fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Funny! Thanks.
-
See also:
Is Atheism a Religion?
http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion -
Zero : An Investigation Into 9/11
-
1. Just like in the Internal Revenue Code, the term “United States” is ONLY defined in its GEOGRAPHICAL sense but the GEOGRAPHICAL sense is not the only sense. The OTHER sense is the GOVERNMENT as a legal person.
1.1 There is no way provided to distinguish the GEOGRAPHICAL use and the GOVERNMENT use in all the cases we have identified.
1.2 The Great IRS Hoax, Section 5.2.13 talks about the meaning and history of United States in the Internal Revenue Code.
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm1.3 All statutory terms are limited to territory over which Congress has EXCLUSIVE GENERAL jurisdiction. All of the statuses indicted in the statutes (including those in 8 USC 1401 and 1408) STOP at the border to federal territory and do not apply within states of the Union. I cannot have a status in a place that I am not civilly domiciled, and especially a status that I do NOT consent to and to which rights and obligations attach. Otherwise, the Declaration of Independence is violated because I am subjected to obligations that I didn’t consent to and am a slave. This is proven in:
Your Exclusive Right to Declare and Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/RightToDeclStatus.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
1.4 As the U.S. Supreme Court said, all law is prima facie territorial and confined to the territory of the specific state. The states of the Union are NOT “territory” as defined, and therefore, all of the civil statuses found in Title 8 of the U.S. code do not extend into or relate to anyone civilly domiciled in a constitutional state, regardless of what the definition of “United States” is and whether it is GEOGRAPHICAL or GOVERNMENT sense.
“It is a well established principle of law that all federal regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States unless a contrary intent appears.”
[Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949)]
“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.”)
[Caha v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211 (1894)]
“There is a canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)
[U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.]
1.5 40 USC 3111 and 3112 say that jurisdiction does not exist within a state except on land ceded to the national government. Hence, no matter what the geographical definitions are, they do not include anything other than federal territory.
1.6 The term “United States” as used in 8 USC 1401 within “national and citizen of the United States” does not invoke the GEOGRAPHIC sense and hence, must be presumed to be the GOVERNMENT sense, where “citizen” is a public officer in the government.
1.7 The whole point of Title 8 is confuse state citizens with federal citizens and to thereby usurp jurisdiction over them. A citizen of the District of Columbia is certainly within the meaning of 8 USC 1401. All you do by trying to confuse THAT citizen with a state citizen is engage in the Stockholm syndrome and facilitate identity theft of otherwise sovereign state citizens by thieves in the District of Criminals.
2. Agreed.
3. Agreed. Don’t know how it can be proved.
4. Agreed
5. The regulations for title 8 and spread all over. The list in the parallel table of authorities provides the list of regulations pertaining to specific sections, but does not break each statute section down to specific regulations. That is your job. Yes, it means you have to look in multiple titles of the regulations for each specific section and it can be time consuming. No, we don’t publish procedures on how to find CFR regulations that pertain to specific sections other than what you have discovered, which is the ONLY method we know of.
6. We are using Microsoft Visio for all out diagrams.
-
We just tried it and it works.
The reason you are having trouble is probably because you are going through a proxy server located outside the United States, and youtube has international filtering turned on based on your effective IP address.
-
Rich Man Poor Man
-
Imperial Washington
-
The Privilege Class
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvgxiV0Kx-Y -
The regs mandating use of SSNs for NRAs are found in:
1. 26 CFR 301.6109-1.
2. Why It is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a Taxpayer Identification Number, Form #04.205 (OFFSITE LINKS)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/04-Tax/Withholding/WhyTINIllegal.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. About SSNs and TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012, Section 9 (OFFSITE LINKS)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/AboutSSNsAndTINs.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
-
1. There is a reg at 26 CFR 1.6012-1(b ) making “nonresident alien INDIVIDUALS” liable to make a return. Peymon Mottahedeh’s $50000 challenge to produce a law making people liable is bogus because this regulation.
26 C.F.R. § 1.6012-1 Individuals required to make returns of income.
Title 26 – Internal RevenueTitle 26: Internal Revenue
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
tax returns or statements(b ) Return of nonresident alien individual—
(1) Requirement of return—
(i) In general.
Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, every nonresident alien individual (other than one treated as a resident under section 6013 (g) or (h)) who is engaged in trade or business in the United States at any time during the taxable year or who has income which is subject to taxation under subtitle A of the Code shall make a return on Form 1040NR. For this purpose it is immaterial that the gross income for the taxable year is less than the minimum amount specified in section 6012(a) for making a return. Thus, a nonresident alien individual who is engaged in a trade or business in the United States at any time during the taxable year is required to file a return on Form 1040 NR even though (a) he has no income which is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, (b ) he has no income from sources within the United States, or (c) his income is exempt from income tax by reason of an income tax convention or any section of the Code. However, if the nonresident alien individual has no gross income for the taxable year, he is not required to complete the return schedules but must attach a statement to the return indicating the nature of any exclusions claimed and the amount of such exclusions to the extent such amounts are readily determinable.
SOURCE: http://law.justia.com/cfr/title26/26-13.0.1.1.1.0.4.29.html
2. There is no regulation or statute referring to PRIVATE NON-individuals or NON-persons.
3. The underlying code is not positive law, it doesn’t create evidence of a duty to do anything. See 1 U.S.C. 204
4. The ability to regulate private rights and private property is repugnant to the constitution and therefore beyond the control of government. Hence, the ONLY thing uncle can tax is PUBLIC property. And it must be public BEFORE they can institute any enforcement action against it.
5. Even if a duty was lawfully imposed upon NON-individuals and NON-persons (26 USC 6671(b ) and 7343), the burden of proof would be upon the government as moving party to prove that:
5.1 The party against whom the duty was being enforced was engaged in public office and therefore subject to the extraterritorial special jurisdiction of the pagan beast under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b ).
5.2 The earnings subject to tax were consensually donated to a public use, public purpose, and public office and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 FRANCHISE district court. This would require WRITTEN signed document officially performing the donation. Otherwise, the property is conclusively presumed to be EXCLUSIVELY private, protected by the constitution, and thus beyond the jurisdiction of the national government.
5.3 The activity subject to tax was conducted on federal territory subject to federal territorial law.
By “NON-individuals” and “NON-persons” we mean EXCLUSIVELY private HUMAN BEINGS and not artificial entities who are beyond the civil legislative reach of Congress. See:
Why Your Government is Either a Thief or You are a Public Officer for Income tax Purposes, Form #05.008
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhyThiefOrPubOfficer.pdf (OFFSITE LINK) -
Commentary from a pastor on Dr. Zimbaro’s talks above:
____________Dr. Zimbaro is a typical humanist that believes in environmentalism; that, the circumstances determine behavior: Zimbaro stated,
“The problem is the barrel, not rotten apples in the barrel.? Problems are external . . . Men become evil depending on their circumstances . . .”
This is nonsense!! Zimbaro denies the Biblical doctrine of original sin, of total depravity and sin in man. Zimbaro believes it was not sin in man that caused the fall, but the tree . This is the Marxist philosophy of man. It is the world, not man, that is the problem. To punish man is viewed as evil. Rather, the remedy to evil is to change the environment. More nonsense.
Adam blamed his wife; Eve blamed the Serpent; the serpent blamed the tree and the environment God created; therefore, God is the problem because He put man in a corrupt environment. This is environmentalism and its Luciferian!
It’s not sin in the environment that is the problem, but sin in man!! Harmatology 101.
Psalm 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray from birth, speaking lies.
In Biblical law, the man must be punished, not the earth. In the case of war, war must be waged against men, not the environment (Deut. 20:19).
Zimbaro is part of the same crowd that teaches that parents are the problem for wayward children. Since parents are the environment of the child, they must be the reason for spoiled monsters. Parents have not done enough for the child . . . or loved enough . . . duh, da, duh, da duh. [ Rushdoony, p. 136].
Is poverty the cause of evil? I don’t think so! Yes, poverty is hard, but want of money is not the root of all evil . . . though difficult circumstances can trigger evil in man, the environment is not the source of evil.
Finally, Jesus was in a bad environment . . .in the hot, dry dessert of Judea. He went for days without food. He was hungry . . . it was as bad as it gets for a man. Yet He would not sin against His Father when tempted by Lucifer!!
So much for the “bad barrel” theory.
Brook
-
Milgram Experiment
A study in what makes people turn evil.
-
-
Fantastic. Thanks.
More good quotes from Irwin Schiff’s son at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/SchiffReportThe above channel is one of SEDM’s favorites.
http://www.youtube.com/user/sedmorg/featured -
Thanks!