lambskin
Forum Replies Created
Sonik,
If you're a kindergartner, then you have to start somewhere and children have to be taught from the git-go. You can't have it both ways. Either you want a full explanation or you don't and if you do want a thorough explanation, then don't expect it to be done in eight lines or less.
I'll answer b) first.
God created the earth and everything else in 6 days. On the 6th day he created the first humans. After that, there were millions of 'em and they were terrible. So, he flooded the earth and wiped 'em all out. Despite this action, they were all his and they were considered to be all the same except for their differences in appearance.
Noah, his wife, his sons and their wives repopulated the planet after the flood. These people were all the same and he accepted them all the same. Then the first division was made when he split them up by language. They now not only looked different but they communicated differently. He did this because men had continued the corruption that he'd just wiped out and something had to be done about it.
After this he made another division. He chose one decendant from one of the families to carry on in his teachings and that was Abraham and his wife. Since all of mankind was still basically the same, except for the languages, he gave Abraham the sign of “circumcision” to separate him from the rest of humanity; nobody was cutting off the foreskin of their privy members prior to this date and nobody was going to do it except Abraham and his clan because nobody was aware of the practice except Abraham and anybody who found out about it later and tried to copy it would've been destroyed. God wasn't going to allow any imposters.
Everything went as well as could be expevted for a long time until it was time for his people to move out of Egypt and into the land that God had promised them. Right after they left Egypt they doubted everything that God had done for them and God had Moses give them “The Law” so they would understand that they needed God to bring about their salvation because they couldn't do it themselves. In other words, it was going to be done his way or no way at all.
This is that “wall” that was built. He built a wall between his people and everybody else on the face of the planet. Anybody that was to gain salvation had to now get it through his chosen people in the way that God had prescribed for it to be done. Everybody had to be circumcised and they had to join themselves to his “nation” of chosen people. They could still speak differently but they had to worship God according to the method that he'd devised and the only ones that were allowed to perform the worship services were the Israelites.
These guys (the Israelites) did fine for a while but then they started to abuse their position of superiority and they started to teach that it was okay to accept other gods so, God came to earth in the flesh (Jesus Christ) and gave them another chance to repent but when they refused to accept him as their “Messiah” he did what is now considered the ultimate sacrifice for sin, he died on the cross for all of mankinds sins.
Even after this, he gave them an opportunity to accept him and what he had done but they refused this offer as well. This is when he changed the program. He took another guy (the apostle Paul) and sent him into the other “nations” (Gentiles) and permitted them to take the “word” of his (Gods') salvation to the rest of the world. The superiority of the Israelites (Jews) had been taken away from them. Nobody had to join them in the former methods of worship or be circumcised to be accepted by God. All that is required for forgiveness of sin is acceptance; when any human accepts God, God accepts them. All ya gotta do is ask. No sacrifices, no circumcising, no tithing, no rituals of any type at all. Just admit that you're a sinner, that you believe you need forgiveness and that you believe he died and rose from the dead. That's it.
That's why we have the different “religions”. Everybody wants everybody else to believe that their “religion” is the “right” religion and everybody has a hard time accepting that it doesn't matter which religion you choose or which “church” you choose to become a member of doesn't matter; we're all his children and we've all gotta answer to him in the end. You ain't gonna do it yourself and if you think you've got all the answers, then you've got a problem 'cause, one day, you're gonna find out how mistaken you were.
Answering question c) partially involves the same process God used to subvert the Jews authority or their “standing” in his church.
When he gave them this position of authority he also gave them the ability to do things that no other humans could do. When God wanted to prove to people that they were dealing with a man of superior abilities, then he would have one of his chosen people (usually a prophet) do something that would prove to these other people that they were dealing with “a man of God”. So, God would permit his prophet to do something miraculous. The ability of these men to do these things were known as the “sign gifts”. God would give the ability to do these things to these men. They didn't possess the ability themselves, they had to get it from God and they only got it when they asked him. When they asked him, they were proving to God that they believed he was able to do what they asked, no matter what it was they were asking him for.
