
fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
fg_admin
AdministratorMay 15, 2014 at 2:49 am in reply to: Social Security "Voluntary", but "Mandatory" to get health insurance? Seeking advice.You can’t post questions in that format. You used personal pronouns and specifically used the forbidden “advice” word. It’s a valid question but you must repost a new topic that conforms with our policies for asking questions:
http://sedm.org/Membership/GuideToAskingQuestions.htm
This thread is locked and will be deleted after you read it and repost your question reformatted to be compliant with the above.
Chances are, your browser has been hijacked. We tried three different browsers and none of them have problems. Try multiple browsers on the same computer, and if that doesn’t work, try another computer. The problem is on your end.
fg_admin
AdministratorMay 7, 2014 at 3:32 pm in reply to: Anonymous Judge Blows the Whistle: America is nothing more than a large Plantation and 'We the People' are the SlavesEDITORIAL: Here is what Larry BeCraft says about the above referenced document.
________________This last week, I received an e-book, The Matrix, alleged authored by a retired Judge Dale and read it. As is very common in this movement, research consisting of a collection of rumors and hearsay is presented
as factual, yet virtually all of it is erroneous. And the naive believe these arguments. I intend to expose these gross errors.Attached, please find a page from this collection of falsities that concerns the 1783 Treaty of Peace which formally ended the Revolutionary War. The book claims to interpret provisions of that treaty. To prove the error of the claim made in Matrix regarding this treaty, I attach a copy of it; mere perusal clearly shows the claim to be a lie.
I also provide further explanations of that treaty and its legal consequence here:
Its in the following article, but you must be a Compliant Member to read or use it:
Getting a USA Passport as a “Non-citizen national”, Forms #09.007 and 10.012
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htmMembership is free. It is a compliant member form because we don’t want people abusing it who haven’t done their homework. That would needlessly jeopardize and compromise otherwise good legal arguments. Members were trying to use it who did not complete the mandatory Path to Freedom Process so it had to be moved to the Compliant Members Only area. You can read about this at:
http://sedm.org/Membership/CompliantMembersOnly.htmAll future questions on this subject should be directed to the SEDM forums, because we aren’t responsible for any of the above.
http://sedm.org/forums/There is deliberately no information on this site about how to obtain a passport as a non-citizen national. It was all removed and replaced with the above.
The state can turn anything into a crime, but they cannot turn the exercise of a right protected by the constitution into a crime.
“. . the assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.” [Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24 (1923)]
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
[Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491 (1966)]“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime.”
[Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d 486, at 489 (1956)]“. . .there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.”
[Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F.2d 946 (1973)]Hence, a predicate for the crime is that the person engaging in the activity must be a public officer on official business. Public officers are not protected by the constitution and can exercise only those privileges granted by their EMPLOYER, which is Uncle. It can’t be a crime for PRIVATE people protected by the constitution because it isn’t even heard in a REAL court. Traffic court is NOT a constitutional court, has no jury box, and is actually an agency in the executive branch. If it were a REAL or common law crime, it would have to be heard in a REAL criminal court with a real jury of your peers, all of whom are NOT statutory “drivers” or public officers in the government, but rather PRIVATE people. Franchise courts are covered in:
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030, Section 21
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Franchises.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Travel is a RIGHT, but the ability to use the public roadways for hire or private gain is NOT. Using the public roadways for private gain is a revocable PRIVILEGE and NOT a RIGHT. Applying to receive and using public property called a “driver license” in connection with the use of the public roadways for hire causes the applicant to be treated AS IF he or she was a public officer on official business in charge of public property. A public officer is anyone in charge of the property of the public and the registration and license are said public property:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Rights/Travel/RightToTravel.htm
Please resist further questions until you have done the due diligence we demanded of you. We aren’t a free legal reference service. We don’t want to have to keep rewriting the Defending Your Right to Travel book in these forums for people who are too lazy or too cheap to get it.
Please consider downloading, reading, and following the following, because you are asking a lot of needless questions. The following free curriculum would allow you to find all your own answers.
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/PathToFreedom.pdfThat curriculum is designed to prevent cluttering the forums with needless questions that it answers and which you could answer if you followed it.
fg_admin
AdministratorMay 6, 2014 at 7:00 pm in reply to: Traveling in your own car is a Right – IdahoWelcome.
You said there were conflicting sources. Please identify SPECIFICALLY all the evidence you have uncovered so far that would answer your question. This is how you demonstrate that you are doing your due diligence. You can only deserve help if you at least try and demonstrate that you are trying to answer your own question before burdening people in these forums. No evidence, no help. We can’t reward people for being lazy and forcing us to do all their legal research for free. If we did, we wouldn’t have a life and would get nothing done. Whatever is free and requires no effort will always be overutilized. We don’t give people fish, but teach them how to fish.
