<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | lchesson | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/lchesson/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/lchesson/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for lchesson.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1457f9c2f9d292a6f7c87215051c87a3</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Fun with IRS Statistics in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fun-with-irs-statistics/#post-11018</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:21:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/fun-with-irs-statistics/#post-11018"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Fun with IRS Statistics</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I&#039;d rather get struck by lightning than ever file another &#039;form&#039; with these criminals.</p>
<p>These people continue to believe they are accountable to none.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/findings/national/taxprosgph.html" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/findings/natio" rel="nofollow">http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/findings/natio</a>&#8230;taxprosgph.html</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
About Data<br />
IRS Criminal Enforcement Data Systems </p>
<p>The information provided the public by the Internal Revenue Service&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6757"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fun-with-irs-statistics/#post-11018" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">80817761ee1e678e7fe973f8e0a74dfb</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion WTP &#38; Bob Schulz Being Sued By DOJ in the forum 2.3.4. Selective enforcement against freedom fighters</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-bob-schulz-being-sued-by-doj/#post-10840</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:43:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/wtp-bob-schulz-being-sued-by-doj/#post-10840"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> WTP &amp; Bob Schulz Being Sued By DOJ</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
Ahhh, call it a hunch, but my sense is that this latest move by the corrupt DOJ, likely is gonna back fire on the DOJ, as some earnest American Citizens with lots of energy and detailed knowledge of certain fields, who are brave and courageous, and who are ready to, uhhh, ahem, get serious, and do battle, take the initiative and step&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4327"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-bob-schulz-being-sued-by-doj/#post-10840" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7941cf4e2b8317ccabee27e465de55eb</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9748</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9748"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Fury wrote on Oct 14 2006, 05:33 PM:<br />
I believe I was the cause to explode the issue off the original intent of this thread. It&#039;s just that I am a defender of truth and whenever I see non-truth uttered, my blood pressure sky rockets.? :ph34r: </p>
<p>Sorry guys and yes I agree: Bottom line is WTC got&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4104"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/8/#post-9748" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46ce5843ad1bfe1bc66d878bdaf14771</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9729</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:51:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9729"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
I just got to see that interview. I&#039;m going right now to try to find it. I will save that one too.</p>
<p>Here ya go:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/FetzerHannityColmes20060622.wmv" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/Fet" rel="nofollow">http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/Fet</a>&#8230;mes20060622.wmv</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">194acf5614ddfe792646df3c0168f355</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9727</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9727"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>911 Mysteries &#8211; Demolitions: Three Part Video</p>
<p>90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with staggering witness testimonials. Moving from &#8220;the myth&#8221; through &#8220;the analysis&#8221; and into &#8220;the players,&#8221; careful deconstruction of the official story set right alongside clean, clear science. The 9/11 picture is not one of politics&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6354"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/7/#post-9727" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9368a95614fa42a99ede7b8e0db2198e</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Federal Mafia Rules on Hansen Injunction in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-mafia-rules-on-hansen-injunction/#post-10491</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:37:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-mafia-rules-on-hansen-injunction/#post-10491"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal Mafia Rules on Hansen Injunction</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Many thanks, Author # 2 </p>
<p>Relevant passage for our friend and brother C. Hansen:</p>
<p>Romans 8:28-31 </p>
<p>28 And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose. </p>
<p>29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6758"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-mafia-rules-on-hansen-injunction/#post-10491" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f120a3ba9b4b68d768323ec3ee8ce114</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Major Victory ForTax Honesty Movement in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/major-victory-fortax-honesty-movement/#post-10467</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/major-victory-fortax-honesty-movement/#post-10467"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Major Victory ForTax Honesty Movement</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>We The People Foundation has jumped on board this one.  The Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales and IRS commissioner Mr. Mark Everson  have been asked to respond to the WTP analysis of DOJ&#039;s actions. </p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/Update2006-06-09.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/" rel="nofollow">http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/</a>&#8230;e2006-06-09.htm</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">097386dfa589aaea0fda2992224cdfdf</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Strange Minds in the forum 3.4.2.  Corrupt practices</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10231</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:54:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10231"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Strange Minds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
::: Sigh ::: Okay Okay! Here is the links yet again!</p>
<p>There are IRS MOLES among us. This was publically announced by Mr. Author #2. Fellow comrade, Bing deserves the credit regard the discredit of Lambskin.<br />
CLICK HERE TO CHECK IT OUT</p>
<p><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=590" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=590</a></p>
<p>Sonik Speed, somehow I missed Author 2&#039;s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6760"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10231" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2d68e0f97792ff9470b52c5d23e2448a</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Strange Minds in the forum 3.4.2.  Corrupt practices</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10229</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10229"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Strange Minds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
I&#039;m trying to understand what goes on in the minds of people who feel that there is nothing wrong with joining organizations like the Klu Klux Klan or the American Nazi party or the Skin Heads or any group that has a history of violence against those it does not deem worthy of its&#039; ideals and concepts. And so it is with the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6761"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/strange-minds/#post-10229" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6c7e9ba464cec4f0f36dc7b1806ff94</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Interesting New Website in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/interesting-new-website/#post-9608</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:22:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/interesting-new-website/#post-9608"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Interesting New Website</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bandwidth Limit Exceeded</p>
<p>The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later. </p>
<p>Crazy &#8220;tax-protestors&#8221; are at it again&#8230; or again, maybe it&#039;s the &#039;infiltrators&#039;&#8230;:lol:</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff58c590803589e8c17eacea2e1d8758</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/7/#post-9581</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/7/#post-9581"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>AndyK wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#039;s not worth my time to expend any more effort here. I&#039;m sure my supervisors won&#039;t mind if I concentrate on other sites where the participants don&#039;t all have blinders on.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are allowed to use whatever resources you can manage.  Your supervisors are summoned to appear.  You clearly need some help.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">624218d4040b35296a22d4e9d3aa6bd7</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9567</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9567"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I have FOIA documents in my possession that were intentionally altered with pen and ink by someone at the disclosure office, under the ruse of 552 exemption.  I used the physical evidence of the deed to determine with 100% accuracy that fraud was committed the instance their pen touched the paper.  This was early in my education and discovery&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6763"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9567" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">055908a6c3bdbd1b920275e01dcc1f32</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion IRS Jobs in the forum 8.1. Help wanted</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs-jobs/#post-10063</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/irs-jobs/#post-10063"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> IRS Jobs</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Apr 5 2006, 11:30 PM:<br />
Does anyone know if the IRS is hiring for any JOB vacancy? If so, then where can I get a job description and location information. I am actually willing to consider to work for the IRS. It sounds like an exciting opportunity to work for them. The pay is really good too. They can sure use a young&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2850"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs-jobs/#post-10063" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b9f1138ff824cbf02490c48d79b8f619</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion PAYPAL Account Summonses in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9253</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:59:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9253"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> PAYPAL Account Summonses</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik, your position is well researched and established, and I would agree with you 100% if I held the same position.   Good job.  However, I disagree in principle that current abuses by the IRS can be ignored in favor of allowing them access to any records &#8211; for any reason.  In this case, the end does not justify the means.  Time and again&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6764"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9253" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f3680156158521fd039e26d1745b39fe</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Any churches have the courage? in the forum 7.8.1. Church v. State</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/any-churches-have-the-courage/#post-9077</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:38:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/any-churches-have-the-courage/#post-9077"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Any churches have the courage?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Soteriologist wrote on Feb 15 2006, 08:10 PM:<br />
Yes, more pastors &amp; clergy need to be made aware of the 501?(3) issue.  I doubt seriously that many (especially those who have been in the ministry for a long time) would be inclined or led to act on it.</p>
<p>In addition to the material on famguardian.org, I recommend two other sources &#8211; Red&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6397"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/any-churches-have-the-courage/#post-9077" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20cc1f7018f37b6de3a3c2ad470157fc</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9563</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9563"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>AndyK wrote on Apr 15 2006, 11:29 AM:</p>
<p>lchesson wrote on Apr 15 2006, 09:32 AM:<br />
Me:<br />
<span>The IRS is now trying to act as if they have first hand knowledge of whether or not Hendrickson received &#039;wages&#039;.? I&#039;ll bet a dollar to a donut that they don&#039;t.</span></p>
<p>AndyK:<br />
<b>You owe me a donut.? The IRS has copies of forms W-2 and 1099, submitted by the 3rd&hellip;</b><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7816"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9563" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5710141cafa34b010bdffabb1edf98fa</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9560</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:32:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9560"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Apr 14 2006, 07:29 PM:<br />
Andy,</p>
<p>Thanks.? We will wait beyond one week.? There aren&#039;t that many questions and they are all admit or deny.? The only reason it would take much work is because you want supporting evidence to argue with, and that&#039;s good.? Truth and education and accountability to the requirements of the law&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7813"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/6/#post-9560" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b038397f86731a261b64b51395c9fc97</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9552</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9552"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>AndyK wrote on Apr 14 2006, 07:36 AM:</p>
<p>Bing wrote on Apr 14 2006, 08:43 AM:</p>
<p><span>The IRS and DOJ are lying in their complaints and the complaints are full of presumption.</span><br />
<b>YOUR opinion.? Any facts to back it up?</b></p>
<p><span># 1 &#8211; Para 7 of the complaint states that Hendrickson asserts that payment of federal taxes is voluntary.  False.</p>
<p># 2 &#8211; Para 8&hellip;</span><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7856"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9552" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c5b6550452f93791c53ba11711bcdbcb</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9551</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9551"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonic, I know you may know what I&#039;m referring to in the above post, so I&#039;ll give you a hint.</p>
<p>You incorrectly presume that I am here to defend Peter Eric when you call him a terrorist.  And when I refuse to play with you, I am accused of having my head up my a$$.</p>
<p>You can either command respect or you can demand respect.  In my opinion,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7855"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9551" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">189199ac9d4d312653a5caca13aca26c</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9550</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9550"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonic,  if you presented consistent arguments, then I would be willing to play.  Too many word substitution and presumptions for my blood&#8230;</p>
<p>For starters, you don&#039;t even spell my name right.</p>
<p>It appears to me that all you want to do is argue and accuse.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6ec9f8c6523d0ff7fe8b63fc7bee3c4</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion PAYPAL Account Summonses in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9248</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9248"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> PAYPAL Account Summonses</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>A cursory reading of this article would not raise any red flags for those that believe taxable income is any and all property from any and all sources.  IRS minions love this kind of stuff.  However, when one understands the MO of both the press and the IRS, it is easy to put into perspective. </p>
<p>The story begins &#8230;&#8221;  to turn over&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7145"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9248" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">02f9b148f14b4a7ca493c0bf51430a86</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9540</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9540"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2 wrote on Apr 13 2006, 05:59 AM:<br />
AndyK,</p>
<p>You expectation of favoritism is unfounded.  Everyone gets the same treatment here, and your employer, the IRS, owes the same obligation to the public at large.  Thank you for reminding me.  I contacted Mr. Sonik Speed privately yesterday to say the same thing to him.  Sonik called Pete&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7845"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/5/#post-9540" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ae2fdfa3a282a52e35f81a6ee6931481</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/4/#post-9531</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/4/#post-9531"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Apr 11 2006, 10:58 AM:<br />
Rebuttal Anyone??? </p>
<p>Someone please tell me Peter Hendrickson is NOT a terrorist. What happen to the folks that defended Hendrickson in this thread? It has been months!</p>
<p>Hello?</p>
<p> Sonik Speed </p>
<p>[post=&#8221;2558&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Since you have managed to turn this thread into a Pete Hendrickson issue, why&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7333"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/4/#post-9531" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ef16c895184d87ceb216decc01a8da6</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion OLD Legal Dictionary CD&#039;s in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/old-legal-dictionary-cds/#post-9215</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:27:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/old-legal-dictionary-cds/#post-9215"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> OLD Legal Dictionary CD&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>You may download Black&#039;s 2nd here &#8212;&gt;&gt; </p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://lawworks.eaglecorps.org/files/Black&#039;s%20Law%20Dictionary/" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://lawworks.eaglecorps.org/files/Black" rel="nofollow">http://lawworks.eaglecorps.org/files/Black</a>&#8230;w%20Dictionary/</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c88a5a94df55435a763593f1dc529a3</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion ***FOREWARNINGS&#033;&#033;***HEADS UP&#033;&#033;*** in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10338</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/forewarningsheads-up/#post-10338"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> ***FOREWARNINGS&#33;&#33;***HEADS UP&#33;&#33;***</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bird flu scam &#8211; out of a Doctor&#039;s mouth.  Dr. Day has an amazing testimony.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/birdflu.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/birdflu.htm</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b47f2e26f9166f6b0fb5c547f10b35ba</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9691</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/page/5/#post-9691"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>1 Hr. 21 min. &#8211;  must see.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&amp;q=In+Plane+Site+%26+Loose+Chang&amp;pr=goog-sl" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8</a>&#8230;hang&amp;pr=goog-sl</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aac25258a21484ac4072600388ee7e5e</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9520</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9520"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Sep 15 2005, 11:08 AM:<br />
THE QUESTION:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
<i>Do you claim that every statement on this website is uncontestable fact with no further proof required? What about for a first time visitor to this site? </i></p>
<p>THE RESPONSE:<br />
<b>I claim that every statement on this website it true and correct. If I feel otherwise, then I personally&hellip;</b><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5992"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9520" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3448d7181aec6a5f6da919cb354d18c4</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion WTP Right To Petition Lawsuit in the forum 2. Activism and Important Events (Members Only.  Guests cannot read or post)</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-right-to-petition-lawsuit/#post-8129</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:53:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/wtp-right-to-petition-lawsuit/#post-8129"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> WTP Right To Petition Lawsuit</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I&#039;ll agree.  No big surprise.</p>
<p>Federal court, Federal judge, Federal money, when will we learn?  Every time we are standing at the line in the sand, we back up a few steps before taking another one.  The line has not moved.</p>
<p>If it goes as far as  SCOTUS, hopefully public awareness will be raised to the fact that this case advanced through court&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7983"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-right-to-petition-lawsuit/#post-8129" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c49e04e7b01b9bc9c601a1d6541da126</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9518</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9518"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Sep 15 2005, 08:49 AM:<br />
You also said<br />
<i></i></p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Ichesson witnessed (fact) what he is claiming! Ichesson talked to a witness regarding a refund. The witness would appear to be speaking of his/her own issue (fact) of receiving a refund. What more do you want?</p>
<p>What I want: SHARE WITH US PROOF RATHER THAN What he said or&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5991"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9518" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05a9e546592cfef45d21076c75da28b5</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9509</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9509"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>O.K., O.K., I&#039;ll start and end the personal assaults by simply acknowledging my own shortcomings.  And the list is long. </p>
<p>We can agree to disagree with the following:</p>
<p>1.  The Title of this thread &#8221; Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue&#8221;  is  an absolutely true statement.  Call it semantics if you will, but the word &#8220;will&#8221; does NOT mean &#8220;shall&#8221;&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5986"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/3/#post-9509" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6d3c201fd94155cd9b2af02d7ec2078</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue.. in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/2/#post-9502</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/2/#post-9502"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dept. of Justice will NOT pursue..</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sonik Speed wrote on Sep 12 2005, 03:52 PM:<br />
Ok great I understand now.</p>
<p>But I am still requesting answers from Ichesson, Fiddo, BOBT whom I still have yet to hear. Suddenly they have disappeared!  :huh: </p>
<p>I would definitely love to hear ESPECIALLY from Ichesson who actually start this post that has deception in the post.</p>
<p>Please&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5980"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dept-of-justice-will-not-pursue/page/2/#post-9502" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4de67f59aac529ad55c13ccbacab44a9</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion 911 Truths-It was an inside job in the forum 3.8. Government omission, terrorism, contrived emergencies, and mismanagment to usurp power</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/#post-9633</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:27:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/#post-9633"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 911 Truths-It was an inside job</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Income tax and 911 conspiracies????  This kind of stuff gives John Q Public such a migraine!!</p>
<p>Yes, NEVER in the history of modern highrises has one ever collapsed because of fire, yet on that day 3 went down into their own footprints.  Totally unconceivable.  Undeniable physics at work here that tell a completely different version of what&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2759"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/911-truths-it-was-an-inside-job/#post-9633" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bee2ab8314383ce173f88d25e9fabc10</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion AMERICAN GLASNOST: Taking the Offensive in the forum 2.3.3. Corruption litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/american-glasnost-taking-the-offensive/#post-9456</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/american-glasnost-taking-the-offensive/#post-9456"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> AMERICAN GLASNOST: Taking the Offensive</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>D., Good work and thanks for sharing this info.   I will be looking into filing similar briefs here in NC.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8eb8aa347b25545f5639cebc34e8b5a3</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion UCC Redemption? in the forum 4.5.3. UCC Redemption and Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/ucc-redemption/#post-9430</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 02:27:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/ucc-redemption/#post-9430"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> UCC Redemption?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;My good friend who has been studying all of this for 30 years (and who knows a great deal more than I do about all of this sovereignty and tax stuff) is becoming deeply involved with this whole UCC Redemption process. &#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps you could persuade him to come on over and tell us all about it.   I&#039;d love to see exactly how it works.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d91d8be22d36d674058c5e3fdff02045</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Will file 1040EZ&#039;s with 4852&#039;s in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9345</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9345"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Will file 1040EZ&#39;s with 4852&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Rattler14,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to respond.  As far as I&#039;m concerned, the information presented here is the most knowledgable and thorough filtration through the webs of fraud I&#039;ve see anywhere.  To be clear, I do NOT consider myself a Taxpayer and in any other way under the jurisdiction of Fedcorp.  I am as freedom minded as they come&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6248"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9345" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4845c0e17fa16258326486cb51830b65</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Will file 1040EZ&#039;s with 4852&#039;s in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9343</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 00:20:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9343"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Will file 1040EZ&#39;s with 4852&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Rant on.  Not that it matters (I&#039;m feeling rejected right now), but I thought I&#039;d shed more light on my journey.  I filed my last 1040 in 1997.  Found Taxgate, Bannister, Rose, Schiff, WTP, et al,,,knew I had been deceived.  Fast forward to 2005.  Currently in collections for 1099MISC&#039;s filed in 1998 and 2000.  COntinuing to read,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6246"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9343" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e9cea0527c4980de7338a3183d1cc967</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Will file 1040EZ&#039;s with 4852&#039;s in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9342</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 23:03:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9342"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Will file 1040EZ&#39;s with 4852&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing wrote on May 27 2005, 11:25 AM:</p>
<p>lchesson wrote on May 11 2005, 08:32 PM:</p>
<p>Help me out if I&#039;m missing something, but I do not see where a 1040EZ testifies to 14th ammendment citizenship.? I am simply tying to correct their records.? Perhaps all I really need to do is send a corrected 1099 and see&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6245"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9342" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">08ff15d939617741bb012250fa60aba7</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Welcome&#033; in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/welcome-20/#post-9357</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 02:11:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/welcome-20/#post-9357"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Welcome&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>OK, so should one just simply file a 1040NR instead of a 1040?  Does one need to go through all the emancipation steps prior to using a 1040NR?</p>
<p>Any possible ramifications using NR form instead of 1040?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">436e40eea573fe7e4903b458c9833380</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Jim Mattatall kidnapped by federal mafia in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/jim-mattatall-kidnapped-by-federal-mafia/#post-9352</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/jim-mattatall-kidnapped-by-federal-mafia/#post-9352"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Jim Mattatall kidnapped by federal mafia</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>BOBT12 wrote on May 11 2005, 07:20 PM:<br />
It seems that the American Gestapo is picking up speed. There is almost no time to adjust, abductions, prosecutions, Real ID Act, etc. When will our side get a brake?</p>
<p>[post=&#8221;1432&#8243;][/post]</p>
<p>Only when the right people decide that enough is enough.  What do I mean by &#039;right&#039; people?  I have no&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8143"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/jim-mattatall-kidnapped-by-federal-mafia/#post-9352" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ae5b7b71a0c7e67ba4de9b5796910c46</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Will file 1040EZ&#039;s with 4852&#039;s in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9337</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9337"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Will file 1040EZ&#39;s with 4852&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Actually, I will not need to file form 4852, only a corrected 1099.</p>
<p>I&#039;m still trying to decide what to do about the citizenry business.  I&#039;m thinking that the 14th Ammendment did not usurp state citizenry, only added a new class.  We may have a confusing situation such as duel citizenship, having the rights of BOTH groups.  Isn&#039;t any cession&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6240"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/will-file-1040ezs-with-4852s/#post-9337" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3ce524bad6d4367cb7cdcce8577d81bd</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion GM to go bankrupt? in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9182</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9182"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> GM to go bankrupt?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Here are an  excert from their most recent 8-K report to the SEC.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://edgar.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=4Ui5IAWGR66PTC0&amp;ID=3477940" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://edgar.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dl" rel="nofollow">http://edgar.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dl</a>&#8230;PTC0&amp;ID=3477940</p>
<p>On February 13, 2005, Standard &amp; Poor&#039;s Ratings Services (S&amp;P) affirmed its ratings on General Motors Corporation (GM), General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) and all related entities. Their press&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2650"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9182" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1b0fde5cc00427595810e003b140c57</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion GM to go bankrupt? in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9181</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9181"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> GM to go bankrupt?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Back in the 1950s, Harlow Curtice, then president of General Motors, said the automaker &#8220;has no bad years. Only good years and better years.&#8221;</p>
<p>How times have changed.</p>
<p>All I could find is this one from yahoo finance.  Note the 71 BILLION dollar increase in long term debt, which is attributed to rising employee benefit costs (health&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2649"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9181" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af896738b2e8b3dce48992230880712c</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion GM to go bankrupt? in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9179</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:48:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9179"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> GM to go bankrupt?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey, back in the early 90&#039;s, I was on board that anyone who though the DOW could pass 4000/5000 was a fool about to depart with his money.  </p>
<p>A behemoth such as GM cannot(will not) be allowed to fail if so much is at stake. And GM is not the only Fortune 100 company in such a predicament.  The banks simply re-negotiate terms and life goes on. &hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2647"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gm-to-go-bankrupt/#post-9179" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a9c9bf94808cecc8487677a14170be4</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Persecution of grandma by IRS in the forum 3.4.1.  Evidence of corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/persecution-of-grandma-by-irs/#post-9175</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/persecution-of-grandma-by-irs/#post-9175"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Persecution of grandma by IRS</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It is a detestable thing how the IRS destroys peoples lives.  It is also detestable when people look the other way and are thankful it&#039;s not them.  This is the EXACT reaction they hope to instill in the people.</p>
