weishaupt1776
Forum Replies Created
I know, it's a big mess. It is my shallow understanding that this DIB is supposed to make sure that an agencies computer records match w/ the main system of records in DC, to investigate discrepencies in ANY SYSTEM OF RECORDS, to correct it, and to stop disclosing false information as a result.
It is my OPINION that going to just the Ogden IRS or D.C. IRS Disc offices to correct the IMF is not enough.
TIGTA IG is supposed to investigate employee fraud & is also a DIB head.
This is new, and I was just looking for some buddies to maybe help me understand this.
Have you checked out the updates on TO 120-01 I have posted?
http://forum.suijuris.net/showthread.php?p=23688
To clarify, I walk the walk, ask JWR. I am in District right now filing an action against an agent so I am running on instinct. You gotta see this knock-down drag out FOIA I'm doing and you gotta see the addresses I'm sending 'em to. I will disclose those later.
Thanks for replying
Thing is the Title is Application of Internal Revenue Laws. It mentions the same stuff as TO 120 minus 51 & 52. We know that there are Internal rev laws & then there are income tax laws.
check this reg:
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TITLE 28–JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER I–DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PART 0–ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SUBPART W–BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES
Current through February 9, 2005; 70 FR 6973
? 0.130 General functions.
Subject to the direction of the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives shall:
(a) Investigate, administer, and enforce the laws related to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, explosives, and arson, and perform other duties as assigned by the Attorney General, including exercising the functions and powers of the Attorney General under the following provisions of law:
(1) 18 U.S.C. chapters 40 (related to explosives), 44 (related to firearms), 59 (related to liquor trafficking), and 114 (related to trafficking in contraband cigarettes);
(2) Chapter 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. chapter 53 (related to certain firearms and destructive devices);
(3) Chapters 61 through 80, inclusive , of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. chapters 61–80, insofar as they relate to activities administered and enforced with respect to chapter 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. chapter 53
Did you know that on the front cover of any Title 26, it says on the preface page III:
* The section numbers of Title 26, USCA, and the Internal Revenue Code are identical?
Cheers,
Weis
I believe I am on the edge of some new insights
http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?ac…&st=0#entry1180
JWR referred me here and got me on the trail w/26USC 7801
Here is my analysis of it:
http://forum.suijuris.net/showpost.php?p=22586&postcount=7
The problem I am having is them finding a loophole w/ the phrases “insofar”, “to the extent that”, etc . . .
One thing y'all haven't hit yet in this thread is 28 CFR .130.
I know that the clear answer is staring me right in the face
I believe that I am on the edge of some new insights HERE
http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?ac…&st=0#entry1180.
