<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | rattler14 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/rattler14/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/rattler14/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for rattler14.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1d55060a65a1a04a12e695677f5a1f2</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Pete Hendrickson Indicted in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11737</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:49:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11737"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pete Hendrickson Indicted</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I concur with the statement that &#8220;pride&#8221; was the ultimate downfall (an affliction we all suffer to in one capacity or another).  But with pride, comes a fall&#8230;  and with the fall, a learning experience.  I personally think Larken has come out smelling like roses after the prison time.  His writing has sharpened, his influence likely&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7053"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11737" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3965b17180dffd20e928f579b5ceae37</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Pete Hendrickson Indicted in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11732</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11732"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pete Hendrickson Indicted</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dear all,</p>
<p>Long time, no see.  I&#039;m so glad to see such wonderful research and education progressing.  </p>
<p>As for the shortcomings of Pete.  I think it&#039;s best to summarize it as mainly a lack of open mindedness versus some of the other specific grievances.  For instance, point number 7 about the 4582 form.  Even just a few short years ago,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7048"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pete-hendrickson-indicted/#post-11732" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6fcf9bf786a1513c6adf1be3a7116079</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Phone salesman amazes crowd in the forum 4.1. Inspiration</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/phone-salesman-amazes-crowd/#post-11120</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/phone-salesman-amazes-crowd/#post-11120"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Phone salesman amazes crowd</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Jan 10 2008, 11:43 AM:<br />
Amazing!</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.maniacworld.com/Phone-Salesman-Amazes-Crowd.html" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.maniacworld.com/Phone-Salesman-Amazes-Crowd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.maniacworld.com/Phone-Salesman-Amazes-Crowd.html</a> </p>
<p>[post=&#8221;4393&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Yes&#8230;  I saw this a week or two ago and have since watched in 4-5 times.  It&#039;s amazing.  I get goose bumps every time I see it.  </p>
<p>I also wonder how many other amazing diamonds in the rough are out&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3122"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/phone-salesman-amazes-crowd/#post-11120" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">615fe2671479746f1c88e415a1434547</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Former IRS Commissioner Fired-11/27/07 in the forum 3.4.2.  Corrupt practices</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/former-irs-commissioner-fired-112707/#post-11090</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/former-irs-commissioner-fired-112707/#post-11090"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Former IRS Commissioner Fired-11/27/07</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Everson certainly has an interesting trend going on here.</p>
<p>First he takes people&#039;s money (and freedom, and rights, etc etc)<br />
Then he takes people&#039;s blood.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.  🙂</p>
<p>So is he going to move on to souls?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a0421e4278c1d8311daee85c8d342ec</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Cornell University Cover-Up of 26 USC 871 in the forum 3.5.2. Censorship, secrecy, and Freedom of Information</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cornell-university-cover-up-of-26-usc-871/#post-10552</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:19:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/cornell-university-cover-up-of-26-usc-871/#post-10552"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Cornell University Cover-Up of 26 USC 871</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Is this suprising?  </p>
<p>I mean, looked at their Annotated Constitution, particularly in the 16th amendment<br />
<a target='_blank' href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt16_user.html#amdt16_hd4" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/am" rel="nofollow">http://www4.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/am</a>&#8230;html#amdt16_hd4</p>
<p>When I first saw this, I knew something was up.  I sent them an email correcting some of their claims, and didn&#039;t hear back from them.  Surprise surprise!</p>
<p>🙂</p>
<p>I&#039;m sure&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7859"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cornell-university-cover-up-of-26-usc-871/#post-10552" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">862aa65a8ed16666f43cdfc7fb25ab8c</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Massachusetts General Laws in the forum 7.5. Word Games that STEAL from and deceive people</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/massachusetts-general-laws/#post-9223</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/massachusetts-general-laws/#post-9223"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Massachusetts General Laws</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on Jan 23 2007, 01:18 PM:<br />
One more nail in the coffin.</p>
<p>The Massachusetts General Laws define the term &#8220;United States&#8221; to mean ONLY the U.S. territories, insular possessions &amp; the District of Columbia.</p>
<p>For proof, see, </p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/4-7.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/4-7.htm</a></p>
<p>[post=&#8221;3468&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Ha!  Good catch Bing.  I noticed this&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4021"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/massachusetts-general-laws/#post-9223" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6a743d4829c48309c34885b27e2cf65a</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Domicile, Consent, Foreign Immunities and such... in the forum 7.1.2. Domicile/Statutory citizenship</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/domicile-consent-foreign-immunities-and-such/#post-10716</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:40:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/domicile-consent-foreign-immunities-and-such/#post-10716"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Domicile, Consent, Foreign Immunities and such...</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Nov 2 2006, 03:59 PM:<br />
Edhudmii,</p>
<p>I LOVE your viewpoint.  You talk like an engineer or techie.  Only an engineer or technie would understand &#8220;escape velocity&#8221; and Newton&#039;s Laws of Gravitation.  Thanks for sharing that with us.  However, who are the &#8220;Cylons&#8221;?  Is that like the &#8220;Klingons&#8221;&#8230;HEEE..HEEEEE&#8230;HEEEE!   😆 &hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7260"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/domicile-consent-foreign-immunities-and-such/#post-10716" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3e1a223b09cc54bb0b495884fec6f39f</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion WTP Lawsuit in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-lawsuit/page/2/#post-9209</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:33:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/wtp-lawsuit/page/2/#post-9209"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> WTP Lawsuit</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes, but undoubtedly the gloating on this forum will make its way round to the judge (thanks to our good buddies at quat-whatever land).  And there will be some pressure on the judge to reconsider his leniency towards the &#8220;tax protestors&#8221; or whatever slur is deemed more appropriate by the dept of (in)justice [note the lack of capitalization,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4261"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-lawsuit/page/2/#post-9209" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6fa673c3380c164b13cd96bfb63bfec</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion My story in a nutshell in the forum 5.4.2. Stopping or Correcting Illegal or Erroneous Tax Withholding and/or Reporting</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/my-story-in-a-nutshell/#post-8801</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:29:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/my-story-in-a-nutshell/#post-8801"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> My story in a nutshell</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>JWR,</p>
<p>Hey!  I was just thinking like 2 days ago how I haven&#039;t seen you or Fiddo on the forums anymore.</p>
<p>I&#039;m sorry to hear about your situation.  I assure you mine is also turning a bit sour, if that offers you any comfort 🙂</p>
<p>I am also planning on going solo with my own business at some point.  I more or less determined that as long as you&#039;re&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6108"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/my-story-in-a-nutshell/#post-8801" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">10f3fac8b5dfb475de994952a9e87860</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion George Carlin on Who Controls America in the forum 4.2. Jokes and Humor</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/george-carlin-on-who-controls-america/#post-10678</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:29:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/george-carlin-on-who-controls-america/#post-10678"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> George Carlin on Who Controls America</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sometimes the truth is said in jest&#8230;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d08434943608e86ec92af31fbbcc881</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9747</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 05:18:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9747"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Oct 14 2006, 05:33 PM:<br />
I believe I was the cause to explode the issue off the original intent of this thread. It&#039;s just that I am a defender of truth and whenever I see non-truth uttered, my blood pressure sky rockets.  :ph34r: </p>
<p>Sorry guys and yes I agree: Bottom line is WTC got knocked&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4102"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9747" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e241ea67ef010777a3191d50849c12c</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9744</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9744"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Federal building or not&#8230;  blah blah blah.  The point is those 3 builidings (WTC1, 2, and 7) were blown up to dust.  </p>
<p>Sometimes getting caught up in all the minutia on a non-law topic is kinda pointless.  The official story is bull, the government was complicit.  How much more simple can it get?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3ff2598a4e3602914dbc1a2c22c1b692</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9741</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9741"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on Oct 10 2006, 10:02 AM:<br />
Hmmmmm.</p>
<p>Tic-toc-tic-toc.</p>
<p>Bing</p>
<p>[post=&#8221;3199&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Not being an alarmist, just informing.</p>
<p>There is a lot of chatter on how these recent DOW records are a result of market manipulation.  The economy, particularly the housing market, is reeling because of the interest rate hikes.  A collapse in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4094"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9741" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f0cfd21e21c63a2652dff6b08e7fedb</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9732</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 01:05:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9732"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Oct 4 2006, 07:22 PM:<br />
Rattler &#8211; maybe you know the answer to these questions!  😆 </p>
<p>1 ) How does a plane 125ft wide and 155ft long fit into a hole which is only 16ft across?</p>
<p>2 ) How does a 757 exit the Pentagon&#039;s 3rd ring and leave a hole approx. 16ft across with no visible wreckage?</p>
<p>😆</p>
<p>I tried to figure it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6359"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9732" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">37423fef807b3801f20315e987943782</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9723</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9723"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Oct 4 2006, 07:07 PM:<br />
And here is the FBI citation:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm</a></p>
<p>Very interesting Rattler!! Why is 9/11 not mentioned? This is no accident&#8230;</p>
<p>But after carefully thinking about why this is the way it is, my final conclusion is because the Federal Government cannot prosecute him&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6351"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9723" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5b9e354dd806bb7697f49237504fbc81</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9720</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:20:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9720"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Not related to the controlled demolition&#8230;  but the FBI recently admitted they do not have a legitimate case connecting Osama to the 9/11 attacks</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html</a></p>
<p>Someone should clue in the rest of the government.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">41fd15c61d72fecfc47dd6459de76259</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion George Carlin on Who Controls America in the forum 4.2. Jokes and Humor</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/george-carlin-on-who-controls-america/#post-10676</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/george-carlin-on-who-controls-america/#post-10676"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> George Carlin on Who Controls America</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Oct 1 2006, 03:12 PM:<br />
Pardon the graphic language but George is RIGHT ON with this.</p>
<p><a href="http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/Articles/GeorgeCarlin-WhoControlsAmerica.wmv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/Arti" rel="nofollow">http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/Arti</a>&#8230;rolsAmerica.wmv</p>
<p>Hilarious!</p>
<p>[post=&#8221;3129&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>I saw this too. It&#039;s hilarious, but very sad at the same time.</p>
<p>Perhaps comedians will finally be able to rattle people awake&#8230; because&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7340"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/george-carlin-on-who-controls-america/#post-10676" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">47a49ab6717252d72b26983468017bc6</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Banking Alternatives? in the forum 6.8. PRIVATE (not public) Property protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/page/2/#post-9139</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:39:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/page/2/#post-9139"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Banking Alternatives?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>PGP offers what are called secure disks or volumes&#8230;  where you essentially create a 10,20,100 gig folder that you unlock with one password.  Then you use it like one folder just like any other&#8230; when you&#039;re done, you &#8220;re-lock&#8221; it and it&#039;s completely encrypted.  That way, if someone were to steal or get your hard drive, it would appear&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5787"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/page/2/#post-9139" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">47bc52b2236720a8ec4d58299d409a53</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Banking Alternatives? in the forum 6.8. PRIVATE (not public) Property protection</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/#post-9129</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:05:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/#post-9129"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Banking Alternatives?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik,</p>
<p>Here are some problems.</p>
<p>Some employers demand that you use direct deposit.  Direct deposit requires a bank.</p>
<p>Ok.  Say you use a &#8220;bank&#8221; that&#039;s not FDIC insured or part of the fed reserve and you use strictly money orders.  That&#039;s fine. But I have found that many of the check cashing places only accept western union money orders and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2298"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/banking-alternatives/#post-9129" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">928b3857862562db9ea5ea781462a42c</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Interesting New Website in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/interesting-new-website/#post-9609</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/interesting-new-website/#post-9609"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Interesting New Website</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I have gone through this guy&#039;s information, and IMHO, it&#039;s bullet proof.</p>
<p>Kudos to him.  He truly has them cornered.  Checkmate</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6bb50ca5ffc157cfe6d6d6820185f206</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9701</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9701"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Ladies and Gents,</p>
<p>It appears, at least at a first glance, that there may actually be a tie in with the IRS/Fed Reserve/Tax honesty movement.  </p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://nesara.insights2.org/History.html" rel="nofollow">http://nesara.insights2.org/History.html</a></p>
<p>Specifically, the following sections</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
In early 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on charges by the Farmers&#039; Union that banks in the U.S.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7917"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9701" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">842d605649ab3ac966e306338b4ad086</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Federal Mafia Rules on Hansen Injunction in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-mafia-rules-on-hansen-injunction/#post-10488</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:46:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-mafia-rules-on-hansen-injunction/#post-10488"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal Mafia Rules on Hansen Injunction</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dude&#8230;  Hansen rocks!</p>
<p>Words cannot even begin to describe how proud I am of him.  His work continues to inspire me.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7063b13487ee746a70e6983b562f0589</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Major Victory ForTax Honesty Movement in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/major-victory-fortax-honesty-movement/#post-10466</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:10:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/major-victory-fortax-honesty-movement/#post-10466"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Major Victory ForTax Honesty Movement</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on May 30 2006, 10:34 AM:<br />
Yea &#8211; it is good news. It&#039;s been on Quatloos for about 2 weeks now.</p>
<p> Sonik Speed </p>
<p>[post=&#8221;2781&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Apologies&#8230;  people like myself tend not to hang out there for my news updates 🙂</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf9e07c4809108f3dafb5e4c0042165d</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 9/11 Quiz in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9291</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 21:51:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9291"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 9/11 Quiz</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on May 20 2006, 11:46 AM:<br />
Rattler, can you point me in the direction where I can obtain the answer as to why the 19 alleged hijacker&#039;s names WERE NOT on the passenger manifests?</p>
<p>I already know that at least 6 hijackers were alive post- 9/11, but why are teh names missing from the passenger manifests.</p>
<p>rattler, do you think the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4386"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9291" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20492eaa0263624c1e487ee567c35883</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 9/11 Quiz in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9289</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 23:07:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9289"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 9/11 Quiz</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>No problem fellas&#8230;  just doing my part to expose the USG for all the evil it stands for AND perpetuates.</p>
<p>Be it taxes, liberties, or even scaring and/or killing us under the pretense of the bogeyman&#8230;  we must end this insanity before even more suffering is inflicted.</p>
<p>As always, if any of you have any (reasonable) questions regarding 911&#8230; &hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4384"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9289" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e8148c24b498125f3352dbe964a908fb</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 9/11 Quiz in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9286</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-quiz/#post-9286"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 9/11 Quiz</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik,</p>
<p>Yes, they are all inter-related.  One must ask&#8230;  who benefits?  Well in war, the international bankers.  They get to fund both sides and make a killing on the interest (which taxpayers are then forced to pay!)</p>
<p>And then 9/11 is then a cause for a slew of other abysmal effects.  And the viscous cycle continues.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4bc6da6ca38bd6919103a428ee4accf3</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion International Driving Permit Link in the forum 9.4. Bad links</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/international-driving-permit-link/#post-9041</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/international-driving-permit-link/#post-9041"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> International Driving Permit Link</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you Admin!  I really appreciate it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6843cc13a1dd3aaafbeb7e32b8584076</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/7/#post-9583</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/7/#post-9583"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
It&#039;s not worth my time to expend any more effort here. I&#039;m sure my supervisors won&#039;t mind if I concentrate on other sites where the participants don&#039;t all have blinders on.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>If you&#039;re on this discussion board on your own free time (i.e. not at work), why would you care what your supervisor thought?  I mean, when I go home,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6024"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/7/#post-9583" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fcc6068f3e1f3afd0d03b843449bf6ba</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion OLD Legal Dictionary CD&#039;s in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/old-legal-dictionary-cds/#post-9214</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:06:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/old-legal-dictionary-cds/#post-9214"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> OLD Legal Dictionary CD&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Basically, they are quite basic.  You&#039;re essentially getting raw scans of the pages in consecutive order and nothing more. </p>
<p>If I was ambitious enough, I would color correct them (the images are clear, yet faded) name by the first and last word on the page, and try to OCR scan them.</p>
<p>Are they useful?  Sure&#8230;  but it would&#039;ve been nicer if&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7196"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/old-legal-dictionary-cds/#post-9214" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b37bf3615be7fb8438262644e817b600</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9696</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:31:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9696"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dear Colleagues,</p>
<p>The 9/11 truth movement definitely benefitted by the recent media coverage of Charlie Sheen questioning the official story.  CNN, which had completely ignored the possibility, was forced to acknowledge that these theories existed and finally mention it.</p>
<p>I encourage anyone who hasn&#039;t done so, to read this entire thread. &hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7912"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9696" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6367e6c0fa740ab2825e361b0e37a63</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/5/#post-10404</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 05:02:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/5/#post-10404"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>AndyK</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Powers not reserved to the Federal government devolve to the states without any contractual aspect whatsoever.</p>
<p>I will disagree with the wording of this.  In order to stay in agreement with the 10th amendment, I would (personally) rearrange as</p>
<p>Powers not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4219"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/5/#post-10404" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6331799b02ad0311d8cd27d990000e67</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/3/#post-10373</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:07:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/3/#post-10373"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Andy,</p>
<p>when you reply to a specific person, just look at the beginning and end quotes.  Surround each particular portion from any of us via these tags, and leave your comments outside of them.  Then, you&#039;ll be able to keep the responses easy for you (and us) to follow.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3aec9f705a3e592345ee32be7f54c624</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10372</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:05:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10372"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik,</p>
<p>No worries, I will not attack and/or spazz out on adrenaline 🙂</p>
<p>I&#039;m just curious about what things are incorrect with the information as put forth by this website.  After all, if he DOES find this or that and we can agree upon it (for example, a misquote, etc), it will merely make famguardian better by eliminating any errors.  And if&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2973"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10372" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cd3291fdf1a2f33ea10f3ec24e76e783</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10367</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10367"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>AndyK</p>
<p>AndyK wrote on Mar 22 2006, 05:30 AM:<br />
Since everyone at Quatloos thinks for him or her self, I can&#039;t assemble a team to debate you.</p>
<p>Certainly you can ask over there no?  I think there seems to be a lot of complaints about Author #2 et al over there, so certainly the motivation to educate him (and others) to their apparent mistakes&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2969"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10367" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">25dc1840bd7daa77fb0e03f094b66075</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10363</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/page/2/#post-10363"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>oooh.  This could be very interesting indeed.  I can&#039;t wait to see who the draft picks are!</p>
<p>As for a famguardian captain.  I&#039;m torn between Bing and Sonik.  Perhaps you two can be nice and co-captain&#8230;  Though I hear Author #2 is no slouch himself 😉</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">40e04176ec7f64da35d4992d4433587e</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9694</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:42:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9694"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Even though I generally don&#039;t like Alex Jones links&#8230;  here is an interview with Actor Charlie Sheen<br />
<a target='_blank' href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march</a>&#8230;harliesheen.htm</p>
<p>Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story<br />
Calls for truly independent investigation, joins growing ranks of prominent credible whistleblowers</p>
<p>he seems to be on the ball&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7911"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9694" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b91d4a81a994452a0f37bfc3010a8d8c</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/#post-10348</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:22:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/#post-10348"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on Mar 15 2006, 02:34 PM:<br />
I did not know Becraft was helping Larken.</p>
<p>But it all make sense now.</p>
<p>I mean, Larken sold out and betrayed the THM and his legions of so-called &#8220;fans&#8221;, just like Larry did.</p>
<p>Nice job Larry. </p>
<p>Larken could not have bent over any further in his effort to appease the corrupt Court and equally corrupted&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2956"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/#post-10348" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bcc238b58db8bc8395137c528dc31a25</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor? in the forum 4.3.2. Attorneys</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/#post-10346</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-larry-becraft-esquire-a-traitor/#post-10346"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Larry Becraft, Esquire, A Traitor?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmm&#8230;  so why was he helping Larken Rose at his trial?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b7f592e273dc27dc521b87188481d404</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion ***JURY ACQUITS AGAINST JUDGES INSTRUCTIONS*** in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/jury-acquits-against-judges-instructions/#post-10435</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/jury-acquits-against-judges-instructions/#post-10435"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> ***JURY ACQUITS AGAINST JUDGES INSTRUCTIONS***</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>So if there is a law saying you have to kiss President Bush&#039;s boots, and someone doesn&#039;t comply&#8230; a juror, saying it&#039;s unjust, can now get convicted.</p>
<p>Hyperbole?  Sure.  But the result is the same.  The power of the jury is the thing that is getting nullified.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f6b93a816b2cb4afc95afc18089df28</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion IRS Employee Talk Email List in the forum 2.5.2. Online freedom training curricula</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs-employee-talk-email-list/#post-8503</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:06:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/irs-employee-talk-email-list/#post-8503"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> IRS Employee Talk Email List</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmm&#8230;.  I smell a honey pot for IP address collection 😉</p>
<p>But more importantly, what IRS employee would want to keep in contact with other IRS agents after retirement?  So they can reminisce on how they use turn the screws on to the people of this country?  </p>
<p>But hey, I figure the conversation would only make my blood boil.  If others want&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5447"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs-employee-talk-email-list/#post-8503" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">910e5381a1846ea48ece26c5b2cb8482</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion ***FOREWARNINGS&#033;&#033;***HEADS UP&#033;&#033;*** in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10335</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 03:49:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10335"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> ***FOREWARNINGS&#33;&#33;***HEADS UP&#33;&#33;***</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Mar 10 2006, 02:41 PM:<br />
Ladies and Gentlemen&#8230;<br />
What Mr. Rattler means by &#8220;eating right&#8221; is pure, fresh, raw and unprocessed organic foods, that have not been filtered through the corrupt FDA.  😉 </p>
<p> Sonik Speed </p>
<p>[post=&#8221;2363&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Of course that is what I meant!  This is not an IRC definition of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2217"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10335" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c5dcaeae5bbca76e35451a01865a1442</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion ***FOREWARNINGS&#033;&#033;***HEADS UP&#033;&#033;*** in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10333</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10333"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> ***FOREWARNINGS&#33;&#33;***HEADS UP&#33;&#33;***</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Considering flu vaccines have been far more trouble than good&#8230;  I wouldn&#039;t trust them to save my life</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/immune_suppression.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/im" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/im</a>&#8230;suppression.htm</p>
<p>The FDA also refuses to speak out against mercury derivatives in vaccines, which have been known to cause all sorts of memory problems, etc.</p>
<p>Bottom line, eat right, give up the shots.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65df0efdea612969584009c7928eb90f</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY in the forum 3.5.2. Censorship, secrecy, and Freedom of Information</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10315</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:43:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10315"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bruce, </p>
<p>Sorry if i did pull the trigger too fast.  You did put a preface at the beginning.  I remember reading that now, but my original reply WAS to clarify that his articles should be read with a certain level of discernment.  </p>
<p>If, for example, the article was from whatreallyhappened.com, I would have said something more like &#8220;yes, this guy&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7767"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10315" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">92f2a1d542fdfd90753566636cb1b01b</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY in the forum 3.5.2. Censorship, secrecy, and Freedom of Information</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10313</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:37:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10313"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>bruce wrote on Mar 6 2006, 12:01 AM:</p>
