SOURCE:
Correcting
Erroneous Information Returns, Form #04.001, Section 3 (OFFSITE
LINK)-SEDM Forms page
"The taxpayer-- that's someone who works for the
federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service
examination."
[President Ronald W. Reagan]
As we said in the preceding section, the income tax
described by Internal Revenue Code, Subtitle A is a franchise and excise tax upon “public offices”
within the U.S. government, which the code defines as a “trade or
business”. Before an income tax can lawfully be enforced or collected,
the subject of the tax must be connected to the activity with
court-admissible evidence. Information returns are the method by which
the activity is connected to the subject of the tax under
the authority of
26 U.S.C. §6041(a). When this connection is made, the person
engaging in the excise taxable activity is called “effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States”.
TITLE 26 >
Subtitle F >
CHAPTER 61 >
Subchapter A >
PART III >
Subpart B > § 6041
§ 6041. Information at source
(a) Payments of $600 or more
All persons engaged in a
trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or
business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages,
premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or
other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other than
payments to which section 6042 (a)(1), 6044 (a)(1), 6047 (e), 6049
(a), or 6050N (a) applies, and other than payments with respect to
which a statement is required under the authority of section 6042
(a)(2), 6044 (a)(2), or 6045), of $600 or more in any taxable year,
or, in the case of such payments made by the United States, the
officers or employees of the United States having information as to
such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto by the
regulations hereinafter provided for, shall render a true and
accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such
form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the
Secretary, setting forth the amount of such gains, profits, and
income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.
The government cannot lawfully regulate private
conduct. The ability to regulate private conduct is, in fact,
“repugnant to the constitution” as held by the U.S. Supreme Court. The
only thing the government can regulate is “public conduct” and the
“public rights” and franchises that enforce or implement it.
Consequently, the government must deceive private parties into
submitting false reports connecting their private labor and private
property to such a public use, public purpose, and public office in
order that they can usurp jurisdiction over it and thereby tax and
plunder it.
“The power to "legislate
generally upon" life, liberty, and property, as opposed to the
"power to provide modes of redress" against offensive state action,
was "repugnant" to the Constitution. Id., at 15. See also United
States v. Reese,
92 U.S. 214, 218
(1876); United
States v. Harris,
106 U.S. 629, 639
(1883) ; James v.
Bowman,
190 U.S. 127, 139
(1903) . Although the specific
holdings of these early cases might have been superseded or
modified, see, e.g., Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States,
379 U.S. 241 (1964); United States v. Guest,
383 U.S. 745 (1966), their treatment of
Congress' §5 power as corrective or preventive, not definitional,
has not been questioned.”
[City
of Boerne v. Florez, Archbishop of San Antonio, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)
]
In a sense, the
function of an information return therefore is to:
-
Provide evidence that the owner is consensually and lawfully
engaged in the “trade or business” and public office franchise. These
reports cannot lawfully be filed if this is not the case.
26 U.S.C.
§7206 and
7207 make it a crime to file a false report.
-
Donate formerly private property described on the
report to a public use, a public purpose,
and a public office with the consent of the owner without
any immediate or monetary compensation in order to procure the
“benefits” incident to participation in the franchise.
-
Subject the property to excise taxation upon the “trade or
business” activity.
-
Subject the property to use and control by the government:
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable rights,-'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;' and
to 'secure,' not grant or create, these rights, governments are
instituted. That property [or income] which a man has honestly
acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations:
First, that he shall not use it to his neighbor's injury, and that
does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor's benefit [e.g.
SOCIAL SECURITY, Medicare, and every other public “benefit”];
second, that if he devotes it to a
public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use;
and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take
it upon payment of due compensation.”
[Budd v. People of State of New
York,
143 U.S. 517 (1892)]
On the other hand, if
the information return:
-
Was filed against an owner of the property described who is not
lawfully engaged in a public office or a “trade or business” in the U.S.
government. . .OR
-
Was filed in a case where the owner of the
private
property did not consent to donate the property described to a public
use and a public office by signing a contract or agreement authorizing
such as an IRS Form W-4. . .OR
-
Was filed mistakenly or fraudulently.
. . .then the
following crimes have occurred:
1.
A violation of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause has
occurred:
U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment
No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on
a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in
the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in
time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the
same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor
be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.
2.
A violation of due process has occurred. Any taking of property
without the consent of the owner is a violation of due process of law.
3.
The subject of the information return is being compelled to
impersonate a public officer in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912.
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 43 > § 912
§ 912. Officer or employee of the United States
Whoever falsely assumes or
pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the
United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as
such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money,
paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
4.
An unlawful conversion of private property to
public property has occurred in criminal violation of
18
U.S.C. §654. Only
officers of the government called “withholding agents” appointed under
the authority of
26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(16) and the I.R.C. can lawfully file these
information returns or withhold upon the proceeds of the transaction.
All withholding and reporting agents are public officers, not private
parties, whether they receive direct compensation for acting in that
capacity or not.
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 31 > § 654
§ 654. Officer or employee of United States converting property of
another
Whoever, being an officer or employee of the
United States or of any department or agency thereof, embezzles or
wrongfully converts to his own use the money or property of another
which comes into his possession or under his control in the execution of
such office or employment, or under color or claim of authority as such
officer or employee, shall be fined under this title or not more than
the value of the money and property thus embezzled or converted,
whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
but if the sum embezzled is $1,000 or less, he shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
If you would like to
learn more about how the above mechanisms work, see:
Nearly all private
Americans are not in fact and in deed lawfully engaged in a “public
office” and cannot therefore serve within such an office without
committing the crime of impersonating a public officer. This is
exhaustively proven in the following:
What makes someone a
“private American” is, in fact, that they are not lawfully engaged in a
public office or any other government franchise. All franchises, in
fact, make those engaged into public officers of one kind or another and
cause them to forfeit their status as a private person and give up all
their constitutional rights in the process. See:
IRS therefore
mis-represents and mis-enforces the Internal Revenue Code by abusing their tax forms and their
untrustworthy printed propaganda as a method:
- To unlawfully create public offices in the government in places
they are forbidden to even exist pursuant to
4 U.S.C. §72.
- To “elect” the average American unlawfully into such an office.
- To cause those involuntarily serving in the office to unlawfully
impersonate a public officer in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912.
- To enforce the obligations of the office upon those who are not
lawfully occupying said office.
- Of election fraud, whereby the contributions collected cause
those who contribute them to bribe a public official to procure the
office that they occupy with unlawfully collected monies, in criminal
violation of
18 U.S.C. §210. IRS Document 6209 identifies all IRS Form W-2 contributions as “gifts” to the U.S. government, which
is a polite way of describing what actually amounts to a bribe.
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 11 > § 210
§ 210. Offer to procure appointive public office
Whoever pays or offers or promises any money
[withheld unlawfully] or thing of value, to any person, firm, or
corporation in consideration of the use or promise to use any
influence to procure any appointive [public] office or place under the
United States for any person, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
For instance, innocent Americans ignorant of the
law are deceived into volunteering to unlawfully accept the obligations
of a public office by filing an IRS Form W-4 “agreement” to withhold pursuant to
26 U.S.C. §3402(p), 26 CFR §31.3401(a)-3(a), and 26 CFR
§31.3402(p)-1. To wit:
26 CFR
§31.3401(a)-3 Amounts deemed wages
under voluntary withholding agreements.
(a) In general.
Notwithstanding the exceptions to the definition of
wages specified in section 3401(a) and the regulations thereunder, the
term “wages” includes the amounts described in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section with respect to which there is a voluntary withholding agreement
in effect under section 3402(p). References in this chapter to the
definition of wages contained in section 3401(a) shall be deemed to
refer also to this section (§31.3401(a)–3).
_________________________________________________________________________________________
26 CFR § 31.3402(p)-1 Voluntary withholding agreements.
(a) In general.
An employee and his employer may enter into an
agreement under section 3402(b) to provide for the withholding of income
tax upon payments of amounts described in paragraph (b)(1) of
§31.3401(a)–3, made after December 31, 1970. An agreement may be
entered into under this section only with respect to amounts which are
includible in the gross income of the employee under section 61, and
must be applicable to all such amounts paid by the employer to the
employee. The amount to be withheld pursuant to an agreement
under section 3402(p) shall be determined under the rules contained in
section 3402 and the regulations thereunder. See §31.3405(c)–1, Q&A–3
concerning agreements to have more than 20-percent Federal income tax
withheld from eligible rollover distributions within the meaning of
section 402.
Those who have not
voluntarily signed and submitted the IRS Form W-4 contract/agreement
and who are were not lawfully engaged in a
“public office” within the U.S. government BEFORE
they signed any tax form cannot truthfully or lawfully earn reportable
“wages” as legally defined in
26 U.S.C. §3402. Therefore, even if the IRS sends a “lock-down”
letter telling the private employer to withhold at a rate of “single
with no exemptions”, he must withhold ONLY on the amount of “wages”
earned, which is still zero. If a W-2 is filed against a person who
does not voluntarily sign and submit the W-4 or who is not lawfully
engaged in a public office:
1.
The amount reported must be ZERO for everything on the form, and
especially for “wages”.
2.
If any amount reported is other than zero, then the payroll clerk
submitting the W-2 is criminally liable for filing a false return under
26 U.S.C. §7206 ,
punishable as a felony for up to a $100,000 fine and three years in
jail.
3.
If you also warned the payroll clerk that they were doing it
improperly in writing and have a proof you served them with it, their
actions also become fraudulent and they are additionally liable under
26 U.S.C. §7207 , punishable as a felony for up to $10,000 and
up to one year in jail.
The heart of the tax
fraud and SCAM perpetrated on a massive scale by our government then is:
1.
To publish IRS forms and publications which contain untrustworthy
information that deceives the public into believing that they have a
legal obligation to file false information returns against their
neighbor.
"IRS Publications, issued by the National Office,
explain the law in plain language for taxpayers and their advisors...
While a good source of general information, publications should not
be cited to sustain a position."
[Internal
Revenue Manual, Section 4.10.7.2.8
(05-14-1999)]
2.
To reinforce the deliberate deception and omissions in their
publications with verbal advice that is equally damaging and
untrustworthy:
p. 21: "As discussed in §2.3.3, the
IRS is not bound by its statements or
positions in unofficial pamphlets and publications."
p. 34: "6. IRS
Pamphlets and Booklets.
The
IRS is not bound by statements or positions in its unofficial
publications, such as handbooks and pamphlets."
p. 34: "7. Other
Written and Oral Advice. Most taxpayers' requests for advice
from the IRS are made orally. Unfortunately, the IRS is not bound by answers or positions stated by
its employees orally, whether in person or by telephone. According to
the procedural regulations, 'oral advice is advisory only and the
Service is not bound to recognize it in the examination of the
taxpayer's return.' 26 CFR §601.201(k)(2). In rare cases, however, the
IRS has been held to be equitably estopped to take a position different
from that stated orally to, and justifiably relied on by, the taxpayer.
The Omnibus Taxpayer Bill of Rights Act , enacted as
part of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 , gives taxpayers some comfort,
however. It amended section 6404 to require the Service to abate any
penalty or addition to tax that is attributable to advice furnished
in writing by any IRS agent or
employee acting within the scope of his official capacity. Section 6404
as amended protects the taxpayer only if the following conditions are
satisfied: the written advice from the IRS was issued in response to a
written request from the taxpayer; reliance on the advice was
reasonable; and the error in the advice did not result from inaccurate
or incomplete information having been furnished by the taxpayer. Thus,
it will still be difficult to bind the IRS even to written statements
made by its employees. As was true
before, taxpayers may be penalized for following oral advice from the
IRS."
[Tax Procedure and Tax
Fraud, Patricia Morgan, 1999, ISBN 0-314-06586-5 , West Group]
3.
To make it very difficult to describe yourself as either a
“nontaxpayer” or a person not subject to the Internal Revenue Code on
any IRS form. IRS puts the “exempt” option on their forms, but has no
option for “not subject”. You can be “not subject” and a “nontaxpayer”
without being “exempt” and if you want to properly and lawfully describe
yourself that way, you have to either modify their form or create your
own substitute. You cannot, in fact be an “exempt individual” as
defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(5) without first being an “individual”
and therefore subject to the I.R.C.. The following entity would be “not
subject” but also not an “exempt individual” or “exempt”, and could
include people as well as property:
TITLE 26 >
Subtitle F >
CHAPTER 79 > § 7701
§ 7701. Definitions
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise
distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent
thereof—
(31) Foreign estate or trust
(A) Foreign estate
The term “foreign
estate” means an estate the income of which, from sources without
the United States which is not effectively connected with the
conduct of a
trade or business within the
United States, is not includible in gross income under
subtitle A.
If you would like to
know more about this SCAM, see:
4.
For the IRS to be protected by a judicial “protection racket”
implemented by judges who have a conflict of interest as “taxpayers” in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §208 , 28 U.S.C. §144 ,
and 28 U.S.C. §455 .
This protection racket was instituted permanently upon federal judges
with the Revenue Act of 1932 as documented in:
4.1.
Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920)
4.2.
O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
4.3.
United States v. Hatter, 121 S.Ct 1782 (2001)
5.
To receive what they know in nearly all cases are false
information returns against innocent private parties who are
nontaxpayers and to act as money launderers for all amounts withheld
from these innocent parties.
6.
To protect the filers of these false reports.
6.1.
IRS Forms W-2, 1042-S, 1098, and 1099 do not
contain the individual identity of the person who prepared the form.
6.2.
Only IRS Forms 1096 and W-3 contain the identity and statement under
penalty of perjury signed by the specific individual person who
filed the false information return.
6.3. If
you send a FOIA to the Social Security Administration asking for the IRS
Forms 1096 and W-3 connected to the specific information returns filed against
you, they very conveniently will tell you that they don’t have the
documents, even though they are the ONLY ones who receive them in the
government! They instead tell you to send a FOIA to the IRS to obtain
them. For example, see the following:
If you want to see the
document the above request responds to, see:
6.4.
The IRS then comes back and says they don’t keep the original Forms 1096
and W-3 either! Consequently, there is no way to identify the specific
individual who filed the original false reports or to prosecute them
criminally under
26 U.S.C. §§7206 and
7207 or civilly under
26 U.S.C.
§7434 . In that sense, IRS FOIA offices act as
“witness protection programs” for those communist informants for the
government willfully engaged in criminal activity.
Internal Revenue Manual
3.5.20.19
(10-01-2003)
Information Returns Transcripts - 1099
Information
1.
Generally, information returns are destroyed upon processing.
Therefore, original returns cannot be retrieved. In addition, the IRS
may not have record of all information returns filed by payers. The
Information Returns Master File (IRMF), accessed by CC IRPTR, contains
records of many information returns. The master files are not complete
until October of the year following the issuance of the information
document, and contain the most current year and five (5) previous years.
Taxpayers should be advised to first seek copies of information
documents from the payer. However, upon request, taxpayers or their
authorized designee may receive "information return " information.
2.
Follow guidelines IRM 3.5.20.1 through 3.5.20.11, to ensure
requests are complete and valid.
3.
This information can be requested on TDS.
4.
This information is also available using IRPTR with definer W.
5.
If IRPTR is used without definer W, the following items must be
sanitized before the information is released:
·
CASINO CTR
·
CMIR Form 4790
·
CTR
6.
Form 1099 information is not available through Latham.
[SOURCE:
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part3/ch02s02.html]
7.
To deliberately interfere with efforts to correct these false
reports by those who are the wrongful subject of them:
7.1
By penalizing filers of
corrected information returns up to $5,000 for each Form 4852 filed
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §6702.
7.2. By
not providing forms to correct the false reports for ALL THOSE who could
be the subject of them. IRS Form 4852, for instance, says at the top “Attach
to Form 1040, 1040A, 1040-EZ, or 1040X
.” There is no equivalent form for use by nonresident aliens who
are victims of false IRS Form W-2 or 1099-R and who file a
1040NR.
7.3. To
refuse to accept W-2C forms filed by those other than “employers”.
7.4. To
refuse to accept custom, substitute, or modified forms that would
correct the original reports.
7.5. To
not help those submitting the corrections by saying that they were not
accepted, why they were not accepted, or how to make them acceptable.
8.
To ignore correspondence directed at remedying all the above
abuses and thereby obstruct justice and condone and encourage further
unlawful activity.
So what we have folks
is a deliberate, systematic plan that:
1.
Turns innocent parties called “nontaxpayers” into guilty
parties called “taxpayers”, which the U.S. Supreme Court said they
cannot do.
"In Calder v. Bull, which was here in 1798,
Mr.
Justice Chase said, that there were acts which the Federal and State
legislatures could not do without exceeding their authority, and among
them he mentioned a law which punished a citizen for an innocent
act; a law that destroyed or impaired the lawful private [labor]
contracts [and labor compensation, e.g. earnings from employment through
compelled W-4 withholding] of citizens; a law that made a man judge in
his own case; and a law that took the property from A [the
worker]. and gave it to B [the government or another citizen, such as
through social welfare programs]. 'It is against all reason and
justice,' he added, 'for a people to intrust a legislature with such
powers, and therefore it cannot be presumed that they have done it. They
may command what is right and prohibit what is wrong; but they cannot
change innocence into guilt, or punish innocence [being a "nontaxpayer"] as a crime
[being a "taxpayer"], or violate
the right of an antecedent lawful private [employment] contract [by
compelling W-4 withholding, for instance], or the right of private
property. To maintain that a Federal or
State legislature possesses such powers [of THEFT!] if they had not been
expressly restrained, would, in my opinion, be a political heresy
altogether inadmissible in all free
republican governments.' 3 Dall. 388."
[Sinking
Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878)
]
2.
Constitutes a conspiracy to destroy equal protection and equal treatment
that is the foundation of the Constitution, assigning all sovereignty to
the government, and compelling everyone to worship and serve it without
compensation.
3.
Constitutes a conspiracy to destroy all Constitutional rights by compelling
Americans through false reports to service the obligations of an office they
cannot lawfully occupy and derive no benefit from:
"It has long been established that a State may not
impose a penalty upon those who exercise a right guaranteed by the
Constitution." Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of
California, 271 U.S. 583 . "Constitutional
rights would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied,'
Smith v. Allwriqht, 321 U.S. 649, 644 , or
manipulated out of existence,' Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339,
345."
[Harman v. Forssenius,
380 U.S 528 at 540, 85 S.Ct. 1177, 1185 (1965) ]
4.
Constitutes an abuse of tax forms as a federal election device to unlawfully
elect those who aren’t eligible and without their consent into public
office in the government, in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912 .
5.
Encourages Americans on a massive scale to file false reports
against their neighbor that compel them into economic servitude and
slavery without compensation:
“You shall not circulate a false report [information
return]. Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous
witness.”
[Exodus, 23:1, Bible, NKJV]
“You shall not bear false witness [or
file a FALSE REPORT or information return] against your neighbor.”
[Exodus 10:16 , Bible, NKJV]
“A false witness will not go unpunished, And he who
speaks lies shall perish.”
[Prov. 19:9 , Bible, NKJV]
“If a false witness rises against any man to
testify against him of wrongdoing, then both men in the
controversy shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the
judges who serve in those days. And the judges shall make careful
inquiry, and indeed, if the witness is a false witness, who has
testified falsely against his brother, then you shall do to him as he
thought to have done to his brother; [enticement into slavery
(pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §1994 )] to the demands of others without compensation] so you
shall put away the evil from among you. And those who remain shall hear
and fear, and hereafter they shall not again commit such evil among
you. Your eye shall not pity: life shall be for life, eye for eye,
tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.”
[Deut. 19:16-21, Bible, NKJV]
6.
Constitutes a plan to implement communism in America. The Second Plank of
the Communist Manifesto is a heavy,
progressive income tax that punishes the rich and abuses the taxation
powers of the government to redistribute wealth.
7.
Constitutes a conspiracy to replace a de jure Constitutional Republic into
nothing but a big for-profit private corporation and business in which:
7.1.
Government becomes a virtual or political entity rather than physical
entity tied to a specific territory. All the “States” after the Civil
War rewrote their Constitutions to remove references to their physical
boundaries. Formerly “sovereign” and independent states have become
federal territories and federal corporations by signing up for federal
franchises:
At common law, a
"corporation" was an "artificial perso[n] endowed with the legal
capacity of perpetual succession" consisting either of a single
individual (termed a "corporation sole") or of a collection of several
individuals (a "corporation aggregate"). 3 H. Stephen, Commentaries on
the Laws of England 166, 168 (1st Am. ed. 1845) . The sovereign
was considered a corporation. See id., at 170; see also 1 W. Blackstone,
Commentaries *467. Under the definitions supplied by contemporary law
dictionaries, Territories would have been classified as "corporations"
(and hence as "persons") at the time that 1983 was enacted and the
Dictionary Act recodified. See W.
Anderson, A Dictionary of Law 261 (1893) ("All corporations were
originally modeled upon a state or nation"); 1 J. Bouvier, A Law
Dictionary Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of
America 318-319 (11th ed. 1866)
("In this extensive sense the United States
may be termed a corporation"); Van Brocklin v. Tennessee, 117 U.S. 151,
154 (1886) ("`The United States is a . . . great
corporation . . . ordained and established by the American people'")
(quoting United [495 U.S. 182, 202]
States v. Maurice, 26 F. Cas. 1211,
1216 (No. 15,747) (CC Va. 1823)
(Marshall, C. J.));
Cotton v. United
States, 11 How. 229, 231 (1851) (United States is "a corporation").
See generally Trustees of Dartmouth College v.
Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 561-562 (1819) (explaining history of term
"corporation").
[Ngiraingas v. Sanchez, 495 U.S.
182 (1990)]
7.2.
All rights have been replaced with legislatively created corporate
“privileges” and franchises. See:
7.3.
“citizens” and “residents” are little more than “employees” and officers
of the corporation described in
26 U.S.C. §6671(b),
26 U.S.C. §7343,
and
5 U.S.C. §2105. See:
7.4.
You join the club and become an officer and employee of the corporation
by declaring yourself to be a statutory but not constitutional “U.S. citizen” on a government form. See:
7.5.
Social Security Numbers and Taxpayer Identification Numbers serve as de
facto license numbers authorizing those who use them to act in the
capacity of a public officer, trustee, and franchisee within the
government. See:
7.6.
Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) serve as a
substitute for lawful money and are really nothing but private scrip for internal use by
officers of the government. They are not lawful money because they
are not redeemable in gold or silver as required by the Constitution. See:
7.7.
So-called "Income Taxes” are nothing but insurance premiums to pay for “social insurance
benefits”. They
are also used to regulate the supply of fiat currency. See:
7.8.
The so-called “law book”, the Internal Revenue Code, is the private law
franchise agreement which regulates compensation to and “kickbacks” from
the officers of the corporation, which includes you. See:
7.9.
Federal courts are really just private binding corporate arbitration for
disputes between fellow officers of the corporation. See:
7.10.
Terms in the Constitution have been redefined to limit themselves to
federal territory not protected by the original de jure constitution
through judicial and prosecutorial word-smithing.
“When words lose their meaning, people will lose their
liberty " .”
[Confucius, 500 B.C. ]
“Judicial verbicide is calculated to convert the
Constitution into a worthless scrap of paper and to replace our
government of laws with a judicial oligarchy.”
[Senator Sam Ervin, during Watergate hearing]
See:
7.10.1.
Meaning of the Words “Includes” and “Including”,
Form #05.014
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
7.10.2.
Rules of Presumption and Statutory Interpretation, Litigation
Tool #01.006
http://sedm.org/Litigation/LitIndex.htm
8.
Constitutes a plan to unwittingly recruit the average American into servitude
of this communist/socialist effort.
TITLE 50
>
CHAPTER 23
>
SUBCHAPTER IV
> Sec. 841.
Sec. 841. - Findings and declarations of fact
The Congress finds and
declares that the Communist Party of the United States [consisting of
the IRS, DOJ, and a corrupted federal judiciary], although purportedly a
political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to
overthrow the [de jure] Government of the United States [and replace it
with a de facto government ruled by the judiciary]. It constitutes an
authoritarian dictatorship [IRS, DOJ, and corrupted federal judiciary
in collusion] within a [constitutional]
republic, demanding for
itself the rights and
privileges [including
immunity from prosecution for their wrongdoing in violation of
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the
Constitution] accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the liberties [Bill of Rights] guaranteed by the
Constitution. Unlike political parties, which evolve their
policies and programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a
wide variety of individual views, and submit those policies and programs
to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and
programs of the Communist Party are secretly [by corrupt judges and
the IRS in complete disregard of the tax laws] prescribed for it by
the foreign leaders of the world Communist movement [the IRS and
Federal Reserve]. Its members [the Congress, which was
terrorized to do IRS bidding recently by the framing of
Congressman Traficant] have
no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent
to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members of the
Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination [in the public schools
by homosexuals, liberals, and socialists] with respect to its objectives
and methods, and are organized, instructed, and disciplined [by the IRS
and a corrupted judiciary] to carry into action slavishly the
assignments given them by their hierarchical chieftains.
Unlike political parties, the Communist Party [thanks to a
corrupted federal judiciary]
acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its conduct
or upon that of its members.
The
Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and gives scant
indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political
means. The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its
numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the
nature of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the
present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must
be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to
force and
violence [or using income
taxes]. Holding that doctrine, its role as the agency of a
hostile
foreign power [the Federal
Reserve and the American Bar Association (ABA)] renders its existence a
clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United
States. It is the means whereby individuals are seduced into the
service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its bidding, and
directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their
revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist Party should be
outlawed
9.
Constitutes an effort to create and perpetuate a state-sponsored religion and
to compel “tithes” called income tax to the state-sponsored church,
which is the government:
To close this
section, we highly recommend the following FOIA you can send to the
IRS and the Social Security Administration that is useful as a
reliance defense to expose the FRAUD described in this section upon
the American people:
|
