fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Neo,
1. I hope that you and the friends you are interacting with are all reading these posts. You are more likely to reach a consensus if you do.
2. As far as the military retiree, show the payor the following:
2.1 Why It is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a TIN, Form #04.205
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/WhyTINIllegal.pdf
2.2 Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Affidavits/AffCitDomTax.pdf
2.3 SSA Form 521 with the number removed and the Proof of service showing that any numbers they have in their system are invalid.
They then cannot require a number, withhold, or report and have to pay the full amount. If they disagree, simply demand that they rebut the evidence that you are not eligible for the number in 2.1 above and/or meet with their corporate counsel. If that doesn't work, take them to court.
As far as your earlier request to clarify the distinctions between the “public office” and the “public officer”, we are informed that a new section has been added to the following as follows which clarifies these distinctions. That new section is a direct result of the confusion you expressed after reading some of the materials available through this website. Thanks for the feedback:
Proof That There is a “Straw Man”, Form #05.042, Section 7 entitled: “Public Office” v. “Public Officer”
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/StrawMan.pdf
-
Neo,
You keep missing the point, perhaps because you aren't being patient enough to do all your home work before you come back and ask more questions. The issue is the coincidence of two franchises: domicile (a protection franchise) and the “trade or business” (public office) franchise. The public office franchise requires a domicile FIRST before it can be enforced. These are the dependencies. When one has a domicile in the “United States” (district of Columbia) AND when one lawfully serves in a public office there and derives “income” from the office there, then and only then can a tax be owing. Being active military or reservist isn't what makes one a “public officer”. Only commissioned officers are public officers. Enlisteds aren't, as we said before. Once again, look at 5 USC 2105 for the definition of “employee”. All “employees” are public officers but only commissioned officers and NOT enlisteds satisfy the requirement for being statutory “employees” as indicated in 5 U.S.C. 2105. If the government files an information return against an enlisted, that information return will be FRAUDULENT and the submitter should be criminally prosecuted for filing fraudulent information returns pursuant to 26 USC 7206, 7207 and impersonating a public officer in violation of 18 USC 912.
Even a military officer who is otherwise a public officer can't be an “individual” unless they are an alien. One of the prerequuisites for being a commissioned officer in the U.S. military is that you must be a “U.S. citizen” and not an alien. 5 U.S.C. 2104. Therefore, they aren't aliens unless they are abroad and come under a tax treaty with a foreign country pursuant to 26 USC 911, just as we said. In that capacity, they are aliens in relation to the foreign country and therefore “individauls” within the meaning of the tax treaty. Did you read our previous posts? Please pay attention.
As we said before, please review ALL the criteria for a “public office” found in the following articles and you will see that only commissioned officers and public officials satisfy the criteria, not enlisteds. Active or reserve makes no difference:
1. The “Trade or Business” Scam, Section 11
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/TradeOrBusinessScam.htm
2. Proof That There Is a “Straw Man”, Form #05.042, Sections 7 and 8
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Please do your homework. We don't like repeating ourself. We have repeated ourself at least three times on most of these issues. We know it can be daunting to hold and consider all this information inside your finite head at one time, especially if you are new. Sometimes, our head feels like its going to explode with so many gigabytes of data crammed in there. Please therefore reserve your remaining duplicative questions about the same subjects over and over until you have done all the repetition (“programming your brain cells”) yourself so you don't force us to have to do it for you. Freedom is not a spectator sport and very few others, especially those in the legal profession and the government, are going to be as patient and sacrificial with you as we have. You must think and learn more independently than you have so far or you may eventually end up in trouble. “He just doesn't GET it!” is what your government opponent will say to the judge before you have the book thrown at you.
