<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | franklin | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/franklin/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/franklin/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for franklin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 20:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3e3ac5f5806a31b9a7d56bbe433e8e7d</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion How can the forums be improved to encourage greater interest? in the forum 1.5. Member Polls</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14624</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:40:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14624"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How can the forums be improved to encourage greater interest?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
People struggling to get informed but who don&#039;t meet your criteria for acceptability matter. You don&#039;t get anywhere preaching the gospel to saints already in heaven. Your criteria for participating in the forums needs to be rethought so that people are attracted to them and take an active part in them. Your need to be Right is not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1716"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14624" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7ea99699e447dece67e68f6c4f76790</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion US government mulls crucifixion for hackers in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/us-government-mulls-crucifixion-for-hackers/#post-14538</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/us-government-mulls-crucifixion-for-hackers/#post-14538"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> US government mulls crucifixion for hackers</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sounds like the government hack-ins were inside jobs so the messiah in the WH can make more laws that put people away for going into websites the Council on Foreign Relations does not like.  </p>
<p>Just more screw tightening.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a8f528d7d2fa1944796448daa267eb3c</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Stefan Molyneux in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/stefan-molyneux/#post-14540</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/stefan-molyneux/#post-14540"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Stefan Molyneux</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I&#039;m not sure why Molyneux&#039;s critic is anonymous.  I can&#039;t think why he would be afraid to be open about the points he <i><b>almost makes</b></i>.  </p>
<p>Maybe he&#039;s a disgruntled self-righteous competitor who feels like M. has beat him soundly in the page rankings.  That would be a reason to remain anonymous, so people could not check the critic&#039;s rankings&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4618"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/stefan-molyneux/#post-14540" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0581d34d6b2eeeba79fd9fa2cbb3116e</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Reclaiming Masculinity in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/reclaiming-masculinity/#post-14529</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/reclaiming-masculinity/#post-14529"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Reclaiming Masculinity</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The best masculine role models today are Hilary, Nancy and Janet.  Sad.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cac02e0dce3a2336b3e46481565ccd8d</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Last statement sent to Sentinel from self-immolation victim in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/#post-14532</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:19:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/#post-14532"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Last statement sent to Sentinel from self-immolation victim</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The world is that much poorer and more dangerous with his leaving.</p>
<p>Here are some faces to put with his statistics.</p>
<p>Teens Helped Unsupervised, Roaming Children in Jersey City</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/teens-helped-unsupervised-roaming-children-in-jersey-city-20110617" rel="nofollow">http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/teens-helped-unsupervised-roaming-children-in-jersey-city-20110617</a></p>
<p>Judge has harsh words for Mom before sentencing her for spanking&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2173"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/#post-14532" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d87ef1d272a1d1ce6ef3ad51ded57abb</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Heir To Rothschild Empire Found Dead In Paris Hotel in the forum 7.4. Money, Debt, and Credit</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/heir-to-rothschild-empire-found-dead-in-paris-hotel/#post-14531</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/heir-to-rothschild-empire-found-dead-in-paris-hotel/#post-14531"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Heir To Rothschild Empire Found Dead In Paris Hotel</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmm, Judas hanged himself too.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">86520885807f650f465c49f403313a7b</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Stay and Fight? in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/stay-and-fight/#post-14527</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/stay-and-fight/#post-14527"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Stay and Fight?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>What about stay and don&#039;t fight.</p>
<p>Most people don&#039;t know the power of consent and the power of withholding consent. </p>
<p>They simply haven&#039;t practiced it enough on a daily basis with petty bureaucrats both in government and in the private sector.</p>
<p>Ghandi just said NO, sat down and brought the British empire down in India.</p>
<p>If all of the people,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4620"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/stay-and-fight/#post-14527" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be6d85aaf1d3271f1fab58356c460584</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion How to fix today&#039;s problems in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-fix-todays-problems/#post-14525</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:53:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-to-fix-todays-problems/#post-14525"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How to fix today&#39;s problems</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin said:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
At least I&#039;m <b>trying</b>. What are you <b>doing</b>?</p>
<p>You have to be more specific Admin.  There is a vast difference between trying to do something and actually doing it.</p>
<p>Did you know, there are actually no identifiable behaviors associated with <b>trying</b>.</p>
<p>Test it out.</p>
<p>TRY and put your shoe on in the morning.  Don&#039;t actually put&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4622"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-fix-todays-problems/#post-14525" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d9b7f20711ec4c35639c1e5144e15775</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion What&#039;s Wrong with American Men? in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whats-wrong-with-american-men/#post-14504</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:53:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/whats-wrong-with-american-men/#post-14504"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What&#39;s Wrong with American Men?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Um&#8230;Aloha&#8230;Hello&#8230;Guten Tag&#8230;Top o&#039; the mornin&#039;&#8230;Where have you been????  A reality check is in order here.</p>
<p>Contemporary men cannot REclaim something they never had.  Masculinity was REPEALED in the &#039;60s.  Just look, just look at H@rry R3id and you&#039;ll see what I mean.  An empty shell.  Can you even imagine for a nanosecond, conjure up&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1030"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/whats-wrong-with-american-men/#post-14504" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1d166c2dc3cce7392be5ef060054ad71</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Why you REALLY are fornicating with the judge when you do business with him in the courtroom in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-you-really-are-fornicating-with-the-judge-when-you-do-business-with-him-in-the-courtroom/#post-14498</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:22:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/why-you-really-are-fornicating-with-the-judge-when-you-do-business-with-him-in-the-courtroom/#post-14498"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Why you REALLY are fornicating with the judge when you do business with him in the courtroom</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Most judges are sociopaths and such behavior is funny because we expect sociopathic behavior from judges (aka inadequate lawyers who could not make partner in a law firm).</p>
<p>The really sick part is that the judge was playing pocket pool while a grandfather was testifying about the brutal murder of his grandchild.  </p>
<p>Even judge Ito only fell&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1636"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-you-really-are-fornicating-with-the-judge-when-you-do-business-with-him-in-the-courtroom/#post-14498" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4e4b85badd4b33e2eaf05177a7499108</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills in the forum 3.6.4.  Debt/Overspending</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/china-has-divested-97-percent-of-its-holdings-in-u-s-treasury-bills/#post-14497</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/china-has-divested-97-percent-of-its-holdings-in-u-s-treasury-bills/#post-14497"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Federal Reserve buying back debts that are owed to it.  That sure puts the icing on the dumb-banker cake.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8dfe75cbaf31ee70d3b878b2a3d5e27e</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion The Fraud Perpetuated on the American People in the forum 3.6.6.  Federal Reserve/Fiat Currency scam</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-fraud-perpetuated-on-the-american-people/#post-14494</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-fraud-perpetuated-on-the-american-people/#post-14494"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Fraud Perpetuated on the American People</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The Credit River decision is here:</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/FederalReserve/FedReserveNotesUnconstitutional.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/FederalReserve/FedReserveNotesUnconstitutional.htm</a></p>
<p>I may be wrong, but I thought I remembered seeing a certified copy of it on either FG or SEDM which could be used for comparison so that it cannot be misquoted or miscopied.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a4e724ccd0cfd097e424f6c60e78e3a8</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Job in USA without SSN in the forum 5.4.1.  Functioning without an SSNs, TINs, or EINs</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/job-in-usa-without-ssn/#post-14480</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/job-in-usa-without-ssn/#post-14480"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Job in USA without SSN</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>If you scroll down the left-hand column of the homepage there is a link to something called &#8220;Social Security &#8211; The Mark Of The Beast&#8221;  This may give you some information that would be useful to you.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78ca3a108edd7e9ff624db1ffddad2a9</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Resisting Ilegal entry of police is against public policy in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14432</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14432"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Resisting Ilegal entry of police is against public policy</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sefl-styled &#8220;Justice&#8221; Steven David, speaking for his co-conspirators against the Constitution, says there is no &#8220;right&#8221; to defend oneself against police illegally entering a person&#039;s home.</p>
<p>Apparently they are illiterate and cannot read the plain language of the 4th Amendment.  </p>
<p>The point is&#8230;</p>
<p>A judge is a lawyer with a GPA from law school&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4625"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14432" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bce56c22dc5d4506561c0ccdd7ed845b</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Heart Disease Deaths Four Times Higher With Low Salt Intake in the forum 4.6.6.  Harmful practices and products</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/heart-disease-deaths-four-times-higher-with-low-salt-intake/#post-14435</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/heart-disease-deaths-four-times-higher-with-low-salt-intake/#post-14435"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Heart Disease Deaths Four Times Higher With Low Salt Intake</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins:</p>
<p>Good point&#8230;</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Even when I was a kid I never understood why we washed our hands after using the bathroom. I always go in the bathroom and wash my hands to clean them BEFORE I touch my junk, then leave without touching anything else.</p>
<p>Reminds me of a friend&#039;s 6 year old who, when he came out of the bathroom, his mother&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4626"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/heart-disease-deaths-four-times-higher-with-low-salt-intake/#post-14435" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f486753d174ec393887dd3f1b69ee226</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Should &#034;Marriage&#034; Even Be Defined in Secular Law? in the forum 6.6. Marriage Rights and Functioning without Marriage Licenses</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/should-marriage-even-be-defined-in-secular-law/#post-14152</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 18:09:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/should-marriage-even-be-defined-in-secular-law/#post-14152"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Should &#34;Marriage&#34; Even Be Defined in Secular Law?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;Marriage&#8221; in statutes or even in Constitutions, is a word of art because it generally means that a man and a woman marry each other in some personal convenant, which may, and often is, religious in nature.  </p>
<p>And so it confuses the public just as many statutes and constitutions do with common English words.</p>
<p>As with any contract, if a common&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-111"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/should-marriage-even-be-defined-in-secular-law/#post-14152" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">28ac84ef167fdfff694da147f2953166</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Resisting Ilegal entry of police is against public policy in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14429</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14429"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Resisting Ilegal entry of police is against public policy</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>To summarize&#8230;</p>
<p>Bing wrote:</p>
<p>Shoot first (Law of Necessity when criminals break into your home). [And, as one sherrif told a female friend of mine: &#8220;Make sure the ciminals&#039;re inside before you shoot &#039;em! And if you shoot &#039;em, do it right, otherwise you&#039;ll be supportin&#039; &#039;em on disability for the rest of their lives!&#8221;]</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5391"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/resisting-ilegal-entry-of-police-is-against-public-policy/#post-14429" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">446bd2005eaffe2fd93810666e396195</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Bin Laden depended on the flash drive in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bin-laden-depended-on-the-flash-drive/#post-14426</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/bin-laden-depended-on-the-flash-drive/#post-14426"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Bin Laden depended on the flash drive</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>This site is devoted on religious and legal grounds to the fact that presumptions can rival money as the root of all evil.</p>
<p>The government has impeached its statements over and over again, contradicting itself, and inventing new &#039;news&#039; about this (probably) non-event.</p>
<p>While it is useful to know about the email technique, it&#039;s not rocket&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5090"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bin-laden-depended-on-the-flash-drive/#post-14426" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9b479e93c4542d6119271ad20a0fbcca</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Question About Notice of Levy in the forum 5.4.2. Stopping or Correcting Illegal or Erroneous Tax Withholding and/or Reporting</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/question-about-notice-of-levy/#post-14410</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:15:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/question-about-notice-of-levy/#post-14410"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Question About Notice of Levy</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The site is clearly not an emergency room for people who are about to receive 3rd degree burns from the IRS.  You should be able to tell that from the sheer amount of material here.</p>
<p>If you read the notice of levy statute, it is perfectly clear who they can notice-of-levy against. If you&#039;re on their list as someone they can levy against, then&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2827"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/question-about-notice-of-levy/#post-14410" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e0994e3ac659c557043085e6c2f3f768</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Cities Taxing Equipment in the forum 3.4.2.  Corrupt practices</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cities-taxing-equipment/#post-14403</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/cities-taxing-equipment/#post-14403"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Cities Taxing Equipment</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins:</p>
<p>State constitutions &#8220;protect property&#8221; from criminals other than state public servants.  </p>
<p>However, the states are not bound by the two taxing provisions and their respective rules found in the federal constitution and can tax directly without apportioning the tax among the counties.</p>
<p>Many states have personal property taxes, some&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5400"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/cities-taxing-equipment/#post-14403" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3de1203bf1d4b05690ec9bcca7d3fa07</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion The government has a PLAN for your cellphone in the forum 3.5.1. Spying and surveillance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-government-has-a-plan-for-your-cellphone/#post-14406</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-government-has-a-plan-for-your-cellphone/#post-14406"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The government has a PLAN for your cellphone</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It looks like all non-statutory citizens will have to turn in their cellphones because they are not qualified to receive sensitive information intended for federal officers on federal territory.  </p>
<p>Cell phones are rapidly becoming a person&#039;s implanted chip.  They can give info about exactly where a picture was taken, etc. etc. etc.  </p>
<p>You can&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4277"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-government-has-a-plan-for-your-cellphone/#post-14406" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbb5b66b9c74bb380a52350610ab3779</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion United States v. Griffith et al., 55 App.D.C. 123, 2 F.2d 925 (1924) in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/united-states-v-griffith-et-al-55-app-d-c-123-2-f-2d-925-1924/#post-14401</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:14:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/united-states-v-griffith-et-al-55-app-d-c-123-2-f-2d-925-1924/#post-14401"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> United States v. Griffith et al., 55 App.D.C. 123, 2 F.2d 925 (1924)</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>There is also a SC case, I believe, but I do not recall at the moment, to the effect that once the Constitution has attached to the land, the land remains protected by the Constitution even if the feds acquire it.</p>
<p>Could be wrong, but I&#039;m sure I read that somewhere.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">596bccc51ae7e058a753a803f2a3fb79</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion United States v. Griffith et al., 55 App.D.C. 123, 2 F.2d 925 (1924) in the forum 5.5.2. Litigation assistance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/united-states-v-griffith-et-al-55-app-d-c-123-2-f-2d-925-1924/#post-14399</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:16:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/united-states-v-griffith-et-al-55-app-d-c-123-2-f-2d-925-1924/#post-14399"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> United States v. Griffith et al., 55 App.D.C. 123, 2 F.2d 925 (1924)</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Interesting and useful.  There are also two aside points that are interesting.  </p>
<p>1.  The common law of Maryland, from which DC was carved, remained applicable on federal land.</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
But, by the common law, a further qualification exists. If that law remains in force in this regard [i.e. a plea in abatement, which is a common law plea] in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5402"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/united-states-v-griffith-et-al-55-app-d-c-123-2-f-2d-925-1924/#post-14399" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d75099b090224d1f136735251cea1f91</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Bin Laden&#039;s murder, the latest false (american)  flag operation in the forum 2.4. Current events and alerts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bin-ladens-murder-the-latest-false-american-flag-operation/#post-14391</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:07:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/bin-ladens-murder-the-latest-false-american-flag-operation/#post-14391"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Bin Laden&#39;s murder, the latest false (american)  flag operation</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>Strategically, your suggested procedure would not only be effective but is plain common sense.</p>
<p>However, it rests on the presumptions that </p>
<p>OBL was in fact alive.<br />
That he was killed by the US.<br />
That he was in fact enemy #1.</p>
<p>All of the discrepancies in the frivolous government conspiracy theory are accounted for saying that the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3093"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bin-ladens-murder-the-latest-false-american-flag-operation/#post-14391" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a29d29794ed795ae8fc371cdd38fb45e</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion How to figure it all out in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14387</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14387"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How to figure it all out</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Well, the issues have to be complex before they can be simplified by students of FG and SEDM.</p>
<p>Good students are a credit to good teachers.</p>
<p>Many patriots have simplified the issues to their detriment by holding up silver bullets and not seeing the complex web the government has woven around simple, easily expressed ideas (e.g. the Bill&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1358"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14387" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">437dbf5e7c6fe48835fab68671d09a94</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion How to figure it all out in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14385</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14385"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How to figure it all out</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Admin:</p>
<p>Excellent piece of writing!  🙂  It elucidates, illustrates and motivates all at the same time AND in language easily understood.</p>
