<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | lambskin | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/lambskin/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/lambskin/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for lambskin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4e7c6ebce09e212a5d28b851f2954ca0</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Trading Prisoners Like Cattle in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11764</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:00:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11764"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Trading Prisoners Like Cattle</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>O.K., sounds good, but you&#039;ll hafta accept it&#039;ll take a bit; ya know… being as I gotta work &#039;n&#039; all.</p>
<p>Also, as a gesture of due respect to FG and its staff, and in effort to at least minimize any risk to anybody, I&#039;ll move any further response other than is included here to a section of the &#8220;Members Helping Members&#8221; forums.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6623"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11764" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">901dfc007c41cc22f5be20be3659a20a</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Trading Prisoners Like Cattle in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11762</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:44:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11762"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Trading Prisoners Like Cattle</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks Admin. Ya gotta love it when people start comin? t&#039;grips. Praise the Lord!</p>
<p>Yes people? Yes &#8211; Yes &#8211; YES! It?s all about &#8220;paper&#8221; &#8211; bonds, bills, notes, certificates, vouchers, tickets, checks, statements, receipts, and on, and on it goes! It&#039;s all &#039;monetary paper&#039; and every single piece of it has got a number printed on it that leads back&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6624"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trading-prisoners-like-cattle/#post-11762" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">61cd92272d8a1c2cd45b9b5789962055</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Special v. General appearance in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/special-v-general-appearance/#post-11644</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:13:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/special-v-general-appearance/#post-11644"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Special v. General appearance</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>And thanks again&#8230; I&#039;d always wondered about that one but could never locate anything on it (in my often harried attempts), so that&#039;s a BIG thank you.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2285307cd0b68f295504a12545f3465e</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Data-stealing trojan virus nabs virtual wallets in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/data-stealing-trojan-virus-nabs-virtual-wallets/#post-11695</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:02:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/data-stealing-trojan-virus-nabs-virtual-wallets/#post-11695"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Data-stealing trojan virus nabs virtual wallets</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>Thanks for the warning. Great find.</p>
<p>Makes ya wonder, due to the recent banking crises, if the revelation of the discovery of this &#8220;crimeware&#8221; hasn&#039;t been strategically developed and timely tied to said industry crises.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f54c4f9f67d0e1cf60568986269a52ca</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion &#34;The World As We Know It Is Going Down&#34; in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-world-as-we-know-it-is-going-down/#post-11613</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:24:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-world-as-we-know-it-is-going-down/#post-11613"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> &quot;The World As We Know It Is Going Down&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>What are the candidates supposed to say? What should they say? </p>
<p>How about &#8211; &#8220;We&#039;re going to dump the Federal Reserve and invest in the knowledge and integrity of the American people. We&#039;re going to remove all Federal Reserve Notes from circulation and infuse the whole economic system with United States Notes. If any body of men,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1385"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-world-as-we-know-it-is-going-down/#post-11613" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">936741bd2233be1900a5d796bd536943</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Is Travel a Right or a Privilege? in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-travel-a-right-or-a-privilege/#post-11608</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:21:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/is-travel-a-right-or-a-privilege/#post-11608"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Is Travel a Right or a Privilege?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Kokomojo,</p>
<p>The Professor (that?s another affectionate moniker used for the wise-guy? um? I mean the ?learned gentleman? known as Bing in these forums) is right, you should do some diggin? around before ya ?pop one? on us. These things take time and it?d make it easier if you sought some answers via the written material first.</p>
<p>The&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4766"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/is-travel-a-right-or-a-privilege/#post-11608" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f57e99d12fb448772877e94e7cea2dd1</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion USA is a corporation in the forum 3.3.4. Privatization and corporatization of the government</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/usa-is-a-corporation/#post-11604</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:14:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/usa-is-a-corporation/#post-11604"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> USA is a corporation</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>You&#039;re the best.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cfd653b7f07fd839c2d9422989cb2a12</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion SCHOOL 1957 vs. 2007 in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/school-1957-vs-2007/#post-11599</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:25:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/school-1957-vs-2007/#post-11599"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> SCHOOL 1957 vs. 2007</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey A#2,</p>
<p>Thank you, very sound wisdom lies in this piece. We should send this type of info to D.C. as well.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ef1ef4de16d735b5587506b8763b68a0</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Oil in the US?.PLENTY&#033;&#033; in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/oil-in-the-us-plenty/#post-11571</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:41:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/oil-in-the-us-plenty/#post-11571"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Oil in the US?.PLENTY&#33;&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>Thank you for the ?heads up?.</p>
<p>There are a number of people who?ve been aware of, and following, the ?oil issues? in this country and across the globe very closely; and I know you?re as aware of many of these issues as well, but one of the real solutions to these energy ?crises?, and the pricing, is good ol? H2O.</p>
<p>One such man&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1387"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/oil-in-the-us-plenty/#post-11571" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">88af61f34ed4c2f49257f93d4bade3f3</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Bible Booklet in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bible-booklet/#post-11513</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:50:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/bible-booklet/#post-11513"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Bible Booklet</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>Excellent post. Everybody should send brother James a warm &#8220;Thank you.&#8221;</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a6e5c937e8f7cb82cc8d42c036da9264</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Please Help&#033;  My partners breeched a JV contract in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/please-help-my-partners-breeched-a-jv-contract/#post-11511</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:07:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/please-help-my-partners-breeched-a-jv-contract/#post-11511"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Please Help&#33;  My partners breeched a JV contract</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey snw,</p>
<p>First, you should concentrate on the foreclosure and leave the legal premises of the breach of the Joint Venture agreement to be ironed out later. The reason I say this is because the ramifications of the breach can be consolidated into the same case or action as the proceedings progress, especially if the financing for the project&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6627"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/please-help-my-partners-breeched-a-jv-contract/#post-11511" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ccaa1def6b3ab909c3d278e1f1f970ab</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Federal jurisdiction ? more than meets the eye? in the forum 5.5.1. Legal Research Assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-jurisdiction-more-than-meets-the-eye/#post-11470</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:18:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-jurisdiction-more-than-meets-the-eye/#post-11470"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal jurisdiction ? more than meets the eye?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Answer = compact.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0347f5ab698ec1aec95d3cb2731e1185</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Using federal courts to quash in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11433</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11433"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Using federal courts to quash</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Franklin,</p>
<p>You?re welcome. You?re doin? fine bud, hang in there and you can nail this thing shut. </p>
<p>1. You asked:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Without being able to see the name of the court and the case number or even the names of the parties to the case, how could a reader verify that it was even a real case?</p>
<p>You don?t need to worry about reading the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5426"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11433" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">19463c253fa750b3d771730677e08fe1</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Using federal courts to quash in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11431</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:25:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11431"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Using federal courts to quash</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Franklin,</p>
<p>Stick to your guns bud. They failed to respond properly and you?ve got ?em in default. Don?t respond with anything other than a judgment from your court in your favor. Their default on your process stands as ?res judica? and there?s nothing they can do about it now unless they get you to ?re-contract? with them.</p>
<p>I?ll take this&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5424"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11431" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05de0c1cc8fd72d195fc69c430920ffc</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Obama and Article II in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/obama-and-article-ii/#post-11459</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:49:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/obama-and-article-ii/#post-11459"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Obama and Article II</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Franklin,</p>
<p>Excellent work. Thank you.</p>
<p>The mainstream media may not get this out, but I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be all over the alternative media sites. Maybe Stanley Hilton will take/make this case. Check this out to see what I mean by that.</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8964" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8964</a></p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8620f93c88aacb3ebf1f98a6fd69734f</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Using federal courts to quash in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11429</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11429"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Using federal courts to quash</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Bing,</p>
<p>In continuance of Franklin&#039;s case, there are other matters of law which need to be considered since we don&#039;t know his status as it relates to the &#8220;taxpayer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Franklin said:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
There was no response to my demand for their written delegated enforcement authority and for documentation that led to their &#8220;reason to believe.&#8221; I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5422"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11429" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af1c79f5ce9220f513f41957ea73af9d</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Using federal courts to quash in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11428</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:58:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11428"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Using federal courts to quash</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Bing,</p>
<p>O.k., you&#039;re right. My answer was broken and indirect. Franklin asked:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
My questions = Is it necessary to have a summons defective on its face quashed in district court? Can you seek the protection of the federal court from a defective summons and then on some other occasion turn around and tell federal courts they have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5421"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11428" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20b7324c9257c3b22e7eea003b8bceb8</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Using federal courts to quash in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11426</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:36:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11426"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Using federal courts to quash</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Franklin,</p>
<p>Just wanted you to know that your presence in these forums is also an encouragement to others here, it lets everybody know that you are another American that seeks to do away with the corrupt activities of the U.S. and the trickle-down effect that corruption has within the several states and local communities. </p>
<p>What I?m about&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5419"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/using-federal-courts-to-quash/#post-11426" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5837ef1e9240e50e24ec021b101c86e1</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion The Subprime Trump Card: Standing Up to the Banks in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-subprime-trump-card-standing-up-to-the-banks/#post-11416</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:43:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-subprime-trump-card-standing-up-to-the-banks/#post-11416"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Subprime Trump Card: Standing Up to the Banks</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>Good item. Thank you.</p>
<p>The worms are coming up out of their holes after the downpour and the flocks of robins will be feasting in no time.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">14e8c443a3ddab29561be79e61b9d5b6</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Video series on citizenship and sovereignty in the forum 7.1. Citizenship, domicile, and nationality</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/video-series-on-citizenship-and-sovereignty/#post-11396</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/video-series-on-citizenship-and-sovereignty/#post-11396"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Video series on citizenship and sovereignty</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey All,</p>
<p>Well said Admin. Thank you.</p>
<p>We should be asking ourselves this, ?Who is this guy? What background does he have in the topics of which he speaks? Is he just repeating a line of ideas taught to him by somebody else, or has he really investigated and uncovered these things to be true?? His words sound very convincing, but are we to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-191"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/video-series-on-citizenship-and-sovereignty/#post-11396" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">00edd5a976319f5a7f95149d290a4902</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Illegal Search And Seizure in the forum 5.5.1. Legal Research Assistance</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/illegal-search-and-seizure/#post-11359</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/illegal-search-and-seizure/#post-11359"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Illegal Search And Seizure</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey rhea,</p>
<p>Wow dude! You really know how (or want) to roil the waters, don&#039;t ya? I?m referring to overall content of both of your posts under this forum heading.</p>
<p>The fact that you even need to ask about the nature of a commercial lien alone tells me you shouldn?t attempt to use one, but a perspective on them would be in order only to show that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3848"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/illegal-search-and-seizure/#post-11359" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">55a6a7696efc69ad9433dac97b07a5f4</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion SUPREME COURT: 7203 does not mean income tax in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/supreme-court-7203-does-not-mean-income-tax/#post-11147</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:12:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/supreme-court-7203-does-not-mean-income-tax/#post-11147"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> SUPREME COURT: 7203 does not mean income tax</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Guys,</p>
<p>Just a word of encouragement. This is excellent work. Thank you from all of us who don&#039;t have the time to take their research to this extent or beyond.  </p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79c07a62b1370882f0514492d20e879b</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Religious Arguments About Taxes in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/religious-arguments-about-taxes/#post-11340</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:05:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/religious-arguments-about-taxes/#post-11340"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Religious Arguments About Taxes</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey A. #2,</p>
<p>Thank you. </p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7166599bbe092a68dbe2f63d5f5ab92f</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Suing mortgage company-latest updates in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/suing-mortgage-company-latest-updates/#post-11297</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/suing-mortgage-company-latest-updates/#post-11297"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Suing mortgage company-latest updates</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Layed, </p>
<p>First: I truly understand your predicament because I?ve been there myself and, not unlike yourself, did my best to ?honor? the ?obligation?, as I thought it was to be honored, at the time. My obligation was not a mortgage, but the premise is the same &#8211; The difficulty that men and women of the United States of America are having&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4888"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/suing-mortgage-company-latest-updates/#post-11297" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e2663a9c450f5ad5846e3892adef3899</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Discovery in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/discovery/#post-11286</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:06:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/discovery/#post-11286"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Discovery</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Author #2,</p>
<p>Nope.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a69ca26babd2e9c8448a43ffdf99099</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Discovery in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/discovery/#post-11284</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/discovery/#post-11284"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Discovery</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Layed,</p>
<p>I have some experience in litigating these types of issues. If you&#039;d care to give me a little more info, it&#039;s possible you&#039;ll be able to save your home. Please PM me so I can determine if the topic can be openly discussed in this thread without exposing anyone to any perils that could ensue. </p>
<p>G&amp;P </p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c196ac005337d07306ba0612d60f326b</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Research authorities in the forum 7.6.1.  &#34;Trade or business&#34; franchise scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/research-authorities/#post-11163</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/research-authorities/#post-11163"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Research authorities</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey All,</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
So the $64,000 questions are ?What is the privilege and where is the Internal Revenue Code section that makes the American people liable for this privilege tax??</p>
<p>One answer is: Trading with the enemy Act.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">01fed27626d553e54f24cce867cbd9b3</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion RealID Act in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/realid-act/#post-11257</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:21:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/realid-act/#post-11257"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> RealID Act</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey All,</p>
<p>Riverway asked:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
what prevents the USG from setting up ports of entry at all state boarders and requiring Real ID at those points of entry.</p>
<p>and the answer is: You.</p>
<p>Write to the congress and some congressperson might eventually get a clue, and when you need to fly anywhere, just give them your passport. If they don&#039;t let&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6664"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/realid-act/#post-11257" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c74c271f0f24d552735113bfc25294c7</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion The Queen and Admiralty in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/page/2/#post-10999</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:08:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/page/2/#post-10999"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Queen and Admiralty</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>What can I say, save &#8220;Praise the Lord&#8221; and &#8220;Thank you for your understanding&#8221;.</p>
<p>I apologize for not being descript enough and I&#039;ll try to remember to post where appropriate in the future.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">950dc2ab9e4b1fdc9059f82f1def805d</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion The Queen and Admiralty in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10997</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10997"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Queen and Admiralty</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info. I don?t know why you thought I was lookin? for the help, </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
You aren&#039;t finding remedies because you are looking on the wrong website.</p>
<p>I was just responding to your request </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
If there is a way to organize, simplify, or present the fundamental truths found on this website better than we have so&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5752"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10997" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a678edd8babe88f9406d2fe489495c1</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion The Queen and Admiralty in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10994</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:03:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10994"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Queen and Admiralty</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey All, </p>
<p>Glad to see another fine topic being revived/continued by the best of minds our nation has to offer. This is undoubtedly what must be done to assist the bewildered and &#8220;shell shocked&#8221;. Let&#039;s all &#8220;Keep up the fight&#8221; because it is definitely working, as simply evidenced by the appearance of juu1k0ry and the other 1,000+ members in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5556"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-queen-and-admiralty/#post-10994" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6d0e15a82983503993236a39034f569e</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Call to Action: Public Enemy Number ONE in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/call-to-action-public-enemy-number-one/#post-11060</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/call-to-action-public-enemy-number-one/#post-11060"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Call to Action: Public Enemy Number ONE</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Admin,</p>
<p>That&#039;s almost as &#8220;pants pi&#8230;n&#039; funny&#8221; as the Professors&#039; topic about the guy who wanted to tax whores and pimps.</p>
<p>I truly enjoyed it. Thanks for keepin&#039; the &#8220;lighter&#8221; side of the forum alive.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3df39445c2a7946a9d1e3af1a6594103</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion There is no Constitution in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/there-is-no-constitution/#post-11005</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/there-is-no-constitution/#post-11005"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> There is no Constitution</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey all,</p>
<p>Let&#039;s not forget that all those men which we all so often quote are dead and that the most superior quote ever uttered on earth, the one-and-only quote that still stands true for every man on the planet, because the Author is still alive, was &#8211; &#8220;You shall know the &#039;Truth&#039; and the &#039;Truth&#039; shall set you free.</p>
<p>Keep that one,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6236"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/there-is-no-constitution/#post-11005" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4f9fbfa73529c372bd90f5a71d882a28</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Tax Court rule switch in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/tax-court-rule-switch/#post-10943</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:29:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/tax-court-rule-switch/#post-10943"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Tax Court rule switch</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Ed,</p>
<p>You&#039;re in an administrative court acting in a judiciable cause known as Equity. Equity covers contracts and negotiable instruments and is a subset of Admiralty law.</p>
<p>This taxing body is trying to enforce its equitable rights based upon an &#8220;Adhesion&#8221; contract that you entered into voluntarily.</p>
