prollins
Forum Replies Created
Thank you for the clear and informative explanation, I do appreciate the effort taken to answer the question and feel that the response was appropriate and exact.
The forum rules state that members should not challenge the validity of the Holy Bible.
“10. Challenge the validity of the Holy Bible or its value as a law book”
This post seems to be a challenge to the validity of the Holy Bible, or I am not reading the article correctly. Is the validity of the Bible in question in this thread? There are other really good writings regarding apostle Paul, Jesus, etc. if this is open to discussion.
My understanding is that a member can be a non Christian and still participate.
I was a full Christian when I first visited the FG site years ago. I left Christianity and also the parent Judaism/Talmudism religions as a result of what I learned on this very website, even though the Bible is quoted throughout the ministry.
Well, my attachment thing is not working, or I am not working it correctly. I have not added an attachment before so maybe I am doing it incorrectly. I keep getting a file not selected even though I did. Anyway…
Some of the wording is as follows…
Quote:People cannot voluntarily end their participation in the program. The payment of Social Security taxes is mandatory, regardless of the citizenship or place of residence of either the employer or the employeeThis part still kills me because it does not say citizenship status, but citizenship.
I know that they qualify it with “of either the employer or employee”, which are special legal terms used to confuse the ordinary, but it still made me laugh.Of course what government doc would be complete without the “working in the United States” line…
Quote:Everyone working in the United States is required to pay Social Security taxes.Quote:The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security system…..and mandatory individual participationThey don’t tell you that nobody is an “individual” until they participate.
The author of that site is a fraud. Like admin said, the author refuses to give any information and is hiding behind the name of Edmund Burke, a statesman from the 1700's if I remember correctly. What a shameful existence. Especially when the author states the following…
Quote:You may post anonymously, and if you care to communicate with me personally, my private email is molyneuxrevealed at gmail.com…as if that is really a way to communicate personally, with a non private email. 😡
Amazing story, thanks for posting. I will dig further when I can make the time. I have lived in Canada, had a sister born there, and also lived for seven years on a Native American indian reservation. I have seen the results of how the PTB thinks and acts toward these people, and it is disgusting.
I will be checking out his webpage as well.
I agree with Franklin. In fact I have been implementing this in my daily life, and it is very effective, especially when you use the word “consent” calmly and clearly, and also the words “choose” and “choice”.
The power of the government is also the government's biggest weakness=====CONSENT. Most think that the government's biggest strength is force or arms or the military, which is false. The military is only as strong as the men and women consenting to serve in that military.
Pull the plug on the consent, and the entire thing evaporates.
If the states want to stop the federal spending and make this thing end, simply don't write the check this month or next month until the budget is balanced.
If the airlines have no passengers because everybody is simply NOT flying to avoid the TSA, then the problem would solve itself in short order.
If everybody stopped filing 1040 and filling out W-2 paperwork, it would end instantly.
If the entire population of Texas mailed their driver's license back to the government, then nobody would need to have one.
I could go on forever, but Franklin is correct. Stop fighting, start living, and simply say “NO”.
Thanks for this post.
In addition to the above regarding phone security, I have heard 😉 of another simple phone security tactic that has been used, not to keep the police from getting the info, but to make whatever info more difficult to link to the man or woman that is being investigated or detained.
Several individuals open phone accounts, or one individual opens an account with multiple lines for the number of people that will be using the phones. If there are three phones, the phones are then exchanged among the other people involved.
Each man or woman, upon receiving the phone, types in a NAME on the phone information that is different than what they are normally called by or named.
Upon arrest or interrogation, the NAME on the phone does not match the NAME in the computer for that man or woman. The account on the phone is not the same as the NAME on the phone or the NAME in the computer for that man or woman.
Even if the prosecutors or law enforcement know who the man or woman is, and who the account holder is, having this type of run around in front of a jury is enough to cause some confusion.
Example:
Alan, Bob, and Chuck open three different accounts and receive their phones. The phones are exchanged up the line alphabetically with Alan receiving Chucks, Bob receiving Alan's, and Chuck receiving Bob's.
Alan types Danny in for owner information, Bob types in Eric, and Chuck types in Frank.
Chuck goes through a license check, he is a National and has no need for a license. The police are trying to find any reason to arrest him, or do arrest him and want to find out his NAME, which he can't give them because he has never been given a NAME by the STATE. The police get his phone and look at the owner information and it says Frank Johnson, and they look under that name. Even after they get to the station and look up the number, because they can't find Frank Johnson in the computer, they see that the phone account in registered to a Bob Smith. And the fingerprints that are on file for the man that they have in custody are for a Chuck Graham.
The police are going “HUH?”, and good luck working all this out on the stand in front of a jury of the average citizen that does not want to be there anyway. It might take days to get phone records released, and in that time you just might be released. In traffic checks, when the road starts to clog, or the turn off starts to clog, they tend to lose interest because they are not going to spend a ton of time when they don't think they will get a return on their investment from a big ticket type of offense. This is also somewhat effective in front of the commissioner that is acting like a judge in traffic court.