There were a lot of men who believed in God and therefore, there were a lot of men that God chose to write down the words that he would give to them. They were writing down the words that God would send via his Spirit. One of the reasons he had the men write it down was because they refused to accept the words that God had written. That happened at mount Sinai. So, he had men write down his words and those words are the words that we have in the bible. We don't get any more miracles or other proofs of his existance because humans have and keep refusing his superiority. People are just too proud to admit that he exists and that his knowledge and his way of doing things is far more superior to anything we have or will ever be able to imagine. We can't do squat without him.
If God was to take away his life sustaining “creation” or process, we'd all cease to exist. He left his words so that we could understand him and his superiority and if yopu choose to deny his words, then you've denied him and if you deny him, he denies you. Take it or leave it.
And as for a), what else can be said? Read the words that he's given you to help you understand him and he'll appreciate that. If you're having trouble understanding his existence or the “form” of his existence as it is described to you by men who read his words, then pick up his book and study it yourself because that's all that really matters anyway. It's between you and him and that's it. Nobody can do it for you. You're only proving it to him and to yourself and that's where you'll find your own level of satisfaction. I don't know why anybody would have it any other way.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Sonik,
You said I “make you sick” and that Apostle is “a liar”. Both of these statements are true. The reason I make you sick is because I'm a man and the reason Apostle is a liar is because he's a man. All men are liars. All men are capable of the most despicable things that anyone can imagine. It's up to the individual to decide what he wishes to participate in, what he wants to do. It's also up to the individual to pick what he believes in. We basically have 2 things to believe in; the world and all things in the world, including other men, or God.
I'll take God.
I've lived long enough to understand what the world has to offer and question my, or any other mans', existence and I've lived long enough to understand what God has got to offer and question his existence.
The questions are, “Who am I, what am I doing here, how did I get here and where am I going?”
The answers are, “I am me, I'm living on this planet, I was born into existence and (at the time) I don't know.”
I then had to decide whether the answers that men were giving me were correct and explained everything or whether or not there was something more; some better answers to all my questions, something more appealing, that made more sense.
You asked about “Faith”. Let me ask you this, “What is faith?”
Faith is believing in something. All men have to decide what they want to believe in. If you like the answers the world has to give you, then believe in that. If you prefer the answers that God has to give you, then believe in those. Either way, you have to have faith. You have to believe what men tell you is the truth or you have to believe what it said in the bible. The choice is yours.
As far as the Jew/Christian nexus goes, they are “one” in Christ. He (God) is the one that determines which is which. When he decides to tell us when the Jews are distinct from the Christians, then that distinction is made. When he decides that the distinction no longer exists, then we're all the same; there is no diversity, we're all “one”. That “oneness” is what we have today. We're all Christians today. The line of distinction has been eliminated.
The bible calls this line of distinction the “middle wall” and it tells us that this “middle wall” has been broken down. If the “wall” no longer exists, then the separation or line of distinction no longer exists. There's no more barrier. There's nothing to keep us from joining together and worshiping him as “one” church. We're all “one” in him. All men, Jews and Gentiles alike. There's no more circumcised and uncircumcised. Everybody is the same, whether they're circumcised or not.
If you want to have your foreskin removed, go ahead; he accepts you. If you don't want to have this particular piece of your anatomy removed, then don't do it; he could care less, you're still his child. It doesn't matter if you don't have any legs, feet, toes, fingers or a nose; all ya gotta have is an ear. You have to be able to hear what he's saying to you and when you listen to what he says and do as he's instructed, then you've shown him that you believe in him and that you believe he has gone to the cross and died for your sins (all those dispicable things that you're capable of) and that he rose from the dead. When you tell him that you believe that he has done this, then you're telling him that you believe that he's capable of raising the dead and if you believe that he can resurrect the dead then you're saying you believe he can do anything and if he can do anything, then he must be God.
