http://msnbc.com/news/734781.asp
Posted 4/8/2002
|
Are
You a Tax Chump or a Tax Cheat? |
Big
companies pay nothing and the superrich have their dodges.
Why more folks are getting aggressive |
|
By
Daniel McGinn
NEWSWEEK |
|
|
|
|
April
15 issue — Freelance
writer Lucy McCauley relies on her creativity to make a living.
And as April 15 approaches, she’s applying it to her taxes, too,
figuring that every life experience that might become essay fodder
can count as a tax deduction. |
|
|
|
|
SHE’S
WRITING OFF her husband’s birthday trip from their Dallas home
to San Francisco (she had breakfast with a publisher, and she may
write about wine country), and she’s deducting the groceries and
liquor for a party she threw for other writers after a book
reading. “I think it works—who knows?” she says. Cynthia
Smith Freed, an interior designer, has started obsessing over
receipts, mileage and every $1.50 phone call—”all the small
things that I previously thought weren’t worth the hassle,”
she says. Freed’s war on taxes is fueled by stories about how
companies like Enron have dodged taxes. “We’re paying taxes
and they’re not?” she says. “It makes me feel like I’m
getting screwed.”
|
|
|
As tax season enters the homestretch, more Americans appear
to be taking aggressive steps to shrink their checks to Uncle Sam.
Federal data on tax compliance are spotty and out of date, but in
interviews with NEWSWEEK, a score of tax experts say that
self-employed and high-income folks appear increasingly
emboldened. They’re aware of the small odds they’ll be
audited, the pros say, so they’re more likely to inflate
deductions. A recent survey shows the number of people who say
they believe in being totally honest on their taxes declined from
87 percent in 1999 to 76 percent last year. There’s also
evidence of more outright evasion. Last month the IRS estimated
that 2 million Americans are using offshore accounts to evade
taxes. And in seminars and on the Internet, a group of tax
revolutionaries are teaching people to stop paying taxes
altogether. They could be in for a surprise: after years of
complacency, the IRS is poised for a crackdown. But as headlines
publicize the growing number of tax cheats, honest taxpayers are
left feeling like chumps. “If there’s a sense that no one else
is paying their taxes,” says William G. Gale of the Brookings
Institution, “people might naturally feel ‘Why should I?’
” |
|
|
|
|
COSTLY
NONCOMPLIANCE
It’s difficult to quantify
exactly how much that thought is crossing people’s minds as they
sit down to do their taxes. The IRS estimates the “tax
gap”—the difference between what people should pay and what
they do pay—was $278 billion in 1998, so every emotion that
drives noncompliance is costly. Academic research shows that
taxpayers’ perception of enforcement (will I get caught if I
cheat?) is the major factor when they decide to fudge or not.
Other data suggest that people who use professionals to do their
taxes are more apt to inflate deductions. But people’s sense of
whether other taxpayers are paying their fair share is an
influence, too, according to researchers. That means all the
headlines about tax evasion could have a trickle-down effect. If
you’d asked University of Michigan tax expert Joel Slemrod last
fall how current events might influence taxpayer compliance,
he’d have said that the patriotism inspired by September 11
might reduce cheating. But with tax evasion now getting daily
publicity, the mix is murkier. Surely some people are thinking ”
‘if everybody else is doing it, if big companies are doing it, I
want to do it too’,” he says. |
|
|
|
|
Even in a world with
few auditors, the IRS has ways to keep most taxpayers in line. The
average family’s income comes mostly from wages, interest and
dividends, and the IRS can match those numbers with reports from
employers, banks and brokerages. Likewise, many middle income
taxpayers don’t itemize deductions, limiting their ability to
embellish. That means most tax tricks are available only to richer
taxpayers, and it leaves out folks like Margaret and Dave Collette.
Emptying their tax records onto their kitchen table, they show how
they owe $9,836 in taxes on their income of $79,844 (he’s an
exterminator, she’s an ultrasound technician). They say their
finances are too straightforward for shenanigans. “Creative
accounting is for people with a lot more money than us,” says
Dave.
The
Tax-Free Bermuda Getaway
Thurston Bell has a
suggestion for him: just tell the IRS you had no income. Bell is a
self-proclaimed tax expert who, like other promoters of the “tax
honesty movement,” has parsed the tax code and concluded that
key portions are vague and unenforceable; he says the IRS is
powerless to stop people who use his convoluted arguments to claim
taxes don’t apply to them. Experts disagree. “A lot of these
people are trotting out old arguments that have been repudiated by
the courts,” says Mark Luscombe, federal tax analyst at CCH
Inc., a tax-guide publisher. In fact, Bell is facing a Justice
Department lawsuit, but people still buy his system of filing
“zero income” returns and answering IRS inquiries with
carefully crafted letters. Bill, a United Airlines pilot, says
it’s no more unethical than when companies relocate to Bermuda
to avoid U.S. taxes. “My whole focus is, how can I take home
more money to provide for myself and my family,” he says.
“Look, if there’s no law that makes you liable, there’s no
penalty,” says Marc Yarborough, a truckdriver who stopped paying
taxes 10 years ago. The IRS has taken him to court, Yarborough
says, but it hasn’t prevailed yet. “Now I’ve got $12,000
more a year in my pocket.”
|
|
|
A BELEAGUERED
AGENCY
These stories
almost make you feel sympathy for the IRS. Clearly it’s a
beleaguered agency. During the last decade, the number of
employees has dropped 17 percent, while the workload has increased
20 percent. Since 1998, when Congress investigated IRS agents’
abusive behavior, the agency has been focused on customer service,
and in 2000 it examined just one in 232 returns, down from one in
79 in the 1988. “For the last couple of years nothing seems to
have raised a red flag,” says Jan Zobel, a tax expert in
Oakland, Calif. “I’m feeling not quite as cautious.” The
agency hopes to change those attitudes soon, hiring new auditors
and has announced a National Research Program, which will mark the
first comprehensive random audits since 1988. “We’re trying to
do more,” says Larry Levitan, chairman of the IRS Oversight
Board. “There is no question we’ve got to stop this slowdown
in enforcement activity.” |
|
|
|
|
Until then, many
filers will be constrained only by their own consciences and their
preparers’ arched eyebrows. Maryland tax expert Connie Kurtz
knows this expression well. When her clients present her with
suspiciously high deductions, she tries to encourage honesty. “I
ask if they have their deductions documented, they say yes, and we
go forward,” she says. She doesn’t approve, but she’s
resigned to it. Chances are they won’t get caught: Kurtz
hasn’t had a client audited in years. But even if Uncle Sam
isn’t watching, she makes a subtle appeal that some higher
authority might be. “Behind my desk there’s a picture of
heaven and hell,” she says. Until the IRS ends its era of
laxity, many people will be praying Saint Peter doesn’t ask to
see their 1040s.
T. Trent Gegax, Ellise Pierce, Joan Raymond, Tara Weingarten
and Rich Thomas
|
|
|
|