[JWR]

ROKEHAI,

If I have read this updated T.O.120-01 correctly (and if I'm wrong, someone please correct me as I'm just going from memory) it just looks like they did a little shuffling of department names and as far as I can tell chapters 51(alcohol) and chapter 52(tobacco) of 26USC still have their implementing regulations in 27CFR part 70.

It's kind of odd because I was just looking that treasury order up last night to use as an exhibit in a foia request and noticed it had changed. But I just won't put it in there now. I'll just use the parallel table of authorities from access.gpo.gov along with the actual regs from 27CFR so the disclosure officer can see what I'm refering to. They don't seem to know how to use their own codes and regs. Gotta go, lunch break is over.

JWR

[JWR]

I'm on break at work right now so I don't have any time to explain it at the present time, but this is the link to the new order.120-01

You might want to read through it.

JWR

[JWR]

andyd,

I have actually recieved a Notice of Deficiency for four different years, but only one has made it to the stage of a Letter 1058 and requesting a CDPH. That would be for the year '00. That is the same year that has the TC560. None of them are valid.

There are some more FOIAs I need to send and re-send but am finding it hard to find the time to do so. I seem to have too many irons in the fire. After work tuesday I need to try to get that CDPH request filled out. I don't want to wait too long on that one.

JWR

[JWR]

andyd,

I have requested quite a few of my files through FOIA and usually get them back in about three or four weeks. I can tell you by experience that there are some things you may never get back. I have requested a copy of the SFR including the agents signiture that created the SFR on me, what the SFR was based on, the document that gives them the authority to create an SFR for a 1040, non-master file, 23c, and a few others I can't think of right now. Oh, yeah, and Form 872, Consent to Extend Time to Assess Tax (or something like that), since there is a TC560 on my IMF.

I can tell you that these documents most likely have never exsisted. I'll go ahead and use the “F” word now, it's called “FRAUD”. I have found out through experience that the law, their own proceedures, and even the supreme court have no bearing on their actions. They seem to do as they like.

I have found one way to double your FOIA requests, possibly double that, also. If you are in an area like me, I can send one out to my “local” disclosure office and one to my “local” service center(only if they are two different locations). And to double up on that, since they are just a request through FOIA, I use two different return addresses, my home address and my P.O.Box. When sending for documents that may or may not exsist, I usually send those to either the service center or to Ogden, UT. You may get a quicker response this way, but doesn't mean you won't get a foot dragging letter. For the SFR stuff I've been waiting since january. Cant produce what they don't have.

As far as trying to clean up after themselves, ie. covering up the fraud, there will always be either a paper trail, or lack of a paper trail. Both can be exposed.

Hope this helps a little bit.

JWR

[JWR]

Hi Sonic,

Thanks for the link, but I think I am one step ahead of you on this one. I have been following We The People for some time now and have been a plaintiff on this almost from the beginning. I just don't put too much faith in this government to do the right thing and put an injunction on the IRS/DOJ's crimminal activity and need to continue as if I was fighting this alone (which is almost the truth as there is no support for me except on this forum).

I have been having a bit of trouble with my printer and didn't get the affidavit printed until after I got off work on friday (I work second shift) and won't be able to get it notarized until monday. You can bet it will go out priority then.

Unfortunatly I will not be able to go to this event as I would not be able to afford to take the time off work (paycheck to paycheck situation) and the company I work for is going to start nine hour days, seven days a week for a while.

As far as the CDPH, I think I will go ahead and request it just to slow them down a bit before they fool my non-federal employer into steeling from me again. Plus I really want to know how they are going to explain away some of their unlawful actions they have committed. I am going to use the altered Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, from Family Guardian (thanks Author #2 🙂 )as it does not imply me being a “taxpayer,” something I am not now, or ever have been.

When I can find the time I'll post a bit about my situation and how I initially became involved in the movement so everyone can benifit from all the mistakes I've made, and there are quite a few.

JWR

[JWR]

Since WTP's response to the lawsuit is rather long I'm just posting the link to the article on their website to save space. I'm not too sure what to say about this that hasn't been said already. I do know that “a house divided cannot stand.” I hope they can work this out before it affects the whole movement in an adverse way.

http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/BecraftL…te04-Jun-03.htm

JWR

[JWR]

Yet again, thank you Bing. I went ahead and got the CP 504 response from sedm.org a little while ago (it's about 3am) and plan on writing to as many of those IRS lawyers as I can this weekend. I just hope I can get this stuff cleared up before they have the company I work for steal my money again. I'll keep you updated.

JWR

[JWR]

Thanks Chris. I just got the MF Decoder Professional Edition version 1.70 in on Tuesday. I haven't gotten all my codes in yet, but I do have a question. Should I put the codes that are on the TXMOD report in with the codes that are on my IMF (specific or complete) or should I enter them seperately? Also, after decoding, should I send in to the IRS both the IMF Specific and the IMF Complete.

By the way, the extra money for the Professional version is well worth it, just for the manuals alone it is a bargain.

JWR

[JWR]

Bing

I sure would like those addresses to those IRS lawyers. I need to do something to stop these guys from coming after me for money I don't owe. I see the fraud they are doing but I don't know exactly how to stop them. I have sent response letters to just about everything they send me and they just keep on coming. Last time they sent a 'Notice of Levy' to the company I work for I tried everything I could to stop them from taking my wages, including explaining to my company the law, CDP Hearing, and they just wound up taking what they wanted. I almost got fired over that one. It seems to be happening all over again, this time for four years instead of just one.

I know there are a lot of people out there fighting right along side of us, but sometimes it feels like I am standing alone. I don't personally know anyone that isn't a sheeple. It is their right to be a sheeple, but it is my right not to be one.

Thanks a lot Bing.

JWR

[JWR]

SuaZman

Actually the 6209 Manual does have the MFR 16 for the IMF. In section 8.5 under Filing Requirement Codes (FR Codes). On page 8-72 under the IMF heading it says it is for Unnecessary filing. You are right in saying that it isn't under the IMF Filing Requirement Codes in section 8.5.2 on page 8-77. Hope this helps.

JWR