tweety
Forum Replies Created
Quote:I don't understand what is so hilarious???Well it was like this. I went on a google/images and typed “US passport” …And of all names and people on this planet, right on the first page of google search results I find a kid named Christopher Hanson..
And then I read that story Barganing with the Tooth Fairy where his father is grumping how his little son Chris wants to take all his money…. Then I used my imagination….
Read it again! Here is a hint:
father=goverment
Tooth Fairy= IRS
😀
But then again, maybe its just me and my weird sense of humor 😕
LOOOOOOOOOOL! Go again on the homepage of http://www.papascott.de
Check “Bargaining with the Tooth Fairy” here:
http://www.papascott.de/archives/2005/05/0…he-tooth-fairy/
Author #2 dont get angry or think I have something against you, or that I want to say something wrong, please, but this is soooo funny!
😆
My intention when posting this topic is not to induce general paranoia…
HOWEVER,
Check this site at http://www.readnotify.com and it will REALLY give you something to think about. Using their service, which is by the way completly legal, any 10 year old kid with basic computer skills can play this on you. He will send an email from his email account to John Doe's email adress by adding readnotify.com. For example: johndoe@mail.com.readnotify.com
GUESS WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
This service will provide the kid with the following info about John Doe:
* Date and time opened
* Location of recipient (per their ISP city / and town)
* Map of location (available on paid subscriptions)
* Recipients IP address
* Apparent email address of opening (if available)
* Referrer details (ie; if accessed via web mail etc)
* URL clicks
* How long the email was read for
* How many times your email was opened
* If your email was forwarded, or opened on a different computer
And this is just tip of the iceberg. John Doe will have no idea that someone gain acess to these informations. Privacy? There is no privacy. Good thing is that hushmail will reckognize and warn about this type of attack. Thats why I cant stress enough how important it is to use IP anonymizer
Cheers…
- Quote:Then when you send an email to your trusted friend/client using your joint hushmail account, you simply use hushmail and send it encrypted to the exact same joint hushmail account.
All emails are confined within the one, joint hushmail email account where files and emails can be jointly managed and controlled.
Of course, both parties could have separate hushmail email accounts too, but then stuff is spread over two accounts instead of being self-contained within the one account.
Not bad Bing. But not regarding safety because informations still have to flow like trough the Internet whenever an email is being sent from the pc to the same account
On the other hand however, using that method, you are actually talking and disscussing with yourself which is your RIGHT, and thats why that method is useful (ever watched Me, myself & Irene?) 😀 😉 Yep, I have multiple personality disorder and/or I like to send mails to myself because noone else does, haha
I wouldnt trust them a bit…. I went to http://www.hyperwhois.com and searched for whois info and it pointed me to the to search at http://whois.godaddy.com and this is what I've got:
Registrant:
Lagniappe Research and Investigations
9088 Southern Charm Drive
Shreveport, Louisiana 71115
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: SEARCHINGSECURE.COM
Created on: 12-May-05
Expires on: 12-May-06
Last Updated on: 13-May-05
Administrative Contact:
Hudson, Rebekah rhudson@sport.rr.com
9990 Smugglers Cove
Shreveport, Louisiana 71115
United States
(318) 795-9353
Technical Contact:
Hudson, Rebekah rhudson@sport.rr.com
9990 Smugglers Cove
Shreveport, Louisiana 71115
United States
(318) 795-9353
Then I went on google and typed http://www.searchingsecure.com in search window.
Only 3 pages on whole www link to this page.
Then I typed “Lagniappe Research and Investigations” ( registrant name of http://www.searchingsecure.com ) in google search window and guess what? It says that they are Specializing in Criminal Background Checks
🙄
But my point was this. How on Earth it is possible that under the same (identical) given circumstances (see above), a person born abroad to a one U.S. national parent can acquire nationality of a parent, while a person born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent (whether natural born or naturalized) can not aquire nationality of a parent. Isn't this discriminatory towards a U.S. citizen parent. And all that due to a lower “standards” required for U.S. national parent 😡
Or, does Sec 1408 (4) and part “national, but a not citizen, of the United States who,” actually has something to do with a location of a parent at the time of a birth of a person born abroad, and as such reflects on a status of a parent.
😕
EDIT: I see that this topic has been viewed over 520 times in the last 24 hours… 😕 If there is a page with a similar discussion and link to this topic, then post a link to that page
