iCallCheckmate
Forum Replies Created
-
Bing,
I've been fighting against the IRS for over 8+ years now. So, I know I'm not one to just lay down and fall asleep.
I fight against the illegal Census Bureau whenever they come around. That's a federal organization that reports back to higher authority so they can see which areas they are going to target next. DON'T LET ANYONE OF THEM DO A CENSUS ON YOU!. You have a right to NOT answer nor cooperate with them. I never have, and I never will.
Although there are many people that do not file (approximately 68 million), there still are people that don't know their rights, and not everyone owns a computer with Internet access. Luckily for the IRS. But while I am still studing the IRS laws, and studing my rights, I came across a Tax Movement website that has been organised to assist anyone in the USA if they have been indicted on tax problems. That is something that's needed from any and all Tax Movement organizations. To be able to go to court to help defend people. Not everyone understands the laws, and not everyone (even if you show them the laws) will be able to make sense out of it. That's just how it is. But they still need help.
Since I came to this site, I've been reading and studying the materials that were made available, and it's something we all need to do. But to have confidence in representing yourself, or to be represented, one must know the laws. And reading/studying them is the guaranteed way,, no doubt about that.
Irwin Schiff is a great man, and he has indeed tried to help the American people. I just hope his efforts weren't in vein. Can they jail everyone? I don't think so. But they'll either jail us or maybe put a hit out on us. That's just how they operate.
I've been doing my part in informing people as to the illegal taxations, and pointing them to sites like this one too. And many of the people I've informed are amazed at this whole thing. At the same time, I've decided to do some of my own research, and hopefully soon, it'll be in the archives of the Tax Movements agenda.
I'm doing a documentary called “Show Me The IRS Law” or “100 Reasons You Don't Have To File Taxes“. I haven't decided on which title yet. It's simply a documentary where I go to 100 tax preparations, accountants, and law firms, and I explain to them that there is a $400,000+ reward (there really is a reward too), and I'm willing to donate 25% of it to them if they can help me win this money by simply showing me in the law that most American citizens must pay and file taxes. I have interviewed about 30+ places or so, but my goal is 100. That's when I'll come to a closing of the documentary. So far, not one of the ones I've intervied (hidden camera +mic) have been able to show me the law. Remember, I'm willing to split a reward with them.
I've been doing this because I know they will never find the law, and they will confirm to the USA citizens that no such law exists. That's my whole goal to doing this. To help wake people up, and to get them well informed, and at the same time, continue to expose the fraud the US Government continuously allows the IRS to harass us about. Hopefully it'll shed alot of light as to where people will start petitioning the release of tax criminals.
When I'm ready for it to be released into the Internet, I have a tool which I use for business clients that gets their messages posted on Google within 2 days tops, and at the same time, reach millions of people in nearly real-time. That's one of my businesses. And that's promoting businesses and (or) websites and having them indexed and listed within a few days. So when I'm ready, it'll reach millions of viewers within a few days. Paper publications have been warned not to print any materials that are against the IRS and other government establishments. I believe they made it a law for newspapers and the like, to not print such materials. So the Internet is our last hope of getting our messages out.
And although we all got this way by design, it's flawed. We don't have to stay that way. Or, as Bush would say “Stay the course“.
Again, as far as the WTC being Federal or not……… I know that is was. There are many federal buildings that we see but don't realize that they're federal buildings. Just like banks, (FDIC), they're federal buildings. I'm sure you can all agree with that. Even utility companies are federal buildings. And last but not least, over 75%+ of the stock market is owned by the federal government, and that means that Coke we all drink is a federally owned product. Once a person understands how these products get owned by the government through the stock market, it's easier to follow the trail backwards. You get individuals, branch entities and others to buy stock from said company. All of the listed people are afilliated, but you don't know it, and they buy up MOST of the stock, leaving room for outsiders to buy some. All along, those same entities, individuals own most of that stock, and then they merge the entities into one, while holding the stock, and that's how the governmet owns much of the stock market.
For an in-depth look at stocks that the government owns,,, do a search for (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) or CAFR, and find the one for your state. Inside you'll see everything you need to know about your states financial status. And yes, you'll even see the stocks they own. You'll see every financial transaction for that year. If you did that for every state, you'll see the states that own the same exact stocks, and when you do the math, you'll soon conclude that the government owns most of that stock.
