Bing
Forum Replies Created
-
For those that might be interested, over the past 10+ years, the U.S. Government Accounting Office(GAO), since renamed, Government Accountability Office (still GAO), testifies before Congress and conducts audits of U.S. government operations and agencies.
Anyway, of all the US Government operations, I would have to say that the GAO and the US Dept of Treasury Inspector General, are probably the MOST honest of all their brethern US Government agencies and operations.
Over the decades, the US GAO has written numerous reports and given testimony that together, continue very valuable admissions from the US Government.
The GAO Reports over the past 15 years on the development life cycle of the IRS decades long computer systems upgrades, and on IRS Operations generally, makes for some very interesting reading and contains good, objective insight into IRS Managerial strengths and weaknesses.
One thing is very clear, the IRS is extremely poor at succession planning.
And this management defect is very good for the THM. lol
And this defect, perhaps more than any single managerial misstep, has led to innumerable missed deadlines by the IRS's MIS vendors, as key IRS decision makers migrate back into private sector and existing relationships between IRS and key MIS partners and Prime contractors, start all over again.
This would not be such a problem if you have a good plan. The MIS workers should be inter changeable and the Plan should Move Forward, independent of the staffing. But this is not how it really is at the IRS.
And that is why there are dozens of GAO Reports critical of the IRS and their half hearted Computer Systems upgrades debacles over the past 15 – 25 years.
See:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/congress/congress_03212001.htm
-
The IRS is in a years long managerial tailspin and is racing towards irrelevency.
The entrenched upper and mid level management at the IRS has led to thinking that is too insular and is self-defeating.
The IRS got clobbered by their own IRS workers during the Hearings led by the late Senator Roth in 1997 and 1998, exposing the IRS's deep seated corruption.
No one at the IRS wants to or is willing to, accept responsibility for mistakes and errors, and this festering problem only compounds over time, and leads to even more ineffective management in the long run.
The IRS has, over the past 15 years, spent, ohh, I dunno, I guess about $8 or 10 BILLION on failed conversion of their computer system.
If you look at the IRS Directory, you can readily see the explosion in the listed positions of computer geeks who were hired to help with the migration over to BSM. The BSM is the IRS new computer systems being developed for about 5 years now. What a debacle this Systems Integration is turning out to be. It is so funny, how incompetent the IRS really is.
And their incompetency all works to our favor in the long run. we should bask in it.
When their decades old computer systems finally crash, and crash they will, it will be with a thundering THUD that will resonate throughout the Beltway and beyond, as the USG and IRS hacks will no doubt scramble to keep the American People from learning that the IRS computer systems have crashed.
Can you spell “d-i-s-a-s-t-e-r r-e-c-o-v-e-r-y”?
I will bet the IRS can't spell it.
Tens of millions of Americans no longer pay income taxes to the IRS.
Don't believe the IRS figures of 500,000. That is a blatant lie.
If you do a tree diagram of the USA Population, broken down by age group, and then compare this to the fact that only about 115 million individual tax returns were filed last year, you will quickly see that tens of millions of Americans at the prime working ages of 20 to 60, do not file a tax form.
Hmmmmm?
America's population is about 305 million, give or take. You do the math.
The IRS strategy of attacking the promoters is a failed strategy because we are so decentralized now. We have to thank the IRS for culling the THM herd and in getting the folks with lesser constitution, back into the IRS corrupt income tax system.
When the IRS issues propaganda in newspapers and scares potential nontaxpayers, and convinces them to be or remain taxpayers, lest they be punished, well, those are not folks that we want in the Tax Honesty Movement anyway, because they are weak links in our chain.
We do not want people in the THM who lack the courage of their convictions. Such sheeple do not deserve liberty.
There is no one person or group of persons, whose false arrest by the IRS will dent our movement. Not now anyway. we are far beyond that point.
The IRS missed the boat. An en masse crackdown now will only result in more publicity and will only serve to drive thousands of more folks to our websites, so they can learn the Truth and what the Law is, and what it really requires, and doesn't require.
When the IRS reaches the tipping point where they have lost all control internally over the boondoggle of a computer system, in true Hegelian fashion, they and the cabal of crooks in the Executive Branch, will manufacture a crises as they try and buy time to right the ship and hide the Truth.
Man overboard!!!
lol
The IRS defeat in the Wes Snipes trial is a HUGE victory as tons of folks will now stop paying the IRS for an income tax that no public law requires them to pay.
We must and we will, stay on course.
Full speed ahead.
Bing
-
The website is covertly funded by the IRS and the resident IRS shill is none other than DEMOSTHENES, which is the moniker used by Ms. J.J. McNabb, who is the uber poster over at the IRS website known as http://www.quatloos.com. Where she posts under the name DEMOSTHENES.
DEMO was present at the Snipes Trial.
