<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | forensics | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/forensics/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/forensics/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for forensics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 13:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.7.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e8d1636e0835b838b51b16ce3df8c037</guid>
				<title>forensics replied to the discussion 6201 (a)1 Assesment Authority in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:21:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 6201 (a)1 Assesment Authority</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you for digging this up! I am quite familiar with IRC 6201(a)(1) and its corresponding regs at 26 CFR 301.6201-1(1) et seq. However, which &#8220;return&#8221; are we talking about? The one that was originally &#8220;submitted&#8221; to but never actually &#8220;filed&#8221; by the agency (read: no DLN stamped on it), or the SFR that was fabricated by the agency  (read:&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6514"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e8d1636e0835b838b51b16ce3df8c037</guid>
				<title>forensics replied to the discussion 6201 (a)1 Assesment Authority in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:21:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 6201 (a)1 Assesment Authority</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you for digging this up! I am quite familiar with IRC 6201(a)(1) and its corresponding regs at 26 CFR 301.6201-1(1) et seq. However, which &#8220;return&#8221; are we talking about? The one that was originally &#8220;submitted&#8221; to but never actually &#8220;filed&#8221; by the agency (read: no DLN stamped on it), or the SFR that was fabricated by the agency  (read:&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6513"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/6201-a1-assesment-authority/#post-10778" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9410f07b187f33a2d5dd44f61338e19c</guid>
				<title>forensics replied to the discussion MFT=55 found in the forum 2. Activism and Important Events (Members Only.  Guests cannot read or post)</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/mft55-found/#post-10775</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:06:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/mft55-found/#post-10775"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> MFT=55 found</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p><!--QuoteBegin-Author #5+Jan 26 2007, 07:15 PM-->QUOTE(Author #5 @ Jan 26 2007, 07:15 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->JWR,</p>
<p>You&#039;re absolutely right!  Nice job!  Some specifics:<br />
1. You are correct that the current version of the MF Decoder does not decode MFT 55.  The current version is 1.91.<br />
2.  MFT55 is in fact listed in the Year 2003 IRS 6209 manual on p. 4-12.<br />
3.  The next version will have this field decode added&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5347"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/mft55-found/#post-10775" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		