fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Yes. Hang around for a while and you will notice that. We go back and fix it by adding space after the “b” and “c”, as we did above. You can also add ”
Quote:” before and “[/quote”] after quotes to get them to appear as we did to your above quote. -
See:
1. Great IRS Hoax, Section 5.6.19
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
2. Requirement for consent, Form #05.003, Sections 10.6 through 10.6.1
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Consent.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. 53 Stat. 1, SEDM Exhibit 05.027
http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm
We here at Family Guardian are not responsible for the content on the sedm website referenced above. If you have questions about their content or errata, please post it on their site. However, we do agree with everything they publish.
Admin
-
Amen, professor bing. You’re paying attention to the evidence and not opinion that is on this site.
-
As we said before. The subjects of TINS, SSN’s, and even the form that you referred to is not specifically covered on this site and is only covered on SEDM. They aren’t covered in the Great IRS Hoax that you reference either. Your questions may be relevant to taxation, but they are not relevant to the content of this site and are more relevant to SEDM. Even our above answer referenced SEDM and not this site in answering your question.
SEDM focuses on APPLICATION and REMEDIES, this site focuses on THEORY and RESEARCH and NOT application or remedies, and especially in the field of taxation. There are many reasons for this
1. We don’t answer for SEDM materials.
2. We don’t give legal advice, but merely information and law that are relevant.
3. The reasons are described in section 1 of the following. The below document is part of the Forum Rules governing these forums and which are referenced in the header to this and every other forum on this site.
Guide to Asking Questions, Form #09.017
http://sedm.org/Membership/GuideToAskingQuestions.htm
4. We want to ensure that people who “use” or “apply” information available through this site or SEDM to a real life situation in procuring remedy, and especially as it relates to taxation, must be constrained in how they use it by agreeing to a member agreement so that nothing unlawful or injurious can result. This site doesn’t have such a member agreement and therefore could be abused as a way to avoid these constraints on the use of our “tax information and services”. Those constraints are found below, but they do not directly protect this site, which is why we don’t “apply” taxation materials to real situations here:
Terms of Use and Service, Form 01.016
http://sedm.org/Forms/01-General/TermsOfUseAndService.pdf
Therefore, your question belongs on the SEDM forums because it relates to APPLYING taxation information to specific real situations and procuring a remedy as you pointed out.
http://sedm.org/forums/
If or when you post your questions to the SEDM forums, please ensure that you read and follow the following document. No disrespect intended, but your above questions are dangerously and improperly framed as a request for legal advice because they use personal pronouns, which are forbidden on both this site and the other site. Hence, the source of our caution on this subject:
Guide to Asking Questions, Form #09.017
http://sedm.org/Membership/GuideToAskingQuestions.htm
Additional reasons for the requirement to consent to a member agreement are found in the above page. Basic membership in sedm is free, so we aren’t trying to coerce you into a commercial relationship with anyone by insisting on the approach that we do here. Nothing in life that is worth having is free, including help, education, or advice. Consenting to the member agreement and thereby expressing and manifesting obedience and allegiance to learn and obey the law is the “cost” of involving us or the sedm sister site in the application of taxation information to specific situations. This is also clarified at the bottom of the SEDM Sister Site Contact Us page:
8.This is first and foremost a religious ministry. While we can directly offer help and benefit only to those people who believe in God and have a sincere intention to learn and obey His laws, we also welcome all those who find themselves resonating with the moral commandments that inspired the Founders of our country. Governments in search of “customer lists” for our ministry are hereby put on notice that God is our only “customer”. For details on whether your religion is compatible with our mission, see About Us Page, Section 9. As such, if you are an atheist, Satanist, or Thelemite then you may obtain, read, consume, and learn our materials, but may not “use” our information or services in their original form in direct interactions with any government or anyone in the legal profession. We do this to ensure that the “benefits” of God’s law may only be enjoyed by those who accept the reciprocal obligation of obedience to those laws that makes them “beneficial” in the first place. This site advocates learning and obeying Natural and Nature’s God’s laws – not as a means of justification, but as a means of thankfulness for the grace of Life. That endeavor is the essence of religion itself. If you can get the milk for free, you’ll NEVER buy the cow. People who refuse to buy the cow are called “anarchists under both God’s law and man’s law”, and we are prohibited by God from helping or protecting such anarchists per Prov. 1:23-33.
“Cujus est commodum ejus debet esse incommodum.
He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage.”
[Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856]The above requirements are mandatory in the case of legal or tax matters and also appear in the Compliance Questionnaire at the end of the Path to Freedom, Form #09.015 indicated above. We do this both for your protection and ours to prevent any of our materials or services from being abused for:
- An unlawful purpose.
- An injurious purpose.
- A commercial purpose.
- An actionable or factual (to us) purpose.
- A political purpose.
- Anything other than the pursuit of purely religious goals as a full time fiduciary under God’s laws.
“Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their trouble, and to keep oneself unspotted [sovereign and independent and foreign] from the world [government franchises, taxes, obligations, and commercial relations]. “
[James 1:27, Bible, NKJV]“Come out [disassociate and be a non-resident NON-person] of her [Babylon the Great Harlot, a corporate for-profit government that worships money and men instead of true and only and living God], my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. [. . .] “Therefore her plagues will come in one day—death and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned with fire, for strong is the Lord God who judges her.”
[Rev. 18:3-8, Bible, NKJV]
We will prioritize our response and the help we can provide based on your degree of compliance to our Path to Freedom, Form #09.015 document and your ability to resource us to be able to help you.
Finally, we are not suggesting that you cannot find help from our Ministry even if we (the ministry leadership) personally cannot help you. You can always:- Join our free Member Forums and post your questions there for other members to read and help with. Click here and then click “Create Account” in the upper right corner. NOTE: By doing so you consent unconditionally to our Member Agreement, Form #01.001.
- Join an Activism Group in your area and receive mentorship from other members. Click here to investigate.
The amount of help you get from the above will be directly proportional to your own commitment to helping others, because we always reap what we sow. That’s the Golden Rule spoken of by Jesus.
[SOURCE: http://sedm.org/storepublic/index.php?app=ecom&ns=contact]
We (the administrator) won’t directly address this subject further on this site. However, other members may be able to help you on this subject. -
See also:
Your USB cable, the spy: Inside the NSA’s catalog of surveillance magic
-
By the way, you can now download ALL of the above reports in PDF or TEXT format at:
http://famguardian1.org/Disks/CRSReports/
Click on “0-index.htm” at the top to look at a list of all the reports and search the list.
http://famguardian1.org/Disks/CRSReports/0-index.htm
The above list has also been added to:
Legal Research Sources, Item 3.5.18:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/LegalRef/LegalResrchSrc.htm
-
Oneofthepeople
Welcome.
1. Those pursuing such status would be non-resident non-persons. There is no provision in the I.R.C. that can or does require the use of identifying numbers for such transient foreigners. The burden of proof is upon those demanding said numbers to show that the obligation MANDATES such use. This is covered in:
About SSNs/TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012, Section 10
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/AboutSSNsAndTINs.pdfIt is also a crime (18 USC 912) to impersonate a public office and using said number is prima facie evidence of said office. Company policy cannot mandate the commission of crime, and therefore indirectly cannot compel the use of numbers by those who are not ALREADY public officers BEFORE they applied for the number.
2. Terminate the account and create a new one. Rename the company or use a holding company with a new name if they won’t allow reapplying with a different status.
The W-8BEN is only for nonresident alien “INDIVIDUALS”. Our members are not “individuals”, which are a subset of “persons”, all of whom are public officers in the government. A substitute for the W-8BEN can be provided because technically, the W-8BEN is not the correct form, and especially if used unmodified. IRS even publishes guidelines on how to make substitutes for the W-8BEN. This is described in:
2.1 Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf2.2 New Hire Paperwork Attachment, Form #04.203
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex-SinglePg.htmOne cannot be ANYTHING under the I.R.C, including a “participating payee” WITHOUT first being an “individual” or “person”, neither of which describes our members because it is a public office, as described in:
Why Your Government is Either a Thief or You are a “Public Officer” for Income Tax Purposes, Form #05.008
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhyThiefOrPubOfficer.pdfThe processing company has the burden of proving that the company applying is domiciled in the geographical “United States**” federal zone as defined in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10). If they can’t satisfy that burden of proof, then as public officers called “withholding agents”, they can’t violate due process by PRESUMING that the non-resident non-person applicant satisfies said criteria and compelling the criminal impersonation of a public officer called a statutory “taxpayer”.
3. Paperwork filed with the secretary of state is only for corporations. A company cannot be “private” and also a corporation at the same time. That would be an oxymoron as you pointed out. If it was us, we would create (or recreate, as the case may be) the company as a private trust instead, rather than a statutory public entity such as a corporation or LLC.
4. Why does the state have to be involved in the creation of the entity? Private trusts don’t require that. The only state officer involved in private trusts is a notary, rather than the Secretary of State.
IN CONCLUSION: Whether the processing company is willing to accept the applicant has more to do with their POLICY rather than what the law requires. No law requires the use of the EIN, that the company must be a corporation, or that the company cannot operate as a non-resident non-person. Innocent and a non-taxpayer until proven guilty and a taxpayer. The burden of proof is on the processor, not you. And if the courts can’t even declare you a “taxpayer”, then how can the company or the IRS make that determination? See 28 USC 2201(a).
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/taxpayer.htmIf no law requires it but they do not as a matter of law, but of company policy, they are conspiring with you to commit the following crimes if you are in fact and in deed a non-resident non-taxpayer:
1. Impersonating a public officer. 18 USC 912.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/9122. Bribery to procure a public officer (withholdings are the bribe). 18 USC 211
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/211Lastly, the focus of this site is not to help businesses or artificial entities such as companies, but only private human beings. Your questions are beyond the direct scope of this site, which is THEORY and RESEARCH rather than APPLICATION. Our answers and assistance may only be used for the benefit and protection of the private owner of the business, not the business itself.
Did you post here to avoid becoming an SEDM member?
Your questions relate exclusively to SEDM content and need to be posted on the sedm site. Not here. We are not responsible for their content and any questions about how to apply it belong on their site, not here. Please confine questions posted to these forums to content found on this site exclusively.
-
Hilarious. Thanks.
-
This guy takes the same approach as us at a simpler level. We agree with him but he is missing HUGE holes in his approach:
1. He doesn’t discuss how domicile is what connects the civil law to the individual.
2. That domicile is based on consent.
3. That without proof of domicile on the record, the case has to be dismissed per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17.
4. That the challenge can and should be made even before a plea is entered.
5. That it is a crime of impersonating a public officer to even enter a plea, if the crime depends on a civil status you don’t have.
6. That all are equal UNTIL those asserting inequality produce evidence of consent to the civil status to which the rights attach.Facts that can be entered into the record are available to support all the above. He has a lot more inadmissible opinions than facts, which is why he gets thrown out of court.
He looks like an idiot and a simpleton to ignore the above omissions in his approach.
We like how he references the judge as a psychopath, which he is, but he is operating more in a political mode than a legal mode, which you can’t and shouldn’t do in a courtroom. That’s why he isn’t more successful.
We have bought and read his book, but it too is too political and not technical enough. We admire his passion and his rationality, but where is the beef (facts and evidence) to back up his position? Even his book doesn’t have any.
-
I’m told that the SEDM folks followed at least part of your suggestion by putting a link to the above video at the beginning of the Path to Freedom, p. 3
-
Bing,
We agree with you. Thanks for sharing.
Admin 🙂
-
_______________
Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration (case terminated) after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora’s box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture
Paul Andrew Mitchell’s case is officially terminated, 12-19-14:
Merry Christmas Paul. Many blessings! Please give support to Paul for him to get settled in after his long and tortuous ordeal.
Paul Andrew Mitchell's case is officially terminated
from:
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
to:
SupremeLaw
cc:
date:
Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM
subject:
escaping the psycho parasites needles attacks
mailed-by:
gmail.com
signed-by:
gmail.com
> how in the heck did you escape the psycho parasites needles attacksFirst of all, when the SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT was issued,that added 4 more co-defendants, and those 4 co-defendants
all hired private attorneys.Two of those private attorneys then formally identified me as a“critical defense witness” i.e. critical to the defense of their clients.I also testified on my own behalf on July 10, 2014 e.g.about my work looking for missing children in Tucson, Arizona,
and my 7 years of pro bono assistance to the U.S. Coast Guard
in downtown San Diego. Indirectly, I received word that the
U.S. Marshals were VERY impressed with that testimony
e.g. how I analyzed the cctv frames acquired by the Pentagon’s
surveillance cameras:http://supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/executive.summary.htm
(see the crucial FRAME ONE which shows how the fuselageforward of the visible tail section was “spray-painted” with apurplish color taken from a different region of that frame:that purple color was NOT present at those pixel locationsin ALL PRIOR FRAMES on the 2 surveillance video sequences!)
Thus, harassing, intimidating or threatening sucha Federal witness with mind-altering (read “brain-damaging”)
psychotropic pharmaceuticals was a FELONY violation of18 USC 1513, 1514, 2340 and 3771:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1513
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1514
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2340 (cf. definition of “torture”)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3771Also, there were the following:* NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST* CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT for arrest of
Robert Sarrazin, M.D. as “Chief of Psychiatry”
and
Christina Pietz, Ph.D. as “Psychologist”at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisonersin Springfield, Missouri (“USMCFP”)
Latter CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT (1X) was servedon the USMCFP Case Manager and Mental Health Unit Manager,
Michael McIntyre and Jon Roberts, respectively.* CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT (1X) for the arrest ofNancy Dell Freudenthal as “Chief U.S. District Judge” in Cheyenne, Wyomingand Stephan Harris as “Clerk of Court” at USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming
and L. Robert Muray as “Assistant U.S. Attorney” in Cheyenne, WyomingLatter CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT was served on the Director of the U.S.Marshals Service in Washington, D.C. via first-class U.S. Mail.* 2 new lawsuits, for a total of five (5) litigation “fronts”
(a) original “criminal” case and “superseding indictment”(b) APPLICATION FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OFQUO WARRANTO AND HABEAS CORPUS invoking
18 USC 1964, 28 USC 2241, 2242, 31 USC 3730(h)and 42 USC 1985-1986, Docket #14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P (USDC/WDMO)
“MDH” = the Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, U.S. District Judgehttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1964
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2241
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2242
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3730 (h)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1986(c) FOIA Enforcement ApplicationDocket #14-3506-CV-S-MDH-P (USDC/WDMO)(d) APPEAL to the Tenth Circuit in Denver, Coloradofor WRIT OF PROHIBITION, Appeal #14-8081 (now pending:a preliminary ORDER was issued on 12/19/2014)(no Docket number assigned, as of today) requested underthe Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 USC 3771
* EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (“TRO”)
* MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Of great interest to the whole nation, perhaps, are my two (2) FOIA Requests forthe OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS of all U.S. Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”)
personnel during the past 10 years, and of all USMCFP personnelalso during the past 10 years.