If you have no research, then you should consider getting the book below so you at least know what to look for in trying to answer your own question before posting to these forums:
Defending Your Right to Travel, Form #06.010
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Ebooks/DefYourRightToTravel/DefYourRightToTravel.htm
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex-SinglePg.htmThese forums are not a first resort but a last resort after you demonstrate your due diligence. This is explained in:
Guide to Asking Questions, Form #09.017
http://sedm.org/Membership/GuideToAskingQuestions.htmIf you need research tools to find the loopholes in your state, see:
State Legal Resources
http://sedm.org/Membership/GuideToAskingQuestions.htmThe Idaho page is at:
http://shome.tzo.com:8000/GIS/JurisdictionDB.aspx?state=IDIf you haven’t yet learned how to do legal research, then please read and learn:
Legal Research and Writing Techniques, Form #12.013
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/LibertyU/LegalResearch.pdfIRS Collection Methodology
Contains a summary of IRS collection methodology:
fg_admin
AdministratorMay 1, 2014 at 4:55 pm in reply to: Muslim Religion is hateful – Examine the EvidenceEDITORIAL: Confirmation of the above.
_____________________
MAN ARRESTED FOR QUOTING CHURCHILL ON ISLAMhttp://rt.com/news/155584-islam-weston-candidate-churchill/
Don’t forget to be politically correct today, cowardess is calling and the want of critical thinking demands it.
Storm Brooks
The following interviews discuss Christian anarchy:
Anarchast Ep.72 with Paul Rosenberg: Christians are Anarchists!
http://anarchast.com/front/2013/5/2/anarchast-ep72-with-paul-rosenberg-christians-are-anarchists.htmlAnarchast Ep. 23 with Paul Rosenberg of the Freemans Perspective
http://anarchast.com/front/2012/4/25/anarchast-ep-23-with-paul-rosenberg-of-the-freemans-perspect.htmlNotice in Ep. 72 above, Berwick admits he doesn’t know what paganism is. That may be why he and most atheistic anarchists practice it.
fg_admin
AdministratorApril 16, 2014 at 2:25 pm in reply to: How do I start my life as a nontaxpayer?rhonda9095,
If you are on this site, there is hope for you. If it is any consolation, we sometimes feel overwhelmed by the information on this site and the obstacles it presents to simply being LEFT ALONE. I’m sorry to say that:
1. We didn’t create all the complexity found in the legal profession.
2. The complexity is the main disguise for the truth that eludes so many people. It was deliberately created to hide your freedom as a needle in a huge hay stack.
3. We have tried very hard to simply the issues we deal with.
4. Even the founding father warned of this complexity and how it is abused to STEAL from people:
“It poisons the blessing of liberty itself. It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is to-day, can guess what it will be to-morrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?
“It has been frequently remarked, with great propriety, that a voluminous code of laws is one of the inconveniences necessarily connected with the advantages of a free government. To avoid an arbitrary discretion in the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules [of statutory construction and interpretation] and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case that comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of controversies which grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to a very considerable bulk, and must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them.”
[Federalist Paper No. 78, Alexander Hamilton]
______________________________________________________________________________________________
“Another effect of public instability is the unreasonable advantage it gives to the sagacious, the enterprising, and the moneyed few over the industrious and uniformed mass of the people. Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue, or in any way affecting the value of the different species of property, presents a new harvest to those who watch the change, and can trace its consequences; a harvest, reared not by themselves, but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow-citizens. This is a state of things in which it may be said with some truth that laws are made for [benefit of] the FEW, not for the MANY.”
[Federalist Paper No. 62, James Madison]5. It overwhelms even attorneys, which is why they call their profession “practicing law” rather than simply DOING or ENFORCING law.
All we can say is, do your best. This subject is also covered in the following offsite link:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015, Section 11
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htmThe extensive studying and organizing that went into this site has taught us that:
1. The main product of education ought to be humility, not pride.
2. The more we learn, the less we realize that we really know.
3. Vanity is at the heart of everything man creates.
4. We all desperately need God because of the vast sin that this learning exposes.Kokeshi,
Thanks for sharing your story. The student loan trap you got yourself into is extensively talked about in the following dialog:
http://youtu.be/swNCLs0pzvgWhen we were faced with trying to go to college, we elected NOT to go into debt to do it. We’re sorry you find yourself in that situation and it will be difficult to get out of.
fg_admin
AdministratorApril 16, 2014 at 6:15 am in reply to: Michael Rupert, investigative journalist ‘commits suicide’; 4/15/2015Here is the last video he did:
Thanks for pointing out that inconsistency in our materials. The instructions you are referring to are located at:
Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online, Step 3.13
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Instructions/3.13ChangeUSCitizenshipStatus.htm
The above text has been revised to remove the requirement to expatriate. That original instruction was outdated.Sorry for the needless confusion caused by this obvious conflict. It is very difficult and time consuming to keep everything on this site consistent with itself as the materials evolve.
Expatriation is unnecessary to regain sovereignty. It will also make you a stateless person with no right to travel ANYWHERE and no way to get a passport if you do not have citizenship in any other country before one does it. This is covered in:
Great IRS Hoax, Section 4.11.13
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htmThe problem is not CONSTITUTIONAL citizenship, but STATUTORY citizenship and its corresponding presumed domicile on federal territory not protected by the Constitution. See:
Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen
http://famguardian.org/Publications/WhyANational/WhyANational.pdfBecause you are a newbie, you are likely to be confused about citizenship based on your question. To clear up such confusion as quick as possible, see:
Why the Fourteenth Amendment is NOT a Threat to Your Freedom, Form #08.015
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/FourteenthAmendNotProb.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The distinctions between CONSTITUTIONAL and STATUTORY citizenship are also summarized at:
Citizenship Status v. Tax Status
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Citizenship/CitizenshipVTaxStatus.htm
You’re wasting your time.Here website: