[reb]

Bing,

You have stated:

Quote:

But in my view, Lane's biggest mistake is that so far as I know, he never filed a Motion under Rule 201, of the Federal Rules of Evidence, requesting the lower D.C. Court to Judicially Notice Specific Facts.

Parties to a lawsuit are allowed to request the Court to Judicially Notice Certain facts, and when the Court does so, the Court is REQUIRED to incorporate each of the judicially noticed facts into the Jury Instructions and inform the Jury that each of the Judicially Noticed Facts are conclusive. This is legal strategy in action, folks. But the best part is that the Judge essentially has no discretion and must judically notice certain facts, if so requested.

That was a strategic blunder of epic proportion by Lane & Company, because Lane & Co. missed their single best opportunity to frame the legal landscape and to get certain facts admitted into evidence. Sorry Mark, there simply was no excuse for dropping the ball on that one. None.

Here is what Rule 201 states:

I have snipped the rest of your quote for brevity, although it is quite important.

Should I understand from your writing that if the defendant asks the court to take judicial notice of a specific section of the Congressional Record as it relates to declaring 26 USC #7201 does not identify an income tax violation, that the court must do so ??? Reference http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=937

Reb.

[reb]

It appears the last ten pages regarding the status of indictments that do not identify a crime were beyond the length limit. Do you wish them to be posted ???

reb

[reb]

I believe Sonik has detected the method of how the fraudulent scheme was installed:

Sonik Speed wrote on Oct 21 2006, 07:25 PM:

>Theoretically speaking, the “x+1” can probably be paid by some other non-note >circulating collateral, because it has to come from somewhere.

When the system was installed in 1913, the FRN was in circulation with US Notes backed by specie. Domestic redemption for specie ceased in 1932. International redemption was terminated by RMN. Since 1972, only x is in circulation.

The contract, since 1972, appears to exhibit clear marks of fraud. It is impossible to repay (x + 1) when only X exists. A contract that is impossible to terminate or complete is void, is it not ?? The self-destruction of the Federal Reserve system has been diagnosed at http://usa-the-republic.com/items%20of%20i…Bankruptcy.html

The federal budget increased 7.2 % last year but the interest on the national debt increased 15%. Interest on the national debt is an exponential growth. The more the debt increases, the interest obligation increases even faster. Where do I file an Action ??

$8 trillion does not exist, unless Leo Wanta is for real.

Reb

[reb]

Bing,

Remind me to never irritate you.

Reb

[reb]

Sonik Speed has observed Title 1, Section 1 includes the following defination:

” the words ''insane'' and ''insane person'' and ''lunatic'' shall include every idiot, lunatic, insane person, and person non compos mentis.”

How many of those terms would apply to congresscritters ?? 😕

Reb

[reb]

Bobt12 has observed our constitution includes:

.”…No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Depts”

It appears to be a real shame our forefathers did not mandate “No state shall accept anything but gold or silver coin as payment for taxes.” It would have put the states in charge of protecting a sound economy.

Maybe next time.

Thanks for the welcome. 🙂

reb

[reb]

Sonik Speed has written:

“The Federal Reserve System is COMPLETELY a legal forum of quasi-organization. It was LEGALLY created by a corrupted, super-rich, power-hungry Congressmen in the early part of the 20th Century. Congress indeed has the power to CREATE private or non-private organizations giving them authority over anything that is within the jurisdictional bounds of Article 1, Section 8 or throughout the entire union by relying solely upon the “general welfare” clause of the Constitution.”

Let us reflect a bit on this.

The operation of the Fed is for every $ of deficit spending by Congress, the Fed will receive a Bill, Bond, or Note in the amount of $ for which the Fed will honor checks drawn on the checking accounts of the US up to the amount of $.

Congress agrees to pay back to the Fed $ upon the expiration date plus interest over the time span.

It must be noted the amount of money created on the accounting books of the Fed is $ (principle) but the amount to be repaid is $ plus interest. Every $ in circulation is created by a $ of principle. The interest does not exist. The only way it can be achieved is to issue more debt, but that means more interest will be due. The interest on the national debt grows exponentially but cannot be paid. If all the $ in the world were used to purchase Bills, Bonds, and Notes, all the $ would be in the vaults of the Fed and a debt in the amount of all the interest since 1913, compounded, would still be due the Fed.

It is an impossibility to repay the National Debt. It is a fraudulent Ponzi scheme.

Is it not a fundamental premise of law that a contract based upon fraud is void from its inception ???

Reb