As far as “polytheism” goes, the answer is no; this is not what I'm saying. The only way I can think of explaining it is comparing it to us, to men. Men have a body, a spirit and a soul. Three equal parts that have to exist together in “one” being. If you lose one, then the other two cease to exist. God is described in the bible as the “Father”, the “Son” and the “Spirit”. How those three make up the “One” is left for you to decide. I'm not going to try to explain it because many men have tried to explain it to me and to many others and have done a miserable job of explaining it and I probably wouldn't do any better. So, the only thing I'm going to add to that is that you have to decide for yourself. Read the bible and if you agree with it, then good, you can be satisfied in your decision; if you don't agree, then find something else to satisfy you but don't come looking to me for any satisfaction because I'm just a man and no human is capable of fully satisfying another human.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Hey All,
One of the greatest problems with the justice system today is that the defendants are now required to prove their innocence when they've been accused of a crime (guilty until proven innocent).
Real justice requires the accusers to bring their evidence into court to support their claims (innocent until proven guilty).
If you have any evidence, other than hearsay, please display it. For, as in any court of law, anybody who accuses another of a crime under false allegations is susceptible to counterclaims that may result in damages being awarded to the defendant.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Hey all,
It'll help to answer or understand the answers if they're rearranged a little. There's no way to cover this unless you've got a bible on hand so you can look up the verses, otherwise I'd hafta type in all the verses.
#5 was about 100% accuracy. The answer is true.
There are many verses that explain this but the plainest are: Job 32:8 – IITimothy 3:16 – IIPeter 1:19 thru 21. Those verses tell you that the bible is written by men who were inspired by the Holy Spirit to put the words on the pages. These aren't the only verses but they're the easiest to understand and if you want to get the rest you gotta read the entire book to grasp 'em.
Are there any errors or contradictions? Nope, not a one. I've read the book cover to cover many times and at first I thought I'd noticed some but upon consecutive readings one begins to see how wrong one is.
#'s 1, 2 and 6. God is Jesus and Jesus is God and God is a tri-une being. He's got a heart, a soul, and a body just like we do; only his body is a spiritual body.
He makes this perfectly clear in his book and goes into it in the greatest detail in the book that is known as the “gospel” of John at verses 14:1 through 17:26 and you can grasp more of it in the book of IJohn.
#3 Are all Jews Christians? Yes and no. Yes if they believe that Jesus Christ was the Messiah and no, if they don't.
You have to know who or what a Jew is and which Jew you're talking about. Today, there are Jews who aren't Jews in the sense of the word as it was spoken by Christ and his prophets. When Jesus and his followers spoke of a Jew, they were referring to anyone who was the lineal ancestor of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Jacob was renamed Isreal). When people speak of Jews today, they can mean anybody from the land of Isreal (Judea) or anybody who speaks in the Judeaic language. If a Jew (in the lineal sense) doesn't believe that Jesus was the “Christ” (anointed Messiah) and that he rose from the dead, then they can't be a Christian. If they do believe this to be true, then they are a Christian. It's got nothin' to do with who you are and everything to do with who he is.
#4 Are all Christians Jews? No. Gentiles can be Christians.
The words Gentiles and Gentile mean a foreign nation or an individual foreigner and these foreigners are foreigners to the nation of Isreal (or the nation of people that grew from the lineal decendants of Jacob). Anybody can be a Christian if they believe that the Lord Jesus Christ was the Son of God and that he died and rose again. Period. That's all it takes.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Sonik,
First, there are no standing Article III (A3) courts in any of the Fed Zones within the several states. Only Hawaii and D.C. have A3 courts and taking ones claim anywhere else will only get one into an administrative court or tribunal to be heard by an Administrative Officer with no actual judicial capacities or authority. In other words, if the man in California (CA) takes his claim into a United States District Court (USDC) in CA and his opponent in NY discovers the facts that I'm about to lay out for you here, NY could get a reversal in an actual A3 county court in his home county at a later date.
This is how it lays out.
There are two types of federal district courts in the nation, the USDC's and the DCUS's. The DCUS's are the courts that were originally intended to be set up to implement A3 courts but due to the timing of their actual implementation and the formation of the states that could have ratified the enactment of the law which would control their activities and/or “business”, they were never properly set up. This has to do with the Judiciary Act, sections 133 and 134 of Title 28 USC and the appointment of the judges to those courts. These judges were to have been enabled to hear and decide matters based on A3 law but instead, they were and are appointed by the President(s) under sections 133 and 134 and this precludes them from acting as A3 judges.
These two sections of Title 28 concern the number of judges appointed to the federal districts and the residency of the judges in those districts but it's in the notes and amendments where one will find the errors in the validity of the judge's tenures. I'm not gonna go over all of those details but let's just say that the research into all of the other codes, Public Acts and Executive Orders will suffice to prove this point so we can move on.
The second type of district court is the United States District Court (USDC). These courts were devised by congress in 1948. In 1948 the courts were reorganized and that reorganization allowed the legislature to apply the legislative or statutory laws in those newly formed districts when they were only supposed to apply to the federal territories and insular possessions of the federal Corp. USA. government. Every district, the judges in those districts and every “citizen” within those districts were blanketed under the reorgaganization and this is where we stand today. Unfortunately, as I'm sure you're well aware, most Americans don't even realize the situation and anybody who goes into these courts gets shafted and scammed.
However, there are some men who are exposing this corruption and two of them are Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera and Paul Andrew Mitchell. You can read up on their research at their respective web-sites.
and
Their delineations are a little sketchy or broken but you should be able to pull everything together if you grasp their general explanations and put them together with a study of the Judiciary Act and Title 28. That's the way I did it.
Getting back to your questions; can CA proceed under commerce? No.
These courts are mandated to “strictly” construe the laws and their applications. Under commerce, the law strictly adheres to it's premises and the premise of the $10,000.00 amount doesn't meet the strict requirement. The suit would get tossed whether the transaction was conducted through the mail or not.
The guy in CA would have to base his claim on Contract Law. Where was the contract formed? In CA? In NY? Through the mail? Depending on this pertinent information, it becomes a matter of “property in interest” and who's the “holder in due course”. If the “holder” of the “note” (the contract) resides in CA, that's where the action should be brought because he's the injured party. If it was a verbal contract, then the lender is still the “holder” because his mouth, or the words that came out of his mouth, formed the provisions and terms of the contract i.e., “Here's 10 grand, I want it back in 3 years.” or ” Here's 10g's, I want you to repay me in 25 months at $400 p.m.”
The county level state courts are really no better than the USDC's because they too are seated with non-judicial officers. This fact is evidenced by the state charters of the local municipalities and those charters only include a Legislative and an Executive Branch. There are no Judicial Branches of government in any of the states or the lower forms of government within those states (counties, townships, cities or towns etc.). This is because the states shelved their original constitutions and adopted the corp. USA constitution during the “Reconstruction” back in the 1860's – 70's. That's another issue altogether but you can verify it by checking into the charters for your state (now State) and it's lower govermental bodies. This issue delves into citizenship and the validity of those citizens as legitimate “Electors” and not just “registered voters” along with the issue of the contracts that the “States” have entered into with corp. USA.
In all, if the guy in CA wants to collect from the guy in NY, he'll have to use the Notarial Protest process and force NY to comply (pay up) via a lien or he could take it to small claims. He should find out the monetary limit for small claims in CA, usually 2-5g's but some states go as high as 10g's. If CA doesn't go that high, he could break the claim down into permissible amounts. This would depend on whether or not the contract was verbal or written. If the guy in CA can get a judgment and subsequent lien in CA, then of course, he could have a federal Marshall enforce the lien at a later date. The Marshalls are still legitimate federal Officers with full power and authority to enforce the law.
That's my take on the situation. Hope it helps.
Grace and peace,
Lambchop…er…uh…I mean
Lambskin
Bing & Sonik,
Nice job guys, nothin' like presenting a positive image toward all of Family Guardian Fellowship's hard work and sacrifices!
BRAVO! guys.
Feeling a little more self-agrandized now?
Your pal,
Lamby
Woodwalker,
For the love of God, DON'T FILE A SUIT IN COURT!!!
Repeat, DON'T FILE IN COURT!!!
Stay out of their courts; they'll hang you out to dry and then come back to “shoo” the buzzards away so they can pick your bones clean themselves.
Go here instead,
Income Tax Freedom, Forms and Instructions: Instructions Area, step 0.5: Commercial Law and the UCC
and learn how to use the Notary Protest and Notary Certificate of Default method of resolving their dispute.
If you've got questions after that, come back and relate your concerns or questions in the forum or send somebody a private message.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Rattler,
Just a vote of encouragement; good stuff man, keep it comin'!
Perhaps you'd be interested in this. It kinda explains what one is really up against when one decides to pick up a gun in this country. I'm sure you're aware of these types of matters but it doesn't hurt to ensure people get as much info as possible.
Read this first and pay particular attention to the sixth paragraph.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index806.htm
Then read this, because this is how well they're armed.
http://www.freecongress.org/centers/cc/index.asp
I'm still not sure how to add a “clickable” link. I need “plain english instructions” “cause techno-speak is “greek” to me. I've been told I'm a “techno-phobe” but that's not true. I just need practice.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
jwr,
Heres more on this thread.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index806.htm
Can it be verified? I don't know, I didn't try but it's worth paying attention to. I'd hate to think that we'd (We the People) be as negligent as the Fed's were before 9/11.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Hey Ehudmii,
Personally, I don't know who these Christians are that are telling you that you must give up your life or the lives of your children but they couldn't be more off base if they condoned suicide.
If you want to understand the “mark” of the beast, it boils down to what Solomon did and the Lord's admonishment to him in the book of IKings 11:9,10.
In otherwords, Solomon received “Six hundred threescore and six” talents of gold; this led to his downfall. He then proceeded to do other things that the Lord had forbidden; such as marrying strange women and then succumbing to their temptations of idol worship.
This is the practice that leads us to deny the Lord. First, the money and then all the things that wealth and the inappropriate application of wealth can lead us to.
“Money is the root of all evil”.
Christians should study the “Word” of God using the “words” of God. If you study the scriptures with the scriptures, there's no room for error.
As far as what we are to do when presented with the adversary's attack on us personally, we are to flee; if flight doesn't get you to safety or out of harms way, then it's perfectly fine to stand and protect yourself and your loved ones.
Grace and peace
Lambskin
Hey dj,
This is really good and I'm sure there are quite a few who'd appreciate the content but the best thing to do is post it up in the “miscellaneous” section, a lot more people view those posts.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Bing,
Had the meeting. 50 showed and went home educated and wiser. No takers from this forum. I wonder why. Too bad, could've done 'em a lot of good.
As for IRS, haven't paid 'em a cent in over 7 years and as for the religious thing, write me an email and I'll show ya all of Gods' love that ya want. It's called wisdom and discernment. It's called a lot of things and produces and eliminates a lot of things and one of the things that it eliminates is fear and paranoia. One of the things it produces is the ability to recognize others who are faithful and those who aren't. It also produces the tolerance it takes to be able to help those who you've recognized as those that are in need of help and the courage to stand face to face with someone and tell them that they need help.
When one does this, they're not to be condescending about it, as this doesn't do either party in the confrontation any good. Simply offer an invitation to give to them everything you've recieved. If they accept then that's a step forward and if they decline, just go on to offer what one has to the next guy.
