INSTRUCTIONS:  5.7.  Sue Employers, County Recorders, and Financial Institutions that Violate Your Due Process Rights
Related forms and resources: Related references:

“Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm.  But submissiveness is not our heritageThe First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our Heritage.  The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people.  The Bill of Rights was added to keep the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, of political and social activities free from surveillance.  The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from Assemblies of People.  The aim was to allow men to be free and independent to assert their rights against government.” 
[Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1; 92 S.Ct. 2318 (1972)}

Banks and employers commonly accept IRS Notice of Levy (PDF Form 668-A(c)(DO)) and Notice of Lien not signed by a judge or magistrate and erroneously surrender property without a court order.  That makes them thieves, not Robinhoods!  When this happens, you should sue them because they robbed you and are co-conspirators in depriving you of your property without due process of law.  As always the defendant's (employer or bank) first motion is a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. WRONG!!! Taking property without due process of law in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments constitutes a legitimate claim. The claim lies in the injury caused by the unlawful activity of the bank or employer’s employees.  The loss suffered under the claim is a loss of property with a specific value, and it had to be replaced at a specific cost, and it caused public embarrassment and mental stress.  That situation can’t be anything but a valid claim.

Now the 'attorney' for the defendants is trying to shield the defendants behind the immunity clause in 26 U.S.C. 6332(e).....WONT WORK!!!!!

"A defendant sued as a wrongdoer, who seeks to substitute the State in his place, or to justify by the authority of the State, or defend on the ground that the State has adopted his act and exonerated him, cannot rest on the bare assertion of his defense. He is bound to establish it.

The State is a political corporate body, can act only through agents and can command only by laws. It is necessary, therefore, for such a defendant, in order to complete his defense, to produce a law of the State which constitutes his commission as its agent, and a warrant for his act."
[Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270 (1885)]

Absent a procedurally valid assessment that can be made ONLY by the "taxpayer" himself on an income tax return and there is no tax due, and there can be no lawful levy absent an assessment.  In order for the agent to claim immunity the law would have to be followed to the letter. As above the agent becomes the deputy of the IRS agent and must have a warrant to cover his action. No warrant, you are a thief, period. No immunity for thieves, only Citizens.

If you would like further information about how to sue your employer or the county recorder, read the book on the SEDM website entitled Secrets of the Legal Industry, by Richard Luke Cornforth at: