Well . . . I agree with all of that.

I’m simply talking about how to STATUTORILY change your status . . . NOTHING MORE.

Whether or not you are on or off duty is irrelevant. 

I AM TALKING ABOUT CHANGING STATUS STATUTORILY.

I AM TALKING ABOUT CHANGING STATUS STATUTORILY.

I AM TALKING ABOUT CHANGING STATUS STATUTORILY.

WHAT AM I TALKING ABOUT?

YES . . . CHANGING STATUS STATUTORILY.

My point and my ONLY point is this:

If you have EVER established yourself as a “U.S. person” by filing a Form 1040….then there is ONLY one way under THEIR, THEIR, THEIR (I hope I’m being clear) statutes to effectuate the change.

As for me and my house….this is the avenue I am pursuing. I’m interested in hearing about any other avenues for success that others have enjoyed.

Admin….just 24 hrs ago we were in agreement in a private exchange….but your position seems to have changed. I understand…..this ministry has a lot of time and material committed to ITS APPROACH.

What will a 26 year retired veteran of the beast do when retirement plunder comes in and the beast wants its tithe? Will said veteran disregard the taxability of these United States sourced payments? In my opinion….said veteran should pay his taxes. But what said nonresident alien does in his wholly private capacity may afford a tax free treatment.

Well, that is 100% correct.  The SSN and the franchise to which it belongs is exclusively in the domain of taxpayers.  It’s their program they devised to bring people into the taxpayer system.

But here’s why the proper status is important:

26 CFR 301.6109-1(g)(1)(i) allows a taxpayer to change status from “U.S. person” to “nonresident alien.”  Notice, you can only change status in THEIR system as a taxpayer.  THERE IS NO OTHER WAY . . . NO MATTER HOW MUCH ONE PROTESTS.  It’s their system and they make the rules.  If you EVER entered THEIR system under THEIR rules, you had darn well better be willing to accept the fact that if you want to change your status, it has to also be done under THEIR rules.

OK.

Now, the SSA admits that a CSP Code is shared with the IRS for tax return processing and enforcement.  So, if you want to change your tax status from “U.S. person” to “nonresident alien,” it has to be done by filing a 1040NR in conjunction with perhaps a W-2, 1099-R, and a 1042S.

BUT . . .

If the SSA is telling the IRS that the “taxpayer” has  CSP Code of A, the IRS MAY reject your “nonresident alien” filing because clearly a CSP Code of A more appropriately belongs to a person with a “U.S. person” tax status.  Now, I fully understand what you have voiced in the past, and that is, that the IRS is going to accept payment under any status as long as you pay.  And you are probably correct.  But the concern for me arises over what MAY happen to you down the road as these government information systems become more tied to databases in the financial and other sectors such as healthcare.  Furthermore, if one does not ensure that all government systems are ACCURATELY reflective of your proper status, you are opening yourself up to government evidence that would absolutely DESTROY YOU in any legal proceeding.  This is not about what will or might work . . . this is about doing what is 100% correct.  I am not interested in ANYTHING “that will work” if it is not 100% true and correct.  I don’t care how much money I’m leaving on the table.  If it’s not 100% true, legal, and correct . . . I WILL NOT PARTICIPATE . . . PERIOD!

Consider the two species of information returns issued by the SSA:

1.  SS 1099R for a “U.S. person”

2.  SS 1042S for a “nonresident alien”

OK . . . so if you want to be a non-“taxpayer”, you had better be a “nonresident alien.”  So, how do you do that if you are a “U.S. person”?  Well, you change your status pursuant to 26 CFR 301.6109(g)(1)(i) AS A TAXPAYER.  And which SS-5 Block 5 status is eligible for an SS 1042S from the SSA?  There is only one:

A “Legal Alien Allowed To Work.”

Now what’s interesting about this SSA civil status is that it can belong to a “U.S. person” or a “nonresident alien” tax status under the IRC.  But a “U.S. Citizen” in Block 5 of the SS-5 will only have a “U.S. person” tax status.  So what this little virtual protection system does is tell the SSA what type of information return to NOT issue — as in . . . “Don’t issue a SS 1042S to anyone with a CSP Code of A.”  This has the practical effect of keeping potentially 300,000,000 Americans within the confines of the Federal plantation with ZERO prima facie evidence on file ANYWHERE with the government that supports a non-frivolous “nonresident alien” claim down the road.

I hope this makes sense.  Of course the statuses of the SS-5 are Federal taxpayer statuses.  But if you want to be a “nonresident alien” non-“taxpayer,” then you had better change your status first according to their rules as a taxpayer.  As evidenced by losthorizons and scores of other tax protester behavior across the nation, Americans are not willing to follow the rules set up by Congress.  They would rather shoot the middle finger to the government, say “I’m sovereign . . . I’m not subject,” and fight a losing fight their entire lives. 

I am not interested in this.

First, I believe a “Lawful Alien Status” is one of the statuses that falls under the Block 5 election of “Legal Alien Allowed To Work” (“LAATW”).  The statuses addressed in the POMS table are statuses that apply to the class of persons over whom the Federal government appoints a civil status–namely, persons of foreign nationality.  This authority over these persons was granted to the the Feds in Art. I, sec. 8, cl. 4 of the United States Constitution.

My alien status as a State Citizen is not something the Federal government appoints, rather, it is something I as a State Citizen elect — thus it is not addressed.  This does not mean that as a State Citizen I do not qualify as a LAATW, rather, it means that I am in the class of persons with this status that operates outside of the Federal government’s appointment policy.  This is because, as a State Citizen, my alien status under Federal law exists only through my election of domicile.  Because this is a political question, the Feds cannot even address it in their policy.  Thus, it is out of sight and out of mind.  It’s brilliant really.

Now. . . with respect to the POMS definition of U.S. Citizen.  They are pulling a fast one here.  And under this section, I am certainly a political citizen of the nation of the United States by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment–a political citizen eligible for program participation. 

BUT . . . it is a HUGE presumption, and a presumption made almost exclusively . . . that a political “U.S. Citizen” under this POMS section is the same “U.S. Citizen” within Block 5 — it is not.  It cannot be.

Block 5 statuses are civil statuses –not an inquiry into the nationality and thus, political status of the individual.  Thus, it is a status based upon a geographical definition that also takes into account the nationality of the individual at issue.  Why?  Because a person of foreign nationality possesses a civil status appointed by virtue of their mere presence on our soil.  Whereas, as a member of the U.S.A., my status is based on my election of domicile.  Thus, the only “U.S.” they can be referring to in Block 5 is the geographical one.  And we know that does not embrace the geography of the 50 states because they are:

1.  Not specifically enumerated in 1301(a)(1); and

2.  They are not in the same general class as those specified in 1301(a)(1), and therefore not within the expansion capability of the terms “includes” and “including” under 1301(b ).

But, for persons of foreign nationality, their civil status is determined by virtue of their foreign political status and their relevant locus within the borders of our nation.  Thus, their presence invokes a civil status promulgated through a political definition of the “United States.”  Therefore, in the context of persons of foreign nationality present anywhere on American soil, the political definition of the “United States” is utilized to appoint their civil status.  Whereas, as a State Citizen a geographical definition of “United States” is used in the context of my domicile election within or without said geographical “United States” so defined.

This is why the SSA claims that an American Samoan is a “U.S. Citizen for SSA purposes” in their own POMS–because it is civil citizenship and not political citizenship they are referring to.

The whole issue is that they hide a State Citizen’s eligibility for a LAATW status by not even addressing it as a possibility in their POMS policy.  They can’t address it because domicile is a political choice for a State Citizen.  However, the Feds can appoint a civil alien status for participating franchisees who are of foreign nationality because the Feds have this authority which the State Citizens granted them in art. I, sec. 8, cl. 4.

For State Citizens, it’s not addressed. . . thus it would appear to be an impossibility.  This is the greatest defense of the entire system.  The cognitive dissonance wall around the CSP Code change from A to B.  Because it is the code which gives the power to the SSA, SSS, the IRS, DHS, DMVs, etc, etc.  This is THE “A #1” issue to be fixed.  Get this changed, and the beast will be de-fanged.