[Bing]

One of the best things about U.S. Government publications is that often times they potentially can contain powerful admissions made by the U.S. Government itself.

Using the Government's own words against them is a very powerful technique that one can use to peacefully oppose the corrupt IRS and the USG.

All U.S. Government publications, most especially Reports issued by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, must be judicially noticed.

Here is what the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee admitted way back in the year 1937:

Quote:

Those of us who hold office in this Government, however humble or exalted it may be, are creatures of the Constitution. To it we owe all the authority and power we possess. Outside of it we have none. We are bound by it in every official act.

Applied in the proper context, and especially when linked directly to U.S. Supreme Court decisions such as Butz v. Economou, admissions made by the U.S. Government in Senate Report 711, can be useful when fighting the IRS.

Tar and feather the IRS and USG with their own words.

Bing

[Bing]

Thank you so much for this important historical document.

I cringe every time I see & hear that plagiarist – of- a – Presidential historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin, pronounce on TV that FDR was a great President because “he led America through the Great Depression.”.

Puhhleeeeeeze!!!

As many in the FG Forum already know, FDR helped cause the Depression and his power grab during the 1930s, like many of his socialist and communistic programs that were later struck down as being unconstitutional, pale in comparison to FDR's ruling by Executive fiat and lying to the America People and accusing them of “hoarding gold” — note, FDR used the term “hoarding” NOT “Saving”, and then systematically tricking the American People to surrender their Gold wealth in exchange for worthless pieces of paper.

Anyone who, whether they have Harvard PhD in American History or not, if they insist to you that FDR was a great President, know that they are lying to you.

BY any measure, FDR, who stole the gold wealth of American families by threatening them with 10 years in prison if they did not turn over their gold to the US Government, made the People poorer during the Depression and FDR's policies prolonged the Great Depression.

FDR was a liar, a thief, a traitor, a murderer of US Navy and Marines (–FDR kept silent about Pearl Harbor attack by Japs) and a philanderer who cheated on his wife and thus violated his marital vows.

But don't just take my word for it, dear readers. Check out what FDR said in one of his radio addresses available for free at http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/History/…-FDRStackSC.htm

See too, the Senate Judiciary Report 711 from year 1937 and in which the US Senate Judiciary committee unanimously opposed FDR's plan to pack the US Supreme Court.

http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/History/…11-19370607.pdf

I strongly encourage everyone to read this U.S. Senate Report 711 from Senate Judiciary Committee — you see first hand how corrupt FDR really was and how he brazenly attempted to usurp the USA Constitution which he had previously taken a solemn oath to uphold, protect, and defend.

The Senate Judiciary evaluated FDR's stated rationale for wanting to expand the US Supreme Court to 15 members, and their analysis exposed FDR to be a disingenuous liar who was merely trying to pull a fast one over Congress and the American People.

Read and incisive analysis of the Judiciary Committee as they deconstruct FDR's position and expose FDR as a epic liar bent on trying to violate the USA Constitution.

Bing

[Bing]

Heh heh heh. 😆

Another nameless, faceless, coward who is too lazy to read the Organic Laws & positive laws for themselves and thereby learn the TRUTH.

Let him wallow in his own ignorance and he will be defrauded out of his own money by the lying, corrupt IRS. Which is what he deserves. 😮

This post is merely my belief, of course. LOL 😛

Bing

[Bing]

Admin wrote on Apr 29 2009, 08:56 PM:

Franklin,

You're absolutely right. Mega dittos.

And furthermore, whether the Sixteenth Amendment was properly ratified is entirely IRRELEVANT to tax liability, because, as the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held, the income tax both before and after the Sixteenth Amendment, continues to be an excise tax upon avoidable activities which, in the case of the I.R.C. Subtitle A income tax, is a “public office” and a “trade or business” in the U.S. government. This is analyized in section 7.1 of the following:

Flawed Tax Arguments To Avoid

http://famguardian.org/Publications/Flawed…ArgsToAvoid.pdf

HERE!!! HERE!!!

And lets us not forget the famous admission by an IRS Disclosure Officer Cynthia J. Mills, a copy of which is available at http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX1000.pdf and which contains the powerful admission that:

Quote:

“The Internal Revenue Code is not positive law, it is special law. It applies to specific persons in the United States who choose to make themselves subject to the requirements of the special laws in the Internal Revenue Code by entering into an employment agreement within the U.S.Government.”

“The law is that income from sources not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the U.S. Government is not subject to any tax under subtitle “A” of the Internal Revenue Code”.

Now, if “trade or business” was meant in its ordinary meaning/sense, then it would not have been appropriate or correct for IRS employee Mills to assert “trade or business within the U.S. Government”.

So, the compelling admission made by IRS employee Mills is further proof that the word of art, i.e. “trade or business” means only the performance of a public office within the U.S. Government, and it ipso facto MUST exclude private sector employment.

And, as my esteemed cyber cohorts Frankiln & Admin already know, this is further verified by the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that having a job and working for a living is both an unalienable right and a constitutional right. For proof see:

Quote:

Butchers' Union Slaughterhouse Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing Co., 111 U.S. 746, 756-57, 4 S.Ct. 652 (1884):

“As in our intercourse with our fellow-men certain principles of morality are assumed to exist, without which society would be impossible, so certain inherent rights lie at the foundation of all action, and upon a recognition of them alone can free institutions be maintained. These inherent rights have never been more happily expressed than in the declaration of independence, that new evangel of liberty to the people: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident' – that is, so plain that their truth is recognized upon their mere statement – 'that all men are endowed' – not by edicts of emperors, or decrees of parliament, or acts of congress, but 'by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.' – that is, rights which cannot be bartered away, or given away, or taken away, except in punishment of crime – 'and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and to secure these' – not grant them, but secure them – 'governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.' Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed in that great document, is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant the right to pursue any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give to them their highest enjoyment. The common business and callings of life, the ordinary trades and pursuits, which are innocuous in themselves, and have been followed in all communities from time immemorial, must therefore be free in this country to all alike upon the same conditions. The right to pursue them, without let or hinderance, except that which is applied to all persons of the same age, sex, and condition, is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States, and an essential element of that freedom which they claim as their birthright. It has been well said that 'the property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands, and to hinder his employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property. It is a manifest encroachment upon the just liberty both of the workman and of those who might be disposed to employ him. As it hinders the one from working at what he thinks proper, so it hinders the others from employing whom they think proper.' Smith, Wealth Nat. bk. 1, c. 10.”

Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114, 121, 9 S. Ct. 231 (1889):

“It is undoubtedly the right of every citizen of the United States to follow any lawful calling, business, or profession he may choose, subject only to such restrictions as are imposed upon all persons of like age, sex and condition.”

Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578, 589-90, 17 S.Ct. 427 (1897):

“The 'liberty' mentioned in that amendment means, not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties; to be free to use them in all lawful ways; to live and work where he will; to earn his livelihood by any lawful calling; to pursue any livelihood or avocation; and for that purpose to enter into all contracts which may be proper, necessary, and essential to his carrying out to a successful conclusion the purposes above mentioned.

“It was said by Mr. Justice Bradley, in Butchers' Union Slaughterhouse Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing Co., 111 U.S. 746 , at page 762, 4 Sup. Ct. 657, in the course of his concurring opinion in that case, that 'the right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an inalienable right. It was formulated as such under the phrase 'pursuit of happiness' in the Declaration of Independence, which commenced with the fundamental proposition that 'all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' This right is a large ingredient in the civil liberty of the citizen.' Again, on page 764, 111 U. S., and on page 658, 4 Sup. Ct., the learned justice said: 'I hold that the liberty of pursuit-the right to follow any of the ordinary callings of life-is one of the privileges of a citizen of the United States.' And again, on page 765, 111 U. S., and on page 658, 4 Sup. Ct.: 'But if it does not abridge the privileges and immunities of a citizen of the United States to prohibit him from pursuing his chosen calling, and giving to others the exclusive right of pursuing it, it certainly does deprive him ( to a certain extent) of his liberty; for it takes from him the freedom of adopting and following the pursuit which he prefers, which, as already intimated, is a material part of the liberty of the citizen.' It is true that these remarks were made in regard to questions of monopoly, but they well describe the rights which are covered by the word 'liberty,' as contained in the fourteenth amendment.”

Adair v. United States, 208 U.S. 161, 172, 28 S.Ct. 277 (1908):

“Such liberty and right embrace the right to make contracts for the purchase of the labor of others, and equally the right to make contracts for the sale of one's own labor; each right, however, being subject to the fundamental condition that no contract, whatever its subject-matter, can be sustained which the law, upon reasonable grounds, forbids as inconsistent with the public interests, or as hurtful to the public order, or as detrimental to the common good,” Id., at 172.

“Of course, the liberty of contract relating to labor includes both parties to it. The one has as much right to purchase as the other to sell labor. * * * The right of a person to sell his labor upon such terms as he deems proper is, in its essence, the same as the right of the purchaser of labor to prescribe the conditions upon which he will accept such labor from the person offering to sell it,” Id., at 174.

Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1, 14, 35 S.Ct. 240 (1915):

“The principle is fundamental and vital. Included in the right of personal liberty and the right of private property-partaking of the nature of each – is the right to make contracts for the acquisition of property. Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment, by which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property. If this right be struck down or arbitrarily interfered with, there is a substantial impairment of liberty in the long-established constitutional sense. The right is as essential to the laborer as to the capitalist, to the poor as to the rich; for the vast majority of persons have no other honest way to begin to acquire property, save by working for money.”

Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33, 41, 36 S.Ct. 7 (1915):

“It requires no argument to show that the right to work for a living in the common occupations of the community is of the very essence of the personal freedom and opportunity that it was the purpose of the Amendment to secure.”

Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525, 558, 43 S.Ct. 394 (1923):

“In principle, there can be no difference between the case of selling labor and the case of selling goods.”

Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625 (1923):

“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 278, 52 S. Ct. 371 (1932):

“[N]othing is more clearly settled than that it is beyond the power of a state, `under the guise of protecting the public, arbitrarily [to] interfere with private business or prohibit lawful occupations or impose unreasonable and unnecessary restrictions upon them.'”

Morehead v. N.Y. ex rel Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587, 601, 56 S.Ct. 918 (1936):

“Nothing is better settled in our constitutional law than that liberty does not mean merely freedom from physical restraint, but includes the right to work for a living by using the powers of brain and muscle in the ordinary activities of mankind.”

Grosjean v. American Press Co., Inc., 297 U.S. 233, 244, 56 S.Ct. 444 (1936):

“That freedom of speech and of the press are rights of the same fundamental character, safeguarded by the due process of law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by state legislation, has likewise been settled by a series of decisions of this Court beginning with Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666, and ending with Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697, 707. The word “liberty” contained in that amendment embraces not only the right of a person to be free from physical restraint, but the right to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties as well. Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578, 589.”

Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474, 492, 79 S. Ct. 1400 (1959):

“[R]ight to hold specific private employment and to follow a chosen profession free from unreasonable governmental interference comes within the `liberty' and `property' concepts of the Fifth Amendment.”

By contrast to the above Supreme Court decisions, with the exception of Adkins, supra, which was later overturned on other grounds, working for the U.S. Government is an excise taxable privilege it is not a constitutional right.

So what I am trying to say is this, Ms. Cynthia J. Mills, an IRS Disclosure Officer was writing truthfully when she wrote that letter to Mrs. Joann Hoverale.

Folks, be smart when you fight the IRS. When you send correspondence to the IRS, consider sending them a copy of the Exhibit 1000 available at http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX1000.pdf and ask the IRS to share their comments about the admissions made by the IRS Disclosure Officer. And see how or whether the IRS responds.

And thus, Bing sayeth not. 😉

Bing

[Bing]

Yep.

You nailed it Bobt12. Thanks for the URL links.

All of the substantive, credible evidence proves that the 9/11 attacks on America were an inside job orchestrated by the corrupt US Government with assistance from MOSSAD agents who were posing as so-called “touring artists” and who, in the months prior to 9/11, were allowed by WTC building security, to occupy one or more offices in the WTC as, get this, “squatters”.

What this all points to is that for the mass of the American public to be so subdued and disinterested in this stuff, means that the USG has largely succeeded in brain washing the America people via the broadcast airwaves, just like the US Army did to the Iraqi Army during Gulf War I in 1990 – 91.

And the notion that we are going to jump start the economy by fixing and repairing roads and highways, is a feint by the corrupt US Government. They want to repair the roads and highways so as to be in a stronger position when the time comes to transport the American People to FEMA run work camps a/k/a concentration camps.

The NYPD and NYFD are culprits in this too. Too many Fireman heard explosions and none of them have banned together to fight and ask questions about why their buddies were murdered. I have no respect for NYPD or the NYFD. Through their collective silence, have dishonored the memories of those who died.

The USG bought them — the survivors and 1st responders– off by paying them $$$$$$.

Simply shameful.

[Bing]

Riverway, great job locating this important info.

“. . .Government investigations and reports focusing on the collapse of the three largest World Trade Center buildings on 9-11 did not include forensic studies of the debris that would have positively identified the presence of incendiaries or explosive materials or their byproducts. . .”

Unbelievable!! 3,000+ Americans are murdered and the US Government forgets to conduct basic forensic tests!!! What does that tell you, dear readers?

Great job Riverway.

[Bing]

Great post, JWK. 😉

Barney Frank is a liar and should have been impeached long ago.

The liberal folks in Massachusetts should be ashamed to have such a person as their Representative.

[Bing]

Simply amazing!!! 😡

But I am not surprised.

We are way worse off than Nazi Germany because we live in a country that has tens of millions of brain -washed, intellectually lazy people who have misplaced their trust in an extremely corrupted Federal Government.

Our societal ignorance and lack of personal courage are keying our nation's downfall.

[Bing]

franklin, thanks for bringing this to our attention.

You know, I never fully and I still don't, completely understand the Church v. State debate.

I mean, I know the government is NOT supposed to establish a religion, but the reality is that the U.S. Government has in fact established a pagan religion. And then it puts people in prison under color of law if one opposes their pagan religion. And those are the lucky ones. No telling how many folks simply disappear each year.

Off point for a second: I overheard someone speaking the other day in a Mall and they said that hundreds of thousands of young kids disappear each year in America.

WTF??

How can this be true??

And why has not the government and the MSM squawking about these missing kids? I simply don't get it. Now, I don't watch Nancy Grace Show except when I am channel surfing, but she does the same story for like, 10 months straight.

Back on point.

I think men and women in government at all levels, would make far better civil servants if they applied the teachings and precepts of a religion to public policy and used religion as a guidepost to their public actions.

One main reason why we have so many societal problems in this country is that far too many lawyers are involved in government either as elected or appointed officials.

I have long ago been convinced that the ills of American society are due in large measure to the corrupt lawyers that have no ethics and no morals, and govern accordingly; and the failure of America's Pastors to speak up in defense of what is just and right, lest they put their 501 (c ) ( 3) tax exempt entity in jeopardy. For the Pastors, at least the ones that were not busy raping young boys and girls, it has been all about the dollars.

The very liberal, left wing, anti-American National Education Association have been working for years to get all religious obeservance of even a hint of religion, like a moment of silence, out of the public schools.

The true Obama is being revealed as he uses real and imagined crises, and in many cases Federal Reserve inspired crises to expand the role of federal government.

The government needs and must remove religion from the lives of the People so they can better institute their mind control programs.

All religion is a competitor to the federal government. Competing for the People's hearts and minds.

Bing

[Bing]

In addition to what my cyber cohort posted, you may want to refer to a decent Law Dictionary, such as Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition, and look up the definitions of estoppel, equitable estoppel, estoppel by acquiescence, estoppel in pais, nihil dicit, and estoppel by silence.

Stay positive, fight smart, study, and feel free to read the Path to Freedom treatise available for free from the FG website.

If the IRS ever writes you a letter and you do not agree with any aspect of their allegations, you MUST reply in writing and deny their allegations.

Let me know if you have any additional questions.

Hope this helpful.

Bing

[Bing]

Excellent.

Thanks.

Also, one can go to any decent University or Law Library and they will or should have in the collection, the Code of Federal Regulations volumes, I think it is volume 3, that is devoted exclusively to Presidential documents and there you will find all of the proclamations and EOs from the prior year. Usually these volumes are stored in the Reference section or in Government documents section.

[Bing]

I never much cared for those pesky John Doe summonses because far too many innocent folk's IDs get swept up in the fishing expedition.

That said, I think the IRS should go after so-called “U.S. taxpayers”, that is, those who ARE engaged in a public office and a federal franchise.

Perhaps some “John and Jane Doe's” will send an anonymous letter (or 2) to the attorneys for State Street and instruct them on how to fight against an illegal IRS summons. Nothing like spreading the knowledge. Simply go to an internet cafe, such as ING or Kinkos, set up an email account and email the info to State Street. Or use a pc at your workplace that you would not normally use every day. . . . use the pc of the guy in the next cubicle who sneezes in your face when he is talking to you over the cubicle wall divider.

The more time and resources the IRS has to devote to fighting State Street, the weaker the IRS becomes and the less resources they have to go after all of us nontaxpayers.

If you know how to fight an IRS summons, like when Bob Schulz defeated the IRS summons a few years ago, please feel free to send that info to State Street Bank ASAP. 😉

Signed,

John Doe 😮

[Bing]

WTF?

It disappeared and then it reappeared without any explanation from the sites owners/authors???

I don't understand.

sniff. sniff. sniff. Something smells fishy to me.

[Bing]

Hmmmm.

I did not know that Barack Hussein Soetoro met secretly with Chief Justice Roberts.

You know, I watched the inauguration all day on January 20th, and I got the sense that when Roberts messed up the Presidential oath of office, it was more of a Freudian slip than most realized. I still feel that Roberts in his heart believes that Barack Hussein NO-bama is not a natural born American.

In any case, for the benefit of all the newbies in this Forum, I strongly urge you to read the powerful e-book titled “What Happened to Justice” which, will, I assure you, knock your socks off with incontrovertible evidence from the U.S. Government itself, about the real nature and origin of the U.S. federal judiciary.

One thing I learned from reading and studying “What Happened to Justice” is that the U.S. Congress, way back when the USA was created, never actually authorized or created a Constitutional supreme Court. Instead, what they created was a Supreme Administrative Court. And, my friends, this is one reason why we now have Supreme Court Justices instead of supreme Court Judges.

Read “What Happened to Justice” which is available from http://www.sedm.org and your views about America and the origin, scope, and depth of the corruption of the U.S.Congress and the federal judiciary will change forever.

Bing

[Bing]

Heh heh heh heh. 😆

Bing