In addition to this, you might have also happened to send yourself, or to yourself in another NAME, some type of mail that seems to be from a business, or any other “professional” type of entity. This mail might seem to be, from the outside looking in 😉 , a response to a job application or something similar. This mail might be carried in the car, where you do not claim it as your own, but allow it to be found by the over eager law enforcement personnel that are eagerly looking for that quick score.
Cops don't like doing footwork, not for small things that are not crimes, so making them WORK to prove their case is not enjoyable for them, and since this is a police state, they can harm you or let you go at their discretion.
The government likes to confuse with fake names and addresses and things that are similar. They are very susceptible to their own techniques, and do give up often.
I do not advise these types of techniques, I simply wanted to comment that I had heard of others doing this with some successes. 🙄
Thanks for the link.
In the interest in defending God, and His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, I offer the following video regarding David Icke. The video gives information regarding David Icke's beliefs and who he gets his information from for his concepts and ideas. It is my belief that David is Luciferian, and his concepts of theosophy should be acknowledged and treated as such.
Thank God that she is out and healthy.
Thanks for the update.
HAHA! 😆 Amen to the above!
Unreal.
Signed and sent.
- Quote:3. Be advised that we don't want our materials used in connection with the use of marijuana because we don't want to be associated with the use of illegal or harmful substances.
I am not sure how to take this statement. I would not want to associate anything that I had helped to create or maintain with druggies, but just like personal income taxes, cannabis prohibition applies to some, but is not illegal for others. If we defend proper statutory construction, and word usage and word definitions, then cannabis is not illegal for everyone and in fact, the argument regarding the definition of “person” in each state code and federal code would show this to be true.
Another idea or thought or concept that is promoted either on this site, or in information linked to on this site, is that all law should pass the test of constitutionality. Cannabis prohibition fails this test because the government does not have the right to regulate what the private people put into their bodies by their own free will.
Also, it took a Constitutional amendment to prohibit alcohol, and another one to lift that prohibition. Cannabis has had neither, and looking into the law and the code and the regs will show this to be almost exactly the same scam that is used regarding income taxes, or most interstate commerce encroachments by the federal government. These cannabis laws ONLY apply to government and their officers, or anyone that is registered to receive government benefits in a program. The Controlled Substances Act reads almost word for word from Wickard v. Filburn, which is a very telling clue about the CSA and who it is for and enforceable against.
In addition, with 50 years of cannabis research into the medical benefits of this particular plant, the implication of the above post that cannabis is harmful is not telling the entire story about cannabis. The list of reputable studies that applaud cannabis as a wonderful and amazing medical miracle is a long one. When we think of harm, we must remind ourselves of the maxim of law that states that abuse does not negate proper use.
If association with cannabis is a negative for this ministry, then I can live with that as policy. I am not here to champion the cannabis cause. However, I am here for truth, and the truth is that cannabis is not illegal for all, and is only harmful if abused. And in the case of abuse, cannabis is less harmful that water or potatoes, both of which can be used in excess to cause death, which is a characteristic that cannabis does not have. This means that the “harm” from cannabis is one of emotional or psychological addiction. These types of addiction can be seen in food, sex, video games, and alcohol.
It would seem like anyone using the knowledge of what they had learned here about law and government would be admired for holding government accountable to their own laws, regardless of what that topic happens to be. Uncovering and exposing the truth in law regarding any part of this horrible luciferian beast matrix that is waging war against God and His humanity should be commended.
This is my opinion right now, but I might feel differently tomorrow.
Thank you for posting these articles from Chuck Baldwin. I greatly appreciate his insight and message.
I am not quite sure I would PERSONALLY want to live that close to Yellowstone. I see that area as a ticking timebomb. Montana is a great place to live, I was there for seven years.
I am pretty sure that I posted previously about the September Clues movie and site. As an update, the site homepage can be found HERE.
The purpose of this post is to direct anyone interested to the September Clues “VICSIM” report, which details the author's research into the 3000+ victims, or as he calls them, vicSIMS. His detailed analysis of the names and numbers shows some very interesting things that he believes proves how the 3000+ victims are all simulated identities.
The 80 page report is not a hard read, but does go into great detail, and should be appreciated by some here at FG. It is a great read.
He has also done some Youtube videos about the face morphing technology that was used to create the faces of the victims, and how that technology is available to the public a decade later. He has done a great job of analysis on the 9-11 hoax.
Hey FF89,
Some caveats….follow the Path to Freedom if you are not, this is not advice, and just my opinion…
If I were in your position, I would not give up trying with this company. If Human Resources is the problem, then go straight to them and try there, it is always harder for them to tell you “NO” face to face, and easier through the boss.
In doing this you can then ask them for an official letter stating that they are denying you because of no social, which SHOULD make them pause. If you get that letter, you can respond (which you might do first) with any appropriate documentation about WHY you cannot legally have a SSN, and how them discriminating against you is a violation of their law. The letter from them to you is great evidence of that discrimination if you decide to push them.
You can always ask them to pay you as an independent contractor and then correct them later if they send you a 1099 of any kind.
There are lots of information online about how to handle this, and how to live without a SSN. Don't give up at the first “NO”.
I know that they qualify it with “of either the employer or employee”, which are special legal terms used to confuse the ordinary, but it still made me laugh.