| IRS Web Scandal #2, July 26, 2002 |
|
For the past several months, tax researcher Dan Meador of the Law
Research and Registry (http://www.lawresearch-registry.org)
has been working with several other researchers on the subject if IRS
administrative liens and levies. He has been publishing his findings
in an article entitled "Relation
Back Doctrine Condemns Administrative Tax Liens and Levies" in
the Dan
Meador Research Distribution List Yahoo group. Revision 3 of
that article was published in April of 2002, and at that time, the
Internal Revenue Manual section that the article referred to regarding the
Relation Back Doctrine was on the IRS website. The article mentioned
an incriminating section of the Internal
Revenue Manual, section [9.7] 14.7 entitled Asset Seizure and Forefeiture that talked
in item #6 about how the IRS knew about this doctrine, which implied that
the IRS were knowingly violating the law regarding levies and liens.
On March 11, 2002, we downloaded the entire IRS Internal Revenue Manual off their website. Shortly after Revision 6 of the Dan Meador Article was published in July 2002, IRM section [9.7] Chap. 14 entitled was removed, which contained the section [9.7] 14.7 referenced in Dan's article. Don't fear guys, because we saved the evidence on our website at: http://familyguardian.tzo.com/Publications/IRM-020311/0,,i1=5&genericId=22326,00.html even though it no longer appears on the IRS website. Why is removal of IRM section [9.7] Chapt. 14 incriminating? Because that section shows that the IRS know they can't lawfully lien or levy anything without a COURT ORDER, and they very seldom obtain such orders in STEALING your property. Instead, they mail out Notice of Levy and Levy forms that have not been signed by a judge as the Constitution requires. This makes them thieves and extortionists, and now they are hiding the evidence that proves that they know they are. Scumbags. |
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship |
Last revision: August 14, 2009 08:07 AM |
| Home About Contact | This private system is NOT subject to monitoring |