fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
SOURCE: http://neddybee.blogspot.com/2011/09/miracle-of-sycamore-at-ground-zero.html
_______________The Miracle of the Sycamore at Ground Zero
Saint Paul’s Churchyard in Manhattan by Edna Barney
Saint Paul’s Churchyard in Manhattan, a photo by Edna Barney on Flickr.
There are Miracles!
On September 11, 2001, an ancient Sycamore tree stood between the small Saint Paul’s Chapel of 1766, and the World Trade Center. The brunt of the force released by the collapsing Twin Towers caused the 100-year-old tree to fall. The tree fell in such a way that its spreading branches created a shield which absorbed shockwaves from the seeming nuclear impact and preserved the historic 18th century Saint Paul’s Chapel of Trinity Church and its ancient tombstones from falling debris, including a direct hit from an I-beam, and what should have been certain destruction.
“This stump is all that remains of a 100 -year-old Sycamore that once stood in the northwest corner of St. Paul’s churchyard. The tree was toppled on September 11th, 2001, when the collapse of the World Trade Center sent tons of debris hurtling towards the church, including a large steel beam from the North Tower. Miraculously, the Chapel’s trees shielded from dam and not a single pane of glass was broken through the church.”
“In 2005, renowned sculptor Steve Tobin worked with tree experts to preserve the original Sycamore stump that you see here at St. Paul’s.” (From the Plaque Below the Stump)
Isaiah 9:10 “The bricks are fallen down, but we will build with hewn stones: the sycomores are cut down, but we will change them into cedars.” -
See also:
http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/379829/ -
EDITORIAL: From a member. We didn’t write this.
______________________________Banks read the newspaper death notices. My mom told me that her friend was a bank president and he cautioned her that safe deposit boxes were not really safe from who really matters. Once a death notice appears in a newspaper or upon being informed, banks FREEZE the contents of safe deposit boxes. My mother informed us on her deathbed with instructions to clean-out her safe deposit box immediately. A product of the depression…She had this habit of wrapping papers up in bundles with old shoe laces. I removed everything but left the shoelaces with this message: “Always the shoelaces and never the shoes.”
-
Here is Dan Harris’ meltdown on TV because of the abuse of what he calls “recreational drugs”:
-
Sovereign Citizens: Radicals Exercising ‘God-Given Rights’ or Fueling Domestic Terrorism?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/sovereign-citizens-radicals-exercising-god-rights-fueling-domestic/story?id=15876417 -
Another story by Dan Harris, the jack ass.
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/sovereign-citizens-radicals-door-15882827
-
Great observations. Thanks Bing! Mega-dittos as they say on the Rush Limbaugh show.
Your cites have been added to the “sovereignty” section of the Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online, Form #10.004, Cites by Topic
-
Attached is the original report. Note the following description of Sovereign Citizens at the bottom of page 11:
3 Although most organizations group Sovereign Citizens with other right wing groups, they are quite unique. Sovereigns do not specifically share the supremacist views of the Klan, etc. Their focus is not on individuals (e.g., minorities, Jews, etc.) rather their focus is on government dysfunction and abuse of authority. Their anti-government ideology is arguably more akin to left wing anarchists than right wing Klansmen.
This is evidence that the persecution of sovereign citizens, political and police violence wise, is really a form of anti-whistleblowing activity. This is a good sign that their reputation is improving!
This kind of admission is a good sign that the reputation of “sovereign citizens” is improving! If we WERE “sovereign citizens”, which we aren’t, we would proudly join the ranks of the vast majority of other law abiding Americans who at this time are EQUALLY pissed about corruption in the government and especially Washington, D.C. We’re not ashamed to admit that we are NOT anti-government, but anti-corruption and that EVERYONE, and ESPECIALLY the law enforcers and law WRITERS, should obey the Constitution and the laws implemented in furtherance of it.
We’ll tell you why “sovereign citizens” are the biggest perceived threat above that of even Muslim extremeists:
1. Because they are whistleblowers against government corruption.
2. Because they are not against government, but against those who PRETEND to be government but refuse to do the ONLY job for which governments are created: Protect PRIVATE rights.
3. Because a corrupted government mafia protection racket only protects itself and to hell with the rest of us.
4. Because a corrupted government knows that “taxes” are really nothing more than “protection money” to bribe a corrupted government to remove you from the “selective enforcement” and persecution list.
