Forum Replies Created

Page 27 of 33
  • franklin

    Member
    December 6, 2008 at 6:14 pm in reply to: U.S. Government wants to track & monitor

    Thanks for the heads up on this.

    It seems they're saying in some foreign language with no grammatical rules that there is no penalty.

    Quote:
    (cool.gif PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FILE.?

    (1) RETURN.?Subparagraph (cool.gif of section 6724(d)(1) is amended?

    (A) by striking ??or?? at the end of clause (xx),

    (cool.gif by redesignating the clause (xix) that follows clause (xx) as clause (xxi),

    ? by striking ??and?? at the end of clause (xxi), as redesignated by subparagraph (cool.gif and inserting ??or??, and

    (D) by adding at the end the following: ??(xxii) section 6050W (relating to returns to payments

    made in settlement of payment card transactions), and??.

    (2) STATEMENT.?Paragraph (2) of section 6724(d) is amended by striking ??or?? at the end of subparagraph (B:cool:, by striking the period at the end of the subparagraph (CC) and inserting ??, or??, and by inserting after subparagraph (CC) the following: ??(DD) section 6050W? (relating to returns relating

    to payments made in settlement of payment card transactions).??.

    ? APPLICATION OF BACKUP WITHHOLDING.?Paragraph (3) of section 3406(cool.gif is amended by striking ??or?? at the end of subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) and inserting ??, or??, and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

    ??(F) section 6050W (relating to returns relating to payments made in settlement of payment card transactions).??.

    (d) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.?The table of sections for subpart B of part III of subchapter A of chapter 61 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 6050V the following:

    ??Sec. 6050W. Returns relating to payments made in settlement of payment card transactions.??.

    If I “understand” the penalty clause correctly…the penalty is that the “person” required to make these returns will become a babbling idiot whose cerebral neurons simply fire at random mixing alpha numeric characters in incomprehensible ways.

    If I've got a grab on this…then it seems just supplying this penalty clause to the “person” required to make a return would be enough to derail this whole scheme. Especially if they write their “returns” in the same lingo as the penalty clause. 😆

  • franklin

    Member
    December 4, 2008 at 3:22 pm in reply to: Young woman teaches Schumer about 2nd Amendment
    Quote:
    damn right!

    the 2nd amend is there for US to protect ourselves from the treasonic political bastards.

    great vid..what year did that all take place?

    I'm not sure Kola.

    I remember reading that story when the incident occurred.

    I want to say it happened within the last 5 years or so. So her testimony is probably not that old.

  • franklin

    Member
    December 4, 2008 at 3:15 pm in reply to: Guidance documents

    This is going to really simplify things when communicating with Revenue Agents from Department of Treasury of Puerto Rico. Thanks

  • Looks like MacDonald's has discovered the fountain of youth. They should be selling it in capsules instead of hamburgers.

    And furthermore…MacDonald's will go down in history as an example of how great America was. Just think of the joy of the archeologist 3000 years from now who discovers an uneaten Big Mac and french fries…fresh as the day they were made (except for the roll). The career of the one who discovers it will be made. In the history books America will surpass the Egyptian mummies for creating something truly immortal and indestructible. It ranks right up the with the cockroach.

    Okay enough. I'm just trying to look at the upside here 🙂 .

  • franklin

    Member
    December 4, 2008 at 2:47 pm in reply to: Donifrio Obama case
    Quote:
    “With regards to Donofrio v Wells—one of a growing number of lawsuits filed nationwide that question the eligibility of Barack Obama to be POTUS—the full US Supreme Court has agreed to conference on the suit 5 December 2008. Obama and the DNC (also named in the suit) were advised by the high court to respond to Donofrio v Wells by 1 December. To date, neither Mr. Obama nor the DNC have responded. With this lack of response, the president-elect has now flatly stated that he is above—if not beyond and outside of—the law and reports and is responsible only to himself. This is what—not who—was elected to the presidency of the United States.”

    http://www.borderfirereport.net/sher-zieve…reme-court.html

    While this may seem like simple arrogance…and it is…my personal take is that it is not Barry's decision. I don't think he makes any decisions at all but simply does what he is told to do…makes the appointments he is told to make…and is a virtual slave to those who put up the half billion dollars to have him “elected.”