Bing, you're invited. Take it or leave it but I'm not gonna discuss this with you here because I believe we've been asked not to do so.
If I were an IRS agent I don't think I'd waste my time trying to scrounge out a mere pittance from a small percentage of the people in this forum, which you've admitted yourself is statistically all that anyone would be able to muster, because for one; even God teaches us to use our time more wisely than that, and two; I happen to be smart enough and honest enough to know and admit that they're probably a bunch of folks who are as broke and destitute as me if not worse.
Grace and peace
Lambskin
Sonik Speed,
Touche my friend; touche and since you've mentioned it, you can bet your bottom dollar that I'll continue to visit this site and divulge to others, through this medium, about the dire state of circumstances that are facing this nation. For, as may not be apparent to you at this time my friend, you see I have children I'm raising and I'm instructing them on what they can expect in the future if things continue status quo.
This is my primary concern but there are the lives and well being of all our fellow mankind to consider as well and none of these can be helped if we lose the liberty to do as we do now.
To that end I'd like to address your suggestion. This isn't the only place to get good information as is evidenced by the fact that both this site and the postings in this forum frequently direct others to other sources and in that vein I think now would be an opportune time to direct you, as well as those others, to another potential good source.
Please accept the invitation like I did and perhaps you'll consider yourself better off, if not, then at least you'll have been exposed to another point of view to which you can weigh against your thoughts and experiences and that's a benefit in itself. If you do in fact find the information you discover to be of value then pass it on because that's what's been asked of me and I can only hope that it'll pay off here.
The site is titled Team Law and they're at: http://www.teamlaw.org
I'd also like to suggest you check out my posts under the Federal Jurisdiction and Police State categories.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
Gentlemen, Gentlemen,
Please, if you wish to yell ignorance from the rooftop, then read what it is that I have said. I said it was an excellent article and it is. It's excellency comes from his efforts and it's content and the excellency in it's content stems from what it is that they think they can do.
Now if you like refering to people as ignorant then look to yourselves, for if this is how you greet and address others, what is it that one should think of you, for I believe the term of address I have chosen on this site is Lambskin and it would appear to those others that you don't know how to read nor have respect for your fellow man and have no sense of contemplation.
Grace and peace,
Lambskin
P.S. Upon inflection, I suppose I could've made myself clearer but at the time I wrote it, I was trying to get a couple of other posts put up before leaving. Also, on the topic of ignorance; is one to believe that you men have known about the things of which we speak since the day you were born. If so, where are your web sites and universities? I'd like to visit them and be in awe of your wisdom.
Gentlemen,
The replies have covered the subject of attacks and/or threats fairly thoroughly. I haven't noticed, nor can I think of anything more important to add than, the mention of the best source for solace on this type of thing.
If one has any questions or doubts about why one suffers the way they do when talking about the truth, any truth, one should turn to scripture. It'll tell ya exactly why this happens, what to expect every time it occurs and exactly how to respond when it does.
You won't find it in any single book, any single incident in which opposition is discussed or in glaring declaration, such as “HEY, LOOK OUT FOR THAT TRAIN!” No, one has to read it all, cover to cover and as often as possible. When one is looking for answers, comfort, consolation of any kind, that's where to find the best.
Rattler, if you've received “a threat”, just one, it “will” become “threats” w/ more frequency and of more severe intent. It's out of personal experience that I can assure you of this. This is only in love my freind. It may become necessary for you to either relocate, get a gun or both. People can be sick, are capable of anything, have no respect for life, and if you've encountered one of these total degenerate types, you've gotta start paying even more attention.
Hope that helps my freind and I truly hope you find it of more value than any advice you'd get anywhere else 'cause if things start to get real ugly soon (and the way it's goin' it looks like that may be sooner for all of us than any of us realizes), it's the only thing that's going to do ya any real good, it's all that's really gonna matter in the end.
Grace and peace.
