fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
CNN just came out with a report on extremism:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/19/politics/terror-threat-homeland-security/
__________________
DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat
By Evan Perez and Wes Bruer, CNN
Washington (CNN)—They’re carrying out sporadic terror attacks on police, have threatened attacks on government buildings and reject government authority.
A new intelligence assessment, circulated by the Department of Homeland Security this month and reviewed by CNN, focuses on the domestic terror threat from right-wing sovereign citizen extremists and comes as the Obama administration holds a White House conference to focus efforts to fight violent extremism.
DHS Secretary: ISIS reaching into U.S. to recruit
Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to — and in some cases greater than — the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention.
The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010.
ISIS burned up to 40 people alive in Iraq, official says
The government says these are extremists who believe that they can ignore laws and that their individual rights are under attack in routine daily instances such as a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order.
They’ve lashed out against authority in incidents such as one in 2012, in which a father and son were accused of engaging in a shootout with police in Louisiana, in a confrontation that began with an officer pulling them over for a traffic violation. Two officers were killed and several others wounded in the confrontation. The men were sovereign citizen extremists who claimed police had no authority over them.
Among the findings from the Homeland Security intelligence assessment: “(Sovereign citizen) violence during 2015 will occur most frequently during routine law enforcement encounters at a suspect’s home, during enforcement stops and at government offices.”
DHS has documented examples of violence by sovereign citizen extremists since 2010. They range from incidents that occurred in the home and at traffic stops to attacks on government buildings.
The report adds that “law enforcement officers will remain the primary target of (sovereign citizen) violence over the next year due to their role in physically enforcing laws and regulations.”
The White House has fended off criticism in recent days for its reluctance to say the words “Islamist extremism,” even as the conference this week almost entirely focused on helping imams and community groups to counteract the lure of groups like ISIS.
Absent from the White House conference is any focus on the domestic terror threat posed by sovereign citizens, militias and other anti-government terrorists that have carried out multiple attacks in recent years.
An administration official says the White House is focused on the threat from all terrorists, including from sovereign citizen and other domestic groups.
“I don’t think it’s fair to say the (White House) conference didn’t address this at all,” the official said, adding that President Barack Obama addressed the need to combat “violent ideologies” of all types.
An official at the Justice Department, which is leading the administration’s counter-radicalization effort, says many of the tactics aimed at thwarting radical Islamic recruitment of young people can also be used to fight anti-government extremist groups.
While groups like ISIS and al Qaeda garner the most attention, for many local cops, the danger is closer to home.
A survey last year of state and local law enforcement officers listed sovereign citizen terrorists, ahead of foreign Islamists, and domestic militia groups as the top domestic terror threat.
The survey was part of a study produced by the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.
In 2013, a man who held anti-government views carried out a shooting attack on three Transportation Security Administration employees at Los Angeles International Airport, killing one TSA officer. Last year, a couple killed two police officers and a bystander at a Las Vegas Walmart store.
Mark Potok, senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said that by some estimates, there are as many as 300,000 people involved in some way with sovereign citizen extremism. Perhaps 100,000 people form a core of the movement, he said.
The federal government’s focus on the domestic groups waxes and wanes, Potok said, in part because the threat from foreign groups like al Qaeda and its affiliates.
Potok says sovereign citizen groups have attracted support because of poor economic conditions. Some groups travel the country pitching their ideology as a way to help homeowners escape foreclosure or get out of debt, by simply ignoring the courts and bankruptcy law.
The Homeland Security report’s focus on right-wing terrorists is a subject that garnered political controversy for the Obama administration in the past. In 2009, a Homeland Security report on possible recruitment of military veterans by right-wing militia groups prompted an outcry from veterans groups.
The report was produced by staff members during the Bush administration but wasn’t published until then Homeland Security Janet Napolitano had taken office. Napolitano criticized her own agency for the report.
See also:
SIM Card Maker Gemalto Bewildered Following Encryption Code Theft By US And British Spy AgenciesThanks.
🙂
Thanks,
Please provide evidence to back this up. No propaganda is permitted in these forums. The evidence must be at least a press article, court filing, etc.
Concerns Emerge About Samsung Smart TVs ‘Bugging’ Owners
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Concerns-Emerge-About-Samsung-Smart-TVs-Bugging-Owners-81691.html
Bing,
Thanks. You misspelled “thimerosal” so I fixed it. For the benefit of our readers, here is an article describing what it is:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228
The above passage has been added to :
Disclaimer, Section 10
http://famguardian.org/disclaimer.htmWe now use this passage as a justification to document that the foundation of our faith is fighting compelled commerce with governments.
Here are links to the above people:
1. Privatis.me Youtube-Peter Eugene
https://www.youtube.com/user/privatis/featured
2. Privatis.me website-Peter Eugene
3. Jonah Bey
These people use a lot of the same language found on this site, but they are redemptionists who seek debt cancellation.
Interview with Steele in prison before he died. He admits he was railroaded in court and framed by the government. He says his lawyer sold him down the river and that he should have represented himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9lGcn66Sds
Steele was FRAMED:
oneofthepeople
Thanks for the errata. You are correct on all accounts. The document has been revised and reposted.The “United States**” described in the book is defined in:
1. Great IRS Hoax, Section 4.5.1
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm2. Citizenship Status v. Tax Status, Form #10.011, Section 1
http://sedm.org/Forms/10-Emancipation/CitizenshipStatusVTaxStatus/CitizenshipVTaxStatus.htm3. Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options, Form #10.003
http://sedm.org/Forms/10-Emancipation/CitDomTaxStatusOptions.pdfAs far as pasting from word into the forums, you can turn off formatting during the paste by clicking on the upper left square symbol in the forum editor toolbar to put the editor in character only mode. That will help the paste by dropping formatting.
Please keep your constructive feedback coming. It is very helpful to a LOT of people and adds to the credibility and authority of the work.
Please provide your detailed list or errata, but do so no more often than after you have read an entire chapter. We don’t want to have to make a bunch of individual changes and republications for only one or two errors at a time. You are correct about your errata.
The citation there is of our own making. We are the source. It says above that above the paragraph.
ANSWERS:
1. It deports people with the constitutional civil status of “alien”, meaning foreign national. These people are CONSTITUTIONAL “persons” but not necessarily statutory “persons”. The power to do so was granted by the CONSTITUTION itself and it needs no statutory origin.
2. No. Separation of powers is a constitutional issue, not a statutory issue. Statutes cannot and do not deal with states of the Union or PRIVATE humans. He litigated his case as a CONSTITUTIONAL “person” rather than a STATUTORY “person”. Do not confuse contexts. There are TWO main contexts for every word: CONSTITUTIONAL and STATUTORY. CONSTITUTIONAL deals with states of the union and their relation to each other and the national government. STATUTORY deals INTERNALLY within federal territory. One can be a CONSTITUTIONAL “person” WITHOUT being a “STATUTORY” person. We cover this in:
Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory “Citizen”, Sections 3 through 5
http://famguardian.org/Publications/WhyANational/WhyANational.pdf3. They didn’t depart. They dealt exclusively with the CONSTITUTIONAL context to base the standing of the Plaintiff. That’s why they kept mentioning Article III of the Constitution in the context of the Plaintiff’s standing.
4. Because they are dealing with the CONSTITUTIONAL context. You are erroneously PRESUMING that the CONSTITUTIONAL and STATUTORY contexts are the same. They are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, in fact. The “citizen of the United States” they are referring to is a CONSTITUTIONAL citizen.
5. All criminal statutes deal with human beings and NOT artificial entities. Artificial entities cannot commit crimes. Only human beings who exercise their powers individually can do so. See the following:
“Under our own systems of polity, the term ‘citizen’, implying the same or similar relations to the government and to society which appertain to the term, ‘subject’ in England, is familiar to all. Under either system, the term used is designed to apply to man in his individual character and to his natural capacities — to a being or agent [PUBLIC OFFICER!] possessing social and political rights and sustaining social, political, and moral obligations. It is in this acceptation only, therefore, that the term ‘citizen’, in the article of the Constitution, can be received and understood. When distributing the judicial power, that article extends it to controversies between ‘citizens’ of different states. This must mean the natural physical beings composing those separate communities, and can by no violence of interpretation be made to signify artificial, incorporeal, theoretical, and invisible creations. A corporation, therefore, being not a natural person, but a mere creature of the mind, invisible and intangible, cannot be a citizen of a state, or of the United States, and cannot fall within the terms or the power of the above mentioned article, and can therefore neither plead nor be impleaded in the courts of the United States.”
“Sir Edward Coke has declared, that a corporation cannot commit treason, felony, or other crime; neither is it capable of suffering a traitor’s or felon’s punishment, for it is not liable to corporeal penalties — that it can perform no personal duties, for it cannot take an oath for the due execution of an office; neither can it be arrested or committed to prison, for its existence being ideal, no man can arrest it; neither can it be excommunicated, for it has no soul. But these doctrines of Lord Coke were founded upon an apprehension of the law now treated as antiquated and obsolete. His lordship did not anticipate an improvement by which a corporation could be transformed into a citizen, and by that transformation be given a physical existence, and endowed with soul and body too. The incongruities here attempted to be shown as necessarily deducible from the decisions of the cases of Bank of the United States v. Deveaux and of Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad Company v. Letson afford some illustration of the effects which must ever follow a departure from the settled principles of the law. These principles are always traceable to a wise and deeply founded experience; they are therefore ever consentaneous and in harmony with themselves and with reason, and whenever abandoned as guides to the judicial course, the aberration must lead to bewildering uncertainty and confusion. Conducted by these principles, consecrated both by time and the obedience of sages, I am brought to the following conclusions:
1st. That by no sound or reasonable interpretation, can a corporation — a mere faculty in law, be transformed into a citizen or treated as a [CONSTITUTIONAL] citizen.
2d. That the second section of the Third Article of the Constitution, investing the courts of the United States with jurisdiction in controversies between citizens of different states, cannot be made to embrace controversies to which corporations and not citizens are parties, and that the assumption by those courts of jurisdiction in such cases must involve a palpable infraction of the article and section just referred to.
3d. That in the cause before us, the party defendant in the circuit court having been a corporation aggregate created by the State of New Jersey, the circuit court could not properly take cognizance thereof, and therefore this cause should be remanded to the circuit court with directions that it be dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.”
[Rundle v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Company 55 U.S. 80, 99 (1852) from dissenting opinion by Justice Daniel]You will note that in the case provided by Bing, the court essentially recognized that the Plaintiff was a CONSTITUTIONAL “person” but not a STATUTORY “person” under the criminal code, Title 18. They were a constitutional “person” because their CONSTITUTIONAL rights were protected by the Ninth and Tenth Amendment, but they were NOT subject to Title 18 and therefore NOT a STATUTORY “person”. As we said, CONSTITUTIONAL “persons” and STATUTORY “persons” are mutually exclusive. You can’t be both at the same time. Those who are subject to Title 18 must commit their crimes on federal territory not within any state. The Plaintiff in that case didn’t do that and therefore wasn’t subject to Title 18. That is why the court ruled the way they did.
Please read the “Why You are a ‘national'” pamphlet completely before you again address the issue of “person”, “citizen”, “individual”, etc. It will answer most of your questions and eliminate the commonplace confusion of context you are engaging in. That confusion is prevalent even among many judges. That confusion is also the source of most of the UNJUST power unlawfully exercised by your government persecutors. That confusion of contexts is also thoroughly documented in:
Foundations of Freedom, Video 4: Willful Government Deception and Propaganda, Form #12.021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvnTL_Z5asc
Please also ensure that you follow the Path to Freedom curricula, because it will prevent the kind of questions you are having and give you a structured approach to study and progress without too much involvement by us or other members of these forums.
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
http://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
It is obvious that you are just getting started. The above should help you greatly. We don’t want to have to rewrite that curricula here in these forums. If you can’t or won’t read or follow it, please spare us your questions and having to rewrite it here. If we had to keep rewriting it here for every newbie that came along, we would be miserable and would have no life.
Please be patient with yourself and determined and disciplined in your study. You can’t overcome 12 years of government fool academy training and propaganda with only a few months of study of this site, and that study must include the Path to Freedom curricula. If you really value your freedom, you will have to earn it by disciplined study NOT of what we say, but of what the LAW says.
“One who turns his ear from hearing the law [God’s law or man’s law], even his prayer is an abomination.”
[Prov. 28:9, Bible, NKJV]”This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate in it day and night, that you may observe to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success. Have I not commanded you? Be strong and of good courage; do not be afraid, nor be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.”
[Joshua 1:8-9, Bible, NKJV,
IMPLICATION: If you aren’t reading and trying to obey God’s law daily, then you’re not doing God’s will and you will not prosper]“But this crowd that does not know [and quote and follow and use] the law is accursed.”
[John 7:49, Bible, NKJV]“Salvation is far from the wicked, For they do not seek Your [God’s] statutes.”
[Psalm 119:155, Bible, NKJV]“Every man is supposed to know the law. A party who makes a contract [or enters into a franchise, which is also a contract] with an officer [of the government] without having it reduced to writing is knowingly accessory to a violation of duty on his part. Such a party aids in the violation of the law.”
[Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 (1877)]See:
Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online, Form #10.004, Cites by Topic
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/FormsInstr-Cites.htm
Please watch the Website Video Orientation on SEDM and you will be able to discover all the resources to locate authorities on any subject and to research any topic using the vast resources on both sites. Its on the opening page of SEDM.ORG
The direct link is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qs7_oq9I2w&list=PLin1scINPTOuZBr68zet-80YknxG1CNou&index=1