<p><b>It provides a concise summary with which anyone could evaluate any situation, and be a critical thinker</b>; as when a town seizes an automobile, as if it were itself a criminal, for unpaid traffic tickets (and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1356"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-figure-it-all-out/#post-14385" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9412f9fb65151d86197d7fd37016814e</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Uncle Sam is &#034;Foreign&#034; in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/uncle-sam-is-foreign/#post-14383</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 18:17:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/uncle-sam-is-foreign/#post-14383"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Uncle Sam is &#34;Foreign&#34;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Author #2:</p>
<p>Thanks for this post.  It is certainly important for a person challenging federal jurisdiction within a state&#039;s borders, to know whether the federal government had retained jurisdiction when the state was admitted into the union; or whether the federal government notified a state of accepting jurisdiction over land ceded to it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5403"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/uncle-sam-is-foreign/#post-14383" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">57944cad07e72a9546989c2f448018a1</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion The coming Financial Collapse and How to Prepare in the forum 4.6.4.  Emergency preparedness and self-sufficient living</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-coming-financial-collapse-and-how-to-prepare/#post-14377</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-coming-financial-collapse-and-how-to-prepare/#post-14377"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The coming Financial Collapse and How to Prepare</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It would be helpful for the poster of videos like this one (no viewer controls, no progress bar to show how much of the video is left), to give some points from the video and its length when that can&#039;t be known from the video.</p>
<p>After 40 minutes I switched out of it; Porter Stansbury, had made his point for the 10th or 11th time and there was&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5404"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-coming-financial-collapse-and-how-to-prepare/#post-14377" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6b4e382744130c15b7fbf98118542f7</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Praise God for the Archbishop of Canterbury&#033; in the forum 4.10.  Sermons</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/praise-god-for-the-archbishop-of-canterbury/#post-14375</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 16:55:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/praise-god-for-the-archbishop-of-canterbury/#post-14375"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Praise God for the Archbishop of Canterbury&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dr. Brooks is going ga ga.  </p>
<p>First of all, the Archbishop of Canterbury supports replacing Magna Carta with Sharia law.</p>
<p>An Anglican priest friend of mine, also delerious with wedding fever, remarked that the bride&#039;s dress was pretty and traditional.  Traditional wedding dresses do not cost 50,000 lbs.</p>
<p>The expense and show of all English&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3689"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/praise-god-for-the-archbishop-of-canterbury/#post-14375" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0812a687d152a1b4969cd2fbac308b69</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Synopsis of a plan dedicated to restoring lawful government in the forum 2.1.4. Secular Activism</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/synopsis-of-a-plan-dedicated-to-restoring-lawful-government/#post-14376</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 15:58:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/synopsis-of-a-plan-dedicated-to-restoring-lawful-government/#post-14376"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Synopsis of a plan dedicated to restoring lawful government</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I agree, the lack of organization among patriots is undermining efforts to put the federal government back in its 10 square mile box.</p>
<p>But the plan is idealistic and difficult to implement for at least three reasons:</p>
<p>1.  Government franchises.  As one man, a White House correspondent, told me&#8230;I don&#039;t give a damn about the Constitution, I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5405"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/synopsis-of-a-plan-dedicated-to-restoring-lawful-government/#post-14376" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ec21e10aba6c99e16ad9d911b4386bb9</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion A Political Annie Oakley in the forum 2.1.3. Religious Activism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-political-annie-oakley/#post-14371</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-political-annie-oakley/#post-14371"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> A Political Annie Oakley</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Lindsey Graham is probably going to smile comfortably at what he probably believes are the ravings of a lunatic.</p>
<p>Anne&#039;s commentary is as strong as the Declaration of Independence and likewise amounts to a multi-count indictment of a would be tyrannical system of &#039;law&#039; that Americans are being invited to adopt. </p>
<p>Her commentary is the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-96"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-political-annie-oakley/#post-14371" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">794ac6c4feae28c4480b5632f1cfa5fb</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Registration in Georgia in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/registration-in-georgia/#post-14369</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/registration-in-georgia/#post-14369"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Registration in Georgia</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins,</p>
<p>My reading of your code citations comes out differently.</p>
