For our article entitled "Why You Aren't Subject to the
Draft or Selective Service Program", we decided to write the Selective
Service System (SSS) website at the address below:
The purpose was to give them an opportunity to rebut our article
point-by point so that we could be sure that it reflected both sides of
the argument and was therefore fair and balanced. The address we
wrote to appears on the above website, which is:
Below is the interchange between the author and the information desk
at the Selective Service System agency. It confirms basically
everything in our article. We show the interchange in date and
time sequence. Incidentally, our invitation continues to stand for
the agency to rebut this article. Don't hold your breath, folks.
You'll die waiting for an answer because if they told the truth, the
whole corrupt and unconstitutionally administered system we have now would blow up.
The Military Selective Service Act is fine, but like the IRS, the way
the SSS administers the law is
deceptive and completely unconstitutional.
I encountered the article below
about how the draft and registering for it is OPTIONAL for those living
in states of the Union who are "nationals" but not
statutory "U.S. citizens".
Here is a link to the article:
A lot of Americans are
interested in this subject, and especially those that don't want to
go to Iraq. The article above has tens of thousands of readers a month
so it is worth your time to respond to it point by point.
Could you please provide a point-by-point rebuttal to the legal and
raised in the article and also in the reference at the top of the
article entitled "Why you are a 'national' or a 'state national' and
not a U.S. citizen". The author has agreed to post your
response so that the public can be well informed about your response
to these views. Additional articles are available at:
under "Military Draft".
If you don't respond or don't
provide evidence and law to back up a rebuttal, then the author has
said he is going to post an article saying that you agree with the
article. He said he isn't interested in opinions, but only
facts and evidence in the rebuttal. If the response is just
opinions and no law or evidence or court rulings, then he is going
to say that you agree with him.
Thank you kindly for your
To: Family Guardian
Registration is not optional.
It is required of all men who reach the age of 18, whether citizens
or resident aliens, legal or illegal.
I invite you to examine the
Military Selective Service Act (MSSA, 50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)
You may find it on the following link:
Thank you for writing
Public Affairs Specialist
Thanks for the response, but
you haven't dealt with any of the issues raised in the article,
which is what I wrote you about in the first place. Once
again, please controvert the issues raised in the article at:
The issues, once again, are:
- The fact that the Military
Selective Service act is "legislation" and that the Supreme
Court said many times that the federal government has NO
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION within states of the union.
Therefore, the Military Selective Service Act can only apply
within the District of Columbia and Federal Territories.
- That the
15 confirms that the federal government cannot directly
requisition men or tax money from the states, but must go
through the state governments and use apportionment, just like
for apportioned direct taxes.
- That the definition of
"State" within the phrase "several States" of the Military
Selective Service act refers to federal territories and not
states of the Union.
Title 50 is NOT
enacted into positive law and therefore is not binding upon
32 CFR 1602.3b makes
only "citizens of the United States" subject, where the "United
States" means the federal territories and the District of
Columbia and NOT the states of the Union. Where does
enacted positive law also add "aliens, residents", etc?
We aren't challenging the MSS
act, but its applicability within states of the Union and federal
jurisdiction within states of the Union. I'm not interested in
opinion, but in enacted positive law and implementing regulations
published in the Federal Register as required by
44 U.S.C. 1505
authorizing you to directly draft men without first going through
the state governments as the Constitution requires.
To: Family Guardian
My final response to you is
that we will not comment on matters beyond the scope of our mission.
Thank you for writing
Public Affairs Specialist
Does your mission include
learning, knowing, and following the law and the rulings of the
supreme court that relate directly to your duties as a public
" Every citizen of the
United States is supposed to know the law, "
[Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall (74 U.S. 169) 666 (1869)]
The law is the source of ALL of
your authority. If you won't recognize the limits on your
authority placed there by the people who wrote both the Constitution
and the Military Selective Service Act, the U.S. Congress identifies
you as no better than a COMMUNIST.
TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 23 >
SUBCHAPTER IV > Sec. 841.
Sec. 841. - Findings and declarations of fact
The Congress finds and
declares that the Communist Party of the United States
[consisting of the IRS, DOJ, and a corrupted federal judiciary],
although purportedly a political party, is in fact an
instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the [de jure]
Government of the United States [and replace it with a de facto
government ruled by a the judiciary]. It constitutes an
authoritarian dictatorship [IRS, DOJ, and corrupted federal
judiciary in collusion] within a [constitutional]
republic, demanding for itself the rights and privileges
[including immunity from prosecution for their wrongdoing in
violation of Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution]
accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the
liberties [Bill of Rights] guaranteed by the Constitution.
Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and
programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide
variety of individual views, and submit those policies and
programs to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval,
the policies and programs of the Communist Party are secretly
[by corrupt judges and the IRS in complete disregard of the tax
laws] prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world
Communist movement [the IRS and Federal Reserve]. Its members
[the Congress, which was terrorized to do IRS bidding recently
by the framing of Congressman Traficant] have no part in
determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent to
party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members
of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination [in the
public schools by homosexuals, liberals, and socialists] with
respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized,
instructed, and disciplined [by the IRS and a corrupted
judiciary] to carry into action slavishly the assignments given
them by their hierarchical chieftains. Unlike political parties,
the Communist Party [thanks to a corrupted federal judiciary]
acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its
conduct or upon that of its members. The Communist Party is
relatively small numerically, and gives scant indication of
capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political means.
The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its
numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as
to the nature of its activities, and its dedication to the
proposition that the present constitutional Government of the
United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any
available means, including resort to force and violence [or
using income taxes]. Holding that doctrine, its role as the
agency of a hostile foreign power [the Federal Reserve and the
American Bar Association (ABA)] renders its existence a clear
present and continuing danger to the security of the United
States. It is the means whereby individuals are seduced into the
service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its
bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial
performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the
Communist Party should be outlawed
Your answer will be posted on
the website prominently along with the article in question and this
dialog. And ALL will be told that you are a FRAUD and a
SHYSTER because your silence on such an important subject reveals that
you know the limits the law places on your authority and refuse to
acknowledge those limits because it would mean the end of your
authority and your job. We ought to be sending troops
everywhere where tyrants exist, including your office.