Charles X
Forum Replies Created
-
PeterFreedom wrote on Dec 7 2006, 09:42 AM:A cookie cutter question for anyone: how will I know what to do and when to do it? Just sent x'clent certified reply to appropriate people re: one of those computer generated gibberish. Is there a specific “if” / “then” procedural guide for me to follow as my situation unfolds and more of these notices manifest ? Yes I love the Lord my God and I will stand strongly in my legal presentment; I just don't know how to “play the game” on that level of court filings, legal procedures, and in my knowledge lack I feel exposed and unprepared. Yet sheer voume of info is daunting. As much as I KNOW that the law is written conclusively in my postion of advocacy as American National I don't want to go to jail, i.e. don't want to martyr myself.[post=”3359″][/post]You are right about the sheer volume of info it is daunting.
I might recommend Jurisdictionary, the price of their Law Course is $219 for the works.
They are also setting up law study groups for their members through out the Cities and States.
I have their law course and I think it is great.
I have been contacted about setting up a study group in my local area.
They have testimnials on their web site.
http://www.jurisdictionary.com/
I figured I would need it some day.
Here are a few links that might also help.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/
Here a few good quotes for your consideration.
indictment: The formal charge issued by a grand jury stating that there is enough evidence that the defendant committed the crime to justify having a trial; it is used primarily for felonies.
http://www.wethepeopleunited.com/Quotes.html
? To be governed is to be watched, inspected, directed, indoctrinated, numbered, estimated, regulated, commanded, controlled, law-driven, preached at, spied upon, censored, checked, valued, enrolled, by creatures who have neither the right, nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
“If there was ever a time in history to impeach a President of the United States, it would be now.” – Barbra Streisand Monday, November 7, 2005
1. “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. Miller v. U.S. 230 F 486 at 489”
2. “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them. Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).”
3. “Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. 16 Am Jur 2nd Section 177
4. “All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Marbury v. Madiso
5. “The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.” Reid v Covert 354 US l (1957)
6 “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it… No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 256
7. “When a legislature undertakes to proscribe the exercise of a citizen's constitutional rights it acts lawlessly and the citizen can take matters into his own hands and proceed on the basis that such a law is no law at all.” – Justice William O. Douglas
8. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
-
PeterFreedom wrote on Dec 7 2006, 09:42 AM:A cookie cutter question for anyone: how will I know what to do and when to do it? Just sent x'clent certified reply to appropriate people re: one of those computer generated gibberish. Is there a specific “if” / “then” procedural guide for me to follow as my situation unfolds and more of these notices manifest ? Yes I love the Lord my God and I will stand strongly in my legal presentment; I just don't know how to “play the game” on that level of court filings, legal procedures, and in my knowledge lack I feel exposed and unprepared. Yet sheer voume of info is daunting. As much as I KNOW that the law is written conclusively in my postion of advocacy as American National I don't want to go to jail, i.e. don't want to martyr myself.[post=”3359″][/post]
You are right about the sheer volume of info it is daunting.
I might recommend Jurisdictionary, the price of their Law Course is $219 for the works.
They are also setting up law study groups for their members through out the Cities and States.
I have their law course and I think it is great.
I have been contacted about setting up a study group in my local area.
They have testimnials on their web site.
http://www.jurisdictionary.com/
I figured I would need it some day.
Here are a few links that might also help.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/
-
I am sorry to say that I paid into Social Security for 50 years, and now the IRS is taking about half of it for alleged back taxes, without a Court Order I might add.
They also show my Social Security Number as a TIN.
I have Diabetes and Congestive Heart Failure at 65 years of age, there may be things I could find to do for work, but I usually can't go for more than a few hours without resting.
After 50 years of paying in and then them taking almost half, I feel like they have me down and kicking me.
My letters and Affidavit's have done no good so far.
I suppose when they take it all I get get out of SS.
They are taking my SS without a court order, which United States v. O'Dell say's they need a Court Order.
I am trying to come up with an indictment to see if that would stop them.
-
Riverway wrote on Jul 14 2005, 10:22 PM:Is a corporate officer subject to and liable for income tax and for filing returns. Any opinions?[post=”1608″][/post]
“It is very true that a corporation can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created. It exists only in contemplation of law, and by force of the law; and where the law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty.” [Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 519; 10 L.Ed. 274 (1839)]
I read somewhere that the “UNITED STATES” and the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” where corporations, so weren't they formed within the Federal jurisdiction, shouldn't they be restricted to the 10 mile square refered to in Article 1 Section 8 clause 17?
-
Riverway wrote on Jul 14 2005, 10:22 PM:Is a corporate officer subject to and liable for income tax and for filing returns. Any opinions?[post=”1608″][/post]
From the Code its self.
TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 80 > Subchapter A > ? 7806
? 7806. Construction of title
Release date: 2003-05-15
(a) Cross references
The cross references in this title to other portions of the title, or other provisions of law, where the word ?see? is used, are made only for convenience, and shall be given no legal effect.
(:cool: Arrangement and classification.
No inference, implication, or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of this title, nor shall any table of contents, table of cross references, or similar outline, analysis, or descriptive matter relating to the contents of this title be given any legal effect. The preceding sentence also applies to the sidenotes and ancillary tables contained in the various prints of this Act before its enactment into law.
-
Bing wrote on Apr 13 2006, 10:17 AM:I strongly disagree with you, Mr Sonik.
The IRS is ASSUMING that all American Citizens who have a PayPal account, also have a corresponding income tax liability under the IRC. And that is a B/S assumption on the IRS's part.
I will say this though, as the IRS expends valuable resources running after and trying to track down the millions of Pay Pal customers, it means that they will have less $$$ and resources to pursue us law abiding American Citizens, who are non-taxpayers and who, like me, lawfully do not pay any income taxes to the IRS. 😛
My view is entirely consistent with the IRS's on this.
If one is indeed a “taxpayer”, that is to say that they are subject to or liable for, an internal revenue tax, then they should not be hiding their money from the IRS, but instead should pay 100% of all the internal revenue taxes for which they are liable.
Each year, I personally pay 100% of all the income taxes for which I am liable and which are lawfully imposed upon me by enacted positive laws. 😀
If you are a “taxpayer” as that term is defined in the IRC, then you should always pay your income taxes. It is quite simple.
Me? I just happen to be a non-taxpayer, so I refuse to pay the IRS liars and thieves any money at all. 😀
Bing
[post=”2575″][/post]Bing,
I am new to this forum.
Can you tell me how to become a non-taxpayer, or at least point me in that direction as to where that information might be?