<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | Godsheart2 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/godsheart2/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/godsheart2/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Godsheart2.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 03:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">715713b58178aa07e3f1f645829b5a14</guid>
				<title>Godsheart2 replied to the discussion Proposed new biographical questionaire for passport applicants in the forum 5.2.5. Getting ID as a &#34;non-citizen USA national&#34;/&#34;non-resident NON-person&#34;</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/proposed-new-biographical-questionaire-for-passport-applicants/#post-14635</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:16:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/proposed-new-biographical-questionaire-for-passport-applicants/#post-14635"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Proposed new biographical questionaire for passport applicants</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks for the information.  I will use the attachment.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e2e619a9b3aa184b7f7b7dcce3586ae6</guid>
				<title>Godsheart2 replied to the discussion Proposed new biographical questionaire for passport applicants in the forum 5.2.5. Getting ID as a &#34;non-citizen USA national&#34;/&#34;non-resident NON-person&#34;</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/proposed-new-biographical-questionaire-for-passport-applicants/#post-14633</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:58:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/proposed-new-biographical-questionaire-for-passport-applicants/#post-14633"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Proposed new biographical questionaire for passport applicants</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am new to the forum but have downloaded the Path to Freedom from SEDM and am following that path.  As a result I need to get a &#8220;non-citizen national&#8221; passport to replace the former one which expires in Nov 2012.  I noticed that the DS-11 form on the Family Guardian site has not been updated with the new expiration date, bar code etc.  I do&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3701"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/proposed-new-biographical-questionaire-for-passport-applicants/#post-14633" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6887339afd5a2e0417979a01027f906b</guid>
				<title>Godsheart2 replied to the discussion USA v. U.S. Lawsuit in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/usa-v-u-s-lawsuit/#post-14355</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:39:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/usa-v-u-s-lawsuit/#post-14355"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> USA v. U.S. Lawsuit</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am new to the forum&#8230;so has this lawsuit been filed?  I did read through it briefly and it looks GREAT!  I also wonder if the recent Supreme Court Decision of June 16, 2011 in case # 09-1227 Bond vs US has been a help to this case.  Based on my reading of the decision it appears to reconfirm both individual and State of the Union sovereignty.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		