<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | Sovereigneer | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/sovereigneer/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/sovereigneer/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Sovereigneer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 18:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e99277bab26d7325e8915d35efff03c6</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/9/#post-9600</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/9/#post-9600"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on Oct 27 2006, 11:03 AM:<br />
Based on AndyK&#039;s posts both here and at Q-loser Land, the feeble manner in which he attempts to argue, and certain other tells, I would conclude that he is just a young kid, probably around 26 &#8211; 32 years of age. I suspect  too that he let his mouth outpace his brain when he boldly promised he would rebut&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1694"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/9/#post-9600" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f4752fd585529916089d834f23fe940</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Sovereign marriage in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8317</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:17:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8317"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Sovereign marriage</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Oct 19 2006, 05:12 PM:<br />
Sovereigneer,</p>
<p>I have told you all the options I am aware of.  If you find others, please let us know.  God measures the degree of our faith by the amount of pain we must endure in putting it into practice.  If you would rather be safe and comfortable and behond ridicule of friends and family members&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7429"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8317" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2e7472f39875d2297baf575be7eeb6e</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat?? in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10703</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10703"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat??</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#039;Author wrote on &#039;Oct:<br />
See:<br />
<a href="http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/News/CHRuling-060615.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/News/CHRuling-060615.htm</a></p>
<p>Very thorough&#8230;I&#039;ll bet C. Hansen never worked for Reader&#039;s Digest did he&#8230;?   <img src="http://famguardian.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif" alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_img" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3b46c8ea1dd6a2f990a98ec5c29ee6af</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat?? in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10701</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10701"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat??</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes, I&#039;ve heard mention on this forum that FamG is under some sort of legal attack.  Are there any particular posts which discuss the particulars?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">67ca9eabf7f24480e658804a32b069f4</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Sovereign marriage in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8315</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8315"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Sovereign marriage</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Oct 16 2006, 01:50 AM:<br />
Sovereigneer,</p>
<p>The subject of correcting an existing licensed marriage is described in the Soivereign Christian Marriage Book on SEDM.  Basically, yoiu have to:<br />
1.  Create and sign a marital settlement agreement.<br />
2  Apply for a summary divorce in your state.<br />
3  Wait the required cool off period<br />
4  Gt&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7427"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8315" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5651005d22dbee1345e558eeaef8668c</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Authorized KJV v. NKJV  Issues in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/authorized-kjv-v-nkjv-issues/#post-10693</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:09:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/authorized-kjv-v-nkjv-issues/#post-10693"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Authorized KJV v. NKJV  Issues</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>ehudmii wrote on Oct 17 2006, 07:31 PM:<br />
I cannot speak for the Famguardian site or SEDM, nor for anyone but myself, my King, and my dependents,&#8230; however!  your choice of quote, regarding the word of the king as having power,&#8230; is reason to ask if you have studied the theme of &#8220;kingship&#8221; within the Scriptures and within history.</p>
<p>Has&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6404"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/authorized-kjv-v-nkjv-issues/#post-10693" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9cad7d13c25e13ea763f67b17d6cba24</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat?? in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10699</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10699"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat??</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>BOBT12 wrote on Oct 17 2006, 10:46 AM:</p>
<p>Sovereigneer wrote on Oct 16 2006, 11:26 PM:<br />
I&#039;ve been reading more and more of this document and the more I read&#8230;the more outraged I become.  You&#039;ve done a breathtakingly superb job of stating the moral and ethical ROT we&#039;ve experienced within our government and our land over the decades.  These&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5646"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10699" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06521dfd80c482e5ada46b1a9994c3ab</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat?? in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10697</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:26:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dl-terminated-but-then-used-to-identify-in-jurat/#post-10697"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> DL terminated but then used to identify in Jurat??</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I&#039;ve been reading more and more of this document and the more I read&#8230;the more outraged I become.  You&#039;ve done a breathtakingly superb job of stating the moral and ethical ROT we&#039;ve experienced within our government and our land over the decades.  These people really MUST be stopped.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a55198d15477942fcf0b5fdf223bf997</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Sovereign marriage in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8313</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:36:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8313"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Sovereign marriage</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I would like to know if there is any way to properly correct an existing marriage that was done under state license without going through a divorce and remarriage under the Sovereign Chrisgtian Marriage Book contract procedures?  </p>
<p>Is there a way to rescind the original marriage license application/license and redo the marriage correctly&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7425"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereriegn-marriage/#post-8313" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">73a23efcd990ff506856c2cda55b275b</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Regarding the possibility of hidden contracts in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10687</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:49:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10687"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Regarding the possibility of hidden contracts</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>BOBT12 wrote on Oct 9 2006, 03:20 PM:<br />
You cannot give away sometime you have no rights to. For instance, you cannot sell your neighbor&#039;s car, without his or her consent, by accident, or on purpose.</p>
<p>That is MY understanding of the situation as well.</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
There is no true contract without understanding and agreement. However, if you&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6851"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10687" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77737ab1c484b02dc68539ad7411d6af</guid>
				<title>Sovereigneer replied to the discussion Regarding the possibility of hidden contracts in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10685</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:48:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10685"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Regarding the possibility of hidden contracts</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you Author #2,</p>
<p>I&#039;m trying to get my mind around the question of just how one becomes alienated from supposedly &#8220;unalienable/inalienable&#8221; rights&#8230;</p>
<p>I can understand encumbrances upon my rights where tort law is concerned and I understand some things about contract law.  However, I have a hard time figuring out how we can &#8220;contract&#8221;&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6849"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/regarding-the-possibility-of-hidden-contracts/#post-10685" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		