stija
Forum Replies Created
Very cute.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said:
Quote:This instance will not and cannot be addressed by the Federal government because it is 100% outside of their purview. This is the brilliance behind the scheme — out of sight; out of mind.'…..this is almost like a microcosm of american foreign policy…' says the commentator. Ha ha ha… gave me a good chuckle.
Wow. Someone really wanted this guy in jail.
I did enjoy reading Justice Scalia's reasoning.
Wow. I don't know what to say.
Both of mine have it.
🙂
Beautifully said. So simple. Let them prove it applies to us. 1 by 1 preferably hhehee.
Neo, while i certainly agree and understand what you are saying and we all understand each other in these forums, i am very doubtful that all your other recepients are. And this is regardless of how we present it to them.
It has been my experience that most of them just tune out after a point because they simply don't care or can't be bothered to even listen and think about it. Of the rare ones that actually do listen i find that half of them either already knew the concepts and just did not put it together while the other half remain very skeptical even if they now understand it. The real life long experiences have brainwashed them enough that they question the new learned truth and reality very hard.
In any event, i am not as confident as you that most of the people i explain this to even care to understand this let alone do understand it. Sad but true.
They are right partly, albeit they are abusing and mixing contexts.
The way i see it, in matters where United States has subject matter jurisdiction throughout the union, it is (can be called) not foreign in respect to the subjects regulated. However it is a well established fact that United States is a separate and foreign sovereign in all other aspects.
Additionally, United States government can only be said and called a national government in the context of the specific subject matter jurisdiction. In all other aspects it is legislatively foreign and a federal government and not a national one.
So long as you qualify it. That seems to be the key.
And in order to do that one must learn a lot of legal mumbo-jumbo instead of watching the Kardashians. Or Jersey Shore.
Larry would not want to be a national though.
This scares me when i realize how much control they want.
Neither did i know that the feds own ~30% of our land mass.
Alrighty then. Time to put some skills in practice.
I've got many skills….like napoleon dynamite. I love that movie. The first time i watched it i thought it was a joke. Apparently not so.
I am not quite clear on your last sentence. Am i to understand that if it is sued in federal court the only appropriate court is the U.S. Supreme court. But one could also sue them in state courts as well.
Thanks.
If one were to sue his own state for U.S. Constituion violations the only appropriate forum to do this would be federal district courts right?
Or can State Supreme Courts hear U.S. Constitutional violation cases? Would they not be biased in rendering and opinion against themselves though??
Just thinking…….
