Good post…because it affirms masculinity and brushes aside all the political correctness garbage about men needing to be “sensitive”. They do, but about the right things. Certainly not about the items on the feminist agenda. But about the need for their strength in combatting with real law, God's law, the incredible maneuvers to destroy society by the sterile eunuchs, who produce sterile, or still born, legislation by the ton. Their “legislation” only advances a perfect society for “them” at the expense of the people.

Helen of Troy was merely a pawn in a war when she left her husband for the pretty boy Paris. (On the other hand, even real men fight over dumb things. The ten-year Trojan war was fought over the loss of Helen's sexual favors. And the perfumed Paris did little of the fighting. By the end of it she probably wasn't even that good looking. (So at times Men will be Men but also at times they fit the saying “boys will be boys”).

But Elizabeth I…now there was a man! She rode into the field on a day when her scraggly troops needed encouragement and told them they would succeed. Her biography reports that she told them “I may have the body of a weak woman…but I have the heart and stomach of a King.” The cheers must have been deafening.

When Elizabeth died Mary Queen of Scots' son James came to the throne and spent much of his time dawdling with his boy paramour. The people shook their collective heads it is reported and the comment of one of them has come down through history…”Before we had King Elizabeth…now we have Queen James!”

The point is that honest stalwart courage and strength can be found in women as well as men. Women who do not spend their time and energy fighting to undermine men. And men need those women, not to stay home and knit socks for their husbands on the field of battle, but to join in and hurl their lances for God's law.

Admin is just such a woman. She hurls that pen of hers and it strikes deep into Godless territory. Bravo!!!

I think some of these rate a “WTF??” 😆

In defense of Neo…I'd have to say that this sentence in admin's reply to Neo's reasoning doesn't belong…

From Neo's efforts to understand, and willingness to put his/her progress out there, I get no sense that there is a missing “sense of decency or morality.”

And it's puzzling why such a statement would appear in professor admin's astonishing, beautifully written, completely cogent, comprehensive, easily absorbed and understood, mini-course on the inalienability of rights…and how mis-guided and bogus attempts to alienate those rights result in the violation of the separation of powers doctrine.

I can see how Neo would arrive at his conclusion. There is much emphasis here, implicit and explicit, on one's absolute right to contract…which requires lawful matter and free, fully informed consent.

It's not a moral or decency issue to travel the short distance (especially with admin's eloquence and knowledge of legal authority), to understand that when lawyers, members of the judiciary, serve as legislators, the very laws they create are unlawful products of ignoring the separation of powers. The subject matter of the quasi-contract franchise is not lawful from the get go. And since every state and county employee who tendered a social security number on their job application is serving as a state/county officer and a federal officer simultaneously, there can be no lawful enforcement of the bogus franchise's requirements because there can be no lawful leaping over the separation of powers requirement of the constitution.

Thanks Neo for bringing this important matter up. And thanks admin for 'punishing' Neo ( ) with a superbly educational response that summarizes so much material in one easy read.

A new and improved slave collar. Ah, the benefits of technology!

I agree with you. The clergy are among the dumbest of the People. Especially ones who wear black dresses with scarlet piping and gold accessories all set off by crimson floor length cloaks. They are not men of God, they are men of gods.

Despite my agreement with you…I must defend those who cannot speak for themselves. Dogs and horses are not good metaphors for clerical scum.

The horse, geldings included, advanced civilization immeasurably. And dogs, descendants of our friends in the forest, the wolf (yup even that little poodle with ribbons on her ears came from the wolf) should definitely not be so degraded. Did you know that border collies have an average of 200 word receptive vocabularies. That's better than a lot of clerics I've heard preaching.

Clerics can be condemned in their own right without taking down with them the noble horse and the invaluable dog. Even a not so smart bulldog has a heart full of love and loyalty and would gladly defend his friend to the death. What cleric would do that??? A horse will work tirelessly for your needs, even if their are for amusement, and only require a bit of grain, some hay and some water in return. Clerics work for their own advancement and enrichment.

Other than that…great post.

The federal government did not extend its authority…except in the sense that criminals extend their authority over the lives and property of fellow humans.

The “authority” it assumed is not authority, since all authority comes from the People. It is merely criminals who believe that law is for the law-abiding and not for themselves. They are merely acting according to their nature.

And, furthermore, acting in a corporate capacity, they merely extended their company policy to their card carrying employees. Companies make and enforce their policies. If a company says you will contribute to the Christmas party kitty, or pay a fine, you will do just that. The corporate status of 16 Pennsylvania Avenue, the supreme court and the congress, is the fundamental end run around the Constitution. If people want to contract with these corporations, the Constitution cannot interfere.

The 14 states that have filed lawsuits claiming the unconstitutionality of the health reform bill are about to set some really ugly federal case law…

How can a sovereign state go into a federal territorial court as a petitioner seeking an administrative tribunal's rulings to uphold state sovereignty? THE COURT LACKS STANDING.

These “law” suits would be like the queen of England going to the government employment agency to confirm that she is indeed the queen.

There are two things in life I really don't understand…

1. Why Noah didn't swat those two mosquitos…and

2. Why God wanted to destroy the world for sin, from which one can repent, and not for the SHEER STUPIDITY of the human race from which it shows no signs of repenting.

All the states, and the People need say is “NO”. No black robed lawyers too stupid to make partner in a law firm are needed to rule on the meaning of NO.

Bloggers and columnists all over the internet who approve of the bill, and self-styled constitutional experts are saying that the authority of the government (the government is not involved here, it is a corporate issue), can promulgate the legitimacy of the bill under the regulate commerce clause.

However, any DF knows or should know that under the First Amendment to the Constitution they've never read, the commerce clause cannot contradict the First Amendment and force people to be parties to commercial contracts. “Contracts made under duress, without full disclosure of material facts, are void or voidable ab initio (as the lawyerly priesthood says in latin). Freedom of assembly means freedom of association, freedom not to associate, freedom to contract, freedom not to contract. “NO” is the only response required at an individual and state level. The Declaration of Independence mandates CONSENT of the governed man or woman even when the government acts TO EXERCISE LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY.

All of the constitutional hand wringing angst over this bill, and how it's going to screw the elderly, among others, including unborn babies, is pretty tiresome.

Then other constitutional experts say that the general welfare clause legitimizes the bill for all Americans. Those DFs don't seem to understand modern English or 18th century English. First, the word welfare in the constitution does not mean socialist government programs. Second, general welfare does not mean those few Americans who have no insurance. Groups selected for special recognition, under the constitution, but not under corporate charters, do not constitute anything “general” at all. General welfare in constitutional terms implies equal protection.

The politicians are only acting according to their criminal natures. The People bear full responsibility for this mess…they debate the “virtues” of their favorite candidate and then elect and reelect their chosen criminal to the legislature for decades. (Given the lack of thinking ability of the average American, it's a wonder, maybe a miracle of divine intervention, that the wise non-Latina, Oprah, hasn't been elected to congress!) And “fighting” the actions of their favorite criminals in federal courts is only going to give the predictable results the color of legitimacy.

Here's what one anonymous author says, and I agree with him or her, the buck stops with the People…the Sovereigns.

http://www.rense.com…90/realdang.htm

rense.com

The Real Danger To America Is

The Majority Of Its People

Author Unknown

3-24-10

The real terrorists in America, those who are truly scarifying, are those referred to in the above quote.

I am amazed. The sovereigns are coming of age. Unmask a “U.S. citizen” and there's a true American and human being underneath.

To answer your question…No, I'm not as confused as you are.

Actually, you are not confused at all.

Confusion is a mental state where actually you have all the information you need to make a sound judgment…it just isn't arranged in a useful way.

You are not confused because you do not have the information you need to make a sound judgment.

You are unaware of the information you need to make a sound judgment.

Instead of listening to all those wise people who also are not confused, just misinformed, and who wound up in jail with you, you might start by clicking the Path To Freedom button and get some solid knowledge that you might be able to arrange in a useful manner.

Good luck.

P.S. If you have a computer and a word processor, you might want to use the spelling checker as an efficient way to learn how to spell while it corrects your mistakes. It will be extremely hard to get anyone to read or publish your fiction if your writing needs extensive editing at the microscopic level.