Start with the earliest year you can find. Becasue this was exposed some years ago, the government have been watering down their financial statements, because they know people now have access to the statements of the financial activities of that state. In other words, you can see where the tax dollars have been going, and you can see where money has come from, going into the state.
On an ending note: wether anything is federal or not is something the federal government doesn't want us to know. The same with “Eminent Domains“, where the government comes and takes your property away from you, wether you like it or not. It's not so much that someone came to the city/state with a proposal, it's the fact the government doesn't want to tell you that that land is theirs (although they never said so) and they want it back, and they build what they want on it. The Neocons & the Illuminati thinks that they own everything, even our lives, and they aren't stopping at showing us they're in control. But I can say this much…. they all got life screwd-up. They're going down, just as they sprung up. One by one. It's time the tables have been turned against them, and all that stands with them.
One Man's Opinion
-
Sonik,
You make excellent points, and they do make sense. But here are a few things to honestly consider.
1. While the 16th Amendment wasn't fully/legally ratified, it's been over 80+ years and we've all be believing that paying taxes is the LAW.. but many of us beg-to-differ.
2. The so-called laws that prove that paying taxes is the law, have been disputed and many have won…… but much more are sitting in prison and not much of anything to do about it is being done. Most would say that the person is in jail because of the tax problems is the result of him/her doing something wrong.
3. The movements to stop this illegal taxations have worked for some,,, but for the majority of people, they are jailed, and it seems that we all still allow the government have their way.
My 3 points above are just facts that are observed, and at the same time, we can use the legal terminology and the correct statutes, but not believe that the government does under-minding tactics against it's own citizens.
Besides reading all the lingo and paperwork of the laws and “He vs Her, or “Us vs Them” why would you think that the World Trade Center wasn't government? Again, forget all the law books…. I'm talking about common sense, and a sense of what's common. All 3 buildings that went down were Federal buildings. And there is no documentation on this planet earth that can dispute it.
While people think that they are suppose to pay taxes, there are people out there that says it's a fraud, and you don't have to. At the same time, there are people out there that thinks the World Trade Center was jast a simple USA target, and then there are others that know that those buildings were federal facilities.
And maybe you don't know the history of the World Trade Centers, but I do.. 1st hand. I've lived in Brooklyn, and I know alot about the WTC.. I used to go there often. It was a federal building. Not on the records, and not on the books, and not on your best interest to think so either…. but that was a federal establishment. Study the history of the WTC and start putting pieces together, and you'll soon see that they were governmental indeed.
Although we all will have differences about subjects or another, I'm on your side if you're for what's right. I have no problem with anyone here and I don't want anyone here to get the wrong impressions of any of my posts. I'll stand by all of your sides if it's for the righteous.
Just because there is no paperwrk at all that directly ties the WTC into the Federal Government, that doesn't mean it wasn't. We all should know by now how clever the government is. They can manipulate anything. Why would you believe it wasn't a federal building?
A library of information on the Internet, especially based on “Conspiracy Theories” can be found at http://conspiracycentral.net:6969
That's just one of the many sites I'm a part of. You want answers.. go there, and I'm sure you'll come away with alot more than when you 1st go there. I guarantee it.
I'm with you all here. You're all very intellegent, and you know the laws pretty well, and I like that, but now we need to put all of this together with everyone who's about this same cause.
Please research and (or) ask people that are from New York about the WTC. Hopefully everyone hasn't been brain-fried by the government to speak out and talk, and I'm sure you'll get loads of people to tell you what was in those buildings…. although they may not use the word “Federal”,, but if they tell you what was stored in those buildings… common sense alone is all you need to know what it really was.
One Man's Opinion
-
Evidence dictates the story of a plane going into the Pentagon anyway. The orders could have been to NOT shoot the “incoming guided missle”, which is so obvious that hit the Pentagon. I'm not going to believe a plane made an almost perfect round hole through a couple of walls, and then the whole plane just dissapears, without a trace.
Even seeing the 1st hand pictures of it all, there were no bodies nor blood. And if a plane did hit the Pentagon, I know the black box would have been findable, in such an isolated area.
This whole thing is to keep the public guessing what happened, but once a person put their common sense in motion, after seeing the aftermath of it all, and witnessing some as they happen, it's quite clear that the official story is not the truth at all.
Besides, what's so hard with showing videos of the Pentagon getting hit if there is nothing to hide? That sickens me when I think throughout the Secret Service and the FBI, and the CIA history, we all have allowed them to continually come and take our only evidence to prove anything. I would have figured that all these years, man would be smart enough to
a. Install a backup recorder hidden inside a wall or something
b. Have their videos being recorded not only in house, but also to a REMOTE location that's off the premises.
Doing any or both of the above will assure you that you'll always have a copy.
I thought we were all taught that just incase someone tries to rob you and take your video recorder. It seems that man just doesn't take heed to his own recommendations.
Proof from many sources would have indeed tell what happened at the Pentagon, but since it's not available for the public to see, it's fair to assume that the government does indeed have something to hide. And that is…. a missle hit the Pentagon.
I saw a documentary a few years ago about missles and the government do have missles that are long rang, meaning they can hit their target thousands of miles away, going over terain, staying low, and at the same level of buildings, guide theirselves away from any structure what-so-ever, and continue to the intended target. These missles can then crash into the exact location of the building, wether it's the window, door, or wall, and still go until it reaches that exact position, then it'll explode.
So, my point is that the missle that did hit the pentagon could have been launched from the sea, it also could have been launched from the roof top of a nearby building or mounted on a truck, or even shot from a plane,, the one that everyone so-called saw. No matter how we figure it out, it's already established that a missle hit the Pentagon,,, especially hearing the reports of the workers smelling corridite, and others said they smelled what appeared to be explosives,, and then reports that the corridite had to be planted inside of the Pentagon. Now these reports are coming from employees at the Pentagon.
The US Government is corrupt and cannot be trusted what-so-ever.
One Man's Opinion
-
lchesson wrote on Oct 5 2006, 02:51 PM:Quote:I just got to see that interview. I'm going right now to try to find it. I will save that one too.
Here ya go:
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/Fet…mes20060622.wmv
[post=”3175″][/post]Thanks
-
I found the interview, and I'm downloading it now.
I should have known that Fox wouldn't have it archived. The Interview was on Sept 28, 2006. They do have an archive (text only) of an issue of the 9-11 on that day, and it mentions Fetzer's name, but continues to say that anyone in the world that questions the official story is a an idiot (paraphrasing). They are a bunch of liars and the truth isn't in them.
The power of the Internet.
One Man's Opinion
-
lchesson,
That's some damning information. I can believe that too, just because of the other evidence revealed.
As far as FOX is concerned (the alpha-numeric term for fox = 666), I would have missed it, because I stopped watching them long ago. They are the biggest liars on the television. But I sure as heck love to see that interview… I'm surprised they didn't “pull the plug“.
Those are no coincidences that Mineta resigned. They're all going to have their “just served” right on them. Just give it time. Their whole operation has been exposed and comprimised.
Another person who went secretly that we don't hear about anymore, and that is Ari Fliesher. He's going to get his too. John Ashcroft, Janet Reno too. Those people were all part of the elaborate scheme that was pulled off against the American people.
But lchesson, you told me something about that incident that I never even heard spoken of before. I'm glad it happened on FOX (666). And really, that's the numeric numbers for the word fox. at least the whole world saw that one, but they didn't see that one coming. :ph34r:
I just got to see that interview. I'm going right now to try to find it. I will save that one too.
One Man's Opinion
-
Sonik Speed wrote:
Quote:But after carefully thinking about why this is the way it is, my final conclusion is because the Federal Government cannot prosecute him for damaging non-Federal Property. The WTC is/was NOT Federal land nor was it Federal property.I have to disagree with that. In the terminology of it's affiliations of the government, we can say no it wasn't… but…. did you know that the WTC (the actual towers) were used to hold:
Precious metals from all over the world (gold, silver, platinum,etc)
diamonds
Federal Documents, including, but not limited to… high profile federal court cases, Wall Street/Stock Market information, Secret Federal Meetings were held there, and a host of other federal activity in … I believe, it was the South tower.
But indeed, the World Trade center (Twin Towers) were part of the Federal Government.
Do you think the name World Trade Center was just a name? It was a world trading center. And anytime the whole world is involved into trading in the same place, it will have Federal Government written all over it. No doubt about that.
Those towers stored things we'd never think about, like:
animals, used for experiments
Federal jail/holding cells (all a secret)
Federal interrogation rooms
I know first hand about alot that was stored in those towers since I was a teenager.
Oh,,, and not to mention all the major drugs that were stored in those towers, and all the weapons too. Remember, that was the World Trade Center.
And none of this was stored in the so-called federal building. The Federal building stored mostly paperwork. Maybe other items too, but not as remotely close as to what was in those towers.
Sonik Speed wrote:
Quote:1 ) How does a plane 125ft wide and 155ft long fit into a hole which is only 16ft across?2 ) How does a 757 exit the Pentagon's 3rd ring and leave a hole approx. 16ft across with no visible wreckage?
😆
I tried to figure it out… and i think i am very close to an answer! :ph34r: (Pink Panter's Music In background) :ph34r:
I think you're starting to see the light (not saying you haven't already), but the whole 9-11 events DEFIES the LAWS of nature, physics, and human comprehension. Even the so-called plane that suppose to have went down in PA, there were no bodis ever found, not even the black box. As a matter of fact, they never found any of them.. they claim they have, but they were bogus, because there were no humans on any of those planes at all. The real planes with the real passengers were diverted to an airport that had a government facility on it… and drone planes were used to do the dirty work. Where did the real people go? Who knows? Maybe they're dead by now, maybe they're still in some secret place.. like maybe one of the 800+ secret underground facilities the government have all over the USA.
I still have the actual videos of the incident of the PA so-called crash,, waaayyyy before any government officials get there, and there is not a single trace of a plane. One of the investigators said that that was the first time he has ever been to a plane crash site and never saw any evidence of a plane had crashed, and he also said that not only could he NOT find any bodies, there wasn't even any blood what-so-ever to be found. A so-called plane crash.
One of the videos I have was filmed from the New Jersey side and while the towers were still up, you can hear explosions and then WHITE smoke coming up from the basements of the towers….. wayyyyy before they fell.
For all that still don't believe this was an inside job, there is proof, living proof of it.
I'd bet none of you would have ever guessed that after 5 years since then, that someone would make available the video she filmed watching the towers get hit and fall? Yep,, I have that too. It was never ever seen before until September 17, 2006…. and you can hear her as loud as day while she was filming it on the 35th floor of her apartment building that she said that it appeared to be a military plane going into the building… she says that while it's going into the building. Five years ago people said they saw a military plane go into the building,,, and five years later, you can hear the young woman saying the same exact thing.
In the comments about the video she filmed (she didn't do any interview), it was said that she said that she held on it for all these years because she was afraid, and didn't want to be targeted. But it's out now.. But.. you'll never find it on any usual web site, I'll guarantee that.
For any of you that want to seek the truth on just about anything (including the 9-11 incidents), think outside the box. Don''t get stuck on that Google thing. There are resources of information out there that Google WON'T index/list. I wonder why? NOT.
And I have an open mind about any and everything. I know how to evaluate any and everything, and I know how to use my common sense.
I sure would love to share with you all, all the videos I have on 9-11, and I do have approximately all of them that are on the Internet. I'll compile my list of titles, and post them here, and you can go and search for them online and see if you can find them. Remember, I got them from online too, so you should be able to find and get them too, that is, if you know how to search and where to search.
One Man's Opinion
-
rattler14 wrote on Oct 4 2006, 06:20 PM:Not related to the controlled demolition… but the FBI recently admitted they do not have a legitimate case connecting Osama to the 9/11 attacks
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
Someone should clue in the rest of the government.
[post=”3163″][/post]If you look on Internet in certain publicly open sources, there is a video with Osama admitting that he had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks and that our government is lying to us and we need to be prepared because our government is going to do something to us too.
One thing I can admit. If the Islamic people are willing to blow themselves up and do the destructive damages that they've been accused of (and some they admitted to), I see no reason why any of them would lie about if they did a glorious deed to them. I believe , along with other evidence that Osama didn't have anything to do with that 9-11 attacks on those innocent people.
In his video, he actually pleaded for us to believe him and NOT our government. If he really did it, I'm sure he would have bragged about it, like any Islamic person that actually does harm to us. Osama was, and is what is called a “Patsy”. That is the government term of doing something and then blaming it on someone else. Just like the USA engages and have been engaging into what is called a “False-Flag”.. and that is disguising the planes, ship, boats, or whatever with the flag of another country, then attack other countries, (mainly they attack the USA itself).. then blame it on the other countries…. because some witnesses say they saw the flags displayed of that suspected country.
That's what the USA does. I knew Osama bin Laden didn't do it.. He actually made that announcement between Sept – Dec 2001.
If I didn't download it, I can find it… and I'll post where to get it when I do find it.
One Man's Opinion
-
No problem. I'm not mad at you.
It just seemed odd. And I didn't judge you. I'm not qualified to do that.
It's all good.
One Man's Opinion
-
Bing wrote on Oct 4 2006, 05:45 AM:What the heck is a “torrent site?”
And why are they thought to be “bad” by the USG?
Bing
[post=”3158″][/post]A torrent site is a website that has practically everything that is available for free. Examples are:
Movies
PC, X-BOX, etc., Games
Software (Every kind imaginable)
Books (mainly pdf format)
Music
Secret Information
Hard To Find Information
Banned materials.. including all the above which may have a banned product
And probably everything else I didn't mention.
People that own any of these things prepare them and use software like
BitComet
BitTornado
uTorrents
and others.. Those are the main ones… but those products are then packeged with tools like above, and when that package is submitted to a torrent site/tracker… it is now available for people to download.
So, if I created a torrent, and I made it available for people to download from me, I'll be the only one sharing it. And when that other person downloads it, and let his torrent continue to run, now there are 2 people sharing that same file. So that way when person no# 3 wants it, he's getting it from 2 people instead of one person. Torrents are designed to not let you take the brunt of it all and hog your bandwidth. It takes parts from everyone connected to it and shares it with everyone. So in retrospect, you never get a file/program from 1 particular person, you get it from many.
I've been using torrent clients for years now. How you think I was able to get that “Creature From Jeckyll Island” so fast?
But anyway, that's why the government are targeting those people and sites. They claim they are downloading illegally, and they're hurting the industry. All of that is further from the truth.
1. Torrent software have been in existence since the Internet has been around, and it does what it was 1st used for,,, and that is to share files, or as we call it “file-sharing“. There is nothing illegal about it.
2. Hurting the industry. False. This is argued all the time amongst us file-sharers… and that is… How can we be hurting any industry if we never planned on buying the product anyway? They want us all to think we're doing illegal downloading. Totally untrue. If anything on the Internet is available for me to download, I'm going to do it. It's that simple.
Don't blame me, blame the ones who made the software, blame yourself for charging such rediculous prices, blame yourself because people are tired of being ripped off by the industry.
Did you ever notice that as soon as you pay your hard earned money for software, then to find out that they have a new version out, and charge you for upgrades, going into the new version? It's called residual income for them. That's how software companies are ripping people off.
But I can tell you this much, torrenting is not illegal at all, they just want us to think that, and they want us to feel bad about it too. You probably see that message when you watch movies on dvd, about you wouldn't steal a car, you wouldn't steal a pocketbook, and all that crap, and then they say downloading movies are illegal. Totally false.
They're also mad about the fact that when a movie come out in the theatres, within 3 days, a peson can download it if someone made it available. And I'm not talking about “ghost” movies. Those are movies where you hear the audience talking and you see shadows. Some movies are like that, but many of them are of dvd or near dvd quality because the person filming it doesn't use traditional camcorders. They use a technique where they actually scan the film while itls playing from the source. That technique is called “Telesync” and you have “Telecine”. So yes, there is a device that can actually scan a movie from the film stip itself,,, and then using hearing impaired devices, they're able to capture the sound.
Also with torrents, you'll have dvd movies (for example) before they are available in your area. In my area, on average, I have the dvd-rip of a movie approximately 4 months before they're available in my area. All movies released on dvd aren't made available in every state at the same time. That's the industries fault for that. I get them when they're released from the industry itself, wether it's from another country or so. And they release English versions in many countries too.
But what makes this so illegal as they say, is that you have those jack-butts out there that go and try to profit from doing this and build empires. That's what gave peer2peer a bad name. It's solely because of people selling the stuff, which I agree, they shouldn't. Everything I have, I have because I want it and I don't sell anything.
Bottom line is this, if you want to find and get a hold of whatever you want or always wanted, you'll probably find it on a torrent site..Also what they don't tell you about torrent sites is the fact that they DON'T store anything on those sites at all. They're actually directories for the contents. So to argue with that, I'd have to ask, then why are those sites being attacked when in fact they do not have any illegal content on those sites at all?
If you have any questions about peer2peer, feel free to post here or PM me. I can point you to sites that have video tutorials online where you can see how to create a torrent and share it with whoever. If you want to share to just one person, you could make the torrent file (usually 2K, 3K or so), then email it to whoever, and when that person double-clicks on that file you just sent to them, they'll be able to download directly from your computer that torrent file you made. It's about a 5 minute procces in all.
Torrents will open the doors to a wealth of information otherwise unavailable to practically everyone.
One Man's Opinion
-
Below is a link to one of the Depleted Uranium videos I have. The quality is lousy, but the point gets made. I'll post my others when I find them.
Depleted Uranium Hazard Awareness
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3582.htm
One Man's Opinion
-
Riverway wrote on Oct 3 2006, 06:00 PM:Am I the only one to sense the “tongue in cheek” with that post?? Come on, that was for entertainment purposes only![post=”3155″][/post]
I kinda thought so, but it was/is well deserved in the “Humor & Jokes” section, not here.
But my post about the nanotechs is to be true.
Also, how do you know this was posted to be entertainment for us by another persons' post? How do you know if that the poster may really believe that or not? Is is possible you're the other poster too?… Just asking.
And I only ask just by seeing that the 1st post from that person is of that nature. Coming here making the post a joke?…. I'm not the one to judge, but you already strike me as someone who is either that poster, using more than 1 usernmae, or you know that poster and not saying so, or you know where this “entertainment” post actually came from. Meaning, you've seen this somewhere else. If you answer no to any of the above, I'd be 1st to “suspect” you're either that other person or you know that other person. I do own/run forums myself too, and it's easy to spot people on forums that are up to no good… not saying you're not,, but I've been around on the Internet for quite some time. I may be totally wrong, and if I am,, I'll publicly tell you “I'm sorry” but your post gives me the impression that you're somehow not on the level here.
You immediately defended a peson with just 1 post… .. how do you know he was just trying to entertain? It's just too odd to join a forum of this magnitude in Jan 2006, and then make your 1st a joke. I know it's long ago, but I happened to see it today because others replied to it,, I saw it and I replied too, just like you did too. No harm done. But it's very wise to be very weary of defending 1st time posters on forums of this magnitude, it can give a wrong impression.
One Man's Opinion
-
I obviously must not understand the money system as I thought I knew about. During my research I learned that any paper (green backs, stocks, bonds, certificates) were not guaranteed and at any time, you could lose whatever you've put into them. I do know that about the green backs.
I know the stock market is a fraud. At least 75%+ is government owned, so you'll lose your money by investing into stocks (paper money).
I don't think diamonds are on the “gotta have” list.
I'm thinking right now to myself… and I know you know something either I don't know or I'm over-looking, but you've compelled me to research some more. It's almost like I'm in school again, and I'm told to double-check my materials and make corrections before the papers are passed in for grading. I'll look at that approach to your reply. And I'm saying it because I believe I'm missing something, and I need to correct it.
I want to ask you what it is,,, but for some reason, I need to research this out some more and post my results.
Sonik Speed, I do want to thank you for letting me know that I'm missing something. Now I need to find out what it is.
Now you got my head spinning for more research. Either way it goes, I'm thankful you brought this to my attention.
Why'd you go and do that?.. I'm going to research this until I find the answer. All I can say is just check back at this thread.
Another question, is there a particular source I should look into?
Thank you all here very much… because I need it, and I'm grateful for it too.