Doing independent research is how EVERYTHING on this website was created: From the ground up by reading only the law, thinking, and organizing. We didn't have anyone else to use as an example because no one we know of has looked as deep into the subject as we have as a ministry. If we needed someone to confirm or approve or rehash everything on this website before we would say it's true, it would take hundreds of years and thousands of people. The only thing you need is confidence in yourself, access to a law library, a logical mind, and a communication path direct to the Creator to know what the truth is. The law speaks for itself. It is only ERROR that needs confirmation, according to Thomas Jefferson. So quit seeking our approval and read the law for yourself and more importantly ACT on what you read. If you can't get to the point where you are willing to commit to act on the truths here, then you have wasted our time because that is the MAIN reason we do what we do: so that people will read and learn the law and then use it to restore their sovereignty and take back their country from thieving, conniving politicians who have entrapped them with “words of art” into eternal servitude and bondage to their own ignorance of the law. If the end product is not action, then go back to your cage on the government plantation with the rest of the lemmings. It's not a pleasant message, but it's the truth and you're here presumably because you want to hear the truth.
Thanks for the kudos. We work VERY hard to try to make sure that our materials are clear and concise as well as self-documenting. We assume people will want to verify everything so we provide links to accelerate the verification for yourself. We encourage everyone to be highly skeptical and research everything they hear from independent sources, including everything on this website. This has the effect of preventing argument and focusing people on independently verifiable truth, evidence, and the scientific method. That may be why there isn't more activity on these forums: It's hard to argue against something that has hyperlinks that prove absolutely everything in the article.
It is very helpful when people like you really do their homework and still have questions. That helps us find areas that need further clarification when we make the next revision of our research. I'm sure the questions under this topic are going to be a gold mine for those working on updating the research referenced in this interchange.
We're glad you found our research useful and helpful. If you find anything wrong with our analysis or the facts it is based upon, please ensure you bring them to our attention as soon as you find them. Keep up the great work.
Lastly:
1. This was a very labor intensive interchange. Other members should not expect this level of attention, and especially from more experienced members such as Admin. We only chimed in because this is an important issue to many people, a common point of confusion, and something that is not covered in any of our existing materials. Other members are reminded to do a much better job at studying our answers before they run off at the mouth and barrage us with more questions, because it was burdensome to keep needlessly repeating ourself. If this level of inattention to detail keeps up in asking questions, we may have to charge people for the “privilege” of an answer because it gets very burdensome and is unsustainable if everyone got that level of effort from us. Remember: This website gets over 300K+ visitors a month! See:
http://quantcast.net. Please be respectful of our time and very limited resources, folks. In the construction industry, the motto is: “Measure twice, cut once.” In these forums, the motto is: “Research the question yourself twice before asking once and don't ask questions that have already been answered.”
2. Everything we said throughout this interchange is non-factual, non-actionable beliefs and opinions that are not admissible as evidence pursuant to Fed.R. Evidence 610. You, the Member of this Fellowship, are bound by our Disclaimer, which says that you take complete, exclusive, and personal responsibiliy for all your decisions and choices and the accuracy of all the facts upon which they are based. You became a member when you joined these forums and agreed to abide by our Disclaimer. Sovereignty begins with personal responsibility and we dont consent to act as a liability insurance company that indemnifies anyone in any way from responsibility or blame for anything, and especially not their own choices or actions in either learning or attempting to act upon what they believe the law requires based on their own reading of the law.
-
Franklin,
Thanks for the feedback. Some additional thoughts along the same lines you established above:
1. These forums are intended to act as a “mock trial” facility for those who wish to develop their litigation skills in order to prepare them for battle with the largest law firm in the country, which is the U.S. Dept. of Justice, in defending not what one subjectively “believes”, but what the law actually says when interpreted in strict accordance with the rules of statutory construction. That law firm has over 3,000 lawyers and has been around for over 200 years.