5. Because they can disarm and immobilize the most educated policemen without weapons by simply quoting the law and thereby showing the policemen that they aren’t enforcing LAW, but policy and franchise agreements disguised to LOOK like law.
They also falsely say that “sovereign citizens” are “more akin to left wing anarchists than right wing Klansmen”. WRONG! This is explained in:
Problems with Atheistic Anarchism, Form #08.020
VIDEO:
SLIDES: http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/ProbsWithAtheistAnarchism.pdf
This report isn’t worth the toilet paper it is printed on. It’s pseudo-science written by pseudo intellectuals who are recipients of essentially a government welfare check. They ain’t never gonna look their gift horse in the mouth or portray the other side….the people slandered and persecuted by their slanderous and false opinions. Why didn’t their list of references have links to the other side or to at least the sites they relied on to determine what a “sovereign citizen” is such as to this site? Because these idiots know they couldn’t argue their findings with real evidence and science if their life depended on it. It didn’t even begin with a definition of even the groups they are referring to or any statistics about the groups. It is basically an opinion poll of emotions, and emotions or beliefs have no business in a scientific study. Only FACTS about real objective definitions, real people, real phenomenon, real behavior, and real statistics from unbiased people belong in a real scientific report. Garbage.
To date, we have not seen a single precise definition of what a “sovereign citizen” is. It’s terrorism to create a label for such a group, refuse to even legally define it, and then use a subjective opinion about who is and is not in the group as a criteria to pick people up and kidnap them to Guatanamo. The government are the REAL terrorists for even taking this approach.
If you would like a full response to this, see:
Rebutted False Arguments About Sovereignty, Form #08.018, Section 5.7
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RebFalseArgSovereignty.pdf
-
EDITORIAL ON THE ABOVE:
Their was a study done that stated people actually LIKED the constant interruptions of electronic devices. Reason? The alternative is something our readers and us have both discovered. Otherwise they would have to…….THINK. And as our readers and us have discovered that is something far too painful for people to do….hence they crave the constant interruptions. Make sense now about Obama phones?
“The power to create presumptions is not a means of escape from constitutional restrictions.”
[Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 , 238, et seq., 31 S.Ct. 145; Manley v. Georgia, 279 U.S. 1 , 5-6, 49 S.Ct. 215]
“But the person who does anything presumptuously, whether he is native-born or a stranger, that one brings reproach on the Lord, and he shall be cut off from among his people.”
[Numbers 15:30, Bible, NKJV]
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence [and presumptions] than does knowledge.”
[Charles Darwin (1809-1882) 1871]
“Believing [PRESUMING without checking the facts and evidence] is easier than thinking. Hence so many more believers than thinkers.”
[Bruce Calvert]
“What luck for rulers that men do not think“
[Adolf Hitler]
“And in their covetousness (lust, greed) they will exploit you with false (cunning) arguments [“words of art” that advance FALSE presumptions]. From of old the sentence [of condemnation] for them has not been idle; their destruction (eternal misery) has not been asleep.”
[2 Peter 2:3, Bible, Amplified Edition]
“There is nothing so powerful as truth, and often nothing so strange.”
[Daniel Webster]
“Prejudices, it is well known, are most difficult to eradicate from the heart whose soil has never been loosened or fertilized by education; they grow there, firm as weeds among stones. “
[Charlotte Bronte]
“The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”
[Albert Einstein]
“He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
[Thomas Jefferson]
-
Here is a REBUTTAL to the above video from our friends at SEDM:
Citizenship and Domicile as Verified by President Obama, Exhibit #01.017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szcA_v3K6I8The slide presentation for the above is found at:
SEDM Exhibit Page, Exhibit #01.017
http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm -
Here is a free copy of the book talked about in the above video:
http://www.copycatsnw.com/uploads/100913/Conquering%20the%20Coming%20Collapse%20V4%20(1).pdf -
(the msg and canola oil song) DUDE, WHO POISONED MY FOOD by Trillion
http://youtu.be/n1Kx-79cAxc -
Here is a site that shows how manufacturers falsify their labeling to hide that their products contain MSG:
-
MSG on 60mintues (1991)
-
The most relevant document is:
Meaning of the words “includes” and “including”, Form #05.014
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Includes.pdfWithin the above document, the following cites are relevant:
“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another.Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d 1097, 1100.Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred.Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.”
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 581]