One Man's Opinion
-
Bing wrote on Sep 13 2006, 07:26 AM:TO ALL NEWBIES:
Both before and after the corrupt DOJ and its counterpart, the even more corrupt and lying IRS, unjustifiably attacked CH, the Fam Guardian Forums were infiltrated by under-cover IRS agents, many of whom operate behind proxy servers.
Anyway, much like Sonik Speed, my radar was and remains primed to identify persons who most likely might be IRS undercover agents posing as “regular Joe's” in these Forums. Some have chosen as their cyber names, seemingly innocent names that have their origins in the Bible. Lambchop = is Lamb of God = lamb, a docile, harmless animal — which is EXACTLY the type of non-threatening image an IRS undercover Agent would want to project. We also have in our midst, an “Apostle” = Disciple of Christ. We also have YawehLight = Yaweh/God. You get the idea. Simply review the Members listing for more info and just be prudent about who you choose to trust.
Now, Lambchop, er, I meant, Lambskin, appeared on this Forum in 2005, and in his very first ever post, he proceeded to invite ALL OF US, even though we were complete strangers, to what he labeled a “Freedom Convention”.
So, sans any kind of introduction, he wrote a very tortured, and purposefully obtusely written initial post, and he extended an invitation to all of us, to fly to Chi-Town, a/k/a the Windy City, Home of the Cubs and Bears, and attend his so-called Freedom Convention.
And then, get this, he also reminded everyone to “bring your business cards”.
Now, one of my many talents is that I pride myself in being exceptionally well qualified when it comes to applying discerning judgement to identify persons who may not be telling the Truth. Using my training and skills, I identified a plethora of notable “tells” in Lambskins posts, especially his initial post.
So, I authored a reply post in which I shared with everyone, some of the reasons why I thought that Lambchop was present in the Fam Guardian Forum under false pretenses.
I mean, we are all adults here, so who ever heard of a Conference Organizer reminding prospective attendees to “bring your business cards”??? I mean, the stupidity of such a reminder had I-R-S paw prints all over it. Only the IRS would be soooo stupid as to write something so assinine as that. This is what I call an intentional distractor, crafted to fool the reader into believing that the author of the invite, in this case, the IRS masking as Lamby was simply a “regular guy.”
In any case, for the benefit of the Fam Guardian Members, especially one of our most learned Authors, and in a genuine effort to alert everyone about “zips in the wire”, I deconstructed Lamby's posts and identified certain internal contradictions and the like and placed my thoughts in a series of posts so everyone could read what I was thinking and be forewarned.
Now, to be fair, I repeatedly asked direct questions to Lamby to share with us the nature of his “Freedom Conference”, and, interestingly enough, Lambchop never answered any of my easy questions even after he offered to share with all of us, the results of his Conference, in which he said that exactly 50 people attended.
You NEWBIES can and SHOULD read all of these opinions at http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=495
Bottom line, I can hardly be blamed for outing Lambchop, given the fact that he posted so obtusely and still, to this day, has refused to share with the Fourm, what topics were discussed at his “Conference”, who the Speakers were, etc., etc.
And, Sonik has been ever vigillent and has tried repeatedly to warn all Forum NEWBIES that there potentially are IRS moles and spies in our midst.
Finally, make no, mistake, in the Fam Guardian Forums we have collectively, some of the brightest minds in the Tax Honesty Movement. I know this. Many others know this. And rest assured, the IRS senior Managers know this too. We are an extremely effective tool that counter-balances the corrupt IRS's propaganda War Machine. And this is a key reason why the IRS has unlawfully tried to violate the First Amendment Rights of C.H.
Stated differently, this here is the BIG LEAGUES. Few of us are present merely to waste time and play. We are trying to share our personal opinions and political speech and beliefs, and to educate folks about their personal Liberty and Freedoms.
Lambchop's main problem was that his actions were incongruent from his posts, and he offered no reasonable explanation why that was so. Thus, he was tarred with the label of being a fraud and an IRS undercover agent.
We stand for Truth, Justice, Liberty, and Sovereignty and we oppose the illegal activities of the IRS and DOJ.
