fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Poppy,
The techniques for modifying PDF files are described in section 1 of the following link:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Forms/IRS/IRSFormsPubs.htm
In particular, you will need a PDF editor. Several options are listed there. The best is Nitro PDF, which we use. Could you please indicate why the modified forms are inadequate for your needs and what specifically needs to be fixed? Perhaps it is a change that might benefit everyone.
-
Bing,
Fixed. Thanks.
-
All the states work the same. It doesn't matter what state you put in there. See:
State Income Taxes, Form #05.031
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The tax codes (e.g. private law and franchise agreement) for each state is different, but all state income taxes require federal liability first, which presumes a domicile or residence on federal territory within the exterior limits of the state.
More details on this is contained in the Tax Fraud Prevention Manual, which analyzes the specifics of each state:
http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Ebooks/TaxFraudPr…raudPrevMan.htm
-
Here's a website that tracked the Snipes Trial:
-
Resource.
We DO NOT respond to comments about materials on SEDM. Please post your errata to their forums. They are a separate ministry from us.
-
Akseeker,
Thanks. These problems have been fixed and the document has been reposted.
As far as the lack of latin or source on p. 20, the original Bouvier's doesn't have it either. We noticed that too.
Keep the great feedback coming.
-
More cites:
_________________
?In 1943, an analysis of the federal income tax was published in the Congressional Record. This compilation of information was written by a former legislative draftsman in the Treasury Department (IRS) and entitled-?The Income Tax is an Excise Tax, and Income is Merely the Basis for Determining its Amount.? This commentary stated, in part:
?The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by the income they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of the tax.?
In 1989 the Congressional Research Service prepared a report for Congress on the nature of the Federal Income Tax. This report addressed the nature of an excise tax:
?WHAT DOES THE (SUPREME)COURT MEAN WHEN IT STATES THAT THE INCOME TAX IS IN THE NATURE OF AN EXCISE TAX?
An excise tax is a tax levied on the manufacture, sale, or consumption of a commodity or any various taxes on privileges often assessed in the form of a license or fee. In other words, it is a tax on doing something to property or on the privilege of holding some property or doing some act, not a tax on the property itself. The tax is not on the property directly, but rather it is a tax on the transaction.
When a court refers to an income tax as being in the nature of an excise, it is merely stating that the tax is not on the property itself.?
According to the Congressional Research Service and the 1943 Report, the federal income tax is not a tax on income. It is a privilege tax that is measured by the income the privilege produces. Income is not the subject of the tax; it is the basis for determining the amount of the tax. In other words, according to these Reports, Congress is taxing a privilege and income is merely the measuring stick to determine the value of the privilege.
So the $64,000 questions are ?What is the privilege and where is the Internal Revenue Code section that makes the American people liable for this privilege tax??
-
-
Wesley snipes Tax Statement posted on NY Times Website!
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/3…t-paying-taxes/
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/News…axManifesto.pdf
It uses stuff from Family Guardian and SEDM!
Yeah!!
-
Excellent!
-
The above post is accurate. A Response based on it in an actual failure to file case can be found below. This file is LARGE (43 Mbytes):
http://famguardian.org/Disks/TaxDVD/Litiga…le-20080121.pdf
-
ldissinf
Please DO NOT post errata for forms contained on the SEDM website. That is a separate ministry and we are NOT responsible for their offerings. Please use their forums for that purpose. Their forums are at:
The author of the document appears in the lower left corner of each page of most of the materials posted on this website
-
resource,
The problem has been fixed. Look at the page again. Now it says:
If you want to know how to get a copy of your Individual Master File (IMF) to see if the IRS has instigated this kind of fraud on you, we refer you to:
1. Section 2.4.8 of our Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Manual.
http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Ebooks/SovFormsIn…vFormsInstr.htm
2. The Master File Decoder.
http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Programs/MFDecoder/MFDecoder.htm
3. Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online, Instructions, Step 0.8
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/FormsInstr.htm
Thanks.
-
From: Sherry Jackson [mailto:spjcpa@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:16 AM
To: Sherry Peel Jackson
Subject: Collateral Attack
Importance: High
Yesterday in federal district court I filed a 90 paged Collateral Attack by Commercial Affidavit against the judgment set against me.
I can't go into a lot of detail but:
1. I fired all the lawyers December 28, 2007. They had no part in this filing. I obtained Godly Counsel.
2. The filing went to 15 different people including the president, secretary of state, attorney general, treasury secretary, appellate court and more.
3. Prior to the filing I filed in the local county courthouse my Nunc Pro Tunc, severing all adhesion contracts with government and waiving all their benefits.
4. They do not have subject matter jurisdiction nor in personam jurisdiction and I will no longer step foot on federal property/federally controlled property.
5. I will not be attending any sentencing.
18 USCS 4100 ? “an offender shall not be transferred to or from
the United States if a proceeding by way of appeal or collateral attack upon the conviction or sentence be pending.”
This is a BOLD move. I was lied on; I was mislead; I was not represented but was re-presented to a court that is no longer under the Constitution of our United States. Please pray for me and my family.
I CAN UNDERSTAND IF YOU DISAGREE WITH WHAT WAS DONE BUT PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR NEGATIVE COMMENTS. THANKS. SPJ
-
A description of the method and the legal authority for doing it in each state is included in the following pamphlet. You don't need a notary who knows the process. Just show them the statutes from their state REQUIRING them to do it documented in the pamphlet. Demand that they follow the law. Cracking the Code is not available so the pamphlet will have to suffice.
Notary Certificate of Dishonor Process, Form #09.014
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
See section 1.9 of the above. The page to which you refer was just updated to add the above link and others. You may wish to check it out again.
See also:
http://commonlawvenue.com/NotaryProtest/00…taryProtest.htm
The Cracking the Code book by Vic Varjabedian has not been available commercially for over three years. He doesn't offer it anymore and BBCOA, which was his main outlet, was shut down by the FTC for offering “fake id's”. The Cracking the Code book doesn't describe how to do notarial protests. It only describes how to do a commercial lien on the “public officer”/”trade or busienss” strawman fiction. An equivalent free document is available on the SEDM website that does the same thing without all the hype. Don't ask me how to use that form either because I won't and can't help you:
UCC Security Agreement, Form #14.002
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Beyond that, I don't have any further answers and you are on your own.