    If government does nothing by accident…I'm wondering if this isn't just one more thing to get the American people disgruntled, activated and literally 'up in arms' so that martial law can be introduced promptly within the next few months.

    Just a thought <_< .

  • franklin

    Member
    November 29, 2008 at 8:11 pm in reply to: People, not states, have rights

    Interesting points.

    I have to admit I missed the distinct use of the word “rights” in Amendment IX and the word “powers” in Amendment X. So this post has been instructive and also a reminder to pay close attention to the words. They mean what they say…except when the fed gov is speaking.

    Speaking of fed gov…It seems to have invented its own 'inalienable right' that you read usually in contemporary SC opinions…the right of the government to bypass the Constitution if it (the gov) has a “compelling interest” in doing so.

    After reading FG and SEDM materials it seems that the gov always has a compelling interest in going round the Constitution. It is a contradiction in the SC's thinking to modify Constitutional prohibitions on the fed gov because the Constitution was written for the very purpose of prohibiting most compelling government interests.

  • franklin

    Member
    November 29, 2008 at 7:50 pm in reply to: New Banking System

    Good idea. However, there is no information on the management. I did read about a year ago that the Lakota nation was divorcing itself from the US federal government by bowing out of all treaties it had made in the past…because the gov. had violated each of them.

    They were inviting people who lived in states contiguous to the reservation to join them. They planned to issue passports and inform the world's nations that they were independent of the United States. I haven't followed up on any of this but it might be an interesting Google to see how it's going…or if it's going.

    Lakota Indians Declare Independence

    The Lakota have withdrawn from their treaties with the United States , citing numerous violations of those treaties by the US. They plan to start their own country, issuing passports and drivers' licenses and living tax-free

    http://english.sabah.com.tr/95885BFE6D334D…F481153EBD.html

    yildiz

    Lakota Indians Declare Independence

    21.12.2007

    The Lakota Indians, who gave the world legendary warriors Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, have withdrawn from treaties with the United States, leaders said Wednesday.

    “We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us,” long-time Indian rights activist Russell Means told a handful of reporters and a delegation from the Bolivian embassy, gathered in a church in a run-down neighborhood of Washington for a news conference.

    A delegation of Lakota leaders delivered a message to the State Department on Monday, announcing they were unilaterally withdrawing from treaties they signed with the federal government of the United States, some of them more than 150 years old.

    They also visited the Bolivian, Chilean, South African and Venezuelan embassies, and will continue on their diplomatic mission and take it overseas in the coming weeks and months, they told the news conference.

    Lakota country includes parts of the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

    The new country would issue its own passports and driving licences, and living there would be tax-free — provided residents renounce their US citizenship, Means said.

    The treaties signed with the United States are merely “worthless words on worthless paper,” the Lakota freedom activists say on their website.

    The treaties have been “repeatedly violated in order to steal our culture, our land and our ability to maintain our way of life,” the reborn freedom movement says.

    Withdrawing from the treaties was entirely legal, Means said.

    “This is according to the laws of the United States, specifically article six of the constitution,” which states that treaties are the supreme law of the land, he said.

    “It is also within the laws on treaties passed at the Vienna Convention and put into effect by the US and the rest of the international community in 1980. We are legally within our rights to be free and independent,” said Means.

    The Lakota relaunched their journey to freedom in 1974, when they drafted a declaration of continuing independence — an overt play on the title of the United States' Declaration of Independence from England.

    Thirty-three years have elapsed since then because “it takes critical mass to combat colonialism and we wanted to make sure that all our ducks were in a row,” Means said.

    One duck moved into place in September, when the United Nations adopted a non-binding declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples — despite opposition from the United States, which said it clashed with its own laws.

    “We have 33 treaties with the United States that they have not lived by. They continue to take our land, our water, our children,” Phyllis Young, who helped organize the first international conference on indigenous rights in Geneva in 1977, told the news conference.

    The US “annexation” of native American land has resulted in once proud tribes such as the Lakota becoming mere “facsimiles of white people,” said Means.

    Oppression at the hands of the US government has taken its toll on the Lakota, whose men have one of the shortest life expectancies — less than 44 years — in the world.

    Lakota teen suicides are 150 percent above the norm for the United States; infant mortality is five times higher than the US average; and unemployment is rife, according to the Lakota freedom movement's website.

    “Our people want to live, not just survive or crawl and be mascots,” said Young.

    “We are not trying to embarrass the United States. We are here to continue the struggle for our children and grandchildren,” she said, predicting that the battle would not be won in her lifetime.

    Yahoo news

    spacer

  • franklin

    Member
    November 29, 2008 at 4:16 pm in reply to: Senate Bill S. 2433 The Global Poverty Act

    The following sentence in S 2433 is an interesting example of the Observable Unconscious.

    Quote:
    Amend the title so as to read: `An Act to require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.'.

    This clause says nothing about reducing poverty or increasing the wealth of those who live on less than one dollar a day. Its plain language is about reducing people.

    These must be the “useless eaters” of Henry Kissinger.

  • franklin

    Member
    November 22, 2008 at 3:10 pm in reply to: IRS charges John Stuart with felony false 1099-OID

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081121/D94JIDLG2.html

    Prosecutor yells at judge for trying to quash indictments before arraignment 🙂 .

    Judge runs to superior court for instructions about what he should do. <_<

    Maybe he should try following the law. Maybe he can't find any precedents.

  • franklin

    Member
    November 21, 2008 at 8:49 pm in reply to: Donifrio Obama case

    Time to check out the book value of various companies and go shopping. 🙂

  • franklin

    Member
    November 21, 2008 at 3:01 pm in reply to: Donifrio Obama case

    Hey Bing,

    Alan Keyes may be in the best position of any litigant in this matter…see separate post above.

    or just go here

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/nov/08111903.html

    Franklin

  • franklin

    Member
    November 19, 2008 at 2:46 pm in reply to: IRS charges John Stuart with felony false 1099-OID

    Cheney and Gonzales indicted relating to government detention camps.

    Judge has not signed the true bill and…here is something I didn't know and find shocking…the judge can throw the indictment out.

    So the judge actually replaces the grand jury with herself…by refusing to acknowledge the true bill.

    As Marge Simpson would say….Hmmmmmm <_<

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081119/D94HOCQ00.html

  • franklin

    Member
    November 19, 2008 at 2:37 pm in reply to: Success in dealing with the IRS

    Fear without knowledge is paralyzing.

    Fear when dealing with outlaws is appropriate.

    Hosea said “My people perish for want of knowledge.”

    You and your wife both need knowledge.

    This knowledge will not take away your justified fear of outlaws…but what it will do is give you resources from which you can act and react effectively. You will not be held hostage to your fear… which is not unwarranted when dealing with outlaws.

    People who go to jail usually have not prepared themselves with knowledge and in their fear grasp at the many straws…erroneous arguments… paying officers of the court that wants to convict them to defend them. Those things often result in jail time.

    You need to start reading…you and your wife together…the FREE Great IRS Hoax book. Stay up late if you have to. And get up early so you can get it integrated and organized into useful knowledge that leads to useful and effective action.

    None of us would be here if those who fought the revolution gave in to their fear…would we? Bravery means acting rightly when you are afraid. People who take on danger when they are not afraid are simply acting recklessly.

    Bravery…knowledge…fear are team mates. Fear gives the brave and knowlegeable person prudence.

    Knowledge and knowing what to do and say in order to use that knowledge…vastly increases the probability that you won't perish. This…of course…is not a guarantee…you could get taken out in a car accident…couldn't you?

    Start studying… you will find your fear and wonderment turning to excitement and hope as your knowledge increases…do it NOW.

    And be prudently afraid of those semi-trucks…look both ways before you cross.

  • franklin

    Member
    November 12, 2008 at 4:09 pm in reply to: IRS calls you a "customer"

    Of course an IRS customer is still a person (as defined).

    Customers usually demand and get value for their money. And they could choose to shop at another store.

    Snoopy got it right in that old Peanuts cartoon. He's sitting at his typewriter banging out a note to the IRS…

    “Dear IRS…

    I'm canceling my subscription…please remove me from your mailing list.”

    Now that's a customer.

    What are those people smoking over at the IRS who think these things up?

  • franklin

    Member
    November 12, 2008 at 4:02 pm in reply to: Men

    And even women's prisons are called penal institutions! 😆

Page 27 of 33