Grace and Peace,
Bing
I thank you Bing, and the rest of the people here. I'm so glad to know that you're all well ahead of the enemy. Haven't they figured out that when a person gets attacked, they learn how to arm and protect themselves from that point. I'm just so glad that you all here know the type of people here and you can judge their motives just by their posts. And for those that don't know, your post is just the exact same as you talking to someone. Just because they're words, don't think people can't “HEAR” what you're saying and the “TONE” of your voice… just by your “WORDS“.
Bing, you're very intellegent, and I am thankful for you because of that. You can tell by screen names, how posts are posted, and how people reply… or not.
This post makes me think about myself here… how at times I've made you all upset with me (a newbie) and I not really respecting everyones rightfulness here just to get my points across, but I knew how sorry I was and I felt so ashamed of myself, and I decided that I should go and get my self together before I make not only me, but this site a problematic situation for you all here. That's why I left. Besides, I needed to get some legal issues in order, and I knew that this is a place for help, but I needed to be part of the solution, and not the problem.
You know what Bing?,, I felt soooo relieved in my heart,, and really, really guilty when I saw your PM welcoming me back here. You really helped me get a heavy load off my chest. I actually thought I was banned when a few times, my connection was refused. I know now what it was… it was GOD giving me instructions to wait, and be patient, and tame my enthusiasm. I did.. I worked on my other sites, researched and then I ask GOD to let me come back to here, and I did. Because this is a site that has really opened my eyes, which were wide shut.
On closing, my username I use here was created by me because of the incident that happened on another forum site I was a part of, and when that (so-called) forum police… that was his title… when he told me to leave because that site was getting shut down, then telling me that his employers were thanking me for helping them out.. that made me very nervous to where I left the site. Then to find out that that so-called forum police was actually an infiltrator of the site, with either hundreds or thousands of posts to his credit (software inflation), I couldn't believe that he lied to me, decieved me, and most importantly of all, disrespected me by thwarting me away from there.
So this name I created is because now I am armed with what I need to know where ever I go online, I'm going to be thinking ahead, and protecting myself, and moving out the way so I don't get comprimised by fraudulent people. This username to me is my notice to all that see it that I'm a chess player too, as they are. That I know moves ahead, just as they do, and I know how to protect myself, just as they try to checkmate me.
Yes, I'll admit what I don't know much about,, like I mentioned in my post above that I don't know my legal rights by law, but I'm learning. But that reply that mentioned me made me feel like that person was attacking me too because I know the deal on the Trust… and he didn't want that part out in the open. I guess I'm glad that I did leave for a minute because I would have asked him to clarify what he meant when he said what he said.. about my opinion on the matter. Now that I read it… it makes me wonder….. And I know you all know this too. But when people are here… in an open forum and then post into forums and want people to PM them.. I always know that that person is trying to hide something. And although I did post that I was going to PM what I had on debit cards.. I made it openly known that I was going to PM it to the forum moderators here. I'm not giving out my resources (not that type anyway) to those IRS agents that may be here. I'm not going to give them that satisfaction.
And on a closing closing…. most information I supply here in the open, the enemy isn't going to do much about anyone who goes after it because the sources are against the actions of the enemy anyway. I gather so much information on subjects crucial to all of our well knowledge of knowing, the enemy isn't going to tread on those grounds. When I finish with my new web site, you all will have access to freely distributed FREE information that the crooked people don't want you to know about. And you'll all be legally able to obtain them too, for FREE… even the enemy can get some information they aught to know about.
Again Bing…. nice “heads up“
One Man's Opinion
-
This was quite a thread. I never heard of this one before. It wery well could be true, but I'm not going to say it is, mainly because of the statements about 9-11 makes me feel like the suggestions of what people say and know to them as facts, were somehow manipulated into illusions of the mind from mind control from the satellite. There are plenty of facts about 9-11 that are widely agreed on, and some that aren't
The beams don't seem to be affecting me. I keep touching my face and so because they actually itch.
Suppose we're all really lost in sight and not reality, like that Stephen King movie “They Live“, where you can only see the true nature of the aliens if you wore those special sun-glasses.
Technology and man is so advanced, it very well may be possible to do such. I've heard that there are “nontechs” right now that have been injected into bloodstreams of humans already. And for those that don't know what they are, they are very, very small computers that can do things to your life as you know it. Just think about it, little computers flowing around in your body, which can terminate you at any given time. I'm still researching that though.
One Man's Opinion