particlefield
Forum Replies Created
I saw Vatican and petabytes and was like, WHAT! that was out of context. Who’da thought digitise and digitize meant the same thing. Digitise just sounds more enticing.King’s English will be the death of me.
This belongs in the humor section
“Without the Gospel, the world would be steeped in dark paganism.”
What is the meaning of this? The Gospel is full of pagan stuff for example, yin yang, masculine and feminine. We read in Issiah 66:11 That ye may suck, and be satisfied with the breasts of her consolations; that ye may milk out, and be delighted with the abundance of her glory. This being a reference to ZIon[New Jerusalem]; and verse 13 As one whom his mother comforteth, so will I comfort you; and ye shall be comforted in Jerusalem.
We read the nurturing aspect of Christ here. This chapter is much like Revelation 12 and the later half. Should God ravage them for wanting to live in harmony with nature, and spare them which believe in him and make the whole world to suffer? Why are you so quick to judge when the elect are to be long suffering [Colossians 3:12] as the Lord [2 Peter 3:9]. Do not mistake the Dark and Fearful Master as one that can ever be fully understood for he is the God of mystery. If you believe believe God has a plan for you, should you not also believe God has a plan for them and the rest of the world. Create or allow the problem and then offer yourself as the solution. Does this sound familiar yet?
I played this game with one of my angels since I had strong supporting evidence that this was the one the bible calls Moses, and got owned by the response:
“If I gave you my name, it wouldn’t be my name anymore.”
I was like, I’m stealing that one.
How much does the feather of truth weigh? We still use these idioms. Weighting heavy on one’s soul; lighthearted. How about the law of conservation of energy? If the lamb takes away the sins of the world where does that energy go? Is this an impossible force paradox? How can something which can never be wrong take on all that which is wrong? Was he or was he not forsaken? Matthew 27:46 If he is never wrong then he is forsaken.
None of these explain why the papacy is woman though. The confusion is that the pope who is said to be Peter is masculine. There is a key term to understand here called the papal tiara, which the pope wears. There is another video that illustrates this concept well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0eAL6oE4Tc
There’s a story being told here. We see it again with how the laws of this country are feminine and the one in charge of the sovereigns of the nations is to protect those laws[the female] as president[king of kings].
It’s interesting in one of the videos about the study of prayer being less beneficial to recovery according the STEP project. I’ve heard those studies go the other way as well. Here’s an example comparing the two: http://health.howstuffworks.com/wellness/natural-medicine/alternative/prayer-healing1.htm
The sun lore in these videos is way off and based on the zeitgeist idea. It’s thought this women clothed with the sun is the same woman is the harlot. Better get some brain wash and scrub that thought. Once you get the symbolism you realize what this actually represents, tell yah what, I’ll put something together on this just for this site as the theme is family guardian just as Isis in mythology is regarded as the protector of family.
1 Corinthians 15 verse 40 in particular talks about terrestrials.
Then this just dawned on me. In John chapter 14 did Jesus give us usufruct to his name? Sure enough it does and validates what I just said. Now I know why the priest and warlocks fear. I see the true meaning in Isaiah chapter 14. What are we if not forsaken.
Don't forget the internet is a WMD (weapon of mass disruption). Obumer said so
Without divulging where my sources come from to protect my own identity, I can't help but wonder if the alien false flag will be the instrument blamed for a potentially more dangerous real threat. My sources have told about Stanford University's special projects division, at least that what it used to be under, was working on cognitive influence external to one's body. If ever, meeting the neighbors, was on the table with the world like it is, it would be so under the weaponization of this development. The globalist may be implementing the demise of this planet, but it would be naive for anyone to think they would stop there.
I couldn't agree more with what you have said. I think the key idea you mentioned was, “behind the scene message.”
This is what is called pseudoscience. There is no credible scientific article in this article or any of its sub-articles. I was also looking to see if there was an agenda. If there is one it’s just to demonize porn. I thought there would be some add somewhere trying to sell a pill, but little bit of unrelated scientific information stating otherwise. Honestly I thought I would see something in an article at least talking about the effects of alcohol and erectile dysfunction. The article did talk about the increased need for more exotic forms of porn being a key factor. This seems to be more likely where the issue is and not jerking off. I don't understand what the deal is there. This is probably due to a much greater understanding of the chi as it is called in some arts than the average Joe who doesn't even know who Semyon Kirlian or Franz Mesmer were or did. It's supposed to be common knowledge buy now, but I’ll digress if I get into that.
I know for myself how powerful this energy can be in attraction and it supports the fact even with all the science we have there have never been any human pheromones found unlike animals. It is widely known in all major schools of thought that these energies concentrate in energy centers all over the body. I have come up with some very easy ways to demonstrate the effects to these simple truths to just about anyone. I do not have enough knowledge to balance the energy centers associated with sexual dysfunction, but then again I have never had to.
I’m curious though. The article said that when they had the test subjects not thinking sexual thoughts and trying to get off if they could get it up and the answer is no, I would have to question the method that was used. If I tell you not to think about pink elephants I know for a fact you are going to be thinking about pink elephants. It is not possible to not think of something. The other possibility is the presumption that men should be walking around pitching tent all the time. The whole thing is completely ridiculous. Mathew 7 tells among other things to not judge or you shall be judge to the extent that you have judged. To suggest that masturbating to porn or even a spank bank is immoral you should be asking yourself if this is right for me and not what is right for some one else. If you’re in a relationship with someone and your partner is masturbating, that’s something you can discuss, if you have a contract with them. You might want to even discuss such acts in the nature of your contract, Mathew 5:32 he who divorces his wife except for marital unfaithfulness commits adultery.
I don't mind articles like these. It was actually a slander in a sense that I even found out about sovereignty. It was the worst kind too. I heard sovereign are terrorist. I was thinking to myself well if that’s true I had better find out what it is. I even watched that CBS special on sovereign citizens about them being paper terrorist. It cracks me up some of the stuff people make up. I’m naturally inquisitive and haven’t been able to change that. The article does mention some very interesting topics, but the general tone of the report is shut up questions are bad, now follow the herd like a good sheeple like me.
Right in the beginning the quote is thrown out there “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” -Benjamin Franklin If it pleases the court please describe why he said this or at least why the name is associated with the quote. What I have come to realize is that a tax is a privilege in each instance I have looked into it. My biblical understanding of death is that there have been 2 accounts of some one never dying, Moses and Enoch. Please correct me if I am wrong. It is puzzling to me though as I recall the story of Adam and Eve. Sorry I do not have my references handy. God told Adam and Even they would die if they partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The wise one deceived them and told them they would not die. Without getting into a very controversial story in the Christian community, God told them they would die that day and they did. There are other places in the Bible that talk about how long a day with God is. As interesting as the story goes, I would have to create a long document and post it somewhere else to not take away from this one.
The next thing the article slanders is the use of punctuation in capital letters. I found and interesting document talking about this kind of wording termed Capitis Diminutio Maxima. This article talks about the different ways things are spelled and why http://loveforlife.c…ant-information
The subject briefly touched upon about a name being copyright is an interesting but potentially flawed concept considering the number of people with the same name. The subject of trademarks, copyright, and patents is of some interest to me and I know its mentioned in the constitution.
Reading on its is quite apparent that whom ever wrote the article thinks Webster is the master dictionary and all works must adhere to common terms. Even when the writer lists the definition for State in the tax code, without citing it though, the reader is presumed to be so dumb down that it is now logical to say, “The IRS says this is the definition it doesn’t apply to you, but do it anyway.”
Are there too many stars on the flag? The right answer would be which flag. There are several different ones. The real question might be, “What flag should be flown higher?”
I thought the missing persons idea was amusing in terms of a police report. That reminded me of I guy I work with that said he tried to claim his dog as a dependant.
I don’t know and the article doesn’t say where the idea that money has to be gold and silver came from. The constitution doesn’t say it has to be so someone made up that idea. There is some definite legitimacy to asking the question about what a dollar is. http://www.theatlant…a-dollar/71944/ This article outlines a standoff between Senator Ron Paul and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. Ron Paul asks Ben Bernake what a dollar is. Bernanke basically says the truth of all things. A dollar is what a dollar will buy. I wish I had the video link I saw once were Ron Paul grills him and asks why the Fed is hoarding the gold and silver. Bernanke’s response was, “Its tradition.” As for the symbol for a dollar, I feel like a total tool for not realizing one of the S’s has 1 vertical line and the other has 2 vertical lines. Now that I think about it I don’t really know what either means for sure.
I'm curious how this turned out. I often wonder if businesses sign a contract with the government somehow with the “business license” stating that they will not contract with anyone other than government employees. The post caught my attention because I have heard of Papa John's Pizza, but I thought they merged with Murphy's Pizza years ago to make Papa Murphy's Pizza.
I don't fully understand the use of the comma. Even in college I was never educated to some of the implications it can have that are claimed here. Can I get a credible link or at least know what key words I need to put into a search engine or ask about at a law library.
