, unswayable, irrational faith that all men are good, that there is no such thing as evil, and unswerving commitment belief that love is the answer to every problem; to a belief that all religions are basically the same; to a belief can all get along if we hold hands and sing “cum by ya”; to a belie that there are no contradictions; that we can win the world by being nice Americans; that by endless talking with Hamas, Hezbollah, the Moslem Brotherhood we can understand one another, give up differences, kiss and make up. {Example of this belief is when Obama thought it would be good for Israel to go back to their 1967 borders, invite Palestinians back to Golan Heights, and extend forgiveness and a policy of assimilating four million Palestinians with their present borders-an act of national suicide for Israel.] Liberals are so committed to idealism they don't live in reality.
3. All religions are the same. Liberals believe all religions are good; that there is very little difference between Islam and Christianity. But, the truth is, Christianity is a religion of life whereas Islam is a religion of death; Christianity teaches children to honor their father and mother while Islam on teaches children to honor their fathers; Christianity teaches that men and women are created equal while Islam teaches that women are sub human toys for man's pleasure. Some religions honor their parents; in other religions, they eat their parents. Liberal idealism in America blinds adherents to contradictions and irreconcilable differences. Idealism, like “niceness”, must be attacked.
4. Immigration: Why are we not stopping the Moslem, Mexican invasion into this county? Americans have gone plum crazy with inviting anybody and everybody to live in the USA. People who do not share the values of life, liberty, and property are changing the fabric of our society. Stealing across the border is a form of theft; that is, every person here in this country illegally is a thief!! God established landmarks for nations: Deut. 19:14; 27:17; Proverbs 22:28: 23:10. When landmarks are ignored, discarded, or moved, it is a form of theft. Americans simply do not see the illegal alien problem as thieves stealing our land, our wealth, and our prosperity. Consider doing your magic on this subject.
Ann, you are doing a terrific job!! Keep it up. Keep calling Christians to be salt blocks and not sugar cubes. Too many Christians are eating honey coated sugar slap cereals for breakfast instead of Iron-man Wheaties . . . if you know what I mean.
“We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” — William Casey, CIA Director (first staff meeting, 1981)
Be wise and alert, you are on Islam's Most Wanted List. Keep your AK-47 loaded and ready to use.
Best wishes and I hope you enjoy Todd and Jo Lynn and family today. Know you are appreciated.
Blessed by your courage,
Dr. Brooks, pastor
-
SOURCE: http://www.kitco.com/reports/KitcoNews20110523DeC_interview.html
EDITORIAL: Here's a related article
__________________
INTERVIEW: Selling Gold Reserves To Pay Off Sovereign Debt Is Unwise – WGC
23 May 2011, 02:02 p.m.
By Debbie Carlson
Of Kitco News
Follow Kitco News on the Updated Kcast Gold Live!+ for the iPhone — Now You Can Watch Kitco Video News Right from Your Phone!
(Kitco News) – Renewed worries about Eurozone sovereign debt has inspired discussions that nations at risk of defaulting should consider selling some of their gold or other assets as part of bailout packages to stabilize their economies.
This idea arose when some German politicians suggested a few weeks ago that Portugal should sell some of its gold reserves as part of a financial aid package for the beleaguered nation. Portugal eventually received aid without having to pledge any gold, but the notion for countries to sell metal reserves or other assets continues to reverberate.
After all, gold prices are just off nominal all-time records and selling reserves would be one way to pay down mounting debt levels. But to do so would not solve the problem and could leave countries in a worse shape than before, said George Milling-Stanley, managing director, government affairs, for the World Gold Council. As part of its mission, the council works with central banks and other policymakers regarding the role of gold in risk management.
“It’s like selling your house to pay down your debt. You can do that, but where would you live?” he said.
Of all the troubled southern-tier European countries, Portugal has the greatest percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves. According to the most recent calculation of world gold holdings, Portugal has 81% of its total foreign reserves in gold, at 382.5 metric tons. That figure is calculated by the World Gold Council using International Monetary Fund's International Financial Statistics.
By tonnage, Italy has the most reserves of the PIIGS, at 2,451.8 tons, which is 69.2% of its reserves, and is the fourth-largest holder of gold globally, behind the U.S., the IMF and Germany. Greece has 111.5 tons of gold, which is 79.3% of its reserves and Ireland has 6 tons, which is 13.3% of its reserves.
Milling-Stanley pointed out that when looking at the official gold holdings of a particular country, it’s the central bank that usually owns the gold, not the government itself, and most central banks are independent of the government. That means it’s not an automatic decision governments can make to sell metal.
The idea of using gold reserves to payment has come up in the past for other situations and many times the idea pits government against central bank. There are a few examples, he said.
“Back when the German government … wanted to sell or revaluate their gold to pay for reunification, the Bundesbank said you’re not using the gold to do that. It caused a holy row that eventually calmed down,” he said.
The question to use gold to pay down debt specifically is unclear for the European Union, Milling-Stanley said. “This is just memory, but I think there’s been a fuss about selling assets to pay down debt,” he said.
He said Belgium and the Netherlands wanted to do sales before the European Monetary Union was set up. At the time, even before the European Central Bank was established, there was a lot of discussion among the European authorities about selling gold assets to pay off debt.
“I don’t know the strict legal definition – it could be legal but there could be restraint,” he said, adding that those who do know the legality of such a situation have stayed mum.
Milling-Stanley said one issue that European countries would have to deal with when taking into consideration any gold sales is the Central Bank Gold Agreement, which limits how much gold they can sell annually. “Even though European banks have not sold anything near the ceiling, it’s still there,” he said.
WHERE WOULD PROCEEDS GO?
Even if a country’s central bank sold gold, there’s no guarantee who would get the profits, he said. It wouldn’t automatically go to the government. Since the gold belongs to the central bank, they could very well keep it.
The Eurozone’s debt obligations have been at the forefront of discussion, but there’s been some talk that perhaps the U.S., with its significant reserves of gold, should sell some of its assets. Mary Miller, assistant secretary of the Treasury for Financial Markets, wrote in a post on the U.S. Treasury website that “this idea is not a viable option.”
Miller said that this idea has been rejected by Treasury Secretaries and U.S. Presidents of both political parties for many years. Miller referred specifically to selling gold to postpone raising the debt limit, but pointed out the folly to sell assets to raise short-term cash needs.
“A ‘fire sale’ of financial assets would be damaging to the economy, taxpayers, and financial markets. It would harm the interests of taxpayers, and would undermine confidence in the United States. Nor would such sales postpone reaching the debt limit for a meaningful amount of time. Congress would still need to raise the debt limit,” Miller wrote in a posting dated May 6.
(For the full essay, see: http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/Federal-Asset-Sales-Cannot-Avoid-Need-for-Increase-in-Debt-Limit.aspx)
At most, she said, considering the U.S. borrows $125 billion per month, assets sold would only buy a limited amount of time.
According to WGC data, the U.S. possesses the most gold globally in terms of percentage of foreign reserves and tonnage. Nearly seventy-five percent of its reserves are in gold, and it has 8,133.5 tons of gold.
“If we sold all of our gold, that would be $375 billion. So we’d run out of money in August and we’d have no asset to borrow against. It’s just a drop in the bucket. The problem is the debts are in the trillions. The basic point is it’s not a smart thing to do,” he said.
Furthermore, while other countries can diversify their total foreign reserve holdings with such assets like U.S. Treasury bonds and notes or U.S. dollars, obviously the U.S. cannot, which is one reason why the U.S. has high reserves in gold.
Does a sale of assets make sense at any time? Milling-Stanley said there are ways to use gold to help in fixing debt problems.
“What they (countries with debt problems) need to look at is a long-term, major structural reforms needed. Look at long-term structural reforms, then come up with the idea to not sell, but to use it as collateral to borrow from, but only once you get the reforms in place,” he said.
If the country used its gold as collateral without fixing the structural issues, then using the gold as collateral would just compound the problems, he said.
NOT DIFFICULT TO SELL GOLD
Right now, central banks are buying gold, not selling it. If a central bank and the country’s government came up with a plan to sell gold, it would not be difficult to do. But discretion would be paramount because the last thing a central bank would want is to have prices fall just as they were selling. He gave the example of Switzerland’s sale of 1,300 tons of gold in 2000-2005 as a proper way to sell, versus Britain’s gold sales which took place between 1999-2002. The advance notice of the sale drove down prices.
Most banks have a relationship with bullion banks so the sales can be handled quietly. But in the case of the U.K., an auction was held “so all the fund managers picked them off,” he said.
The Swiss sales were done quietly. “The Swiss sought out their in-house expertise – they sold 1,300 tons which is not small – but did it with maximum profit where they were buying and selling all the time so you couldn’t pick them off. They did it over a couple of years,” he said.
By Debbie Carlson of Kitco News dcarlson@kitco.com
-
Supreme Courts Affirm The Police State
May 23, 2011 by Bob Livingston
Our descent into a police state is complete, as evidenced by rulings by the Indiana and U.S. Supreme Courts which, last week, effectively and finally abolished the 4th Amendment.
No longer are American citizens “secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” thanks to the two rulings affirming police authority to bash down your door and enter your home without a warrant. Resisting such an incursion is now a crime. If it weren’t obvious before that we live in a fascist system under guise of Democracy, surely, it must be now.
In Indiana, the Supreme Court ruled 3-2 “that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.” The U.S. Supreme Court’s 8-1 ruling affirmed that officers can kick down a door if they smell marijuana or hear noises indicative of the destruction of evidence. (Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, writing, “Police officers may now knock, listen, then break the door down, never mind that they had ample time to obtain a warrant.”) The fact that the door they kicked in was not the door their suspect had entered was irrelevant to the court.
Of course, we told you a couple of weeks ago about the case of Maryanne Godboldo, who had a Detroit Police SWAT team crash into her home and remove her daughter because Godboldo made the perfectly reasonable and rational choice to determine what medication her daughter should take.
… Read the whole article here:
-
The rules of statutory construction apply. They are covered in:
Meaning of the Words “includes” and “including”
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/FalseRhetoric/Includess.pdf
“includes” can mean ONLY or IN ADDITION TO. When they mean IN ADDITION TO, they have a duty to specify in the following ways:
Quote:“In addition to the definition at…, “person” ALSO includes…”and if they don't specify, they mean to REPLACE the default definition provided in Title 1 with language such as:
Quote:“For the purposes of this chapter, section, etc “person” means…”.Read the includes pamphlet. Consistent with our member agreement, our word, however, is not to be relied upon, but only what the courts say in the above pamphlet. Every citizen is supposed to read and KNOW the law. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Marbury v. Madison that we are a society of law ad NOT men. Therefore, LAW is the ONLY basis for reasonable belief and its pointless to ask us questions in the form you asked. The correct way to ask is:
Quote:What legal authority DETERMINES how to understand the use of the word “INCLUDES”. I'M NOT interested in OPINIONS. And where can I learn how to find legal authorities pertinent to a given context?The answer is:
Legal Research and Writing Techniques Course, Form #12.013 (OFFSITE LINK)
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/LibertyU/LegalResearch.pdf
We are not a fish supplier. We teach people HOW to fish. You asked for fish. If you don't want to learn how to fish, then just get used to bending over for the next attorney or judge JOHN in the corrupt government.
Your post also had five errors and was carelessly composed and was posted in the wrong forum and had to be moved. Please be MUCH more careful when crafting posts to these forums because you make tremendous extra work for us editing and improving your posts to make them readable and pertinent to people OTHER than yourself. That's an important part of good citizenship within these forums. Only the vigilant and the careful can be free. The ONLY weapon one can fight with in the legal field are words. Weapons must be used carefully in war. All litigation is WAR.
Lastly, please DO NOT ask us any questions relating to links pointing to external sites such as SEDM. We are NOT responsible for their content.
-
David Miner indicted and raided. See: http://www.irx-solutions.com/cases.htm
_______________
On December 13, 2010, the US Department of Justice filed a civil lawsuit against David L. Miner, IRx Solutions, and Blue Ridge Group, for the purpose of restricting Dave Miner, along with our Associates, from engaging in the IMF Program and the creation of Business Trusts that we offer to Americans who are facing unloawful or improper collections or enforcement actions from the IRS. Fifteen days later, on December 28, 2010, papers were served on Dave Miner relative to this case.
The elements of the court action claim that Dave Miner, through IRx Solutions, offers a “scheme” (18 times the DOJ uses the word in a pejoritave sense to make sure its attempt to prejudice the court and jury was successful…) that “purports” to obtain and correct clients' Individual Master Files as a means to restrict the IRS from pursuing individual Americans for returns and for taxes.
These elements also allege that Dave Miner, through Blue Ridge Group, offers for sale pure trusts, or business trusts, which may be used to “hide” assets or income from the IRS, an action which the DOJ alleges is illegal.
When successful, the DOJ claims that we reduce clients' taxes due and inhibit the ability of the IRS to collect taxes, a result which the DOJ alleges is illegal.
Aside from the obvious false claims in the court documents, we appreciate the DOJ admitting that our efforts are effective at reducing the amounts which the IRS can collect as taxes, and that we reduce unlawful collection and enforcements.
We appreciate the Department of Justice admitting that our efforts are effective. On the other hand, we DO NOT appreciate the DOJ's claims that our activities are illegal. These same activities are conducted by CPAs, Tax Attorneys, and return preparers all over America to accomplish the same goals. Yet the DOJ does not claim their efforts are illegal.
On Tuesday morning, March 22, 2011, approximately eight armed law enforcement from several departments arrested Dave Miner on criminal charges related to but clearly separate from the civil charges above.
In the interest of full disclosure, we are informing our clients in particular and the general public of the charges and the progress of these two court cases. Make no mistake, these charges are serious. The worst case would be that Dave Miner is found guilty on all charges, civil and criminal. In this event, Dave Miner will possibly go to jail for at least two years and face civil fines and penalties in the six figures. The best case scenario is that we will be found not guilty of all charges and will face no jail time and no fines.
We will be posting here all court documents filed on both sides. You need to follow these cases. There are documents being filed in these cases that most people who are charged with civil or criminal charges relative to federal taxes can use. I believe that there are groundbreaking legal arguments filed in these cases that are totally unique, and possibly the most important defenses ever presented against IRS allegations concerning liability and culpability in federal tax cases.
WATCH THESE CASES! They are important for Dave Miner, his clients, and for all America.
To review the documents in the CIVIL CASE, click here
To review the documents in the CRIMINAL CASE, click here
-
Great. Can't wait to see your research. Thanks for your participation.
-
Prollins,
Thanks!
Admin
-
SOURCE: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20063220-83.html?tag=rb_content;main
____________________
Report: Windows 7 almost five times more secure than XP
by Lance Whitney PrintE-mail.111 comments Share
Windows 7 is four to five times less vulnerable to malware infections than is Windows XP.
Those are the findings of Microsoft's latest Security Intelligence Report (PDF), which detailed in depth the state of software vulnerabilities, exploits, security breaches, and malware in 2010.
Overall, the study found that infection rates for newer Microsoft operating systems with the latest service packs are consistently lower than those for older OSes, giving Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 the highest marks for security.
Looking at the number of reported infections per 1,000 computers, Microsoft found that Windows 7 64-bit had the lowest number at 2.5, while the 32-bit version had 3.8.
Windows XP with SP3 came in with 15.9 infections per 1,000, while XP with SP2 had the highest number at 19.3. Breaking down the numbers, Microsoft's stats mean that Windows 7 is around four to five times more secure than XP.
Windows Vista's infection rate was considerably lower than that for XP but still turned out to be double that for Windows 7.
Drilling down further, the 64-bit versions of Windows 7 and Windows Vista are less infection-prone than are their 32-bit counterparts, which Microsoft attributes to a couple of factors.
First, the 64-bit versions of both systems may appeal to more tech-savvy users, presumably ones that would better know how to secure their computers. But second, Windows 64-bit offers a feature called Kernel Patch Protection, which protects the Windows kernel from unauthorized changes.
Analyzing server-based operating systems, Windows Server 2003, which offers both 32-bit and 64-bit editions, had 5.8 infections per 1,000. Windows Server 2008 R2, which comes only in a 64-bit flavor, had 3.6 infections.
Security holes in applications versus those in operating systems or Web browsers accounted for most of the vulnerabilities last year, according to Microsoft. However, the total number of holes found in applications fell 22.2 percent from 2009. But exploits that take advantage of Java vulnerabilities rose dramatically in last year's third quarter, surpassing every other category, the report noted.
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20063220-83.html#ixzz1McgyFbjr
-
Here are some links on “sovereign citizens”. The Southern Poverty Law Center is a government funded terrorist organization, as near as we can tell, so we don't give it any credence. Notice we aren't indicated in any of the links:
1. The “leaders”. All of them are redemptionists or white supremists. We don't advocate either.
2. Police tips
3. Sovereign citizen indictments by state
http://www.adl.org/learn/sovereign_movement/list_recent_sovereign_incidents.pdf
It appears to us that “sovereign citizen”, as used by the above websites, is a synonym for redemptionists who are violent. We don't approve of redemption or violence, so we don't fall within their definition of “sovereign citizen”.
We have searched this website for references to “sovereign citizens” authored by us. We can't find any. If you find any, please bring them to our attention so that they can be removed or at least qualified.
-
generalcongress-bounces@constitutionalgov.us
[mailto:generalcongress-bounces@constitutionalgov.us] On Behalf Of Charles Stewart
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 1:46 PM
To: generalcongress@constitutionalgov.us
Subject: GCongress> Copy of Donna Kane's Complaint to A.G Holder; Accusing “Frame-Up” of her Son & Husband Jerry & Joe Kane.
http://freeamerican.com/Images/ERIC%20HOLDER%20CRIMINAL%20INVESTIGATION%20COMPLAINT2.doc
TO: US Attorney Eric Holder
Attorney General of the United States 4/24/2011
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR US DOJ CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION INTO THE MAY 20, 2010 HOMICIDES OF JERRY & JOE KANE
I am giving Formal Public Notice & Demand for the US DOJ to criminally investigate this matter fully, based upon the info contained within this communication. The “Official” main evidence in the Jerry and Joe Kane murder case of West Memphis, AR, May 20, 2010 is the recorded 911 eyewitness call, the ASP-Case Summary Report, the ASP Crime Laboratory Autopsy Reports & one traffic stop dash cam, with no audio. The contention is that there are glaring impossibilities within the Official main pieces of evidence, also other videos, articles, audios, FOIA materials, Autopsy reports and thousands of man hours, we present the following evidence:
Here is the APB/BOLO description broadcast on May 20th, 2010…
************************************************************************
(West Memphis, AR 5/20/2010) Two West Memphis police officers have been shot at I-40 and Airport Road in West Memphis, AR.
We have confirmed Brandon Paudert, son of West Memphis Police Chief Bob Paudert, was killed.
Police are looking for two hispanic males in a white Dodge Caravan white with an orange roof and Ohio plates.
A third suspect is being sought.
The van was last seen headed east on I-40.
Both the I-40 and I-55 eastbound bridges are closed at this time due to the shooting.
************************************************************************
Jerry and Joe Kane were caucasian, in a white Plymouth Voyager white with a white roof and Ohio plates.
According to the ASP Crime Lab Autopsy reports, Jerry and Joe Kanes manner of death was Homicides.
Sole 'Eyewitness' Vincent Brown stated in his recorded 911 call 'These guys just shot a cop.'
The dash cam shows a morbidly obese man, alleged to be Jerry Kane, clearly never with a weapon.
**Which evidence is true? As both are in complete conflict, that doesn't mean that one must be true. Both the 911 call AND the dash cam can be fake**
Sole 'Eyewitness' Vincent Brown stated in his 911 call that “They're all with automatic weapons.”
The dash cam shows a morbidly obese man alleged to be Jerry Kane, was never with a weapon during the video, while on camera.
**Which evidence is true? As both are in complete conflict, both the 911 call AND the dash cam can be false**
On Chief Paudert May 26, 2010, in The Commercial Appeal video interview he said his officers Bill and Brandon had THEM out and they were talking to them, Brandon on one side, Bill on the other, talking to THEM, when the guy in the back started shooting.” The dash cam never shows both of the Kanes out of the vehicle at the same time being talked to by Bill and Brandon. This describes a completely different scene with three (3) or more individuals, having nothing to do with the Kanes.
**Chief Paudert could be lying or the dash cam could be faked. There may be other possibilities. The Chief could be lying AND the dash cam could be fake.
The Sole eyewitness states that the killers took the license plates off at the traffic stop.
The dash cam shows the license plates were never taken off at the traffic stop.
**The Sole eyewitness could be lying or the dash cam is faked. There may be other possibilities. The eyewitness could be lying AND the dash cam could be fake.**
ASP Crime Lab Autopsy report states that Jerry Kane Jr. had a slightly obese abdomen.
41 days later a dash cam appears, displaying a man with a morbidly obese abdomen who is not Jerry Kane Jr.
**Either the ASP Crime Laboratory Autopsy report Coroner is lying or the dash cam is faked** We have maintained all along that Jerry Kane was NOT morbidly obese as portrayed on the dash cam.
In recorded 911 call, two (2) 911 operators ask the Sole eyewitness if the killers car had Ohio tags, he said no.
911 put out an APB that the killers had Ohio tags despite the Sole eyewitness distinctly saying no, to Ohio tags.
In the December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article, Wren stated that 'The Kanes marched toward them (Wren and Busby) in the Walmart parking lot.' Marched is a term designed to give a military impression to imply justification of self defense on the part of the participants. Where is the evidence of “marching?”
The Helicopter video shows the Kanes never left their minivan in the Walmart parking lot and march anywhere. Is there other video shows marching, perhaps the helicopter did not have the scene framed and focused? If so, present it!
**Wren could be lying or the Helicopter video could be doctored. There may be other possibilities. Wren could be lying AND the videos could be doctored.**
The December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article Wren stated “As the suspects marched toward the officers, he heard one of them reload. The clip slapped into the gun, metal on metal.”
The Kanes had one revolver that held 5 rounds, revolvers obviously don’t have a ‘clip to slap in.’
The Kanes had one AK-47 that didn't have a clip, it had a magazine that couldn't “slap into the gun, metal on metal”! What Wren heard was a fellow officer REloading because it was impossible for the Kanes to have done it! And why would an officer be REloading unless he had already UNloaded and shot his weapon out of bullets?
**Either Wren is lying or FBI custodian of the property is lying** It is impossible for both to be true!
The December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article Wren stated 'Suddenly a swarm of officers shouted to Wren and Busby: “Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground!” Wren and Busby, both blood-soaked, watched as fellow officers fired over their heads, pushing the suspects back in the van.
Busby and Wren were shot by officers located around the scene, not by the Kanes. When Busby and Wren were ordered to Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground it was only AFTER Busby and Wren got down that fellow officers were, then, 'Firing over their heads.' Prior to Busby and Wren told to Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground! Busby and Wren were DIRECTLY in fellow officers’ line of fire around the Kanes van and Busby and Wren were shot repeatedly by friendly fire. This is WHY they were told to Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground! Everyone saw the crazy circular cross firing stance of the officers shortly thereafter. Where are all the Ballistic reports? Oh that's right, the Prosecutor announced 41 days after the incident that they weren't going to do ballistics. We were stunned that they hadn't done ballistics ALREADY within the forty one day interim waiting period for the dash cam to come out. Prosecutor Mike Walden said they didn't NEED to do ballistics…. Why are the reports not generated? Why isn't it needed?
We are demanding all powder testings and ballistics be done immediately!
But…Wren stated 'Suddenly a swarm of officers shouted to Wren and Busby: “Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground!”, there is not one officer to be seen other than Wren and Busby in any direction of the scene from the aerial view of the helicopter video! And considering there was an alleged Helicopter overhead, how could Wren hear anything from anybody? **Wren could be lying or the helicopter video could be doctored. There may be other possibilities.
The eyewitness could be lying AND the videos can be fabricated.
We never see the 'suspects' out of the van 'marching' in order to make it possible to be 'pushed back in the van.'
**Wren could be lying or the Helicopter video could doctored** There may be other possibilities. Wren could be lying AND the video can be a fabrication.
Chief Paudert said Court was held in the parking lot that day stating that if the Kanes had put down their weapons they'd be alive today and in jail. This is a boldfaced lie. The Kanes would never have used weapons unless they tried to surrender and were shot first, as indicative of the defensive wounds on Jerry Kanes left palm and the Kanes would not be in jail. The Kanes would have cleared any wrongdoing surely and swiftly. These 'law enforcement officers' were rogue vigilantes that killed an innocent family.
According to the ASP Crime Laboratory autopsy report, the real Jerry Kane Jr., the one with the slightly obese abdomen, (not that obese actor that looked 12 months pregnant with breasts) had been shot below his thumb through the palm of his left hand. Jerry Kane, Jr. palm had to be facing toward Sheriff Busby and Wren in a defensive, hands up surrender mode, when Wren or other officer/s shot him. There were no calls for surrender from Busby and Wren. After Jerry Kane, Jr., held his hands up in a surrender mode, he was shot! Put down what weapons? Are hands held up in surrender mode palms forward, now considered weapons? Jerry Kane, Jr. started to back his minivan away from the altercation, most likely horrified and very confused as to why his minivan had been cut off in the Walmart parking lot by an unmarked vehicle cutting off his minivan in the front, the same actions carjackers use. Wondering why he was shot to begin with, with hands up, then the 'Hero' wildlife officer slammed his truck into the Kanes minivan then proudly recited how he shot 30 rounds down at them. We have forensically analyzed the videos frame by frame and we also used FLIR technology. No shots came from the Kanes minivan. However, many shots and shotgun loads were seen going into the Kanes van. The Kanes were slaughtered with extreme prejudice because it was falsely believed they had killed Paudert and Evans at a prior stop. The Kanes had done nothing wrong to warrant their vehicle being rammed, father and minor son and 2 beloved family pets riddled with bullets. Little Missy was killed when the 'Hero' wildlife officer rammed the minivan. Olie was shot 8 times AFTER he jumped out of the minivan.
Chief Paudert grabbed his gun that day and said he was “Going to go down to the Walmart and kill the suspects himself.” A threat to kill “suspects” from a public servant who took an Oath to protect and defend the Constitution without regard for due process is an impeachable offense in a due process community. Who is the domestic terrorist here? Did Chief Paudert give the order to kill or imply for the Kanes to be killed when he said in the May 25, 2010 wmc-tv story, The Pauderts went home, but Bob had his police radio. He heard officers had cornered the suspects in the Walmart parking lot. Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
So, Chief Paudert knew the suspects were still alive and cornered, and he had the opportunity to fulfill the duties and obligations of his job and Oath of Office as a law enforcement officer. Yet Chief Paudert goes on to say “I grabbed my pistol and I was going to Walmart and I had planned on killing them,” Paudert said. “I wanted to kill them.” Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
http://www.wmctv.com/story/12543145/west-memphis-police-chief-recalls-losing-son-in-deadly-traffic-stop?clienttype=printable&redirected=true. He didn't say he was going to go down to the Walmart and try to make the suspects turn themselves in. He said he planned on killing them, in his own words! Was this the verbal ok to other officers to kill the Kanes and deprive them of due process? To make sure that there were not to be any calls for surrender? It sure sounds that way to me. Chief Paudert outright premeditated 2 murders while he clearly could have given due process to Jerry Kane and Joe Kane as they were still alive and cornered. One of his yet to be named SWAT officers came to his house after the shooting and told him about shooting Jerry Kane. “I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me and I blew his brains out,” Paudert said. “I hugged him and kissed him and said he did exactly what I would have wanted him to do.” Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
Aimed at the suspects head….And it sure looked that way to me after 150+ bullets are launched toward the Kanes van. No sense in letting petty things like facts or silly Due process of real Law (not Color of Law) get in the way. Before he got out of his house, he heard the suspects, Jerry and Joe Kane, had been killed. A SWAT officer went up to the Chief and recounted how he had killed Jerry Kane. According to an article published by The Commercial Appeal, an unnamed SWAT officer said “I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me and I blew his brains out,”
Who is the domestic terrorist here? He didn't say “I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me I called for him to surrender, he refused and I blew his brains out,” Who is the Domestic Terrorist here? He didn't say “I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me I called for him to surrender, he refused and aimed a gun to me putting me in fear of my life and I blew his brains out,” SWAT MAN SAID “I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me and I blew his brains out,” According to an article published by wmc-tv, Chief Paudert said “I hugged him and kissed him and said he did exactly what I would have wanted him to do.” Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
These are clearly the types of remarks of individuals who have no business in law enforcement and feel they are above the law. Vigilante justice and should not be tolerated by anyone working at a law enforcement agency for which they represent and are employed. Who are the Domestic terrorists here?….Again, no call for surrender ever came.
Where is the evidence that a call for surrender was issued or that officers were identified prior to the alleged gun battle that the Kanes allegedly participated in at Walmart?
The only circumstances in which Jerry Kane or Joe Kane EVER would raise a gun to anyone is if they'd been shot first. Jerry and Joe had never shot anybody, EVER. Vigilante 'justice' is illegal and unlawful precisely because of horrific unimaginable injustices such as this. As he speaks to the rapt group of Tennessee officers, Paudert projects graphic photos of the two dead assailants onto a giant screen. Source: As printed in The Commercial Appeal article dated April 17, 2011by Kristina Goetz, Cindy Wolff
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/apr/17/west-memphis-police-chief-sovereign-citizens/
Chief Paudert conducts 'Conferences' going around the country telling other officers that the Kanes were Sovereign citizens.
He refers to them as “scum” or “vomit.” No description seems too vile. Source: printed in The Commercial Appeal article dated April 17, 2011 by Kristina Goetz, Cindy Wolff
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/apr/17/west-memphis-police-chief-sovereign-citizens/
Chief Paudert warning officers and parading dead photos of an innocent man, an innocent child. Who is the Domestic Terrorist here? All in an obvious effort to be on the Offense because once he stops the endless lies, the cover up of the Kanes falls apart like a house of cards.
Facts about Jerry Kane:
DID NOT HAVE;
A Homemade License Plate. Jerry was a National, not a Sovereign citizen. Jerry & Joe Kane were not racist. Jerry & Joe Kane believed in the Constitution and Laws. Speculation ran wild about a License Plate being the Cause for the alleged traffic stop. Chief Paudert has never corrected the speculation for both counts.
DID HAVE:
An Official, valid Ohio License Tag number EDE 8396.
A valid Ohio registration expiration date of June of 2012. (Feel free to look it up in the Ohio DMV database)
A Drivers License.
A wife. Married in a state that recognizes common law marriages. Florida recognizes common law marriages from other states.
Chief Paudert: Inaccurate Statements and Deliberate Actions:
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately classified Jerry and Joe Kane as Sovereign citizens without evidence.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately withheld from the public, the fact that Jerry Kanes minivan had a proper Ohio license plate.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately withheld from the public, fact that Jerry Kanes minivan was properly Ohio registered until June, 2012.
Willfully, knowingly, deliberately and falsely described Jerry and Joe Kane as Sovereign citizens and not believing in proper laws thereby maliciously withheld information and mislead the public, without evidence.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately withheld the fact that Jerry Kanes license plate was valid so he could continue falsely profiling and demonizing the Kanes as Sovereign citizens.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately alludes to yet another UNTRUE allegation- Jerry and Joe Kane were racists. This could not be further from the truth. The City Counsel of West Memphis and NAACP has had three (3) Public Press
Conferences to get Chief Paudert to resign for his Hypocrisy, Racism and Brutal Policing Practices! Jerry and Joe Kane were murdered 2 weeks exactly after the 3rd Public Press Conference.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately lied in the March 29th, 2011 Commercial Appeal article when he said “the FBI knew that the Kanes were listed as domestic terrorists in 2005 and 2006.” We have the FBI report that shows they didn't feel the Kanes were a threat for helping people with Foreclosures and closed out the inquiry!
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately has never revealed a reason for the traffic stop (there was no reason because there wasn't a traffic stop, with the Kanes)!
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately continued to allow the public to assume Jerry Kane had an invalid, HOMEMADE license plate.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately NEVER corrected the false public assumption that Jerry Kane DID NOT HAVE an invalid homemade license plate when he knew the Kane’s minivan was Properly Registered and Properly Licensed through The State of Ohio.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately along with the SPLC and ADL created and incited a false public assumption that Jerry and Joe Kane were Anti-government. The Kanes were Anti-corrupt government.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately attacks Americans in concert with SPLC and ADL. Jerry Kane was not a Sovereign citizen. Jerry Kane said the term was ridiculous, like calling oneself a free slave. The minor son, Joseph Kane, was not a Sovereign citizen. He too said the term was ridiculous. The Commercial Appeal, April 17, 2011, article states the West Memphis Police Department keeps Jerry Kane’s Apostilled papers as 'evidence.' Within these papers, Jerry Kane, in his own words, gives 'evidence' by describing himself as a “National”, not a Sovereign citizen.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately possesses many pieces of evidence proving that Jerry and Joe Kane were not Sovereign citizens. Jerry Kane and Joseph Kane specifically described themselves as Nationals.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately allowed the public to believe that Jerry Kane was Sovereign citizen for his own hidden agenda.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately continues to lie and tell Chiefs and officers in his 'conferences' that the Kanes were Sovereign citizens. If he stops his smoke screening, people will see all the holes, lies and Homicides in the 'Official' story.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately lies when he says that people who consider themselves to be “Free” do not believe in any laws. To the contrary, Nationals absolutely hold themselves completely responsible if they harm people or property, in accordance with the Constitution, which is the Supreme Law of the Land! What they do not agree with is the bizarre idea that a crime can be committed without a victim….. willfully, knowingly and deliberately knew two (2) suspects were alive and cornered at the Walmart parking lot.
Willfully, knowingly and deliberately didn't make the call for the two (2) suspects to be brought in while they were still alive because he said “I grabbed my pistol and I was going to Walmart and I had planned on killing them,” Paudert said. “I wanted to kill them.”
Wilfully, knowingly and maliciously did not make the radio or phone call to stop the wrongful no due process homicides of Jerry Kane and Joe Kane. Further investigation may reveal tell officers on the scene.
Wilfully, knowingly and maliciously deprived two (2) people of civil rights under color of law.
Unbiased Autopsy Report:
Alleged shooting occurred on May 20, 2010.
Autopsy was performed by ASP Crime Laboratory on May 21, 2010, the day after the alleged shooting.
Autopsy findings by the ASP Crime Laboratory denotes Jerry Kane, Jr at 5’ 11”, 285 lbs with a slightly obese abdomen.
We have maintained all along that the morbidly obese man in the traffic stop dash cam was not Jerry Kane.
The Kanes:
Were murdered after not even matching the description of the real Hispanic killers or the number of real suspect killers (3), despite reports of Hispanics/Mexicans running from the scene of the traffic shootings.
Were murdered after not even matching the vehicle description of the real killers with an ORANGE roof.
Were murdered even after the sole eyewitness told 911 “no”, to the killers having Ohio Tags!
Were never at any traffic stop with Brandon Paudert and Bill Evans. This is the reason West Memphis Police produced one badly concocted video. West Memphis Police Department claims that neither police vehicle had audio recording and the backup patrol car had no dash cam. Above all, a concocted video was released forty-one (41) days after the alleged traffic stop. In the ASP-Case Summary report it states that when Brandon Paudert made the scene (as backup), he turned his dash cam off. Yet his patrol car lights were still flashing when the First Responders show up at the scene!
Would a Sergeant arriving as backup to a scene turn off his dash cam? How is this possible? This is not credible as Chief Paudert stated that “these men were personally handpicked by him.”
Were Wrongfully murdered by the very people who swore Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution.
In conclusion:
We have never disputed that two officers were killed. We have maintained all along that it was not the Kanes that killed the officers, that it was others. We couldn't understand why, even when everything pointed to both the officers at the traffic stop and the Kanes both being killed, was slapped down as ridiculous. Then with sickening shock and horror, we realized why. If they admitted to the real scenario then that would make WMPD, CCSO, AR GAME & FISH, etc., guilty of Homicides. The wrong people were killed (and these rogue, vigilante cops would not admit that they cold blooded murdered the Kanes so the effort has been to fabricate a connection to place the Kanes at an earlier place and time). Enter the faked dash cam that doesn't match the eyewitness or Pauderts accounts (with no audio whatsoever) comes into play. The dash cam doesn't even match the officer down pages. They stated: The two (2) officers ordered the vehicle occupants out of the vehicle. (The dash cam doesn't show this). The vehicle occupants exited the vehicle armed with AK-47's. (The dash cam doesn't show this). The officers were killed with AK-47's. (The dash cam doesn't show this). When it was found that the Kanes only had one (1) AK and one revolver, the officer down pages were altered to reflect same as above, except they stated the officers were killed with a long rifle and a handgun.
When they were alerted to the fact that their newly revised version of events were now completely in conflict with the Sole eyewitness accounts, they changed it back to reflect the officers were killed with AK-47's. They have constantly altered, lied, changed, rechanged, edited because the stories they put out at the beginning were all lies. Their statements describes completely different scenarios from both the traffic stop, 1st Responder and Walmart scene. APB out for three (3) Hispanics, orange roof. The videos are all faked. Every last one.
The real killers of Paudert and Evans, are still at large. The ongoing psychotic demonization, lies, false profiling of 'Americans' by the SPLC and the ADL ‘501(c)(3) Tax exempt corporations' acting completely outside of the scope of their corporate charters needs to end NOW. The ongoing psychotic demonization, lies, false profiling and parading around of innocent peoples death photos by a public servant who purportedly swore to Protect and Defend the Constitution and people's Rights, ends NOW.
§ 448. Fraud Proved by Circumstances.—Fraud is seldom established by direct and positive proof, and such proof is not necessary. Generally, the first effort of a man, who intends to commit a fraud, is to throw a veil over the transaction, to conceal it from discovery, to baffle all attempts at detection, and to shield it against attack. No man willingly furnishes the proof of his own turpitude. Fraud is, for this reason, rarely perpetrated openly and in broad daylight. It is committed in secret, and is usually hedged about by every guard that can be devised to prevent its discovery and exposure. Its path is crooked and circuitous, its footprints are carefully covered up, the signs of its operations are diligently removed, or attempted to be removed, and the mask of honesty and good faith is put over the face of the real transaction.
This will serve as Public Notice that all derogatory information and inflammatory information, all negative comments regarding the profiling of the Kanes as Soverign citizens or domestic terrorists and any mention of the Kanes thereof, are to be removed immediately and saved as evidence. Public retractions, apologies and all the information concealed and withheld from the public by Chief Paudert, the SPLC and the ADL are to apologize to all family members publicly. Public retractions are to be made and all information that shows the Kanes were not Sovereign citizens or domestic terrorists are to be made public. All death photos and copies are to be mailed to the widow. In fact, this is a CEASE AND DESIST for any government agency or corporation to profile anybody henceforth. We have a Police Chief who thinks he can just go shoot suspects without due process. We have the SPLC who states in their articles of incorporation that their Nature of Busines is “TO EDUCATE THE ECONOMICALLY & EDUCATIONALLY DEPRIVED ” Source: Alabama Secretary of State Division of Corporations web site,
http://arc-sos.state.al.us/cgi/corpdetail.mbr/detail?corp=813903&page=name&file=
yet they falsely believe they have authority to profile people and 'hate groups.'
The SPLC drums up millions of dollars in donations, as if handing the SPLC a donation, it will stop the next lone wolf from pulling a trigger. We also have the Anti Defamation League who goes around defaming everyone, who says “people need to realize that the government has the ultimate control over them.” WMPD, SPLC and the ADL are operating grossly outside of their charters and enough is enough. It is time to go back to being Americans. No more categorizing or labeling. No more racist, rogue or tax exempt corps trying to fearmonger, kill or separate Americans, for their own profit, just to fleece people and get donations. The least amount of government intrusion as intended by OUR Founders. That's what Jerry and Joe Kane would have wanted and that is the very least that Jerry and Joe Kane deserve, after being wrongfully murdered!
**We have sync'd up the 911 call to the dash cam. It is impossible for the Kanes to be the killers**
**WE DEMAND A FULL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION IMMEDIATELY**
Must See Videos: Jerry Kane Incident Chief Paudert Interview 2 analysis pt 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oayNFOcz7z4
And: Jerry Kane Incident Chief Paudert Interview 2 analysis pt 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biA9VBKFytQ
Then see: Jerry Kane Incident 9-11 Audio to Video Overlay
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1_BRi_A3G0&feature=related
Then: http://www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com
Donna Lee Wray-Kane (727) 449-9419
* Permission is given to copy, reproduce, print, post, email, mail and publish this but only in its entirety.
-
Rights attach to the LAND one is STANDING on at the moment they receive an injury. They DO NOT attach to the land one is BORN in. See:
Great IRS Hoax, Section 4.2.3
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
Please at least read chapters 3 and 4 of the above as required by the Path to Freedom, Section 2 before you clutter these forums with garbage questions that are already dealt with above and make a fool out of yourself (and us, if you use our materials) in your interactions with the government. We don't want to be forced to rewrite our publications in these forums for those who can't or won't do the necessary homework or preparation before entering questions in these forums.
Be patient with yourself. You have decades of government kool-aide public school and media propaganda to overcome and explain before you can think clearly about any issue. It takes time.
Long-term commitment to learning and enforcing the law and helping and caring about more than just yourself is the only thing that will elicit the kind of response you seek in these forums. Your emotional bank account is empty. You have to make a few deposits before there is anything to withdraw here. Those who need help can only deserve it after they put in their homework and demonstrate their long term commitment.