http://www.sss.gov/

The purpose was to give them an opportunity to rebut our article point-by point so that we could be sure that it reflected both sides of the argument and was therefore fair and balanced.  The address we wrote to appears on the above website, which is:

Information@sss.gov

Below is the interchange between the author and the information desk at the Selective Service System agency.  It confirms basically everything in our article.  We show the interchange in date and time sequence.  Incidentally, our invitation continues to stand for the agency to rebut this article.  Don't hold your breath, folks.  You'll die waiting for an answer because if they told the truth, the whole corrupt and unconstitutionally administered system we have now would blow up.  The Military Selective Service Act is fine, but like the IRS, the way the SSS  administers the law is deceptive and completely unconstitutional.

To:  information@sss.gov

Date: 3/20/2005

Dear sir,

I encountered the article below about how the draft and registering for it is OPTIONAL for those living in states of the Union who are "nationals" but not statutory "U.S. citizens".  Here is a link to the article:

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Military/Draft/NotSubjectToDraft.htm

A lot of Americans are interested in this subject, and especially those that don't want to go to Iraq.  The article above has  tens of thousands of readers a month so it is worth your time to respond to it point by point.  Could you please provide a point-by-point rebuttal to the legal and regulatory issues raised in the article and also in the reference at the top of the article entitled "Why you are a 'national' or a 'state national' and not a U.S. citizen".  The author has agreed to post your response so that the public can be well informed about your response to these views.  Additional articles are available at:

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Military/Military.htm

under "Military Draft".

If you don't respond or don't provide evidence and law to back up a rebuttal, then the author has said he is going to post an article saying that you agree with the article.  He said he isn't interested in opinions, but only facts and evidence in the rebuttal.  If the response is just opinions and no law or evidence or court rulings, then he is going to say that you agree with him.

Thank you kindly for your time.

Family Guardian

To:  Family Guardian

Date: 3/21/2005

Sir:

Registration is not optional.  It is required of all men who reach the age of 18, whether citizens or resident aliens, legal or illegal.  

I invite you to examine the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA, 50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.) You may find it on the following link: http://www.sss.gov/PDFs/MSSA-2003.pdf.

Thank you for writing

Dan Amon
Public Affairs Specialist

To:  information@sss.gov

Date: 3/21/2005

Dan,

Thanks for the response, but you haven't dealt with any of the issues raised in the article, which is what I wrote you about in the first place.  Once again, please controvert the issues raised in the article at:

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Military/Draft/NotSubjectToDraft.htm

The issues, once again, are:

1. The fact that the Military Selective Service act is "legislation" and that the Supreme Court said many times that the federal government has NO LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION within states of the union.  Therefore, the Military Selective Service Act can only apply within the District of Columbia and Federal Territories. 
2. That the Federalist Paper 15 confirms that the federal government cannot directly requisition men or tax money from the states, but must go through the state governments and use apportionment, just like for apportioned direct taxes.
3. That the definition of "State" within the phrase "several States" of the Military Selective Service act refers to federal territories and not states of the Union.
4. That Title 50 is NOT enacted into positive law and therefore is not binding upon anyone.
5. That 32 CFR 1602.3b makes only "citizens of the United States" subject, where the "United States" means the federal territories and the District of Columbia and NOT the states of the Union.  Where does enacted positive law also add "aliens, residents", etc?

We aren't challenging the MSS act, but its applicability within states of the Union and federal jurisdiction within states of the Union.  I'm not interested in opinion, but in enacted positive law and implementing regulations published in the Federal Register as required by 44 U.S.C. 1505 authorizing you to directly draft men without first going through the state governments as the Constitution requires.

Family Guardian

To:  Family Guardian

Date: 3/21/2005

My final response to you is that we will not comment on matters beyond the scope of our mission.
Thank you for writing

Dan Amon
Public Affairs Specialist

To:  information@sss.gov

Date: 3/22/2005

Dan,

Does your mission include learning, knowing, and following the law and the rulings of the supreme court that relate directly to your duties as a public servant?

" Every citizen of the United States is supposed to know the law, "
[Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall (74 U.S. 169) 666 (1869)]

The law is the source of ALL of your authority.  If you won't recognize the limits on your authority placed there by the people who wrote both the Constitution and the Military Selective Service Act, the U.S. Congress identifies you as no better than a COMMUNIST.

TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 23 > SUBCHAPTER IV > Sec. 841.

Sec. 841. - Findings and declarations of fact

The Congress finds and declares that the Communist Party of the United States [consisting of the IRS, DOJ, and a corrupted federal judiciary], although purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the [de jure] Government of the United States [and replace it with a de facto government ruled by a the judiciary]. It constitutes an authoritarian dictatorship [IRS, DOJ, and corrupted federal judiciary in collusion]  within a [constitutional] republic, demanding for itself the rights and privileges [including immunity from prosecution for their wrongdoing in violation of Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution] accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the liberties [Bill of Rights] guaranteed by the Constitution. Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide variety of individual views, and submit those policies and programs to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and programs of the Communist Party are secretly [by corrupt judges and the IRS in complete disregard of the tax laws] prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world Communist movement [the IRS and Federal Reserve]. Its members [the Congress, which was terrorized to do IRS bidding recently by the framing of Congressman Traficant] have no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination [in the public schools by homosexuals, liberals, and socialists] with respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized, instructed, and disciplined [by the IRS and a corrupted judiciary] to carry into action slavishly the assignments given them by their hierarchical chieftains. Unlike political parties, the Communist Party [thanks to a corrupted federal judiciary] acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its conduct or upon that of its members. The Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and gives scant indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political means. The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the nature of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to force and violence [or using income taxes]. Holding that doctrine, its role as the agency of a hostile foreign power [the Federal Reserve and the American Bar Association (ABA)] renders its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United States. It is the means whereby individuals are seduced into the service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist Party should be outlawed

Your answer will be posted on the website prominently along with the article in question and this dialog.  And ALL will be told that you are a FRAUD and a SHYSTER because your silence on such an important subject reveals that you know the limits the law places on your authority and refuse to acknowledge those limits because it would mean the end of your authority and your job.  We ought to be sending troops everywhere where tyrants exist, including your office.

Family Guardian

Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship