<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | republic | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/republic/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/republic/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for republic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29762b75396e223335c3cb69c3436b39</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Why You Are a “national”... in the forum 9.3. Errata Reports</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-you-are-a-national/#post-12382</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:29:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/why-you-are-a-national/#post-12382"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Why You Are a “national”...</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p><a href="http://famguardian.org/Publications/WhyANational/WhyANational.pdf" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">Why You Are a &#8220;national&#8221;&#8230;</a><br />
The link to [Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265; 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821)] is broken.  This link is repeated on pp. 23,91, and 111.  A corrected link is:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=19&amp;invol=264" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://caselaw.lp.fi" rel="nofollow">http://caselaw.lp.fi</a>&#8230;ol=19&amp;invol=264</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4fc5e21612e8dcf5763b60ebc557d817</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion This is QUEEN PELOSI&#039;S NEW JET&#033;&#033;&#033; in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/this-is-queen-pelosis-new-jet/#post-12947</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:28:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/this-is-queen-pelosis-new-jet/#post-12947"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> This is QUEEN PELOSI&#39;S NEW JET&#33;&#33;&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin,</p>
<p>I appreciate this article, despite the fact that I was so disgusted I had dry heaves (I guess I was feeling emotional yesterday). This article made me furious despite the fact that I have a solid understanding of political philosophy, and have seen plenty of political waste in my day. Reflecting back on the experience of reading&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8247"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/this-is-queen-pelosis-new-jet/#post-12947" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dc9ed1f5d4608f19e70b7ea65b479d33</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Utter Frustration in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/utter-frustration/#post-12950</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:38:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/utter-frustration/#post-12950"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Utter Frustration</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Brian,</p>
<p>I understand the feelings that you have expressed.  Like Admin stated, it is not advisable, nor permitted for members of the ministry to provide specific advice to you and your situation.  However, it is clear that you do not have a comprehensive and coherent understanding of the material presented on the Family Guardian and SEDM&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6176"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/utter-frustration/#post-12950" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ece81eebd816edeaf537b5b797599d8e</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Health Care Bill in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/health-care-bill/#post-12902</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:12:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/health-care-bill/#post-12902"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Health Care Bill</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>It is axiomatic that this expansion of federal power into the medical industry is not to the benefit of the people, but I am not so much afraid of the potential pitfall that this legislation presents for those who would fall for it in ignorance, but rather I am afraid that there will be no health care for those who do not enter the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8248"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/health-care-bill/#post-12902" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">45bd8401ede755d48c7dc2e559ce5120</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Cut Wall Street Out&#033; in the forum 5.3.1.  General discussion</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cut-wall-street-out/#post-12898</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:10:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/cut-wall-street-out/#post-12898"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Cut Wall Street Out&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Interesting ideas, but whenever you are using a fractional reserve system, and the interest rates are manipulated by the political powers instead of by the interaction of savers and borrowers, the result is inevitably misallocation of resources and then a bust to liquidate the malinvestment.  The desire for loose monetary policy is an&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3722"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cut-wall-street-out/#post-12898" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">971e5331941122fb9a26a85624e99c33</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Did Canada become part of the United States recently? in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/did-canada-become-part-of-the-united-states-recently/#post-12882</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/did-canada-become-part-of-the-united-states-recently/#post-12882"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Did Canada become part of the United States recently?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
XI.<br />
Canada acceding to this confederation, and adjoining in the measures of the United States, shall be admitted into, and entitled to all the advantages of this Union; but no other colony shall be admitted into the same, unless such admission be agreed to by nine States.</p>
<p>&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6769"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/did-canada-become-part-of-the-united-states-recently/#post-12882" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6a6022bcf965960186516b54057aa9d</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion State constitutions and state boundaries in the forum 3.3.4. Privatization and corporatization of the government</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/state-constitutions-and-state-boundaries/#post-12885</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/state-constitutions-and-state-boundaries/#post-12885"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> State constitutions and state boundaries</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin,</p>
<p>I have not completed my research into this subject, but I will continue and will share my results with both ministries. I wanted to make sure I had not overlooked some other research into this aspect of the privatization of government. Thanks for the suggestions.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7724266788ca88612ca9aff6c7846239</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Levy on Third Parties in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/levy-on-third-parties/#post-12861</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/levy-on-third-parties/#post-12861"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Levy on Third Parties</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Good info.  I noticed the speculation about tax farming.  It is one thing to have a private central bank, which the common man does not readily understand, but overt private tax collection just is not going to sit well with the American people.  I doubt that the IRS is foolish and brazen enough to attempt that, but their audacity at present&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7598"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/levy-on-third-parties/#post-12861" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fc9f7cdb879bcdc19eaf4eef997a01a3</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion The anti-Constitution Party in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12856</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12856"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The anti-Constitution Party</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Frankin,<br />
thanks for the constructive feedback on the letter.  It is well advised to take your suggestions into consideration when individuals communicate with government employees in the future.  It can be difficult to hold these people accountable in a letter without bruising their over inflated egos.  With this in mind, it is probably&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8249"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12856" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">104e86ce4143af775c1e03c7a63a646a</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion The anti-Constitution Party in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12854</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12854"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The anti-Constitution Party</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Good finds franklin.  I wrote a little more about Pelosi and her fellow Congressional leadership in <a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3243&amp;hl=" rel="nofollow">this post</a>.  The more that these cretins openly flaunt their ignorance and smug sense of superiority, the more Americans will realize they have been deceived by charlatans and mountebanks and poisoned by a complicit media.  Keep it up Pelosi,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8250"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-anti-constitution-party/#post-12854" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">278a1cb539ea350ae4a462bfa28e87f7</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Unincorporated trust - pure trust in the forum 6.8. PRIVATE (not public) Property protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/unincorporated-trust-pure-trust/#post-12808</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/unincorporated-trust-pure-trust/#post-12808"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Unincorporated trust - pure trust</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Typically it is the case where if the trustee and beneficiary are the same natural persons, the trust is deemed collapsed.  Basically it is my understanding that a trust in which the trustee is the beneficiary, removes the irrevocable nature of a trust.  The courts look at such trusts as a dba or alter-ego of the trustee/beneficiary.  As&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5004"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/unincorporated-trust-pure-trust/#post-12808" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dcae7b6d13e8dd879ef195b56ee8f09d</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/page/2/#post-12377</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/page/2/#post-12377"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin,</p>
<p>I have attached a PDF version of the document to this post, but I also have a copy of this in <a target='_blank' href="http://www.openoffice.org" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">openoffice</a> format. I can provide that if it is at all useful. Additionally I have an updated version of the certificate of service which takes into account the page counts for this document as well as some of the sedm enclosures which have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1304"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/page/2/#post-12377" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e79a318d4f41203e1a275285ec3b8d13</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Sodomite Indoctrination Now Mandatory in the forum 4.5.5. Sexual Immorality</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sodomite-indoctrination-now-mandatory/#post-12753</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:19:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/sodomite-indoctrination-now-mandatory/#post-12753"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Sodomite Indoctrination Now Mandatory</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>As you are well aware, most churches are creatures of the state and serving their true master.  To campaign against this perversion would be to participate in political speech which is forbidden for those holding 501©3 status.  Although placing this status in jeopardy if not rejecting it all together would be the best action that the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7936"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sodomite-indoctrination-now-mandatory/#post-12753" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8ef150c6fa01877811ef52c63b91833e</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12375</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12375"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I was reading the rather interesting discussion and clarification on passports and nationality in <a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3049" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">this post in the issues and research forum</a>, and it brought up the subject of endorsements. With great celerity I was issued a passport once I utilized a version of the <a target='_blank' href="http://sedm.org/Forms/AvoidingFranch/PassportNotAndDmLtr.pdf" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">Passport Notice and Demand letter</a> which was modified for the variant of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1318"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12375" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">657a3b19124824ca953451f784881179</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Will You Trust THis Mis-Leading Group of IRS People With Your Guns and Health Care?? in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-you-trust-this-mis-leading-group-of-irs-people-with-your-guns-and-health-care/#post-12760</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/will-you-trust-this-mis-leading-group-of-irs-people-with-your-guns-and-health-care/#post-12760"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Will You Trust THis Mis-Leading Group of IRS People With Your Guns and Health Care??</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks for the pointers Bing,  I haven&#039;t had time to research this aspect of federal law as well as I would like.  I have only briefly investigated this subject, but it appears that I may have to increase my focus on this area of legislation.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0005b674f4d776e71fee72bc8f96d755</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Keystroke loggers being installed in new laptops in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/keystroke-loggers-being-installed-in-new-laptops/#post-12703</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/keystroke-loggers-being-installed-in-new-laptops/#post-12703"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Keystroke loggers being installed in new laptops</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Consensus is that this is a hoax.  More details and the original location of the photos used are dicsussed on Bruce <a target='_blank' href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/06/dell_keyboard_l.html" rel="nofollow">Schneier&#039;s blog</a>.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9037067a11ab4e42ca0c17025ca4aadd</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion The states are battling gun control with the constitution in the forum 6.5. Gun Rights and Gun Control</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-states-are-battling-gun-control-with-the-constitution/#post-12705</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-states-are-battling-gun-control-with-the-constitution/#post-12705"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The states are battling gun control with the constitution</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>That is a good read franklin, but I would have to say that the ATF is correct on this issue when they speak to their franchisees.  By accpeting the FFL and giving up the protections of the 1st and 2nd Amendments, the licensed dealers have agreed to play by the BATF&#039;s rules.  If the BATF finds that it is against their regulations for an FFL&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1513"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-states-are-battling-gun-control-with-the-constitution/#post-12705" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b5ad62252dbee66504cdcc019359fa40</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Error in INSTRUCTIONS: 3.13 Correct... in the forum 9.3. Errata Reports</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/error-in-instructions-3-13-correct/#post-12697</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:14:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/error-in-instructions-3-13-correct/#post-12697"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Error in INSTRUCTIONS: 3.13 Correct...</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I can understand the problem that you and the other maintainers face.  I appreciate your quick response to the issue at hand.  If I were more familiar with the subject at hand, I would have filed this issue as an errata.  I will be sure to bring further inconsistencies of this nature to that venue.  Thanks.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5eb0643f128ab3cb10818288f9d36c4d</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Pete Hendrickson attacking our stand on Social Security Numbers in the forum 5.2.2. Quitting Social Security</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-attacking-our-stand-on-social-security-numbers/#post-12646</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:58:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-attacking-our-stand-on-social-security-numbers/#post-12646"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pete Hendrickson attacking our stand on Social Security Numbers</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing and Admin,</p>
<p>Pete&#039;s most recent rant is at first glance unhelpful, but also childish and un-sound. He provided no court cites, nor did he provide any relevant sections of code which buttress his claims. There is a vast and immediately recognizable difference between the research which has been and is conducted at Family Guardian and SEDM&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2048"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-attacking-our-stand-on-social-security-numbers/#post-12646" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3cc47cde1a01267656e36f75df620f51</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Romans Chapter 13 Revisited in the forum 7.8.1. Church v. State</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/romans-chapter-13-revisited/#post-12639</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:26:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/romans-chapter-13-revisited/#post-12639"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Romans Chapter 13 Revisited</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>That was a good article.  I also have read an interesting article on Romans 13 from the folks over at hisholychurch.  I hope you don&#039;t mind if I <a target='_blank' href="http://www.hisholychurch.info/study/bklt/romans1307.pdf" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">link</a> to it.  It looks at the translation of Romans 13 from the original Greek and comes to the conclusion that powers or state is a mistranslation.  Furthermore, like Rev. Baldwin, they investigate&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6479"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/romans-chapter-13-revisited/#post-12639" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ae86d5e755fc243da23f65227c886dd2</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Obama trying to make it illegal to offer private healthcare insurance in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12617</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:43:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12617"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Obama trying to make it illegal to offer private healthcare insurance</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>In order to make the health care plan work, not only will private insurance have to be eliminated (and there is wording in the bill to make this occur via attrition), but private payment must be eliminated completely.  Ignorant or duplicitous people may call it a right, but it clearly is national socialism.  I hadn&#039;t thought about health care&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5606"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12617" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7d51605607ae1df98b1139a1fd6266f3</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Obama trying to make it illegal to offer private healthcare insurance in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12611</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:34:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12611"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Obama trying to make it illegal to offer private healthcare insurance</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>While I certainly agree that those people who maintain their natural rights and have recourse to the Bill of Rights may rightly assert their 1st Amendment right of freedom to not contract and their 13th Amendment right to be free from coerced labor required to maintain a coerced contract. However, those who have read even a small amount&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6196"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obama-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-offer-private-healthcare-insurance/#post-12611" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fac289661b934a1e08adfbf8df8a7ce1</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion RED ALERT: The Total Takeover Of America&#033; in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/red-alert-the-total-takeover-of-america/#post-12559</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:18:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/red-alert-the-total-takeover-of-america/#post-12559"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> RED ALERT: The Total Takeover Of America&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>BOBT12,<br />
Any guess as to under what authority the CDC can enforce a mandatory vaccination?  Thanks for collecting this important news.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">88f474451befe7675378a026c684e5da</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12374</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12374"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Is there any evidence that including the following in a letter of notice and demand could be strengthened or corrected. This might be useful in a list of regulations and code sections to prove an application&#039;s compliance, similar to section 2 &#8220;SATISFACTION OF BURDEN OF PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP STATUS&#8221; from the <a target='_blank' href="http://sedm.org/Forms/AvoidingFranch/PassportNotAndDmLtr.pdf" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">Passport Letter of Notice and&hellip;</a><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1317"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12374" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8af354175543973c264e129efef8a468</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion DOD Ends Sale of Expended Military Brass to Remanufacturers in the forum 6.5. Gun Rights and Gun Control</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military-brass-to-remanufacturers/#post-12216</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:17:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military-brass-to-remanufacturers/#post-12216"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> DOD Ends Sale of Expended Military Brass to Remanufacturers</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>This wasteful policy has been <a target='_blank' href="http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/g/georgiaarmsammo.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">overturned</a>, but not before it affected manufacturers and the ammunition market.  It amazes me how hoplophobia can lead to careless disregard for fiscal responsibility among the policy makers in Washington.  Not only does hatred for the second amendment overrule fiscal common sense, but in this case it would have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1514"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military-brass-to-remanufacturers/#post-12216" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f07a7491f7f129173f0b92786252a601</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Notice and Demand Letter in the forum 9.3. Errata Reports</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-notice-and-demand-letter/#post-12498</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-notice-and-demand-letter/#post-12498"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Notice and Demand Letter</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks Admin.  I will go inform them as soon as I get signed up.</p>
<p>republic</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">131708d521c14852cb958fa70bfd7783</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12373</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:11:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12373"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I have been studying the materials presented above and am crafting a letter similar to the notice and demand suggested by Admin. It appears that there is a small mistake on <a target='_blank' href="http://sedm.org/Forms/AvoidingFranch/PassportNotAndDmLtr.pdf" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">page 8</a>.</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
All of these questions ARE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNCONSCIONABLE AND IRRELEVANT INVASION OF MY FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND MY FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1316"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12373" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3dc1ee073b2d1b6fa9c336867e2f6dc5</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12372</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:33:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12372"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin,</p>
<p>Thank you for the suggestions, I have been catching up on the updates which have occurred in just the past few weeks and had just started looking at the material posted in this sub-forum. I will review these materials and primary sources in the process of formulating my response. I am certain that this will give me time to focus my&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1315"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12372" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8e894d9975d83ee36e1f217ec35f8172</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12370</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:22:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12370"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I received an second delay letter from the agent processing my passport. I am posting a redacted version. At first glance it appears to be similar to the original delay letter. It again fails to address the issue of which definition of US Citizen is meant in relation to the passport and passport application. The waters are muddied by the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1313"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12370" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7cd061cf6a283d7cf98ba47869b08f05</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12367</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:20:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12367"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I have made a few modifications based on suggestions provided by Bing, and I have attempted to clarify a few of my points. I have not made any comment about the request for a drivers license, but I think that is a red herring which will only lead to excessive letter exchanges. If the agent or his/her superior or legal advisor actually deal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1310"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12367" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cd23667fce16b6101034d64fd7ee3cb3</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12366</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12366"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestions, and I am glad to be here.  I do feel that my letter should include a statement to the effect that my application is false and not valid unless accompanied by the USA Passport Application Attachment.  I will will try to either place this statement into my request item 2, or put it into my introductory&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1309"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12366" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8898d716281903d9afb688f835cfb517</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12364</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12364"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>First of all, thank you for helping me focus on the most important issue at hand. Here is the response that I have formulated at this time. I hope that it has stayed on point, and covers the essential elements addressed in the agency&#039;s response and with regards to the separation of the Application Attachment from my passport application.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1307"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12364" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8bf22c33347bd57ba8974a1f184bc4ab</guid>
				<title>republic replied to the discussion Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12362</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:26:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12362"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Passport Delayed and Application Dismembered</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>To clarify an important point, I was not able to write the subornation of perjury clause when I signed the DS-11. I thought it was a coup that the passport agent even included the Attachment within the &#8220;official staple.&#8221; Perhaps my first course of action is to return the USA Passport Application Attachment to the Agency to the attention of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1305"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/passport-delayed-and-application-dismembered/#post-12362" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		