Bing
-
Yes, the attorney for the Tax Divison at the U.S. Department of Justice admitted under oath in the T-Bow case, that the IRS was NOT an agency of the U.S. Government.
Get a copy from http://www.supremelaw.org
The Truth of the Matter is that the DOJ Trial handbook itself (please correct me if I am wrong) itself asserts that the DOJ lacks the legal authority to represent the IRS.
As a side bar, I know someone who used to sell life insurance to US Government employees. And he told me a few months ago, that when he drove to Virginia and Maryland and Washington, DC to call on prospective customers employed by the US Government, he was strictly forbidden from selling or even pitching any insurance deals to IRS employees because he was told that the IRS workers were not employed by the US Government.
Go figure.
-
I agree that the courts are and have used presumption to attack WTP and Bob Schulz. But it is also true that WTP and Bob have allowed the use of presumption, and themselves consistently failed to recognize when presumption was being used to undermine their Rights.
From what I know so far, both WTP and Bob Schulz have done a lousy job defending themselves and the fact that they allowed presumption to be used against them, without fighting hard or smart enough, is yet one more sign that the WTP leadership has dropped the ball yet again. That Bob Schulz and WTP took down the WTP website, in response to a vague court Order, is further proof that Bob Schulz is unfit to lead WTP and is in way over his head, with all this pending litigation. Bob should have stepped aside several years ago, and been made Chief Volunteer, and someone else should have been named CEO in his stead.
Despite his past successes as an attorney, I question the wisdom of relying upon the 80 year old Mark Lane, who apparently has other personal issues on his plate at the moment, to serve as Chief legal strategist and trial counsel.
Mr. Lane may have once been a pit bull inside the court room, but the reality is that neither he, nor Bob Schulz, nor the WTP leadership, have availed themselves of the new knowledge and free material available at http://www.sedm.org and http://www.famguardian.org. Now, who is responsible for that strategic gaffe?
Bob's intentions have always been honorable and good, and he is man of great courage, and his integrity is beyond reproach, but I would say that as a legal strategist and CEO, his skills are far less than one would have hoped. And the fact the he still shows up in court and says he is “pro se”, as opposed to asserting that he is “Sui Juris”, is the least of his legal woes, and is one more indication that so far as learning from his past mistakes, well, he apparently doesn't do that as well as he should or could have.
Sigh. 🙁
I blame the always invisible and ever silent WTP Board of Directors, who so far as I am aware, have yet to issue any Press Release of any kind, for not effectively discharging their stewardship and oversight responsibilities, and for not recognizing sooner, ohhh what does it matter what I think. . . . .I am only wasting bandwith with this post.
May WTP R.I.P. – – – It was an interesting and fun ride while it lasted.
Thanks for the memories, Bob. Ohhh, let us all know how the WTP move to the Washington, D.C. area is proceeding.
Bing
-
Admin wrote on Sep 14 2007, 03:39 PM:. . . You're confused.[post=”4241″][/post]
LOL 😮 yes, I was confused. Sorry.
I did, however, see the quote with ” ” in one or more SEDM Forms, next week I will look for it. I don't recall the Form numbers, as I was reading thru a bunch of stuff and can not recall where I read it. But the quote is in italics and indented.
Thanks.
Bing
-
Wolfman, also, you need to keep in mind that the IRS has an active Program in place in which they coordinate with the US Postal Service, and whenever a person moves and they fill in the USPS Change of Address Form, so their mail can be forwarded, the Post Office immediately shares this info with the IRS.
This program was established, I believe, under the false pretense that the IRS needed the new address information so they can better track down non-custodial parents who fail to pay child support.
Always remember a golden Rule of Thumb, whenever the IRS publicly declares the reason they are doing something, you can rest assured that they are lying to the American People and that their real reasons and motives, are far more nefarious.
Bing
PS. The IRS and corrupt and lying lawyers employed at the US DOJ, are every bit as bad as the Gestapo SS Police were in Nazi Germany. They may even be worse than teh SS, because they operate under the color of law as they unceasingly attack honest American Citizens whose only crime is that they are nonresident aliens not engaged in a Trade or Business.
-
Personally, I think that courts should not be allowed to even issue unpublished opinions.
Why?
Because when a Court has to resort to issuing an unpublished opinion, it generally is an indication that said Court has either violated the litigant's due process of law Rights, or they violated some other unalienable or Constitutional right.
You can bank on that.
Further, when the judiciary does not want to be held accountable to the public or to the legal community, they craftily will resort to issing unpublished opinions so as to better hide their corrupt behaviour.
There is an direct correlation between the number of unpublished court opinions issued by a Judge or a Circut Court system, and the level of corruption and malfeasance found within said Judge or said Circuit. And you can bank on that too.
What we in the THM should do, is somehow figure out how we can compile and publish, every year, every unpublished federal court opinion we can find. I found a website a few years ago, that I think, focused on just that, but I forget the url and its name.
Courts are supposed to be the last stalwart against tyranny and injustice, and to the extent they feel compelled to not publish their opinions, and they hide their public actions from public scrutiny, they violate their respective oaths of office and should be terminated forthwith.
Bing
-
The Yale Professor I am referring to is named Akhil, I think that is his first name.
Lawyers, by and large, are almost all, to a person, untrustworthy.
Lawyers excel at being disingenuos and crafty and are masters at obfuscation and creating presumptive authority and presumptive jurisdiction, where no lawful authority actually exiists.
Remember, the Office of Law Revision Counsel housed within the U.S. House of Representatives, is comprised of all lawyers and these are the folks who write the US Code.
Now, to their credit, the Office of Law Revision Counsel has has bequethed us an amazing audit trail, so to speak, and we just need to become better adept at locating and applying their trail.
As to the ongoing dispute between my esteemd cyber cohorts, Sonik and Richard, I am confident that their disagreement is grounded in the common desire to learn and seek the Truth. The only thing I can add is that when the USA Constitution was initially created, it had no formal name or title placed atop the document.
All that said, the Preamble contains the answer because it says, “. . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Bing
-
Also in the same document, 6.20, in the section under conclusions, item 7. refers to the Great IRS Hoax book as having 1,700 pages, when in fact, it is 1,983 pages as of Sept 11, 2007.
More importantly, though, under item 8.3 of the Conclusions section, the jurat refers to UCC 1 – 207. This is incorrect as the reservation of rights under the UCC has been reclassified and now appears under UCC 1 – 308. It may be worth considering referencing both sections by stating some like:
All rights reserved without prejudice, UCC 1-308, and its predecessor, UCC 1-207
It is my understanding that when making a reservation of Rights under UCC 1- 308, many courts insist that said Reservation be prominently displayed and set apart from the regular text. If such be the case, consideration should be given to enlarging the font size and making it bold type.
Bing
-
I noticed about 3 or 4 years ago, any number of errors and deficiencies with the Avalon website run by Yale Law School, so it has long ago lost its credibility with me. And when I wrote to them, they never replied or fixed their mistakes. What does that tell you.
And that so-called Constitutional law expert at Yale is at best, a shill for the ABA, and is not qualified to carry the jock straps of a couple of folks in this Forum, who are not only as learned than he, but they are more honest.
Bing
-
Great points, BOBT12. Thanks.
I agree, one makes a general appearence or they make a special appearence.
Bing
-
Richard, can you please post the url links to the Tommy Cryer case materials, including the Trial Transcript, trial briefs, Motions, etc.
I, and many others in this Fourm, I am certain, would like to read the Cryer Record.
Thanks.
Bing
-
The Pro Se trap is this:
When you make an appearance in any Court as a Pro Se, you in effect concede that the Court has in rem or in personum jurisdiction, and you in effect, become an Officer of the Court in your capacity as counsel to yourself, and this makes you subject to sanctions by said Court.
If you think the Court does not have jurisdiction, you need to make clear that you are Sui Juris and that you are not “making an appearence”.
If you understand the above, perhaps you can go and explain it to Bob Schulz, who even at this extremely late stage, when he appears in Court, still insists that he is Pro Se. 😮 Go Figure.
Bing
-
J, welcome to what is arguably the single best Web site in the entire world.
The first thing you should do is be clear on where you were born and where you are domiciled at present.
Next, read the About Us page on FamGuardian. Then go and do a search on FG of the term “trade or business scam”.
Next, go to FamGuardian website and read Chapters 1 thru 6 of the Great IRS Hoax book.
Then reread Chapters 4, 5 and 6 of the Hoax book. Really study these chapters.
Then you must determine whether you are a taxpayer who is subject to an internal revenue tax because you are engaged in a trade or business ( i.e the performance of a public office) inside the District of Columbia.
If you decide you are not engaged in a trade or business as that term is defined by the tax code at 26 USC 7701 ( a ) ( 26 ), then you may have the basis to decide that you are not liable for Subtitles A and C income taxes. Only you can decide whether you are a taxpayer or a nontaxpayer.
If you are a taxpayer, a U.S. person, and/or a statutory U.S. citizen under 8 USC 1401, you are not permitted to use either the FamGuardian website or the SEDM Website, but instead, you should consult the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov for information.
Go to SEDM.org and read the About Us page, the Copyright License Agreement, and the SEDM Membership Agreement. If you decide you are a non-taxpayer and you are not a U.S. person, even though you may have filed forms in the past that created the presumption that you are an “alien” or a “statutory US citizen”, you also may want to consider joing the SEDM Ministry.
If you decide to join the SEDM Ministry, you must voluntarily sign the Member Agreement BEFORE you can use the free SEDM educational materials.
Once you become a Member, go to SEDM Forms page, and read and study Forms 05.001 and 05 .020.
Follow the url links and read and study. Then come back here in 90 days and we can talk some more.
Good luck.
Bing