<p>Rattler,</p>
<p>I fail to see the disinfo in Sysmanski&#039;s articles.  However, I do see alot of unfounded allegations to defame Sysmanski.  You say his stories have been proven completely false.  Where is your references that prove these allegations?  Help me out, am I missing something from the WingTV non&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7765"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10313" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7444a356c12db6f4f8a7f460720ebcd4</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9692</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9692"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>lchesson wrote on Mar 5 2006, 11:47 AM:<br />
1 Hr. 21 min. &#8211;  must see.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&amp;q=In+Plane+Site+%26+Loose+Chang&amp;pr=goog-sl" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8</a>&#8230;hang&amp;pr=goog-sl</p>
<p>[post=&#8221;2338&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>This DVD is awesome.</p>
<p>I have more than 100+ copies of it.  Any of the regulars here, if you PM me with an address (if you feel comfortable with disclosing said info), I&#039;ll mail you,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7909"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9692" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29aed5b23914146fa30f0621b66b3ce7</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY in the forum 3.5.2. Censorship, secrecy, and Freedom of Information</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10310</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:32:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10310"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>JWR wrote on Mar 4 2006, 01:49 AM:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;And, now years later, many of my military contacts have confirmed the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition with <b>bombs being placed in the basements of both towers</b>.</p>
<p>All you have to do to show this as a false statement is watch the buildings fall. If the &#8220;bombs&#8221; were in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7762"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10310" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c35fd84e378b4a6ca4e254eb7d588196</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY in the forum 3.5.2. Censorship, secrecy, and Freedom of Information</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10307</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10307"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Whistle Blower exposes EVIL CONSPIRACY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Syzmanski is disinfo<br />
For a great example, read the article here.<br />
<a target='_blank' href="http://wingtv.net/thorn2006/syzmanski2.html" rel="nofollow">http://wingtv.net/thorn2006/syzmanski2.html</a></p>
<p>He mixes truth with some really really stupid things, thereby giving the opponent the easy straw man to attack and discredit the whole movement.  The 9/11 movement (as well as other movements like the tax honesty movement) are rife&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7759"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whistle-blower-exposes-evil-conspiracy/#post-10307" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b24b7d78793e4c6bc13444a340353638</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion My passport app was not accepted in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/my-passport-app-was-not-accepted/page/2/#post-9811</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/my-passport-app-was-not-accepted/page/2/#post-9811"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> My passport app was not accepted</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Mar 1 2006, 12:00 PM:<br />
Mr. Rattler &#8211; are you saying that the State Department much like the IRS, are starting to send computer generated letters saying to the effect: &#8220;No Silly &#8211; you cannot be a national.&#8221; ???</p>
<p>When did they start doing this???</p>
<p> Sonik Speed </p>
<p>[post=&#8221;2316&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>I&#039;m busy at work.  But I&#039;ll dig up&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1285"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/my-passport-app-was-not-accepted/page/2/#post-9811" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd3c94e9500d60cb4a4d9a118eaf5b96</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion My passport app was not accepted in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/my-passport-app-was-not-accepted/page/2/#post-9809</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/my-passport-app-was-not-accepted/page/2/#post-9809"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> My passport app was not accepted</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they seem to form letter respond back now, making ridiculous claims that &#8220;nationals&#8221; can only be living and breathing human beings that were born in the Somoa and Swain islands.  </p>
<p>I&#039;ll try again with the unmodified form, but I have a feeling it&#039;s going to be the same old story.  No real response, just a form letter F-U</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">189d8dfc2fc4753571201c082e1e6d2d</guid>
				<title>rattler14 replied to the discussion New evidence on &#34;Includes&#34; in the forum 7.5. Word Games that STEAL from and deceive people</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/4/#post-8242</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/4/#post-8242"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New evidence on &quot;Includes&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Colleagues,</p>
<p>Before we get into a flame war, let us not forget</p>
<p>Matthew 7:6<br />
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.</p>
<p>We have other battles to fight.  Arguing with those that have infinite time on their hands, is certainly not worth the effort.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		