juu1k0ry
Forum Replies Created
-
looks like i answered my own question. i was most concerned with taxes. both the 1849 and 1879 only give the state the power to tax property. so it doesn't matter which one I use.
darn its confusing though.
-
it has come to my attention that there are 2 constitutions for California! the 1849 California Constitution, and the 1879 State of California Constitution.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/California_Constitution
while skimming the 1879 constitution – i saw …
– Article 1 Section 7 Paragraph 2 –
“Except as may be precluded by the Constitution of the United States…”
Shouldn't this read “Constitution For the United States of America”?
and Article 2 Section 2
“A United States citizen 18 years of age and resident in this State may vote.”
well that's not me either – wouldn't I be a Citizen with an upper case, or a National,
and I don't have a residence! Why does my United States citizen status matter to vote in California?
Do I follow the 1849 California Constitution instead? Is this second 1879 for 14th amendment federal citizens who are also in the State of California. Or, do I use the most recent and pick out only the bits of this 1879 that apply to me?
Anyone come across this yet?
Thanks!
-
thanks Bing!
-
Thanks!
All I know is I was so fixated on how to remove my US Citizen status and become a National, that I couldn't step back far enough to see the whole picture. I was still trying to work inside the system, but to do it 'properly' this time. I still felt that the constitution made me free, and I needed to be able to remove myself from the federal government to be able to be protected by the constitution again. When I learned the constitution is essentially defunct, I was crushed.
Then, for some reason, I thought – if Jesus is King of Kings… then who are the kings? That would be me. I am a Sovereign/King.
And from there, it all clicked.
“there is no spoon!”
Thank you all so much! Its been a helluva ride!
-
I'm heading over to fax in my application to the SEDM!
Last night, after pondering over your responses, I stood straight up in bed – I think I made the mental breakthrough.
If all nations, states, and governments are merely corporations, and I sever my dependence/connection to them, what is to keep me from creating my own sovereign nation, where I am king? I would not expect my new corporation to be recognized by any other country, but what difference does that make?
As a sovereign, all governments constitutions and regulations are just paper. I'm not privy to any of them, I was just told I was. It doesn't matter if I'm not a party to the Federal Constitution. They're all just corporations which I have no business with! As far as I'm concerned, they do not exist! Its just me and God.
“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do, they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain.”
–Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520
-
Thank You for your time and patience!
After reading “The US is a British Colony” I was so shell shocked that I didn't understand how the Constitution was even valid anymore. None of our court system was setup properly as you have confirmed, Washington setup the Districts for each state, I felt like I was declaring myself a National of an abrogated system.
like saying, I am a National of Athens! – “well that's great pal, hit the brig!”
I will keep reading, and hope the answers come too. Thank you again.
-
Thanks Bing,
I'm still new at this, but from my understanding …
When I say I'm still a “US Citizen” I mean, I have not gone through the process of gathering evidence to prove that I am a National (new passport). I am a National by birth, but I still hold a Drivers License, Social Security Number, and have a bank account under an SSN – things that make me dependent on the federal system, and would constitute me being a resident and move my domicile to the District of Columbia and engages me in “trade or business” according to the IRS.
I'm a national, but I've made contractual obligations to the “United States” that show otherwise. I think I must remedy those first, before I can properly say I'm a National.
Am I wrong in this thinking? Yes, i've been duped into signing all those contracts, by wrongful will or intent, but I don't want to make any excuses for myself, i want to set things right.
What's the pro se trap? Would it be better to get a lawyer and have them read over Liberty U vs defending myself? It seems like all I need to show is that the the I.R.C. has no jurisdiction over me as i'm a National, and that I am acting within reason, with no mal intent. I am not required to pay taxes according to the Constitution, and that is the law.
-
Hi Bing,
Thanks for your reply. I'm learning I can only serve one master at a time – god or man. So I must indeed sell my house and rent until I can aquire the funds to outright purchase a house without needing a bank.
At the moment I am still a US Citizen. I have been reading through the Liberty U courses, planning out my removal and regaining my “national” status.
The hardest part will be giving up the house. My family and I have lived in it for some time now, we've only paid for half of it. The loan we have is through an FDIC insured bank, I believe from my understanding, that makes me a “public officer” and I must get terminate that account.
So yes, my question was, how do people keep their homes? I've looked into offshore loans, but the interest rates are very very high (in new zealand anyway.)
The other option was to have my wife stay a citizen, until we pay it off, and then remove her from the system later. That's kind of unfair to her though as well.
My question was more fishing for information – are there any other options out there?
-
Thank You Author #2 – That is EXACTLY what I needed to hear.
Back to studying!