mcwolf
Forum Replies Created
I believe we can better characterize this move to eliminate income tax as a move to eliminate an illegitimate tax/extortion scheme for what might be a legitimate scheme. Isn’t that all that we insist on? I think that I would pay any tax I was liable to pay, but I don’t want to pay any that I’m not liable to pay.
The stated objection by the Michigan radio show host ignores the fact that the poor are always easily extorted into paying for everything, after their labor is stolen/extorted they are de facto slaves anyway. The rich cannot be taxed they are rich because they know how to avoid petty extortionists, in fact they are the extortionists in some instances.
Just my thought, I like the idea that state legislatures can make amendments and as Faris stated, there are sufficient obstacles for legislation that would be odious to certain regions and otherwise provacative or unfair to certain segments. Further, the state legislators don’t run to DC to hide from their constituents, they live near the electorate, close enough to the pitch forks and torches that make for good deterrents to bad legislation. I am a proponent of the project.
I don’t call myself a liberal, but I don’t accept the idea that a black man is different than me by virtue of his skin color. Race is a liberal pseudo scientific word that birthed phrenology and eugenics. So this leaves me without a reason for why black skins are so different than other “skins”. I can accept that the blacks, browns, asians, and whites have separate ethnic origins, I suppose I state the obvious, and these origins seem to have significant effect on social action/reaction in our society. I’m not displeased to learn that criminals are punished, this is a positive thing, but would there be more criminals from other ethninicities if such crimes were mentioned? Would this public defender see more Jews, asians, and whites if fraud cases were considered more important to pursue than say petty theft? How about extortion? I’ve yet to be extorted by anyone but a white woman, or a jewish man. I’ve yet to be ripped off by anyone but a jew and a white. I’ll admit that both of the “perps” in my case were polite mostly, and didn’t swear at me, but I wouldn’t say either had any remorse nor were any less criminals than the robbers mentioned by the liberal public defender. My lily white community is on the surface a good place to live, but I was assaulted in the Registrat of Deeds Office by the corporate counsel, I was denied due process by the all white women that operate that office, and it was a white man that assaulted me.
My conclusion is this: most of the criminals that have victimized me are whites and jews, they are ruthless, dishonest, liars, extortionists, and just plain criminals.
Let me phrase the subject like this:
The “employee” withholding” sham begins with a voluntary agreement when it isn’t required by subtitle C. Let’s assume some bloke then makes an “agreement” ignorantly, but isn’t engaged in a “trade or business”. The withheld sums are gifted and likely unrecoverable, but the payments for work are not “wages” from a “trade or business” although it is so alleged on a W-2 report. This is an error by the unidentified person that made the W-2 report. The code is cleverly vague on the subject, but what does the Statute at Large say? I don’t believe I know it(I don’t) does anyone?
Said another way, treating payments for work cannot be “transformed” into “Trade or Business” payments, the natural person made an agreement without regard to payments that would otherwise not have been included in the withholding agreement. Withholding agreements presuppose that the worker may have legitimate “Trade or Business income”. The natural person is given the opportunity to “withhold” in the unlikely event that he/she has “Trade of Business income”. The language in the statute is probably clear(or at least clearer I hope).
Now, it seems likely to me that the entire sums reported are not “Trade or Business income” based on the W-4 “agreement” but must be reported as they are, and that is likely, payment for common work. What possible position could anyone have to challenge the reality of it?
these are my humble thoughts,
MC
I know all about the correction form, don’t mention it if you don’t mind,
I’ve been garnished by that nonsense NOL, I quit, found another job and started over again. I lost my friends at that concern, I was a loyal employee and did my very best to help the concern succeed(they failed 18 months after Levy). It was a heart breaker to lose the colleagues and reputation, but that’s what the slanderers at the IRS do; they tarnish your good name, call you a thief, when it is they that do the thieving.
I had to walk away and work elsewhere. I’ve done that knowing that I will have that day come again. I still invest myself with my colleagues and do my best to build my reputation as an honest and thoughtful employee. I know they slanderers will come and spoil it all. I will move on and start over again.
I wish the best to all the crime fighters on the forum, Go team Venture!
As I retroactively correct W-2’s I discovered in my own private records that I did file a W-4 for the years 2001 – 2005. Can those year’s W-2’s be corrected? I haven’t made a ‘withholding agreement’ since 2005, is there a contradiction in correcting a W-2 on the years that W-4’s were signed?
I was going to just send the corrections in, but I’m concerned.
All the best, family guardians!De-number, yes done and done in 2005, but then all the time I didn’t file prior to then is numbered! How can I de-number retroactive? doesn’t seem possible; can those W-2’s from 2001 to 2006 be corrected?
I know that everything withheld is now a gift to the scums, but in no way am I liable without a return declaring that everything I earned before 2006 was connected with a trade or business.
What is the consensus, can I still correct W-2’s in the years that I reluctantly made W-4’s under duress(but did not state that in the form). I was duped!
MC
The contract is just as improper as the IRS ‘contract’ and your employer accepted it, then it appears that you have an agreement. No withholding, excellent.
Naturally the IRS over time will demand Single 0 withholding and you employer will comply in the future…..keep your resume up to date and be on the look out for another position somewhere else, or better yet prepare for self employment.
The IRS and their filth will attempt to extort you with lien/levy so you will have to diversify your assets.
Fight on!
Bing,
I admire your inputs and your writings, articulations, and etc….but I’m not a fan of your spirit toward PAM and for that matter Peymon Mottehedeh. Is it necessary to chip away at the person as well as point out some of the weaknesses in their character or approach? You are very good at pointing out the ideas you find weak and I thank you for it; but “they had it coming because of……” is just wrong! No one is a criminal like the IRS, the USDC’s, and by proxy congress. Whatever legal flaws go before a USDC, the court itself is failing to exercise fiduciary duty under oath, and it is believed that they are under oath and obligation by 99% of Americans, so they are constructing a fraud in the first case. So again no one is deserving of anything from the federal benches. I’ve said enough.
Dan Pilla? no thanks! he convinced my brother to file 1040’s, He hadn’t submitted a W-4 in those years; he had submitted exemptions certificates under penalty of perjury fashioned from PA Mitchell.
NO thanks, no Dan Pilla for me.
Bleeding criminals! It’s one thing to be a sneaky two faced chimp, but this is stalinesque.
Another excellent source of practical implementation of the grand jury comes form Randall Kelton. He has a web cite that I can’t remember the name.
Thanks for posting, very well organized and illustrated, stays right on point.
I wouldn’t say any method “works” as a matter of fact, the persons you’re dealing are responding to you based somewhat on your ability to speak authoritatively to them. They don’t know thing one about social security or taxes or law or much of anything. You will have to tell them what to think and refuse to accept anything but the results you demand. It’s a process, a “draw” can be a good result.
I might be all wet here, but the more I listen to the Commercial position and Strawman arguments, the less I find them compelling. I’m not saying that the UCC isn’t a tool of the enemy, but it is a one way tool. The banks and institutions are allowed to use them, but if you try to use their paper forms,…..at least I’ve had no luck. My county recorder accepted a lien in violation of the rules spelled out on the Ottawa County recorder of deeds web page. Never the less the Notice of Lien has been recorded. I pointed out the error in this and was met with nonsense. Anyway, I have my doubts about humans and the use of the UCC system of law.