<p>An &#8220;Owner&#8221; is <b>either</b> a person who who has title to a vehicle but who is <b>not</b> a lienholder or someone with a security interest in a vehicle [no bank or credit company involved, vehicle owned debt free]. <b>Or</b> an owner is also someone privileged to use the vehicle and pay for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1577"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/registration-in-georgia/#post-14369" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">997463e39d2c3961bb44a4a4d08e211f</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion The Demonic Roots of Globalism in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-demonic-roots-of-globalism/#post-14359</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:35:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-demonic-roots-of-globalism/#post-14359"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Demonic Roots of Globalism</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Jung, Chardin, NWO pagans all demonstrate the power of words of art over the minds of people sorely in need of connection to a higher power&#8230;which is God.</p>
<p>To become one&#039;s own god, to become god, the origin of truth, through canonization by words of art spoken by other gods in search of followers (e.g., Jung, Chardin (a Jesuit&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7980"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-demonic-roots-of-globalism/#post-14359" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7a6f63896a97743be9e013dcab60991</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Hansen: Atheists are in town, so Scriptural spats heat up in the forum 2.1.3. Religious Activism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/hansen-atheists-are-in-town-so-scriptural-spats-heat-up/#post-14361</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/hansen-atheists-are-in-town-so-scriptural-spats-heat-up/#post-14361"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Hansen: Atheists are in town, so Scriptural spats heat up</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It&#039;s all politics, the dumb-ass party and the jack-ass party spitting venom at each other.</p>
<p>Atheism is all about God.  Without God what would atheists be ranting about?  </p>
<p>God created humans, God created atheists.  </p>
<p>The original atheists are the slaves God chose to free from the Pharaoh and have Moses lead into the promised land&#8230;</p>
<p>They not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-352"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/hansen-atheists-are-in-town-so-scriptural-spats-heat-up/#post-14361" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">369a9902d386608f57c8e2d433c52540</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion USA v. U.S. Lawsuit in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/usa-v-u-s-lawsuit/#post-14352</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:05:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/usa-v-u-s-lawsuit/#post-14352"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> USA v. U.S. Lawsuit</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Some initial comments:</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">74405c65f85f5d080e5a2a82d9d5eb55</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion World Economic super power in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/world-economic-super-power/#post-14350</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/world-economic-super-power/#post-14350"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> World Economic super power</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It&#039;s interesting how the world rulers are called the &#8220;secret&#8221; rulers of the world.  </p>
<p>There&#039;s nothing secret about it.  </p>
<p>These people have faces, names, and addresses.  Even young patriots have accosted David Rockefeller coming out of his NY townhouse.</p>
<p><iframe title="WeAreChange Confronts David Rockefeller" width="640" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7sU6vy9EeL0?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>  </p>
<p>These people are &#8220;hidden&#8221; in plain&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7981"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/world-economic-super-power/#post-14350" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7af1d8381f032196276d156b371c7599</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion What court to file complaint in in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-court-to-file-complaint-in/#post-14337</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:47:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/what-court-to-file-complaint-in/#post-14337"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What court to file complaint in</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Juliusbragg,</p>
<p>Here&#039;s an idea: There&#039;s research on this site and sedm re constitutional citizens using sec. 1983 and Bivens actions.  There&#039;s also research that goes into detail about the term &#8220;citizen of the United States&#8221; and its geographical meaning in the 14th Amendment.  You&#039;ll be able to answer your own question when you search out&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2906"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-court-to-file-complaint-in/#post-14337" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e5a9ac1c57ee5d8a4f56c02cdb472c72</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Child Support Contempt letter during Path to Freedom in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/child-support-contempt-letter-during-path-to-freedom/#post-14324</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/child-support-contempt-letter-during-path-to-freedom/#post-14324"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Child Support Contempt letter during Path to Freedom</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins,</p>
<p>It&#039;s a good start.  I have never gone through the family court charade, but I know people who are presently enduring the psychotic process [some of the family court judges on you tube actually seem mentally impaired.]</p>
<p>So, whatever can be used and developed would be useful to those who cannot possibly arrive at a situation that is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1035"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/child-support-contempt-letter-during-path-to-freedom/#post-14324" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1e736caec946f855005aa412a70b3064</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Domicile in GEORGIA in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/domicile-in-georgia/#post-14334</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/domicile-in-georgia/#post-14334"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Domicile in GEORGIA</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks Prollins:</p>
<p>It would be a good idea for everyone to check out the exact wording of what constitutes domicile in their state codes.</p>
<p>It&#039;s interesting in the code citation you provided that a person &#8220;of age&#8221; has his or her domicile determined by the State as the place where the family is domiciled. </p>
<p>Raises a question about same sex&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4030"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/domicile-in-georgia/#post-14334" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">70fbd2bfe49e63bdcd1afacc364b2b22</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion More women becoming hooked on internet porn in the forum 4.5.5. Sexual Immorality</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/more-women-becoming-hooked-on-internet-porn/#post-14316</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/more-women-becoming-hooked-on-internet-porn/#post-14316"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> More women becoming hooked on internet porn</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Porn addiction is actually substance abuse.  </p>
<p>As with all <b>addictive</b> substance abuse, food, nicotene, alcohol, street drugs, prescription drugs, sex, the addict has little or no control over the addictive behavior and will develop an efficient subset of behaviors to get to the desired object.</p>
<p>As will all substance addiction, the porn addiction&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2939"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/more-women-becoming-hooked-on-internet-porn/#post-14316" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a412a31975c23a38628beb378ee4f8a</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Judge Bows to Sovereign in the forum 2.3.2.  Rights litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-bows-to-sovereign/#post-13714</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/judge-bows-to-sovereign/#post-13714"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Judge Bows to Sovereign</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins you wrote:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
I do not understand the effects of invoking common law in court, and what that does to the standing of the judge and the rest of the parties.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure what the litigation in that video was about.  But there is another video posted on this site, and on you tube, about a young man fighting a speeding ticket&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2505"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-bows-to-sovereign/#post-13714" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42718223dfca543ca85cbd5be4185282</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion A National ID Card For American Citizens? Get Ready – The Real ID Act Goes Into Effect On May 11 in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14323</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:10:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14323"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> A National ID Card For American Citizens? Get Ready – The Real ID Act Goes Into Effect On May 11</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Well Bing, if that bill ever becomes and &#039;Act of Congress&#039;, there&#039;s simply going to be a whole lot of federal felons around.</p>
<p>But, it is not the government that is creating the police state; they are only implementing it with the People&#039;s consent.  It is the average American who consents to &#039;Acts&#039; of congress.</p>
<p>As one of the great prophets of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5093"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14323" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8637b933fbce5c17d847d4862c0f3e4</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion A National ID Card For American Citizens? Get Ready – The Real ID Act Goes Into Effect On May 11 in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14321</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14321"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> A National ID Card For American Citizens? Get Ready – The Real ID Act Goes Into Effect On May 11</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
Please contact your representatives in Washington D.C. and let them know that you want the Real ID Act repealed once and for all.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks they are represented in Washington D.C. is seriously out of touch with reality.</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Hopefully the American people will wake up and will realize that this is not what our&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7378"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-national-id-card-for-american-citizens-get-ready-the-real-id-act-goes-into-effect-on-may-11/#post-14321" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60bbc1803a76ef25c4ba17524242a0c1</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Nonresident aliens EXEMPT from Obama care in the forum 7.6.2. Non-Resident Non-Person Position</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/nonresident-aliens-exempt-from-obama-care/#post-14318</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/nonresident-aliens-exempt-from-obama-care/#post-14318"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Nonresident aliens EXEMPT from Obama care</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Stija,</p>
<p>You wrote:</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
We can&#039;t even have them recognize that we do not reside in District of Columbia and apply the law as intended.</p>
<p>Are you sure that statement is true?</p>
<p>Given some of your recent posts, in which you documented your personal difficulties with employers&#8221;, you might change the &#8220;We&#8221; to &#8220;I&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you mean the federal and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7715"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/nonresident-aliens-exempt-from-obama-care/#post-14318" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">022710c03347e37145e23d52b53f66f2</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Ways to enforce your status and rights locally in the forum 5.2.3. Restoring, proving, and generating evidence of personal and state sovereignty</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/ways-to-enforce-your-status-and-rights-locally/#post-14297</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:25:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/ways-to-enforce-your-status-and-rights-locally/#post-14297"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Ways to enforce your status and rights locally</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Prollins,</p>
<p>These seem to be intuitively good ideas.  How they are implemented will determine whether they wind up as useful ideas.</p>
<p>Backing up any Notice to the sheriff, judge, attorney, with the legal foundation for the notice would probably go a long way in preventing them from classifying one as a &#8220;sovereign citizen nut case&#8221;.  </p>
<p>So part of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1346"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/ways-to-enforce-your-status-and-rights-locally/#post-14297" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">55c88d4146c626590d00e4c5630fc4b3</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Faith-Based Statism in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/faith-based-statism/#post-14314</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:17:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/faith-based-statism/#post-14314"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Faith-Based Statism</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Many Americans love franchises, just drive to any venue, village, town or city in America and before you get to the center with its local stores, museums and houses, you are bombarded by franchises from fast food companies, oil companies, hotel and motel companies.</p>
<p>You might as well never have left your hometown.</p>
<p>Franchises prosper in their&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2542"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/faith-based-statism/#post-14314" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">450b8fdb0057c687423cf94e0bf838e5</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Republic of Missouri, The CHANGE Your Founders Believed In in the forum 5.3.2. Groups you can join</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/republic-of-missouri-the-change-your-founders-believed-in/#post-14315</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/republic-of-missouri-the-change-your-founders-believed-in/#post-14315"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Republic of Missouri, The CHANGE Your Founders Believed In</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Has anyone who espouses the birth certificate/bond issue ever even seen an original birth certificate in a federal reserve bank?  Has any whistle blower, if there are any in the Federal Reserve banks, ever brought one forward?</p>
<p>Is that where OB&#039;s birth certificate is stored?</p>
<p>How do these people know birth certificates were sold in the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3161"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/republic-of-missouri-the-change-your-founders-believed-in/#post-14315" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c7ad40f7ccdc24c2627d758dd6d94dbc</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Why you can&#039;t trust Wikipedia in the forum 4.7. Free Press, Media Bias, and Mind Control/Monitoring</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-you-cant-trust-wikipedia/#post-14311</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:34:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/why-you-cant-trust-wikipedia/#post-14311"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Why you can&#39;t trust Wikipedia</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I agree that it should not be used for tax information of any kind.  One post I read several years ago made the undisputed point that the Brushaber decision was a one time only permission for the Congress to levy a direct tax on incomes in spite of the requirement that all direct taxes be apportioned. </p>
<p>Clearly a genuine tax researcher&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8281"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-you-cant-trust-wikipedia/#post-14311" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">749e66833bfbbf97aa9aedb79ed42083</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Paul Andrew Mitchell&#039;s take on U.S. Supreme Court Corruption in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paul-andrew-mitchells-take-on-u-s-supreme-court-corruption/#post-14281</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/paul-andrew-mitchells-take-on-u-s-supreme-court-corruption/#post-14281"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Paul Andrew Mitchell&#39;s take on U.S. Supreme Court Corruption</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing</p>
<p>Good reminder about the 201 motion.  </p>
<p>As to why more attorneys don&#039;t file those on behalf of their clients; well you don&#039;t want to nail the butt of some judge who can pull your license to acquire money you get even if you fail at your job and your client goes to jail. The judge approves and supports attorney incompetency,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/paul-andrew-mitchells-take-on-u-s-supreme-court-corruption/#post-14281" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">578d1bab80c86e877ea903edc860ea68</guid>
				<title>franklin replied to the discussion Headlines From the Year: 2059 in the forum 4.4. Political Commentary</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/headlines-from-the-year-2059/#post-14306</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:47:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/headlines-from-the-year-2059/#post-14306"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Headlines From the Year: 2059</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It&#039;s funny  😆 until you realize how prophetic it is  😮</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		