The following factors, which are not intended to be an
exhaustive list,
may be considered in
deciding whether there is a more substantial interest in Federal as
opposed to
State prosecution of the offense:
A. The relative strength of the state's interest in
prosecution. The Federal and State characteristics of the
criminal
conduct should be considered. One of the jurisdictions may have a
particularly
strong
interest because of the nature of the offense; the identity of the
offender or
victim; the fact that the investigation was conducted primarily by
its
investigators or through its informants or cooperators; or the
possibility that
prosecution will lead to disclosure of violations which are
peculiarly within the
jurisdiction of either the Federal or State authorities or which
will assist an
ongoing investigation being conducted by one of them.
B. The extent to which the criminal activity reached
beyond the
local jurisdiction. The extent to which the criminal
activity reached
beyond the boundaries of a single local prosecutorial jurisdiction
should
be considered. The nature, extent, and impact of the criminal
activity upon the
jurisdiction, the number and location of any murders, and the need
to procure
evidence from other jurisdictions, in particular other States or
foreign
countries, are all relevant to this analysis.
C. The relative ability and willingness of the State to
prosecute
effectively. The relative likelihood of effective
prosecution in the
State and Federal jurisdictions should be considered, including the
ability
and willingness of the authorities in each jurisdiction; the
prosecutorial and
judicial resources necessary to undertake prosecution promptly and
effectively;
legal or evidentiary problems that might attend prosecution;
conditions,
attitudes, relationships or other circumstances that enhance the
ability to
prosecute effectively, or alternatively, that cast doubt on the
likelihood of a
thorough and successful prosecution.
In deciding whether it is appropriate to seek the death
penalty, the
United States Attorney, the
Attorney General's Committee and the Attorney General shall
consider any
legitimate law enforcement or
prosecutorial reason which weighs for or against seeking the death
penalty.
In determining whether or not the Government should seek
the death
penalty, the United States
Attorney, the Attorney General's Committee and the Attorney General
must
determine whether the statutory aggravating factors applicable to
the offense and
any non-statutory aggravating factors sufficiently outweigh the
mitigating
factors applicable to the offense to justify a sentence of death,
or, in the
absence of any mitigating factors, whether the aggravating factors
themselves are
sufficient to justify a sentence of death. To qualify for
consideration in this
analysis, an aggravating factor must be found to exist beyond a
reasonable doubt.
Recognizing that there may be little or no evidence of mitigating
factors
available for consideration at the time of this determination, any
mitigating
factor reasonably raised by the evidence should be considered in
the light most
favorable to the defendant. The analysis employed in weighing the
aggravating
and mitigating factors that are found to exist should be
qualitative, not
quantitative. Finally, there must be sufficient admissible ev
idence of the aggravating factors to obtain a death sentence and to
sustain it
on appeal.
The authorization process is designed to promote
consistency and
fairness. As is the case in all
other actions taken in the course of Federal prosecutions, bias for
or against
an individual based upon characteristics such as race or ethnic
origin may play
no role in the decision whether to seek the death penalty. For
additional
discussion of the issue of aggravating and mitigating factors,
see the Criminal
Resource Manual at 78-83.
Once the Attorney General has authorized the United States
Attorney to
seek the death penalty, a
notice of intention to seek the death penalty filed with the court
shall not be
withdrawn unless authorized by the Attorney General or approved by
the United
States Attorney as a condition of a plea agreement. If the United
States
Attorney wishes to withdraw the notice and proceed to trial, the
United States
Attorney shall advise the Assistant Attorney General for the
Criminal Division
of the reasons for that request, including any changes in facts or
circumstances.
Any request to withdraw a notice shall be reviewed by the
Committee
appointed by the Attorney
General, which will make a recommendation to the Attorney General.
The Attorney
General shall make the final decision.
The death penalty may not be sought, and no attorney for
the Government
may threaten to seek
it, for the purpose of obtaining a more desirable negotiating
position. No plea
agreement shall be negotiated until an evaluation in accordance
with USAM 9-10.020 has been conducted by
the United
States Attorney. After an evaluation has been completed by the
United States
Attorney regarding whether or not
to recommend the seeking of the death penalty, the United States
Attorney may
approve any plea agreement. There is no need for the United States
Attorney to
obtain prior authority from the Attorney General to approve a plea
agreement.
Should a plea be entered in any death penalty case, the
United States
Attorney shall advise the
Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division in writing of
the plea
agreement and the reasons for
it.
See USAM 9-16.000 for
more
information on the topic of pleas and plea agreements.
June 1998
| USAM Chapter 9-10
|