<p>My hat is off to you, my friend, for becoming proactive.  I pray you will be an inspiration to those around you.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">04b3f6acec0378eacc3bc51f6f861cdb</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Notice of Levy in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notice-of-levy/#post-9155</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 04:07:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/notice-of-levy/#post-9155"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Notice of Levy</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>They told you you could NOT speak with their attorney?  Is this the same attorney that can show you a lien of judgement?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, and I hope I don&#039;t offend anyone, but these attorneys are a major part of the problem.  I would guess that the only way they would not steal your money is if somehow this so-called attorney could see the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5798"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notice-of-levy/#post-9155" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c13533438f91fd847b11609e72bd5896</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion State liens in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/state-liens/#post-9033</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/state-liens/#post-9033"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> State liens</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>All I can say is SHOW THEM THE LAW.  If it happened to me, I would take a look at the document that supposedly empowers my employer to state to act on the state&#039;s behalf.  It&#039;s not worth the paper it&#039;s written on.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t know if this will help or not, but I know that North Carolina does not meet the requirements of this statute when they send&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5024"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/state-liens/#post-9033" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e7792ca94d6491e8bc23d19cb0d5fc6</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion Notice of Federal Tax Lien in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notice-of-federal-tax-lien/#post-8992</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:01:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/notice-of-federal-tax-lien/#post-8992"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Notice of Federal Tax Lien</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>JWR,</p>
<p>You probably would have been cc&#039;d by IRS if one was filed.  It&#039;s a Form 668(Y)© Notice of Tax Lien.  They don&#039;t certify the thing, it only gets the rubber stamp, and most counties enter this as an actual lien.  It is filed in the county where your property is located.</p>
<p>I did manage to get it removed from one of the credit&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7593"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notice-of-federal-tax-lien/#post-8992" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8573a5c343222c6c5985914a53927f6d</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion &#34;Voluntary&#34; National ID Bill in the forum 3.1.1.  Federal abuses</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/voluntary-national-id-bill/#post-9022</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/voluntary-national-id-bill/#post-9022"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> &quot;Voluntary&quot; National ID Bill</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Michael Badnarik, the Libertarian Party&#039;s 2004 presidential candidate, doesn&#039;t shy away from the fact that he does NOT have a Driver&#039;s License, nor does he put tags on his car.</p>
<p>Whenever he gets a ticket, the prosecution usually will drop the charges. I don&#039;t know how he does it, but wouldn&#039;t it be fun to tell the cops that you don&#039;t need&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4581"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/voluntary-national-id-bill/#post-9022" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9165a3a69e9763caf34ae4ccc1b4c8d7</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion President&#039;s Tax Reform Panel Put On Notice in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/presidents-tax-reform-panel-put-on-notice/#post-9032</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/presidents-tax-reform-panel-put-on-notice/#post-9032"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> President&#39;s Tax Reform Panel Put On Notice</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>To save space, I won&#039;t post the attachments, but you can read them here:</p>
<p>ATTACHMENT 1:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/TaxResearchCD/Attach1.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/TaxResearchCD/Attach1.htm</a></p>
<p>ATTACHMENT 2 overview:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/TaxResearchCD/Attach2-Overview.htm" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow"></a><a target='_blank' href="http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/TaxResea" rel="nofollow">http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/TaxResea</a>&#8230;h2-Overview.htm</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca339000535cc9c035152839ad4760a2</guid>
				<title>lchesson replied to the discussion President&#039;s Tax Reform Panel Put On Notice in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/presidents-tax-reform-panel-put-on-notice/#post-9031</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/presidents-tax-reform-panel-put-on-notice/#post-9031"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> President&#39;s Tax Reform Panel Put On Notice</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Here is Shultz&#039;s letter to The President?s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform which will hold it&#039;s first public meeting on 2-16-05.</p>
<p>______________</p>
<p>We The People Foundation For<br />
Constitutional Education, Inc.<br />
2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, NY 12804<br />
Phone: (518) 656-3578 Fax: (518) 656-9724</p>
<p>February 11, 2005</p>
<p>VIA PRIORITY MAIL</p>
<p>Hon. Connie&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5841"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/presidents-tax-reform-panel-put-on-notice/#post-9031" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		