<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | Requiem | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/requiem/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/requiem/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Requiem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.5.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4d53fa9b162b24bbb7b5fd761298c501</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Rule 16 Conference Required in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rule-16-conference-required/#post-15162</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rule-16-conference-required/#post-15162"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Rule 16 Conference Required</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Update: The Magistrate has backed down, I believe. I did not file any of the above with the Court. I do however, have a fee schedule that I wrote up and almost filed, and as soon as I have time, I will locate it and copy/paste it here.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">26d0aa1f8be299b73658703e3ef2d05b</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Rule 16 Conference Required in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rule-16-conference-required/#post-15160</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:13:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rule-16-conference-required/#post-15160"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Rule 16 Conference Required</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>To answer your questions: both Federal.</p>
<p>Now, please don&#039;t think of me as stupid&#8230;but&#8230;</p>
<p>1. When you say &#8220;Fee Schedule&#8221;, you mean, for example: the rate per hour of work/time spent dealing with their crap?<br />
2. And when you say &#8220;Notice of Lien&#8221;, you mean a regular notice of lien, specifically, I&#039;m thinking a Nonconsensual lien? Per&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2500"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rule-16-conference-required/#post-15160" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3e992e47ad21667ee3764afbf1b47e9a</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion The Star Spangled banner&#039;s missing Second verse in the forum 2.4. Current events and alerts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-star-spangled-banners-missing-second-verse/#post-15147</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:33:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-star-spangled-banners-missing-second-verse/#post-15147"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Star Spangled banner&#39;s missing Second verse</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Remember this: the Star Spangled Banner tune was adopted from a supposed drinking song. And yet we had prohibition. Acorn alcohol saved Plymouth. And yet we had prohibition. 2-4% by volume alcohol rendered water drinkable during colonial days, yet we had prohibition. Americans forget their history.</p>
<p>The &#8220;In God We Trust&#8221; issue is due to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3091"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-star-spangled-banners-missing-second-verse/#post-15147" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3ad857994c7a957cd73d4362c1b30fe4</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion FBI, etc. Jurisdiction?  post-9-11? in the forum 3.1.1.  Federal abuses</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fbi-etc-jurisdiction-post-9-11/#post-14985</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:47:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/fbi-etc-jurisdiction-post-9-11/#post-14985"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FBI, etc. Jurisdiction?  post-9-11?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sorry to being this up again, but I was speaking to a friend, who brought up something I could not myself refute properly&#8230;</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
(2) without limiting the authority to investigate any matter which is conferred on them or on a department or agency of the Government.</p>
<p>My friend said that since the FBI investigates matters that are usually,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2337"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fbi-etc-jurisdiction-post-9-11/#post-14985" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ddef5a2043fa0fb570157b12fc67d2a3</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion 28 USC 1441 and 28 USC 1451 in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/28-usc-1441-and-28-usc-1451/#post-15071</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/28-usc-1441-and-28-usc-1451/#post-15071"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 28 USC 1441 and 28 USC 1451</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you Neo, I&#039;ll have to read through the Includes and including stuff, yes, and will have to thoroughly read trough the other things in more detail than a one-time read. I&#039;ll get back to that at a later time, if I have questions.</p>
<p>The one thing that I do have a question about however, is you&#039;re stating you believe the wording &#8220;includes&#8221;&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5299"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/28-usc-1441-and-28-usc-1451/#post-15071" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c133375274d761ff8a0f5c01d7f26ce</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion States of the Union are not &#034;foreign&#034; in relation to the national government in the forum 3.4.4. Flawed Tax Arguments to Avoid</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/states-of-the-union-are-not-foreign-in-relation-to-the-national-government/#post-15048</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/states-of-the-union-are-not-foreign-in-relation-to-the-national-government/#post-15048"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> States of the Union are not &#34;foreign&#34; in relation to the national government</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>What I&#039;ve noticed is simple: people don&#039;t want to believe they&#039;ve been deceived as much as they have been. They like the &#8220;security blanket&#8221; if you will.</p>
<p>How I&#039;ve managed to convince a few people: do a couple small tests. The simplest being sending mail for 2 or 3 cents through the post office. When it gets delivered (around here, it&#039;s about&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/states-of-the-union-are-not-foreign-in-relation-to-the-national-government/#post-15048" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4564dddd6874c17dd98f81a38ced651d</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion *So Obama&#039;s Father Served in WWII? in the forum 3.3.6.  Corruption of individual politicians</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/so-obamas-father-served-in-wwii/#post-15036</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/so-obamas-father-served-in-wwii/#post-15036"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> *So Obama&#39;s Father Served in WWII?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Emailed the link to a friend, who had an interesting idea&#8230;maybe he mis-spoke, and meant his grandfather.</p>
<p>His mother&#039;s father did serve in WWII. According to Google.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">807883b3d0636dd83bd72c3663517963</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Obamacare is constitutional -- here&#039;s why. in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obamacare-is-constitutional-heres-why/#post-15016</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:07:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/obamacare-is-constitutional-heres-why/#post-15016"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Obamacare is constitutional -- here&#39;s why.</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Romney has stated that he won&#039;t repeal Obamacare, just re-configure it or something to that effect. He&#039;s going to keep certain things (most of it), and get rid of certain things (the you have to pay for it), I don&#039;t know how he intends on doing that.</p>
<p>The ruling just astounds me, usually the Courts and Congress don&#039;t blatantly do things that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4718"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obamacare-is-constitutional-heres-why/#post-15016" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7c009c9e78e15c806890a9a8aa468d4b</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Micronations - Ability to Gain Int&#039;l Recognition in the forum 5.3.1.  General discussion</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/micronations-ability-to-gain-intl-recognition/#post-15024</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:49:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/micronations-ability-to-gain-intl-recognition/#post-15024"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Micronations - Ability to Gain Int&#39;l Recognition</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am terribly sorry if I have given you the impression that I am in some way forcing slave labor upon you, for that surely is not the intent.</p>
<p>I am reading a lot of your material, and re-reading a lot of it, and it is confusing on certain aspects. So I come here for assistance.</p>
<p>I have come to a realization that I have only barely assisted&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1662"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/micronations-ability-to-gain-intl-recognition/#post-15024" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c41002add3e66a5f202f47fbaa0329c</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion FBI, etc. Jurisdiction?  post-9-11? in the forum 3.1.1.  Federal abuses</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fbi-etc-jurisdiction-post-9-11/#post-14984</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:44:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/fbi-etc-jurisdiction-post-9-11/#post-14984"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FBI, etc. Jurisdiction?  post-9-11?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Ah. Sorry. I wasn&#039;t actually asking anyone to do research for me here, I just wondered if those acts would have changed it/supplemented it in any way.</p>
<p>I never thought of the fact that if they&#039;d been changed, they&#039;d need to update the USC to reflect it. Thanks for that bit of information. Clears up a good amount of questions.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7ac94f5dd8d4dd806e1e716412782ca0</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Articles of the Confederation in the forum 3.3.1.  General Corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/articles-of-the-confederation/#post-14980</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/articles-of-the-confederation/#post-14980"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Articles of the Confederation</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>So, if it&#039;s a supplement, does that mean that everything that Constituion disagrees with (per se) with the AOC, who trumps whom? Does anything in conflict render those parts null and void in the Const. or the AOC?</p>
<p>From what I&#039;ve read of the AOC recently, I&#039;d think the Const. would become null and void (at least the parts in disagreement) since&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7511"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/articles-of-the-confederation/#post-14980" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1da0914044e10483aba2fa477c7bb992</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Being a nontaxpayer without denumbering self in the forum 5.4.2. Stopping or Correcting Illegal or Erroneous Tax Withholding and/or Reporting</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14816</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:22:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14816"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Being a nontaxpayer without denumbering self</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Okay, I&#039;ll have to get back to reading everything, probably re-read what I&#039;ve already read. I want a full understanding of what I&#039;m doing before I do it, I hope you can at least understand and respect that.</p>
<p>A couple questions, again, a bit simpler I hope. Sorry to offend, if I have.</p>
<p>1. You still can get a driver&#039;s license without a SSN,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2820"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14816" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">47434ff9cdfe9df2ad3302cfd8f2124e</guid>
				<title>Requiem replied to the discussion Being a nontaxpayer without denumbering self in the forum 5.4.2. Stopping or Correcting Illegal or Erroneous Tax Withholding and/or Reporting</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14814</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14814"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Being a nontaxpayer without denumbering self</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Okay, so you can have a SSN and not use it, and be a non-taxpayer? And attach the form to everything?</p>
<p>A few questions then, if I might ask&#8230;</p>
<p>1.  How do you &#8220;fix&#8221; the SSN issue? If you divorce the US and denumber yourself, how do you correct the number to be &#8220;nothing&#8221; on documents you&#039;ve already submitted? Court to license to banks to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2818"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/being-a-nontaxpayer-without-denumbering-self/#post-14814" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		