stija
Forum Replies Created
I've flown recently and at the airport thy had a 'Y' shaped path to go to.
Right lead to the scanner and left through the old metal scanners like they always had. The TSA agent was standing at the point of the biforcation and telling people where to go. While some lady was scanned on the right he motioned 3 people ahead of me to keep going left through the simple metal detector. When i came up he motioned to stop. I stopped and watched him look over to his left (new scanners) to check how much more that lady would be.
When he looked at me again i said, theres no point in waiting since i am not going thru that. He didnt catch it at first and asked me to repeat and as i repeated he just motioned me to the left.
The second time (flight back) i didnt get profiled.
And my favorite, Justice Thomas never even gets past the “ordinary meaning” and how there is no conflicts between the laws themselves. So he never addresses the constituitional issue, which i would hope would be 100% concurrent with Justice Scalia's.
So if the first canon of statutory interpretation is to not go beyond the language in the statute itself, assuming that language is clear and unambiguous, then Justice Thomas used the correct approach. He just follows the rules it seems. And more importantly he knows what they are.
Can a Supreme Court opinion be appealed? Obviously only Scalia and Thomas got it right. What kind of precedent does this set? I'd like to quote Scalia especially so can that be used as precedent even if a dissenting opinion?
As simply as i can put it…..Congress can legislate outside Constitutional restraints for its territory (excluding territory that was part of a state) and its property. Since Constitution does not apply to (most of) the federal zone they legislated the bill of rights to give federal slaves and property some rights (privileges).
No problem but it is rather simplistic. I figured i did not want to say more than necessary to get the point accross that i know what i have to give and what i don't.
Also, where is the chip exactly? Is it in the little flag type golden rectangle with the dot in the middle??
Quote:**************************************************************
USA Passport Application AttachmentTo whom it may concern:
I am providing this additional attachment because I want to ensure that my status is accurately and precisely reflected on the required DS-11 form. My right to choose how to express myself and interact with my federal government is guaranteed by my first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore to remain compliant and use a proper and required DS-11 form, I choose to add an attachment to clarify my citizenship and national status:
- I am a Constitutional citizen and non-citizen national per 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and 8 U.S.C. §1452
Please find attached a diagram documenting the different citizenship and nationality statuses in Title 8 of federal law as well as the three different definitions of United States pursuant to United States Supreme Court.
I also did not provide a Social Security Number because that number is the property of the Social Security Administration as evidenced by current law and on the back of the card itself. I choose not to mix public property in my private affairs and am not required to do such thing by law.
Please refrain from sending me the IN-709-01 form as procedure because such form is neither legally authorized nor required to be filled out by me. The only requirement for issuance of my travel passport document is proof of my allegiance pursuant to 22 U.S.C. §212.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746(1) I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
/s/ Date:
I also attached the venn diagram of the different United States. As far as the DS-11 goes, i pretty much left the whole 2nd page blank except the residential address: “God's Kingdom” and City: “Heaven”. My parents information was answered with 'private'.
I got my passport today. 😀
Very interesting and very funny!
So then this really would take precedence over the U.S. Constitution which was drafted upon it. But what advantage would this give you over the Constitution?
Well depends what the controversy in the case is. You can challenge jurisdiction based on your domicile which most likely will be a union state but it depends on the question or subject matter before the court.
For example…if you are accused of counterfeiting currency or some other currency related crime, feds do have jurisdiction over that. And many other things per Article 1 Section 8 of U.S. Constitution.
In either case it would not be wise to challenge something you don't truly understand. Don't you agree?
I just applied for my first american passport at the local usps office. The lady was courteous and actually read the one page attachment i compiled along with the copy of the three united states diagram. She asked if you could make a copy of it before i signed it and my name appeared on it anywhere for someone else who may be interested in this. She also inquired if i was a lawyer. All in all she was very receptive.
As far as application goes it does not include the ssn and permanent residence is heaven. All other non crucial information was left blank. The less i give them the better. In retrospect i shouldn't have provided my personal cell phone on there either. A slip up.
I also heard from the post office clerk that a few people have applied without SSNs in the past and some of them were living without SSN per what they told her when she asked why no SSN.
Now we wait.
Thank you for your answers.
In regards to statutory privileges, there must have been a misunderstanding. The only reason federal statutes may get mentioned is as a request for production of the alleged federal statutory authority on the private business associate that prohibits processing of w-8ben forms. We know that such federal statutes don't exist and can't exist.
The judicial notice will make sure and crystal clear that the private citizen entering court is doing so by his own God given and constitutionally protected right in defense of his private rights and property. This actually makes me think of another issue. Can a federal civil suit be brought under both constitutional diversity of citizenship (not statutory) AND federal question or does it have to be one or the other.
Also what did you think of breaking it into two separate actions. First focusing on nonexistance of federal statute prohibiting the foreign private business associate (delaware corp) from processing w-8ben as alleged by them. The second, after the first one is won, would have a bases for illegal plunder, involuntary servitude, undermining sovereignty, etc because all actions were done illegaly without clear lawful authority. This route of two separate actions makes more sense in my head as it makes the first one really simple and easy to win since there is absolutely nothing they can present to prove their case.
Then once you obtain ruling that there is no such statute or federal law…….the rest will come easy as they clearly were acting outside the law and injuring private citizen.
If a private citizen filed W-8BEN forms with his private employer and this private employer was under the impression that the private citizen is pulling some sort of a scam by filing this form and call his arguments frivolous and refuses to process the form on the basis that 'there are federal rules and regulations that prohibit processing” such forms for such frivolous territorial arguments. Bunch of nonsense really, no legal evidence whatsoever.
Lets further suppose that the private citizen files an action in equity in fed court under federal question jurisdiction. Would it be advisable, or a good tactic, to keep it simple and obtain judgement in regards to there not being any statute or federal law (and the impossibility thereof) that would dictate what form a private citizen would file or authorizing the employer to disregard or not process testimony on a proper federal form given by the citizen to the private employer. In other words simply force the private employer to either produce this alleged auhtority to refuse the w-8ben or ask the court to rule that there is no such statute for lack of legal evidence and compel performance of processing such form by the private employer.
Aaaaand then file another action in equity for tort/torts and ask for damages. So separate the lawsuits in two separate suits. One to compel production of legal evidence or process the form and the other one asking for damages. The strategy would be to keep it simple in the first action to obtain the most important judgement –that there is no federal law authorizing private employers to refuse to process testimony on proper federal forms given them by their private employees. Then once this judgement is obtained and the private employer obviously acted without clear legal authority, it would make a much better cause of action for the damages sought in the second complaint. Does this strategy actually make legal sense and simplifying things?
Additionally, if anyone wants to chime in and let me know if i am understanding the federal rules of civil procedure correctly. Federal Rules of Civil procedure take precedence where there are no local federal rules of civil procedure as in when it says 'no local rule'. But if there are local rules, do these local rules take precedence over federal rules or are they additional and in conjunction to the already set federal rules of civil procedure? In other words if there is a local rule, is that the rule to obey or do i have to read it in the context of the federal rules of civil procedure.
What is the difference in random assignment to a District Judge vs a Magistrate Judge? The difference in judges is not explained in the rules of local procedure. Are they the same or is one of the constitutionally authorized while the other isn't and that is the trick they are trying to pull because it speaks of having to consent to the Magistrate Judges authority and give him jurisdiction under rule LRCiv 3.8 of Arizona local rules.
Link to the local arizona rules.
http://www.azd.uscou…pdf?openelement
Which judge does a constitutional state citizen want?
This is coming in very handy. Thank you very much for these links.
S
You will not get a non US citizen passport. You can only make sure that your application for the same will reflect your correct status as a citizen of your state and a federal non citizen national. In other words, your testimony will reflect who and what you are, but the the passport will be the same for all of us.
Good job anonymous member. Keep up the good work brother.
@moneymaker….buddy, with all due respect, if you can't figure out what cover letter to send please don't take this journey into legal land. If you really can't figure out a simple task like that it's the best advice you can get this time.
