fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
ixyx,
The Applying for a Passport article has been expanded to address your situation and an additional form is available for dealing with it. A link to the modified article is below:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Citi…orAPassport.htm
SEDM also introduced a new form that allows you to use the standard DS-11 form, but to include as a short attachment a new form that defines all the terms on the DS-11 form that are defined in neither the form or the law so as to preserve your sovereign status. This prevents them from rejecting the form, which will then be THEIR form, but also ensures that no false presumptions are made about the meaning of terms on the form. You can find the new attachment below:
USA Passport Application Attachment, Form #06.006:
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
By rejecting your application, they are attempting to induce “privilege induced slavery” so as to compel you to surrender your sovereignty to procure government privileges. This constitutes a violation of your rights that gives you standing to sue them if they won't accept this new approach.
Please let us know how this turns out.
-
Layed,
Fixed. Thanks.
-
Submit these via private message to Author #5.
-
Ed,
I LOVE THE WHAT YOU JUST SAID!!! Couldn't have said it better myself. FANTASTIC!
Amen…Amen….Amen….Halelujah!!!
ONLY to the Lord be all praise, glory, worship, and obedience.
-
Dear friends,
AndyK's forum account has been suspended unless and until he honors his promise to answer the Trade or Business Questions. He has been informed of this via private message. We don't allow liars into this forum who refuse to honor their promises.
All future posts will be deleted until he submits answers to the questions.
-
msd63109
What she is saying is to quote 26 USC 1441, 1442, and 1443, which describes who are “withholding agents”. This is also described in the Federal and State Withholding Options for Private Employers book, Section 3 at:
http://famguardian.org/Publications/FedSta…teWHOptions.pdf
She is saying that you can't be a withholding agent unless you fit one of these three categories, and most PRIVATE employers don't. Therefore, they can't legitimately be called “employers”. The tax is on a “public office” and all “public offices” must be exercised ONLY in the District of Columbia, pursuant to 4 U.S.C. 72. In the I.R.C., a “public office” is defined as a “trade or business”. See:
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/TradeOrBusScam.pdf
A person who is a nonresident alien not engaged in a “trade or business” as defined in 26 CFR 1.871-1( 😎 (i) cannot truthfully be called an “employee” pursuant to the I.R.C. The only way they become an “employee” under the I.R.C. is to voluntarily sign a W-4 withholding agreement pursuant to 26 USC 3402(p) and 26 CFR 31.3401(a)-3(a). Otherwise, you are just a “worker” and not an “employee” and the person you work for is not an “employer” in relation to you.
These are religious and political opinions, and not facts.
-
Author #2,
I second that motion. It is an AWESOME book and it explains so much about the corruption we see in both the DOJ and the Courts. The description page also has an audio testimonial from a CPA with 40 years in the business. Check it out:
http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Ebooks/WhatHappJu…HappJustice.htm
-
Rattler,
The tax freedom solutions manual doesn't exist anymore. I don't control where the old manual links to or the destination link. The ONLINE version of that section has been fixed though, and it it as:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Instruct…tateDrivLic.htm
Admin
-
Check the step again. It has been updated. See also:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Evidence…BakerLetter.pdf
-
fisherman,
That was a typo. It's fixed now. Thanks for the feedback.
-
Because I have not been able to find any basis in law that authorizes either. We don't recommend doing anything that can't be defended successfully with evidence and law to a jury. This site does not entertain patriot mythology, nor concern itself with strictly commercial matters. The purpose is salvation and disconnecting from the matrix, not making money and especially not securities fraud. For the reasons why it is a BAD approach for the most part and why you cannot “use” our materials if you are participating in Redemption generally, see:
Policy Document: UCC Redemption, Form #08.002 (OFFSITE LINKS)
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/UCC.pdf
-
BOBT12,
Thanks for that clarification. As you can now see, Family Guardian has updated the page in the Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online in order to expand the points you made and thereby avoid false presumption for those who use that area.
-
Concerned Christian,
Thanks. Here is the link to the article to which you refer: