fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Link to the act:
-
Answer:
1. If they won't issue the driver license to you because you have a NONRESIDENT status and no number, then the DMV will have to issue you a “letter of disqualification” stating that you came in to get one and were told you were NOT eligible. They can't give you a ticket for not having that which you are NOT legally eligible for, now can they? This is covered in:
Defending Your Right to Travel, Form #06.010
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Item…ghtToTravel.htm
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
2. Terminate the number with:
Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee, Form #06.002
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…stIndenture.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. EVERYTHING the government will not provide without an SSN/TIN is a government “benefit”. This includes, Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment insurance, Student loans, etc.
4. We will help you understand but we don't provide legal advice. Your questions must conform to the following so that they don't appear as legal advice and you must read and reread everything on the subject and try your best to answer your own question before you post it. Otherwise, you're going to piss us off because you are being lazy and forcing us to do your work for you:
Guide to Asking Questions, Form #09.017
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Memb…ngQuestions.htm
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
We won't invest anything in you unless you at least BEGIN by committing yourself to follow the Path to Freedom. We are here to help only members who are obedient to God's law and who we share a covenant and commitment with to DO justice, not just talk about it, as Micah 6:8 requires.
Welcome to the forums and the fellowship. We love people who pull their own weight and consistenty give as much as they take. Anyone else is a socialist, a moocher, and a parasite.
-
It is the policy of this ministry that you MUST quit franchises and withdraw your consent. You are trying to straddle the fence and we don’t allow that. If you want to straddle the fence and preserve eligibility to receive public assistance, you shouldn’t be using our materials to interact with any third parties. You can’t remain half pregnant or half free. See:
FAQ 1.17
http://sedm.org/FAQs/FAQs.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
Please don’t ask questions about the above link or anything linked to SEDM because we aren’t responsible for it.
Some answers to your questions:
1. Terminate everything previously connected with the SSN and reestablish it WITHOUT the SSN. This includes all financial accounts, loans, license applications, employment documentation, etc.
2. Ask your postman for Certified mail procedures. That’s a real basic issue.
3. The ramifications are that:
3.1 One will NOT be eligible to receive any government benefit.
3.2 If one wants to borrow money, they will have to do it through an artificial entity and NOT associate the loan to their personal name.
3.3 One will have to use the forms and procedures on this site in every case where SSNs or TINs are requested or normally used.
3.4 One will not be eligible for any government license of any kind that requires use of SSNs or TINS on the application, such as driver licenses.
4. One works as a nonresident alien NON-individual and NONtaxpayer not engaged in the “trade or business” franchise. Instead of using the W-4 and W-2 they use a custom W-8. See:
1. About IRS Form W-8BEN, Form #04.202
DIRECT LINK: [url url=”http://sedm.org/compliant-member-only-forms/about-irs-form-w-8ben-form-04-002/#4.__Why_the_government_agrees_with_this_article_about_the_liabilities_of_nonresident_aliens_not_engaged_in_a_trade_or_business”]http://sedm.org/compliant-member-only-forms/about-irs-form-w-8ben-form-04-002/[/url]
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
2. Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…ienPosition.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
If you would rather live a life of luxury on money stolen from unborn children or your neighbor, eligibility for receipt of which is designated by the STINKING number, then you are the Great Harlot spoken of in Rev. 17 and 19:
For true and righteous are His judgments, because He has judged the great harlot who corrupted the earth with her fornication; and He has avenged on her the blood of His servants shed by her.”
Revelation 19:1-3 (in Context) Revelation 19 (Whole Chapter)
SOURCE: http://www.biblegate…mp;version=NKJV
The fornications spoken of above are those who contract away their rights in exchange for privileges, and thereby become slaves of satan. The “contract” and the commerce/fornications it represents are government franchises. Black’s Law Dictionary defines “commerce” as “intercourse”, as in “fornications”, and the Beast is the political rulers spoken of in Reve. 19:19 who you contracted your rights away to. The “blood of servants” is that of the unborn babies and your neighbor who will be forced at gunpoint to pay for the government debt used to pay your luxurious “benefits”.
Avoid Bad Company
“My son, if sinners [socialists, in this case] entice you,
Do not consent
If they say, “Come with us,
Let us lie in wait to shed blood;
Let us lurk secretly for the innocent without cause;
Let us swallow them alive like Sheol,
And whole, like those who go down to the Pit:
We shall fill our houses with spoil [plunder];Cast in your lot among us,
Let us all have one [GOVERNMENT] purse [AS A PUBLIC OFFICER]”–
My son, do not walk in the way with them,
Keep your foot from their path;
For their feet run to evil,
And they make haste to shed blood.
Surely, in vain the net is spread
In the sight of any bird;
But they lie in wait for their own blood.They lurk secretly for their own lives.
So are the ways of everyone who is greedy for gain;
It takes away the life of its owners.”
[Proverbs 1:10-19, Bible, NKJV]
Please read the above links. The questions are endless and needlessly repeated here. Doing your homework using these links will anticipate and answer just about every question you have. There is no substitute for education and study and we won’t rewrite all the research that has already been done in these forums because people are too lazy to read the extensive research already done on the subject. The volume of materials on this site are extensive and intimidating to many. We won’t allow that situation to get worse for everyone because you don’t want to read what is already available.
Now please get to work. We aren’t here for your entertainment or to reward people for being lazy or being so selfish that they would only do the right thing if the benefitted financially and personally from it.
The hand of the diligent will rule,
But the lazy [or irresponsible] man will be put to forced [GOVERNMENT] labor [as a COMPELLED public officer].
[Prov. 12:24, Bible, NKJV]
-
Members of this ministry are nonresident aliens. The only way that a nonresident alien can be a non-taxpayer is to NOT be engaged in the “trade or business” excise taxable franchise. See:
About IRS Form W-8BEN, Form #04.202, Section 4
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/W-8BEN/AboutIRSFormW-8BEN.htm
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
26 CFR 301.6109-1(b) says that nonresident aliens are ONLY required to have or to use a number when they are engaged in a “trade or business”. Without quitting SSA and terminating the number, and contininuing to use it in all future transactions as a nonresident alien, one is:
1. Indirectly implying that they are engaged in the “trade or business” franchise.
2. Volunteering to become or at least be treated as a statutory “taxpayer”. Every time the number is used, the presumption is that the person providing it is engaged in the “trade or business” franchise per 26 CFR 301.6109-1.
So the short answer is NO, you can't become a nontaxpayer if you continue to use a number in connection with future transactions, even as a member because you will be creating evidence to the contrary. The ONLY way to quit being treated as a statutory “taxpayer” is to:
1. Stop using the number in connection with EVERY activity.
2. File a criminal complaint against anyone and everyone who compels the use of the number.
3. Attach the following form to any instance where use of the number is compelled:
Why It Is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a “Taxpayer Identification Number”, Form #04.205
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…yTINIllegal.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
For futher information on the use and SSNs/TINs, see:
1. About SSNs/TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #04.104
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…s/AboutSSNs.htm
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
2. Subject Index, section 57
http://sedm.org/Sear…ubjectIndex.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
3. Social Security: Mark of the Beast
http://sedm.org/Search/SubjectIndex.htm
To simplify what we just said, the number is GOVERNMENT property. It says that in 20 CFR 422.103(d) and on the back of the SSA card. That means it is PUBLIC property. You can't lawfully:
1. Use PUBLIC property for PRIVATE gain. Every use of said property in connection with an otherwise PRIVATE transaction transmutes the PRIVATE property so associated with a PUBLIC OFFICE. There is no way around this. If you want to remain private and beyond government jurisdiction, you have to quit using PUBLIC property in connection with any and all of your property.
2. Impersonate a public officer. See 18 USC 912. Only PUBLIC OFFICERS on official business can use GOVERNMENT property such as the SSN/TIN in connection with their business activities. Otherwise, they are STEALING.
Several of our members have told us that they have witnessed the IRS testify at criminal tax trials that without a number associated with the property, it is illegal to lien or levy it. LISTEN UP!
-
See also:
-
Support our troops. They protect us from possibly terrorist sheep.
http://widk.com/2011…atch-and-cheer/
The troops who should be supported don't want to be troops
-
EDITORIAL: Another approach to the same issue from a reader. We didn't write this but he/she has some valid points.
_________
Almost all of the scripture quotes are equally applicable to heterosexuals, so I don't think a very compelling case against homosexuality can be made from scripture. Overland truck drivers are a major source of venereal disease.
Heterosexual couples practice anal intercourse. So, there should be a scripture that says” men and women should not lie with each other the way homosexuals do”
Homosexuals worship youth. Their values are skin deep.
It is hypocritical to discriminate against homosexuals if heterosexuals are doing the same thing as homosexuals. It denigrates Christianity to be so hypocritical.
-
You weren't tricked into using the all caps name. You were tricked into using the SSN/TIN in connection with all your otherwise PRIVATE property and PRIVATE activities. Forget the all caps name. Form #05.042, section 14 proves that the all caps name is a fallacy. You're going to righfully be called a psycho if you try to convince a jury of the all caps name and people who do are discrediting the freedom community generally. Courts and lawyers make fun of people who do this all the time. When are we going to get past this and focus on the REAL issues?
The average American and anyone OTHER than a public officer on official business, are NOT required to use the number. See Form #05.012, Section 9. Only public officers in the government are required to use the number and connecting the number to specific property or activities causes those things to effectively be donated to a public use and public purpose, and hence, subject to government regulation. The process is very simple and is exhaustively explained in:
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030, Sections 2 through 2.6.
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…/Franchises.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Unless you:
1. Have legally admissible evidence to disprove the above.
2. Have legally admissible evidence to support your assertion.
. . .it's a pointless a waste of time to pursue theories and presumptions that have no evidence to support them. We try to stick to the facts and the law here and would like to continue to do so.
-
Nicodemus,
Glad to see you taking a more active role in the forums. 🙂 🙂
You appear to be chasing the straw man and trying to prove its existense. That has already been done:
Proof that there is a Straw Man, Form #05.042
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…aw/StrawMan.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The principles you espouse are general principles of common law, which is explained in:
Sovereignty and Freedom, Section 8.3
http://famguardian.o…dom/Freedom.htm
The de facto government's statutes themselves identify the government as a public trust.
Quote:TITLE 5–ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNELCHAPTER XVI–OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
PART 2635–STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH–Table of Contents
Subpart A–General Provisions
Sec. 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.
(a) Public service is a public trust. Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws and ethical principles above private gain. To ensure that every citizen can have complete confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government, each employee shall respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set forth in this section, as well as the implementing standards contained in this part and in supplemental agency regulations.
The U.S. Supreme Court called the constitution the trust document.
Quote:“Whatever these Constitutions and laws validly determine to be property, it is the duty of the Federal Government, through the domain of jurisdiction merely Federal, to recognize to be property.“And this principle follows from the structure of the respective Governments, State and Federal, and their reciprocal relations. They are different agents and trustees of the people of the several States, appointed with different powers and with distinct purposes, but whose acts, within the scope of their respective jurisdictions, are mutually obligatory. ”
[Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)]
Anyone serving in an office in the government as a public officer is a trustee of the trust and works for a corporation (what they call the “body corporate”) that is created by and wholly owned by the trust.
Quote:“As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1] Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official which tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy.[6]”[63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247]
[1] State ex rel. Nagle v Sullivan, 98 Mont. 425, 40 P.2d. 995, 99 A.L.R. 321; Jersey City v Hague, 18 N.J. 584, 115 A.2d. 8.
[2] Georgia Dep't of Human Resources v Sistrunk, 249 Ga 543, 291 S.E.2d. 524. A public official is held in public trust. Madlener v. Finley (1st Dist) 161 Ill.App.3d. 796, 113 Ill.Dec. 712, 515 N.E.2d. 697, app gr 117 Ill.Dec. 226, 520 N.E.2d. 387 and revd on other grounds 128 Ill.2d. 147, 131 Ill.Dec. 145, 538 N.E.2d. 520.
[3] Chicago Park Dist. v Kenroy, Inc., 78 Ill.2d. 555, 37 Ill.Dec. 291, 402 N.E.2d. 181, appeal after remand (1st Dist) 107 Ill.App.3d. 222, 63 Ill.Dec. 134, 437 N.E.2d. 783.
[4] United States v. Holzer (CA7 Ill) 816 F.2d. 304 and vacated, remanded on other grounds 484 U.S. 807, 98 L.Ed.2d. 18, 108 S.Ct. 53, on remand (CA7 Ill) 840 F.2d. 1343, cert den 486 US 1035, 100 L.Ed.2d. 608, 108 S.Ct. 2022 and (criticized on other grounds by United States v Osser (CA3 Pa) 864 F.2d. 1056) and (superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in United States v Little (CA5 Miss) 889 F.2d. 1367) and (among conflicting authorities on other grounds noted in United States v Boylan (CA1 Mass) 898 F.2d. 230, 29 Fed Rules Evid Serv 1223).
[5] Chicago ex rel. Cohen v Keane, 64 Ill.2d. 559, 2 Ill.Dec. 285, 357 N.E.2d. 452, later proceeding (1st Dist) 105 Ill.App.3d. 298, 61 Ill.Dec. 172, 434 N.E.2d. 325.
[6] Indiana State Ethics Comm'n v Nelson (Ind App) 656 N.E.2d. 1172, reh gr (Ind App) 659 N.E.2d. 260, reh den (Jan 24, 1996) and transfer den (May 28, 1996).
The straw man or the all caps name are NOT the issue. The Social Security Number or TIN is the issue. THAT property is government property by statute (see 20 CFR 422.103(d) and the back of the card), and anyone using it is a (usually DE FACTO) officer of the government, a trustee, and a fiduciary of the public. It is illegal to use public property for a PRIVATE benefit so all those who:
1. Use it in COMBINATION with their name are trustees of the PUBLIC trust.
2. Connect it to otherwise private property are donating the property to a public use and public purpose.
Anyone who uses public property is either a THIEF OR deemed to be an agents, trustees, and fiduciaries of the people.
Quote:“Public office. The right, authority, and duty created and conferred by law, by which for a given period, either fixed by law or enduring at the pleasure of the creating power, an individual is invested with some portion of the sovereign functions of government for the benefit of the public. Walker v. Rich, 79 Cal.App. 139, 249 P. 56, 58. An agency for the state, the duties of which involve in their performance the exercise of some portion of the sovereign power, either great or small. Yaselli v. Goff, C.C.A., 12 F.2d. 396, 403, 56 A.L.R. 1239; Lacey v. State, 13 Ala.App. 212, 68 So. 706, 710; Curtin v. State, 61 Cal.App. 377, 214 P. 1030, 1035; Shelmadine v. City of Elkhart, 75 1nd.App. 493, 129 N.E. 878. State ex rel. Colorado River Commission v. Frohmiller, 46 Ariz. 413, 52 P.2d. 483, 486. Where, by virtue of law, a person is clothed, not as an incidental or transient authority, but for such time as de- notes duration and continuance, with Independent power to control the property of the public, or with public functions to be exercised in the supposed interest of the people, the service to be compensated by a stated yearly salary, and the occupant having a designation or title, the position so created is a public office. State v. Brennan, 49 Ohio.St. 33, 29 N.E. 593.[Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 1235]
Government has no jurisdiction or PUBLIC right without the use of this number. An all caps name doesn't give them jurisdiction. Even an all caps name of a NONRESIDENT transient foreigner does not grant them jurisdiction. The following factors are where ALL of their civil and tax jurisdiction comes from:
1. DOMICILE/RESIDENCE on federal territory.
2. Use of the government property loaned to you.
3. Contracts and franchises you consent to.
4. Purposefully conducting commerce within the legislative jurisdiction of a foreign sovereign under the foreign sovereign immunities act, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97.
Anything else appears to us to be a wild theory, which is why you are having so much trouble proving it and why you had to come to us to ask for more proof to continue your studies. If you want to prove your case, your evidence HAS to derive ONLY from these sources. We try very hard not to engage in presumption in these forums and that is all you have offered so far: a theory that is a presumption at its heart.
Property law and the status of the SS card and number as government property are very well defined and understood, on the other hand, and cannot be argued against by the government. It's better to stick to things you can prove. If you can't defend your theory and do so with evidence in front of a jury, it's not worth pursuing.
The proof we have found so far that is admissible in court is sufficient as a defense and no further evidence is needed:
About SSNs/TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…SSNsAndTINs.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Nevertheless, show us some evidence and maybe you will change our mind. In ten years of searching we have never seen evidence that links a birth certificate to a civil status under federal law, OTHER than a “non-citizen national” and statutory “alien”, of course. Please explain why the use of the number as the equivalent of a de facto license to represent a public office and as a franchise is insufficient as a defense.
-
John Quincy Adams. On July 4, 1837, he spoke these words:
Quote:“Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day? … Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer’s mission upon earth. That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity, and gave to the world the first irrevocable pledge of the fulfillment of the prophecies announced directly from Heaven at the birth of the Savior and predicted by the greatest of the Hebrew prophets six hundred years before?” -
The following resources are available on that subject:
1. SEDM Jurisdictions Database, Litigation Tool #09.008- compares specific statutes and authorities in all 50 states
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Liti…onsDatabase.pdf
LITIGATION TOOLS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Liti…on/LitIndex.htm
2. Family Legal Assistant (FLA) Case Management Software-integrates the entire above database into it
http://sedm.org/Item…ams/FLA/FLA.htm
3. State Legal Resources– you can look up corresponding statutes in your state
http://famguardian.o…alResources.htm
4. Westlaw. They have what they call “50 State Surveys”, which correlate the specific statutes of all 50 states with each other. This is an expensive premium service because it takes so much work to produce and keep updated
http://store.westlaw…&filter_type=-1
5. State Vehicle Codes--compares vehicle code legal authorities on all 50 states
http://famguardian.o…VehCodeLaws.htm
6. State Income Taxes-compares tax legal authorities on all 50 states
http://famguardian.o…IncomeTaxes.htm
The information in this post is also contained in Note 5 at the bottom of item 3 above.
Don't expect others to do this work for you. Liberty has be earned, not gifted. The best way is to find the authorities yourself as a way to prepare to defend yourself in court and stand on your own two feet. Rather than view this as a deficiency, view it as follows:
Quote:“Problems are just opportunities in work clothes.”If you compile this information for your state, we welcome you to post it here so it can be shared with others.
-
Based on the preceding scriptures, it appears that God provides the following guidance:
1. Do not keep company with MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH or those who profess faith if they are also homosexuals.
2. If they are of the world but not christians, they should not be allowed to join the church.
3. If they are in your own family but they are not believers, you hold them at arms length and do not initiate contact with them, because Prov. 12:26 says they will tear you down with them. If you have to go to a family gathering where they are there, and especially if they have their homosexual lover with them, then ignore them and admonish them, but do not avoid them because you would have to avoid EVERYONE in your family to avoid them.
4. Those so-called “churches” that advance homosexuality, or who have homosexual clergy are to be treated NOT as biblical “churches” or believers, but rather of the world. This includes the Unitarian Universalists, the Methodists, etc.
-
EDITORIAL: A reader's astute feedback on the above post. We didn't write this.
____________
This is all true. Texas now does the same. The presumption is: the resident plantation slave must have a license for driving in commerce, always, and forever, and the license must always be renewed, even when there can not legally and lawfully be a statute or law requiring that one contract with a third party in order to exercise a right previously preserved in well establishes historical constitutions and treaties and Congressional Ordinances and Doctrines remaining in full force and effect. The agents of “this state” do not recognize that they are a legal subdivision of “the state” as in the Texas constitution Article 11 sec 1. And, their belief is, once a plantation resident slave,,,, always a plantation resident slave.
However, the remedy is a suit for about 100K lawful dollars in the United States Claims Court in Washington D.C. for the taking of a property right without just compensation and due process. The plaintiff will win every time. Sue “the United States,” the jurisdiction that will not cancel the commercial whatever as an agency with an EIN, and the agent with a ssn, and ask for a referral to the justice department for a Titl 18 USC 242 violation. The entire suit should only take 6 to 8 pages double spaced. Service must be made upon the agent, the registered agent for the agency, and also served upon Eric Holder and the AG of your state. A slave owner absolutely hates to lose a slave. I can see that the one who wrote the above does not understand the difference between “this state” and “the state.” The officers of “the state” are not abusing anything because there are not any lawful officers of “the state.” The abuse is coming from the officers and agents of “this state” who are acting without their scope of employment as corproate guard thugs with guns for the protection of the assets and property, the “resident” slaves of the communitarian welfare benefit plantation called “this state,” “THE STATE OF WHATEVER.” However, people who remain under the Articles of Confederation and the North West Ordinance and the NAFTA labor matriculation treaty are immune from the statutes and ordinances and code and public policy of “this state” and “the United States.”
-
What the above member told us, based on the above correspondence, are the following conclusions of law that are inevitable:
1. Domicile or residency are the “res” to which all government civil rights attach over the human being.
2. The de facto government will NOT allow you to extinguish the res and restore your EQUAL standing to them in equity because they won't allow you to extinguish but NOT “suspend” the license.
3. The de facto government pretends to be the ONLY one with the authority to terminate a license and no one else can.
4. The only way a licensed party can extinguish the license is to go to another state and apply for ANOTHER license there. At that point, the license in the OLD state must be turned in and surrendered in most vehicle codes, at which time the:
4.1 The presumption of residency in the other state is extinguished.
4.2 The driving privilege is extinguished but NOT “suspended” in a statutory sense.
4.3 A NEW residence is established.
5. The only remaining way to cancel but not “suspend” a license is to wait for it to lapse or expire, at which time, if the holder of the license has no other license, the license is treated as “suspended” and NOT “cancelled”.
6. Because the result of allowing the license to expire is a statutory “suspension”, then the party can be prosecuted for the crime of driving with a “suspended license”.
7. In all cases, the “residency” established is in the DE FACTO state, not the de jure or common law state. That means all those in possession of said license may lawfully be treated as public officers within the federal but not state government. In effect, the states are abusing their authority to regulate the public roadways as an excuse to make EVERYONE into a federal public officer, franchisee, and statutory “taxpayer”.
The indirect result of all of the above is that those who refuse to do business with the government of a state by electing a domicile or residence therein, and want to terminate all licenses and commercial relations with said state become CRIMINALS automatically by driving with a “suspended” license, and there is no way to avoid committing the crime, because they won't let you CANCEL rather than suspend the license.
This is the same CRAP they try to pull with SS: lying to you by telling you you can't quit, even though continuing to participate is a CRIME of impersonating a public officer in violation of 18 USC 912.
Welcome to the MATRIX, NEO!
-
Dear All,
Under the new legislation proposed by your “elected representatives” , the research forwarded below, or even sharing the info, would be censored, and most likely would land you on the cold floor of a very dark room.
You be the jury. But reach a verdict quickly, cause they are dead serious.
They ain't joking. They only provide the entertainment (i.e. distractions). If you saw the “republican” debates, maybe you noticed the “Saturday Night Live” entertainment like flavor in the air. However, towards the end, did you notice the
“disturbance” in the audience, and the “security” engaging the guy who “dared” to raise the issue about the Federal Reserve?
Although the moderator “thank” him twice, the issue was never addressed. I guess they rather take questions from Tweeter, not from somebody in the audience.
Why?
I believe it is because the Fed Res is the real issue. The rest is bread and circuses.
Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSRYzlyn6yk
The commotion starts at minute 4. and goes on for about 15 secs. Turn up the volume to hear the guy from the audience mentioning the federal reserve. I guess they were “running out of time” to address an issue “not important to them”.
Them = the real guys behind the guys behind the guys behind the Federal Reserve puppets.
C'mon people… Join the Re-love-ution, or let's say our good-byes now, cause soon your computer will be spying on you. They don't need smart meters for that… The smart meters are to shut off your power remotely.
If my forwards make you uncomfortable, please let me know to take you off this list.
I'll hate you for that, cause you'd be dumping your share on me. But hey…. it's a free country! … Ain't it?
Check out this three punch knock-out forward:
From: Campaign@democracydefined.org [“]mailto:campaign@democracydefined.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:18 AM
To hold the Office of President, the aspirant is required to be “American born.”
Thought this would interest you…
“Very Interesting Bit Of Detective Work” Makes you wonder…
1. Back in 1961 people of colour were called “Negroes.” So, if genuine, how can the Obama “birth certificate” state he is “African-American” when the term wasn't even used at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is
aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in “Kenya, East Africa.” This wouldn't seem to be anything of concern, except the fact that “Kenya” did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27
years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate.”
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital.” This cannot be so, because the hospitals in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children's Hospital” and “Kapi'olani Maternity Home,” respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 … ? How, unless it is a fake, and a bungled one at that !
Resources:
http://www.kapiolani…us/default.aspx
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia….istory_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
(I think we all know the answer to that!)