<p>The only way you can win in this court is to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8167"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/tax-court-rule-switch/#post-10943" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5dbff5c651e5eb859cf990d5cc3ae1bc</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion WTP Decision in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/wtp-decision/#post-10863</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/wtp-decision/#post-10863"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> WTP Decision</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey all,</p>
<p>This may get poor reception, but there really is no need to discuss this beyond one point, and one point alone.</p>
<p>The answer to WTP&#039;s dilemma is simple&#8230; make a law that says that &#8220;Government&#8221; must respond.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8be9104cefe1740dcdd300a897d90d39</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Hypothetical Post in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/hypothetical-post/#post-10860</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:33:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/hypothetical-post/#post-10860"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Hypothetical Post</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Bing,</p>
<p>Fine work&#8230;. Fine, fine work. I&#039;m gonna use these quotes as often as I can. </p>
<p>Everybody should take exceptional note of the fact that the judges are to determine the court&#039;s jurisdiction even if the question hasn&#039;t been raised by either of the parties at suit.</p>
<p>G&amp;P,</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3a1a393596114302a3fd3aa93fcbad0</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion New Article on IRS Propaganda in the forum 3.4.3.  Deceptive tax propaganda</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-article-on-irs-propaganda/#post-8278</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:10:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-article-on-irs-propaganda/#post-8278"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New Article on IRS Propaganda</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey all,</p>
<p>First: I&#039;d like to thank Admin for another great update.</p>
<p>Second: Welcome Eliot.</p>
<p>Third: To remind all FG advocates to set up a trust and use the W-8ben with their employers; and,</p>
<p>Fourth: Bring everybody&#039;s attention to Mr. Matthews&#039; remarks about &#8220;abusive trusts&#8221;, the comments start on page 15 of the manual.</p>
<p>In his reference to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2752"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-article-on-irs-propaganda/#post-8278" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c2e044cb54b2e7ab0751e5dffd6d3821</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion 14th amendment in the forum 7.1.1. Nationality/Constitutional citizenship</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10823</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10823"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 14th amendment</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Reb,</p>
<p>I have a suggestion for you. Compare two copies of your state constitution; one should be prior to 1960, the other should be the current one, and see if you don&#039;t find any changes that might raise a few questions. Then do the same for your state&#039;s Criminal Code; it should have been changed around 1960 &#8211; 61 as well, and ask yourself why&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-156"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10823" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f35d40aa9537cb888a861d68c0b73f38</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion 14th amendment in the forum 7.1.1. Nationality/Constitutional citizenship</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10819</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10819"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 14th amendment</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Scot,</p>
<p>I think I understand your conundrum. Yes, 14th amendment citizens are statutorily created citizens; or rather, they&#039;re citizenship is of a lesser, or different, status than those of a &#8220;national&#8221;. The 14th amendment was supposedly written to guarantee equal rights under the laws to &#8220;non-nationals&#8221; &#8211; such as aliens, immigrants or slaves -&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-152"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/14th-amendment/#post-10819" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">861f7d5aaa192d6f9750f8586c87dfdb</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Missing in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9990</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:44:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9990"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Missing</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2,</p>
<p>You&#039;re correct, thank you. </p>
<p>I wandered off the topic when I brought up the &#8220;jurisdictional&#8221; issue. The Fed rules do apply to all sovereign Americans as long as the procedures one follows are those that have been laid down by lawfully elected and/or appointed officials and are being applied in the correct venue and/or&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1654"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9990" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8356bb0cc4ea7716a536cd40dca0c819</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion President Bush&#039;s Contempt &#38; Hatred in the forum 3.1.1.  Federal abuses</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9038</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9038"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> President Bush&#39;s Contempt &amp; Hatred</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Reb,</p>
<p>Have you ever read the District of Columbia Act, or are you just anti-accuracy and truthfulness? </p>
<p>Claiming or endorsing something that can&#039;t be verified or proven should be considered a sign of an unstable mind as well, or at least brought to the attention of the speaker. Thank God trigger-pullin&#039; aint&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3593"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9038" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a90596e587d70080e88e8a25685e628</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion President Bush&#039;s Contempt &#38; Hatred in the forum 3.1.1.  Federal abuses</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9035</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9035"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> President Bush&#39;s Contempt &amp; Hatred</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>Excellent suggestion, but which &#8220;Constitution&#8221; is being attributed to his statement; the original or the one the corporate U.S. created, to which is he bound by oath, and in what capacity?</p>
<p>Only his direct response can vindicate him; and if he were to respond in affirmation to the original, then who would be in error?</p>