THE WHOLE NATION NEEDS TO KNOW THAT “BOP” PERSONNELEVIDENTLY HAVE NOT EXECUTED THAT MANDATORY CREDENTIAL!!!I’ll try to get everything uploaded to the SLL, but it’s going to take
quite a lot of time: many of those pleadings will need to be re-typed.
The “criminal case” alone now has more than 200 discrete Docket entries at present,
with no sign of taping off any time soon.
Also, Juan Schoch has been uploading many of my pleadings and
related email messages to his own website: contact “Juan Schoch” <jvschoch@gmail.com>
—
Sincerely yours,/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, ‘Ronald Gust’ via SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com> wrote:Hello Paul, nice you see your back, Marry Christmashow in the heck did you escape the psycho parasites needlesattacks, you need to write a book on your ordeal.Ron
On Monday, December 22, 2014 10:09 AM, “Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.” <supremelawfirm@gmail.com> wrote:Got this TODAY, Bill!I can’t thank you enough for greeting me at the bus terminal,
for your immense generosity, and for the fabulous conversation
we enjoyed together yesterday.
I am hoping and praying that we will become BEST FRIENDS
with no hesitation 🙂
So, consider that an offer you may NOT and can NOT refuse !!
God bless you and yours, Bill. You have helped me in more
ways than you know!
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!/s/ Paul
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com> wrote:
Forwarded message
From: Bill Zavales <bid@binternational.biz>
Date: Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Subject: Hello and thankyou
To: mrfsys@gmail.com
Bumped into your writings almost 2 1/2 years ago and thought you might have NW connections per box office address. You have opened my eyes and I share your sites to whom ever will listen. I live in Kirkland ,Wa. and would like to extend an offer to contribute to the valuable service you have given. Bill Zavales, small business owner,former employer(1099s now),Dad,Husband and 20 word p/m
typist. 206 465 4288
—
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
—
Sincerely yours,/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
___
Related: SupremeLaw Renewals are now due … http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/12/supremelaw-renewals-are-now-due-.html
‘Bundled Away’ Megapost
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.htmlRef(s), trackbacks:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=6717
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com.au/2014/12/paul-andrew-mitchell-update.html
-
Here is the Psychopahty Checklist
http://www.decision-making-confidence.com/hare-psychopathy-checklist.html
______________________
The 20 items
The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised consists of 20 items which are rated 0 to 2, zero meaning ‘does not apply’, one ‘applies somewhat’ and two ‘applies fully’. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised is completed on the basis of firstly, an interview with the subject, and secondly, corroborating information such as criminal history, medical history, school history etc.
The 20 items of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised are
1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM – smooth talking, verbally agile, a psychopath is rarely stuck for something to say. They are not in the least bit shy. In fact, they are not afraid to say anything!
2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH – they have an opinion on everything, they boast and brag about the things they have done, their skills and abilities. They have enormous egos, plenty of confidence and arrogance and consider themselves superior. One psychopath said that he preferred to hear himself talk, because what he said was more interesting than what other people had to say.
3. SEEK STIMULATION or PRONE TO BOREDOM – they like to be doing new and different things, always looking for excitement and entertainment. They take risks in what they do as well as what they say. For example, cult leaders, in a subtle way, may explain to their victims how exactly they are manipulating them. They rarely engage in activities that they find boring, or they don’t finish the job.
4. PATHOLOGICAL LYING – their ability to lie is stunning, even when they know there is a high probability of being caught. Lies can be cunning and sly or unscrupulously manipulative.
5. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS – they deceive, cheat, con, bilk, trick or defraud others for personal gain. This is separated from no. 4 to the extent that the subject shows ‘callous ruthlessness’, that is, a lack of concern or pity for the suffering and feelings of their victims.
6. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT – despite their words they experience little emotion or concern for the pain and suffering of their victims. They are unfazed, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. There is often a disdain for the victims, and they may even say the victims deserved it.
7. SHALLOW AFFECT – emotional poverty or very shallow feelings, coldness towards others despite seeming very friendly.
8. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY – a general lack of feelings towards other people. They tend to be heartless, contemptuous, indifferent and tactless.
9. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE – they will intentionally manipulate and exploit others for financial gain. This goes along with poor motivation and little self-discipline and no sense of responsibility in terms of earning their own living.
10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS – there may be sudden expressions of annoyance, irritability, aggression and verbal abuse. There may be sudden outbursts of anger and temper and they may act hastily.
11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR – they may have many brief encounters, many affairs while married, and may be indiscriminate in selecting partners (heterosexual and homosexual relationships) and even maintain several relationships at the same time. There is often a history of attempting to coerce many people into sexual relationships and they may take great pride in discussing their sexual conquests.
12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS – there is often a history of antisocial behavior before age 13, including lying, stealing, cheating, vandalism, bullying, truancy, sexual activity, fire-setting, substance abuse, and running away from home. Cruelty to animals or siblings is particularly ominous.
13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS – while they talk about big plans, they show an inability or persistent failure to execute long-term goals; then may drift from one place to another lacking any real direction in life.
14. IMPULSIVITY – many of their behaviors are not premeditated and seem to be unplanned. They seem unable to resist temptation and urges or to delay gratification. They may not consider the consequences and so they appear reckless, foolhardy and unpredictable.
15. IRRESPONSIBILITY – they will repeatedly fail to honor commitments or obligations, in school, work, family or social situations. The fail to turn up, don’t pay bills, fail to honor contracts etc.
16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS – it seems like it’s never their fault or their responsibility. They have little or no sense of duty or conscientiousness and often deny their responsibility. And in denying, they will even try and manipulate others!
17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS – inability to maintain a long-term relationship because they are inconsistent and unreliable.
18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY – behavioral difficulties between the ages of 13-18. Typically behaviors that are crimes or are clearly manipulative, aggressive and callous.
19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE – they may have had their probation revoked for technical reasons such as failing to appear, carelessness and so on.
20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY – unlike other criminals who may specialize in one area they are often involved in diverse activities, taking great pride at getting away with crimes.
On the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised subjects score between 0 and 40, zero being no psychopathy symptoms and 40 being a full-blown psychopath.
Normal individuals typically score less than five and many non-psychopathic criminals (who do actually have symptoms of antisocial personality disorder) may score 20 to 22.
A score over 30 on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised is used to diagnose the presence of psychopathy.
Read more about the characteristics of a psychopath and how they use mind control to manipulate
-
We contacted the above gentleman and here was his response:
THIS, however, is the very best weapon I’ve seen to fight them in the
entire 20 plus years I’ve been involved..http://www.allaboutkaratbars.com
http://www.learnaboutkaratbars.comThe #1 net anti fraud/scam guy, in over 6200 magazine articles worldwide including Forbes OVER 100 times is actually now WORKING the deal…
http://fraudandscam.com/?s=karatbars&x=7&y=5
http://fraudandscam.com/investor-alerts/karatbars-overcomes-speculation/
Couple of vids:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqRrfNDIM0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl4_A4Wak9U#t=24
Karatbars is the single finest opportunity that has ever crossed my path. IMPORTANT. It is also the most honest, moral, ethical, on top of being top flight professional and downright ‘classy’, that I’ve also ever been associated with..
-
Excellent. However, he doesn’t understand the full picture. The confusion is not over “citizen of the United States” and “non-citizen national”, but over the three “United States”. Fourteenth Amendment is NOT the problem, and he is wrong about this. See:
Why the Fourteenth Amendment is Not a Treat to Your Freedom
http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/FourteenthAmendNotProb.pdfWe also disagree that state citizens are “U.S. nationals”, but rather non-resident non persons and “nationals of the United States OF AMERICA” and NEITHER a STATUTORY “citizen of the United States**” or “Non-citizen national of the United States**”
Here is his website:
http://auspassport4ed.com/