THE ULTIMATE CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE IRS |
WARNING!: OUR READERS HAVE
Investigated this and found that it is a scam! Here is what one of
our readers who investigated this said in an email dated May 31, 2001:
From:
Jerryaci@aol.com [mailto:Jerryaci@aol.com] Family Guardian, Would you explain what's going on with this "Ultimate Lawsuit" stuff. I paid $135.00 for the transcript of case # CIV 00-541 from the Eastern District of Oklahoma and read through it. It mentions NOTHING about the "7 missing sections in the IRS manual". The bulk of the defense in this action was the OMB number and the judge (Frank H. Seay) DISMISSED the action, saying..."the United States asserts that Plaintiffs' claims are overall without merit .." I always look at things with suspect when they are presented as an untruth. The message under the 'ULTIMATE LAWSUIT' heading is not telling the truth. Would like-minded people that are really trying to do something about the unlawful action of the IRS try to scam other people. If this is true than the scammers are much worse than the IRS and belong in the same class together. If I don't hear from you I will assume my conclusions are correct. If I am wrong, show me. Best regards,Jerry From:
Deal505@aol.com [mailto:Deal505@aol.com] Hello Family Guardian, Thanks for sending me the article regarding the "Ultimate Lawsuit." I wrote to them at: clientservices@ultimatelawsuit.com. You may want to do the same, and send them the article.Also, their web-site used to list people to contact if interested in jjoining the suit, with e-mail addresses and phone numbers. This is no longer there. I've sent several e-mails to the person I originally spoke with asking questions. NO REPLY!I told them that my research has shown me that this is a scam. No reply, but will forward to you if I receive one. Regards, Richard PLANETNEWS broadcast... May 10, 2001
FYI...those interested in the IRS class action suit..
Dear Friends,
I have been asked to explain to you how the Ultimate Lawsuit came to
be. A renouned Constitutional legal expert by the name of Dale Livingston from SLC, Utah discovered that in the Treasury Regulation 861 it describes what a taxable source of income is. It also explains that as in the 16th amendment too, a interstate or intrastate source of commerce is not a taxable source of income. Since our domestic source of income falls under the intrastate commerce source, it is not a taxable source of income. This of course has helped to win many cases in court especially in Bankruptcy court.
Dale was inspired and felt too that there had to be something
regarding interstate and intrastate commerce in the IRS code book. As he began his search he was shocked to find absolutely nothing in the current code books regarding these issues. He didn't give up. After spending thousands of hours studying the back issues of the IRS code books he finally found not just a few codes but 7 whole sections of information in the 1949 code book. He was extremely happy but also became angry and disgusted as he found out that between the 1949 and 1953 code books, all 7 sections were illegally and fraudulently deleted. In fact the IRS was so afraid to have this found out they did not print the 1954 code book until 1959. When they did this they printed it as a revised edition. Strange, how can it be a revised edition if it was not printed in 54?
This fraud and many other obvious patterns of deceit and fraud have
been found in the 50's and 60's code books. In other words there is absolutely no way the IRS can wiggle out of this fraud case because it! is in black and white what they did. This information has made this Mass action lawsuit to be the lawsuit of the CENTURY.
To validate this, Dale filed a lawsuit in the Eastern Federal
District of Oklahoma under the name of Lawrence Buckner. This case was filed to find out two things, how the courts would respond and how the IRS would respond. The IRS became so freaked out that they tried every avenue available to them to declare this a frivolous lawsuit and have it thrown out. We countered their motions and the Judge refused to let it drop because the evidence was so overwhelming.
The IRS is so upset and freaked out over this little evidence that
they are currently trying to seek a settlement out of court so that the evidence presented cannot be found out by the American public.
We of course will not do this, what will be done is that the lawsuit
will be eventually dropped and then in August be refilled with all the the damaging evidence that has been found. I can't wait to see the IRS fill their drawers over this case. All of those who get involved with this lawsuit will be allowed to get back all of their back taxes since 1954 at 3% compounded interest. Also anyone who has had their homes taken, or any other assets taken will be compensated for them too. On top of that, you will never have to pay Federal Income Taxes ever again in your life.
If you would like more information regarding this case feel free to
contact Les Hollingshead at 480-558-3346. Don't forget to tell him that John Waszil asked you to call.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
"THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE"
Les Hollinghsead
|
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship |
Last revision: October 04, 2010 12:32 PM |
Home About Contact | This private system is NOT subject to monitoring |