Family Guardian | weishaupt1776 | Activity https://famguardian.org/members/weishaupt1776/activity/ Activity feed for weishaupt1776. Wed, 01 Apr 2026 22:17:18 +0000 https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0 en-US 30 hourly 2 75d70b0001f7ed4ecf52041dd9f1ca2e weishaupt1776 replied to the discussion Data Integrity Board in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/data-integrity-board/#post-9056 Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:54:42 +0000 Reply to Data Integrity Board

I know, it's a big mess. It is my shallow understanding that this DIB is supposed to make sure that an agencies computer records match w/ the main system of records in DC, to investigate discrepencies in ANY SYSTEM OF RECORDS, to correct it, and to stop disclosing false information as a result.

It is my OPINION that going to just the Ogden IRS… Read more

]]> d535b0b89719af848f8c769b991dac3d weishaupt1776 replied to the discussion Silver Bullet in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/silver-bullet/#post-8747 Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:27:35 +0000 Reply to Silver Bullet

Thing is the Title is Application of Internal Revenue Laws. It mentions the same stuff as TO 120 minus 51 & 52. We know that there are Internal rev laws & then there are income tax laws.
check this reg:
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TITLE 28–JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER I–DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PART 0–ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT… Read more

]]> 19a1063ca116fdb29d841beb5d3b37f2 weishaupt1776 replied to the discussion T.O. # 120-01 in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/t-o-120-01/#post-8723 Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:08:07 +0000 Reply to T.O. # 120-01

I believe I am on the edge of some new insights
http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?ac…&st=0#entry1180

]]> 51aa9543336e3fc4a5a90f61adf9b8b0 weishaupt1776 replied to the discussion Silver Bullet in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/silver-bullet/#post-8745 Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:03:06 +0000 Reply to Silver Bullet

JWR referred me here and got me on the trail w/26USC 7801
Here is my analysis of it:
http://forum.suijuris.net/showpost.php?p=22586&postcount=7

The problem I am having is them finding a loophole w/ the phrases “insofar”, “to the extent that”, etc . . .

One thing y'all haven't hit yet in this thread is 28 CFR .130.
I know that the clear… Read more

]]>