Riverway
Forum Replies Created
Icallcheckmate, your statement about the WTC being a Federal holding may or may not be wrong. All real property has title, being recorded in the various county jurisdictions around the country. One would look up the parcel number to see who has ownership. The only caveat to this would be a privatly owned building with a lease agreement to the Feds. I don't know what the legal ramifications would be to that one.
Perhaps some here would know that answer.
- Quote:(Also, how do you know this was posted to be entertainment for us by another persons' post? How do you know if that the poster may really believe that or not?)
Just one mans opinion.
Quote:(I'm not the one to judge, but you already strike me as someone who is either that poster, using more than 1 usernmae, or you know that poster and not saying so,)You're free to be struck however you choose. I'm not intelligent enough to come up with the theory that jokester espoused.
(your post gives me the impression that you're somehow not on the level here.)
You stated you're not the one to judge, why are you judging then?
Look, I really don't care if you think I'm on the level or not. I don't live my life based upon other peoples opinions. I say what I say based upon what I believe, period.
Am I the only one to sense the “tongue in cheek” with that post?? Come on, that was for entertainment purposes only!
In regards to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8, it's my understanding this pertains to the power of congress (or it's delegated authority) to grant patents for a limited time. I could be wrong, but I am in involved with this at the moment.
Got mine a few weeks ago without SSN.
Author 2 and Sonic, I have followed this string with anticipation and have watched you both offer solid case law and logical construction with AndyK. (Not that I am any expert on these matters!) I don't want to jump on the bash AndyK bandwagon, but what you have seen him do here, with the dodging and obfuscation is what I percieve his employer and associates routinely use as an operational method.
What a crystal clear example. Good job, guys!
Sonic Speed wrote:
If the above two worked for me, then I do not see why the Passport will not work. My next area is the Passport (although I do not travel much). I am not an advocate of the “Birth Certificate” of being some sort of government chattel. Personally I am just not persuaded with enough evidence, therefore will provide it if needed. My whole purpose is to not disclose an SSN and to show that I am a non-Federated citizen.
Sonic, have you begun the process of applying for a passport yet? And if so, what has your experience produced?
Does the IRS RRA 1998 apply to this one?
1- Does the Internal Revenue Service have a specific court order, statute, Executive order or reorganization plan?
Sonic, I watched the Russo film, and I was underwhelmed. I was hoping for more substance, and I left with a ho-hum indifference.
I suppose some of it was the depth of knoweledge and understanding I see displayed on the few forums I visit, compared to the depth displayed on the film.
Perhaps the film is geared more to the ignorant (of subject matter).
Just one man's opinion.
Thanks, Author #2.
Just wanted to let you know, it still says “last update 3-22-05”
Sonic, I just wanted to wade back in this topic if I could. Apparently Lambchop thinks discussing the word of God is futile. I'll let him (or her or it) live with that, but I think it is very worthwhile!
Revisiting the question about the Father, Son, Holy Spirit being three seperate persons, I find this:
N.A.S. John 16:13-15. But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak, and will disclose to you what is to come…..
Now, all I can offer is my opinion (which is worthless), and scripture (which is priceless)! In the above mentioned passage, there is certainly a clear distinction of the Holy Spirit as a seperate person or entity as written.
The way I personally view the persons of God as discribed in the Greek of the New Testament, is that of a corporation. All three being representative and the embodiement of truth and holiness, all three being co-equal. to whatever capacity they have established or determined.
I may be way off base, according to some previous posts, but that is the way I reconcile it.
The reality of this all, is that there a few among the many who see trouble ahead, and this allows the few to prepare. What else can those who understand the times do?
Most people scoff and consider this foolishness.
I sure don't disagree with you!
rattler14 wrote on Mar 3 2006, 11:12 AM:Syzmanski is disinfoFor a great example, read the article here.
http://wingtv.net/thorn2006/syzmanski2.html
He mixes truth with some really really stupid things, thereby giving the opponent the easy straw man to attack and discredit the whole movement. The 9/11 movement (as well as other movements like the tax honesty movement) are rife with such unwanted individuals.
If you disagree with me, that's fine. But I don't trust the guy, especially since he has not apologized or retracted any of his sensationalistic stories that have been proven to be completely false.
Riverway wrote on Mar 3 2006, 08:54 AM:“Tall White creatures” ???? Yeah, right!Look, a lot of this story is plausable, govt. bringing down the buildings etc., but the tall white creatures pretty well does it for me.
[post=”2331″][/post][post=”2332″][/post]“Tall White creatures” ???? Yeah, right!
Look, a lot of this story is plausable, govt. bringing down the buildings etc., but the tall white creatures pretty well does it for me.
How about starting another site w/a name similar to Quatloos to debunk the fake debunkers at Quatloos, draw in legitimate questioners, and spread the truth about this big tax scam?