<p>This is not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7481"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/president-bushs-contempt-hatred/#post-9035" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6737898068f62a31034b137ee4bcc1c</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Missing in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9987</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9987"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Missing</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>You are absolutely, 100% correct my good man; anybody who uses the F.R.C.P. is steppin&#039; into a minefield.  I know you are more than likely aware of the following, but others may not be, so:</p>
<p>This is why one must issue an abatement in any proceeding one may encounter from any of the &#8220;corporate&#8221; Federal, State, or local&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4378"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-and-missing/#post-9987" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4547bfa4e7920d84ca04c9edb9c99b7</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Maine Lawmakers Reject National ID in the forum 6.8. PRIVATE (not public) Property protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/maine-lawmakers-reject-national-id/#post-10747</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:49:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/maine-lawmakers-reject-national-id/#post-10747"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Maine Lawmakers Reject National ID</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Bing,</p>
<p>Again, kudos are never too infrequent or late in delivery. You&#039;re definitely in your forte, so, thanks for the info and keep it up.</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b4a4eada7fb44a602be430897fda84af</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion U.S. Treasury Department in the forum 3.4.1.  Evidence of corruption</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/u-s-treasury-department/#post-9425</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/u-s-treasury-department/#post-9425"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> U.S. Treasury Department</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Bing,</p>
<p>Thanks for the laugh; not quite the &#8220;pants pisser&#8221; of taxing the whores, but a good belly buster never-the-less.</p>
<p>You&#039;re still &#8220;da man.&#8221;</p>
<p>G&amp;P</p>
<p>Lambskin</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4fcf1ae096f55723514c4d65f48ebb2</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion PAYPAL Account Summonses in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9259</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:06:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9259"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> PAYPAL Account Summonses</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Charles,</p>
<p>Welcome. You&#039;ve certainly come to the right place, but you&#039;ve got a long way to go from here.</p>
<p>Before you do anything to bring attention to yourself from the likes of the I.R.S., or any other entity you choose to avoid, try abstinence; that, simply means, just don&#039;t file anything. It has worked wonders for me for many years now,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7149"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paypal-account-summonses/#post-9259" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e66af809eb2bae349409b3d8f33f432</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Demands of banking and SSN in the forum 5.4.1.  Functioning without an SSNs, TINs, or EINs</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/demands-of-banking-and-ssn/page/2/#post-9242</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:25:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/demands-of-banking-and-ssn/page/2/#post-9242"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Demands of banking and SSN</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Lewis,</p>
<p>Nice take on this topic. Very proficient.</p>
<p>Sonik,</p>
<p>Why don&#039;t you compile your evidence into one nice little package and post it in one place. Then all will be able to revue it in light of the claims that are being made against me; unless of course you&#039;re just like the judges that sit on the benches of our courtrooms, who prefer&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5580"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/demands-of-banking-and-ssn/page/2/#post-9242" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4f0e6c8cd8fac5ff54207f31105288e</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion IRS in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs/#post-10724</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:23:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/irs/#post-10724"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> IRS</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Layed,</p>
<p>That&#039;s great, but don&#039;t completely discount what the Binger has said; you need to let these guys know where you stand, on your Land yes, but that&#039;s not wholely enough. You need to create some evidence to provide to the court (that&#039;s where you&#039;re at &#8211; in their court), whether you should be asked to produce it, or whether you&#039;ve&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3751"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs/#post-10724" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bbac908c7adb0a068d7fce29be650859</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion Amero - New &#34;currency&#34; in the forum 4.5.1. Economy and Commercial scams and frauds</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/amero-new-currency/#post-10740</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/amero-new-currency/#post-10740"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Amero - New &quot;currency&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Rattler,</p>
<p>Thanks man, it&#039;s updates like that that keep us on top of what our corporate, de facto boys in D.C. are capable of. I can&#039;t say I agree with the &#8220;force&#8221;-ful sentiment expressed in the statement made in bold type at the beginning though; there&#039;s a better way to oust these guys, and the means of doing so, sans the force, are&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1373"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/amero-new-currency/#post-10740" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2beac9aff0342e1f5b1e0fb941b06483</guid>
				<title>lambskin replied to the discussion IRS in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs/#post-10719</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:34:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/irs/#post-10719"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> IRS</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hey Layed,</p>
<p>Yep, sounds exactly like their s.o.p., they&#039;ll run ya broke if you let &#039;em get away with it. </p>
<p>Don&#039;t try to tackle these guys in court, either in person or by filing any answers or motions; just send them (the IRS &#8211; not the court) a registered letter (that&#039;s Registered.. not Certified mail and keep copies of everything you send/get&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6885"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/irs/#post-10719" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		