2. This law firm has proven time and again that it loves YOUR money more than it loves freedom, truth, or justice. Consequently, there will be no end of skulduggery and treachery they will resort to in order to preserve a false belief in the minds of the public about what the law actually says. The goal of that false belief is to fool you into donating to their state sponsored church established in violation of the First Amendment. See:
Socialism: The New American Civil Religion, Form #05.016
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. The only way one will ever be free is to be well prepared to defend their beliefs using the law at any time. This means you had better:
3.1 Have evidence in your administrative record to back up your belief.
3.2 Have the communication skills to be able to explain your beliefs to a jury of your peers using the evidence.
3.3 Love to debate and not be afraid of it.
4. Freedom is not for the timid or those who need their hands held. As one court put it:
Quote:“The privilege against self-incrimination [Fifth Amendment] is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of their rights, nor to one who is indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is only valid when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person.”[U.S. v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (1947), Emphasis added]
5. We are hard on people here because we want to prepare them for the ultimate battle. It will be the ultimate battle because the love of money is the root of all evil and because they will be fighting that battle face to face with the biggest THIEF in the world protected by the largest single law firm in the world, which is the government. We didn't call them a thief, by the way, but the Bible itself does. The book of Revelations in the Bible describes this thief as “Babylon the Great Harlot”.
Quote:For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses.”
[1 Timothy 6:5-12, Bible, NKJV]
6. This thief they will be fighting is unlike any other thief, in that:
6.1 This thief writes the law that is supposed to be designed to prevent all forms of thievery, including its own.
6.2 This thief uses the law itself as propaganda to unlawfully steal, by imposing it upon those who are not subject and who are outside their jurisdiction. It does this thorugh “words of art” deceptive publications that are untrustworthy, and through propaganda that even its own so-called “courts” engage in.
6.3 This thief pretends that “private law” is public law that applies to everyone.
6.4 This thief is a highly educated and erudite thief. It hires people to defend it who have at least seven years of schooling before they can “practice” their craft of STEALING using “words of art”.
6.5 This thief abuses language not as a tool to empower or protect people, but as a way to deceive and enslave them.
6.6 This thief is not a protector, but a predator. Yet it lies to everyone about its goals by saying “I'm from the government, and I'm here to help and protect you.”
6.7 This thief entices you into its jurisdiction by offering “benefits” that they aren't required to provide, and yet pretends that it has an enforceable franchise contract without providing any legally enforceable consideration. Once you eat their forbidden “benefit” fruit, you have a new landlord and a new employer: Uncle Sam. You're hired and you got the job as their cheap whore. See:
Government “Benefits” Scam, Form #05.040
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
It is impossible to overestimate the magnitude of the evil this ministry was established to fight. We are therefore not hard on people because we are mean, but because we want them to have strong convictions and to be prepared to argue those convictions whenever the time arises. Of such people, the Bible says:
Quote:“Lord, who may abide in Your tabernacle? Who may dwell in Your holy hill?He who walks uprightly, and works righteousness, and speaks the truth in his heart;
He who does not backbite with his tongue, nor does evil to his neighbor, nor does he take up a reproach against his friend;
In whose eyes a vile person is despised, but he honors those who fear the Lord;
He who swears to his own hurt and does not change;
He who does not put out his money at usury, nor does he take a bribe against the innocent.
He who does these things shall never be moved.”
[Psalms 15:1-4, Bible, NKJV]
According to the Bible, flattering lips work ruin, but the wounds of a friend are faithful and we want to be your friend, not a flattering idiot who leads government lemmings (“citizens”, “residents”, and “inhabitants”) over the cliff:
Quote:“Open rebuke is betterThan love carefully concealed.
Faithful are the wounds of a [Christian] friend,
But the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.”
[Prov. 27:5-6, Bible, NKJV]
-
When you say “Ya'lls code is a pack of lies”, do you mean that our interpretation contradicts itself and is therefore incorrect, or that the code contradicts itself and therefore cannot be truthful or enforceable? We agree with you that the truth cannot contradict itself. You probably got that from the Nonresident Alien Position pamphlet, section 23, in fact:
Nonresident Alien Position, Form #05.020
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…ienPosition.pdf
However, there are lots of things the government does which are based on contradiction, which is why you shouldn't trust the government, and the I.R.C. and all the contradictions it contains is proof of that. Everything we have said, however, is completely consistent with what the code says and everything else we have said, so it has to be truth. Don't forget that it doesn't matter whether the code contradicts itself, because you can't be subject to it without your consent. It is a private law franchise agreement and anything consensual can't form the basis for injury.
QUOTE Volunti non fit injuria.
He who consents cannot receive an injury. 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 2279, 2327; 4 T. R. 657; Shelf. on mar. & Div. 449.
Consensus tollit errorem.
Consent removes or obviates a mistake. Co. Litt. 126.
Melius est omnia mala pati quam malo concentire.
It is better to suffer every wrong or ill, than to consent to it. 3 Co. Inst. 23.
Nemo videtur fraudare eos qui sciunt, et consentiunt.
One cannot complain of having been deceived when he knew the fact and gave his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 145.
[Bouvier's Maxims of Law, 1856;
SOURCE: http://famguardian.o…viersMaxims.htm]
If you think what we say can't be truthful because it appears to contradict itself, then it ought to be easy to point to the definitions in the code to prove that our interpretation is incorrect. We invite you to contradict anything we have said using the code. We have been looking at this carefully for over 8 years and everything we have said is completely consistent with everything else we have read or heard right from the horse' mouth: the government.
Presidential tax returns are FRAUD. The Constitution says the President has to be a natural born citizen, meaning a person born within a state of the Union. As such he is an NRA because he is a non-citizen national. He can only file a 1040 if he is a statutory and not constitutional citizen (pursuant to 8 USC 1401 and NOT pursuant to the fourteenth amendment) temporarily abroad under 26 USC 911. He isn't if he is domiciled in a state of the union and therefore cannot truthfully or lawfully file the 1040. He only does that do get the sheep to follow suit because that is where his retirement check comes from.
You are confusing the office with the officER. They are two different things and separate legal persons. When they BOTH have a domicile in D.C., then a tax is owing. Income from “sources within the United States” under 871 is the only subject of the tax. Earnings from the office can only originate in the “United States” if the office is physically located in the District of Columbia and the officer goes to work there. If the office and the officer don't coincide in the same place in the District of Columbia, then:
1. The earnings do not originate from within the “United States”.
2. The public office isn't lawfully occupied, and therefore no “trade or business” is actually executed, because not executed where required by 4 U.S.C. 72, IRC 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), IRC 7408(d), and IRC 7701(a)(39). FRCP 17(b) dont' change that situation, but only affect the choice of law.
No, even if Uncle was honest, they would not honor a dual status filing you describe because the domicile or residence referred to on IRS forms is the OFFICER, not the OFFICE. You are confusing these two. The officer can be a “nonresident alien” nontaxpayer but still receive “gross income” that is taxable. The “taxpayer” in that case would be the withholding agent and NOT the recipient. That is why 26 USC 1461 makes the withholding agent liable to the tax: Because they can't reach the recipient legally after they have paid it out! An example would be Social Security benefits under 26 U.S.C. 861(a)(8) which, if received by a nonresident alien who is not an “alien” or an “individual”, would be taxable but the recipient would not be a “taxpayer” because they would not be a a “person” or “individual” referred to in the code.
Please don't waste your time on trivia. My words and my logic are simple, and the only thing consistent with the definitions in the code. The ONLY way you will ever win in court is if you keep it simple and stick to what the code actually says. If you make it complicated, the jury is going to go glassy eyed and throw the book at you:
1. Only “individuals” have a duty to file 1040 and 1040NR. It says that right in the upper left corner of the 1040: “U.S. individual income tax return”. The duty to file returns is established at 26 CFR 1.6012-1, and the only entity listed there who is specifically identified as an “individual” is a “nonresident alien individual”.
2. All “individuals” are aliens within the Internal Revenue Code. Click here for details. “individuals” includes citizens in other titles of the U.S. Code, but in Title 26, they are limited to ONLY aliens. If you disagree, produce a definition that includes “citizens” within 26 U.S.C. Even the “citizen” mentioned in 26 USC 911 is really just an alien in relation to the foreign country he is temporarily in and he interfaces through a tax treaty with the foreign country as an “alien” under the I.R.C. The reason citizens and residents (aliens) are grouped together is because they share the same characteristic when in a foreign country, which is that they are aliens in relation to the foreign country. In law, all things that share similar characteristics are grouped together. Ejustem generis.
Why are all taxpayers aliens? Because these are the only legal persons that the feds have statutory jurisdiction over within the exclusive jurisdiction of a state, so these are the people they had to levy the tax upon. These people are privileged, unlike the rest of us:
QUOTE In accord with ancient principles of the international law of nation-states, the Court in The Chinese Exclusion Case, 130 U.S. 581, 609 (1889), and in Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893), held broadly, as the Government describes it, Brief for Appellants 20, that the power to exclude aliens is “inherent in sovereignty, necessary for maintaining normal international relations and defending the country against foreign encroachments and dangers – a power to be exercised exclusively by the political branches of government . . . .” Since that time, the Court's general reaffirmations of this principle have [408 U.S. 753, 766] been legion. 6736 The Court without exception has sustained Congress' “plenary power to make rules for the admission of aliens and to exclude those who possess those characteristics which Congress has forbidden.” Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 387 U.S. 118, 123 (1967). “[O]ver no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress more complete than it is over” the admission of aliens. Oceanic Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214 U.S. 320, 339 (1909).
________________________________________________________________________________
___
While under our constitution and form of government the great mass of local matters is controlled by local authorities, the United States, in their relation to foreign countries and their subjects or citizens, are one nation, invested with powers which belong to independent nations, the exercise of which can be invoked for the maintenance of its absolute independence and security throughout its entire territory. The powers to declare war, make treaties, suppress insurrection, repel invasion, regulate foreign commerce, secure republican governments to the states, and admit subjects of other nations to citizenship, are all sovereign powers, restricted in their exercise only by the constitution itself and considerations of public policy and justice which control, more or less, the conduct of all civilized nations. As said by this court in the case of Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 413, speaking by the same great chief justice: 'That the United States form, for many, and for most important purposes, a single nation, has not yet been denied. In war, we are one people. In making peace, we are one people. In all commercial regulations, we are one and the same people. In many other respects, the American people are one; and the government which is alone capable of controlling and managing their interests in all these respects is the government of the Union. It is their government, and in that character they have no other. America has chosen to [130 U.S. 581, 605] be in many respects, and to many purposes, a nation; and for all these purposes her government is complete; to all these objects, it is competent. The people have declared that in the exercise of all powers given for these objects it is supreme. It can, then, in effecting these objects, legitimately control all individuals or governments within the American territory.”
[. . .]
“The power of exclusion of foreigners being an incident of sovereignty belonging to the government of the United States as a part of those sovereign powers delegated by the constitution, the right to its exercise at any time when, in the judgment of the government, the interests of the country require it, cannot be granted away or restrained on behalf of any one. The powers of government are delegated in trust to the United States, and are incapable of transfer to any other parties. They cannot be abandoned or surrendered. Nor can their exercise be hampered, when needed for the public good, by any considerations of private interest. The exercise of these public trusts is not the subject of barter or contract.“
3. All “taxpayers” are public officers and “individuals”. See:
Why Your Government is Either a Thief or You Are a Public Officer, Form #05.008
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…rPubOfficer.pdf
4. You can't be an alien and a public officer at the same time. Therefore, it is legally impossible to be a “taxpayer”. Those who file ANY “taxpayer” form are therefore committing perjury under penalty of perjury because they are contradicting the law and themself and impersonating a public officer in criminal violation of 18 USC 912.
QUOTE 4. Lack of Citizenship§74. Aliens can not hold Office. – – It is a general principle that an alien can not hold a public office. In all independent popular governments, as is said by Chief Justice Dixon of Wisconsin, “it is an acknowledged principle, which lies at the very foundation, and the enforcement of which needs neither the aid of statutory nor constitutional enactments or restrictions, that the government is instituted by the citizens for their liberty and protection, and that it is to be administered, and its powers and functions exercised only by them and through their agency.”
In accordance with this principle it is held that an alien can not hold the office of sheriff.[2]
[A Treatise on the Law of Public Offices and Officers, Floyd Russell Mechem, 1890, p. 27, §74;
SOURCE: http://books.google.com/books?id=g-I9AAAAIAAJ&printsec=titlepage]
5. A human being born anywhere in America and domiciled in a state of the Union is NOT an “individual”, “alien individual”, or “nonresident alien individual”, but is a “nonresident alien”. Therefore, he or she cannot have a tax liability because the only section that describes “gross income” of NRAs is I.R.C. 871, and it refers to “gross income” of “Nonresident alien individuals” but says nothing about “nonresident aliens” who are NOT “individuals”. Therefore, by the rules of statutory construction, it is impossible and illegal to have a tax liability as a non-citizen national domiciled in a state of the Union who is a “nonresident alien” but not an “individual”.
QUOTE “Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d 1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.”
[Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 581]
If you think that anything we have said is untrue, the place to start is to disprove any of the above statements. If you can't prove any of the above are wrong, then our overall argument is unassailable. If we don't hear a rebuttal to any of the above enumerated items, we will assume that you agree with the conclusions that naturally result from them. Your proof should come from the I.R.C. and the Treasury regulations, just like everything we do. We would love to be proven wrong, which is why our materials are posted on the web to begin with: To invite rebuttal. Eight years of waiting and no one so far has been able to disprove any of the above elements of our overall argument.
Please quit twisting my words and trying to make it more complicated than it is. It's simple if you read the statutory definitions FIRST and apply them consistently. The I.R.C. is a franchise agreement and a contract. Approach it like any other contract: Read the definitions first, which are usually at the beginning of the contract. The reason they are at the end of the I.R.C. private law contract is because they DON'T want you reading them! The reason is that no one would even bother to read or obey the rest of the contract after they looked at the definitions.
-
Neo,
Very interesting and challenging perspective, and very glad to see that you are doing your homework and reading everything that's relevant. It definitiely shows. My response:
1. Uncle doesn't want ANYONE to know that all “taxpayers” are public officers. See:
Why Your Government is Either a Thief or You Are a “Public Officer”, Form #05.008
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/WhyThiefOrPubOfficer.pdf
They don't want you to know ANYTHING about what it takes to lawfully become a “taxpayer”. The minute they define who the real “taxpayer” is then people will apply that criteria to disengage the system. That's why the definition in IRC 7701(a)(14) vaguely says “subject to” instead of defining HOW one becomes subject. Obviously, one must engage in the “trade or business” franchise and participate in publici juris and thereby abandon their private status and become a public officer to truthfully be called a “taxpayer”. Private conduct is otherwise protected by the Constitution and beyond the legislative reach of Congress. See:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/PublicVPrivateEmployment.htm[url url=”http://famguardian.o…eEmployment.htm”][/url]
2. You logic breaks down because the judge, the prosecutor, and the IRS have always tried to fool people into believing that the straw man doesn't exist and that YOU are the “taxpayer” so that they can procure your consent to act as a public officer invisibly. The straw man is definitely a virtual being and a public office. You are a physical being and a public officER temporarily occupying the office. YOU, as a physical being, are the only one who can select or change or declare the domicile or residence of the office and the officer. That is the essence of what it means to be a public officer: no supervisor to tell you what to do except the law itself! The straw man can't do anything without your consent and active participation. Why do they need a physical presence test in IRC 7701(b ) if the straw man never moves and is always in D.C. and is always a privileged “resident”? In fact, everything having to do with domicile, residence, and physical presence can ONLY refer to the human being or public officer and NOT the “public office” he fills. F.R.Civ.P. 17(b) only kicks in when you step into a court to litigate and only affects the choice of law rules the court applies to the controversy. Only when the physical domcile of the human being (public officer) AND that of the office coincide can a tax lawfully be levied. If the human being/officer has a domicile outside the district, he doesn't pass the presence test and therefore can't have a domicile or residence in D.C. and isn't therefore a “U.S. person” or a “taxpayer”. If you disagree, please explain why we even need a presence test to begin with? It doesn't make ANY sense without taking our position on the subject. The law must be entirely consistent with itself in every particular or you probably aren't construing it correctly.
QUOTE It is, of course, true that statutory construction [or interpretation] “is a holistic endeavor” and that the meaning of a provision is “clarified by the remainder of the statutory scheme … [when] only one of the permissible meanings produces a substantive effect that is compatible with the rest of the law.” United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 484 U.S. 365, 371, 108 S.Ct. 626, 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
[U.S. v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., 532 U.S. 200, 121 S.Ct. 1433 (2001)]
3. If you try to separate the straw man (the “public office”) and the human being (the “public officer” or “employee” filling said office voluntarily) and have them file separate returns, your government opponent is going to say the following:
3.1 You contradicted yourself, because you can't be a resident and an NRA at the same time!
3.2 There is no straw man and you are both the office and the officer.
3.3 Your arguments are frivolous because they contradict themselves, never mind the law!
3.4 You need to decide which one you are: resident or nonresident.
They will do the above because they are toast the minute they admit that you are acting in a representative capacity as the straw man because then they will have to explain to you how to unvolunteer to occupy the office and admit that the income tax is voluntary, which we know that it is.
4. You'll also be contradicting yourself and violating the law by filing a tax return form that is only for “individuals” because all “taxpayers” are aliens and “individuals” and as the following article points out, it is ILLEGAL for aliens to occupy a public office in the government and therefore be a “taxpayer”. See section 16:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/TradeOrBusinessScam.htm[url url=”http://famguardian.o…usinessScam.htm”][/url]
Does it therefore matter whether you file a 1040 or 1040NR as a non-citizen national? Either way, you're committing perjury by misrespesenting your status as an “individual” and an alien engaged in the “trade or business” outside of the only place it is authorized to PHYSICALLY be exercised, which is the District of Columbia. It's a crime pursuant o 18 USC 912 to exercise the physical office outside D.C. and you're not an alien so you can't have a liability under either I.R.C. Section 1 (for U.S. persons) or I.R.C. Section 871 (for “nonresident alien INDIVIDUALS” but not “nonresident aliens”).
The above contradictions are a product of the fact that the income tax is a public officer kickback program disguised to LOOK like a legitimate income tax, but the two systems are completely incompatible because they obviously contradict each other! Show me the statute that authorizes the PHYSICAL EXERCISE of the office in the place that you suggest, which is a state of the Union, consistent with 4 USC 72. There ain't none! And there ain't any internal revenue district within the bounds of ANY state of the Union. That physical office address MUST have a business address somewhere. If physical presence didn't matter, then why did the Treasury hide Treasury Order 150-02 by removing it from their website recently after we used it, even though it is still in force? Where is the office exercised? It ain't in D.C. (“United States”) if you are receiving mail for it cause YOU ain't in the District of Criminals. Now do you know why they call it the District of Criminals? The IRS can only enforce within internal revenue districts and the only remaining one is the District of Columbia pursuant to T.O. 150-02. For a laugh on the subject of D.C., see:
http://www.jibjab.co…ood_to_be_in_dc
So you better rethink your approach. Either everything is virtual and we don't need a physical presence test, or the officer and the officer are two separate people between which there is a partnership. Hence, the definition of “person” in 26 USC 6671(b) and 7343 including a partnership. The human being is a resident agent for the straw man, and it is HIS residence that determines the obligations of the straw man. To suggest otherwise is to defeat the idea of the straw man to begin with. A public office is a federal job. Every federal job has a “work place” where you must go to work. THAT is the business address and “situs” of the straw man, and when the office and the officer BOTH coincide in D.C. and the “United States”, then and only then can a tax be owing.
-
stija,
Why don't you disclose the evidence upon which you make that accusation for the enlightenment of all in these forums.
-
Franklin,
Thanks! Excellent song. Just reposted at:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/scams.htm
See the beginning of section 3.
-
Neo,
This sounds like a question about someone working in private industry who is going to receive military retirement pay starting at age 60 after serving 20 years in the military. Below is our understanding of what the code says about those who claim to be NRAs and who also will be eligible to receive military retirement.
1. The issue you address IS, in fact, already discussed in the following:
Nonresident Alien Position, Form #05.020, Section 13
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/NonresidentAlienPosition.pdf
2. Dual status filing only applies if the physical location or the domicile of the NRA changed during the year. If it didn't physically change and if the domicile didn't also change, then dual status would not apply, as we understand it. Those receiving retirement checks, as a practical matter, receive them every month and not during only one half of the year where they can physcially claim domicile in the “United States” (federal zone).
3. The 1040 form is only for “U.S. persons” (26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(30)) who are also aliens, and who are domiciled on federal territory. The definition of “individual” found at 26 CFR 1.1441-1(c )(3) identifies all “individuals” as aliens. If you disagree, provide a statute or regulation that includes a statutory “U.S. citizen” within the meaning of “individual” from Title 26 and not another title. Even statutory “U.S. citizens” interface to the code as aliens and only have a requirement to file under 26 U.S.C. 911 when they are an alien in a foreign country and interface to the code through the tax treaty as aliens by availing themselves of tax treaty “benefits”, which are excise taxable franchises. Those domiciled and physically present within a state of the Union, for instance, cannot lawfully or truthfully claim “resident” status nor file IRS form 1040, unless they are married to a statutory but not constitutional “U.S. citizen” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1401 as permitted by 26 USC 6013(g) and (h). A spouse who in fact is not domiciled on federal territory cannot truthfully file IRS form 1040 and thereby claim to be either a statutory U.S. citizen or resident alien under the I.R.C. and if they do, they committed perjury. They start out with the same status as the NRA they are married to, domiciled outside the “United STates” and outside of federal territory as defined in 26 USC 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 26 U.S.C. 7408(d), and 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(39).
4. One cannot be a “resident” of a place without a physical presence there, in full accordance with the presence test found in 26 USC 7701(b ). Those filing the 1040 need a physical presence in the “United States”, which is defined in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) as the District of Columbia. Nowhere are states of the Union included in the definition. By the rules of statutory construction, they are purposefully excluded:
Quote:“When a statute includes an explicit definition, we must follow that definition, even if it varies from that term's ordinary meaning. Meese v. Keene, 481 U.S. 465, 484-485 (1987) (“It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term”); Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. at 392-393, n. 10 (“As a rule, `a definition which declares what a term “means” . . . excludes any meaning that is not stated'”); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lenroot, 323 U.S. 490, 502 (1945) ; Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 294 U.S. 87, 95-96 (1935) (Cardozo, J.); see also 2A N. Singer, Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory Construction § 47.07, p. 152, and n. 10 (5th ed. 1992) (collecting cases). That is to say, the statute, read “as a whole,” post at 998 [530 U.S. 943] (THOMAS, J., dissenting), leads the reader to a definition. That definition does not include the Attorney General's restriction — “the child up to the head.” Its words, “substantial portion,” indicate the contrary.”[/u]
“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d 1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.”
[Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 581]
Furthermore, even if they are lawfully serving in a public office, 4 U.S.C. 72 says those offices can only physically and lawfully be exercised in the District of Columbia, consistent with IRC 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10). Therefore, unless one served in the office in the District of Columbia or unless the government as moving party can produce a statute expressly authorizing them to serve where they served in a state of the Union, there is no way they could be lawfully engaged in the public office and therefore a “taxpayer” while collecting the retirement check. If the NRA satisfies all the legal criteria for occupying a public office found in the article below AND if there is a statute authorizing the office to be exercised in the state of the Union outside of federal territory where he is at, then and only then can he claim to be engaged in a “trade or business”. All those occupying such an office are listed in 5 USC 2105(a). If the NRA isn't in there, they are neither an “employee” nor “public officer” nor lawfully engaged in a “trade or business”. An example would be commissioned officers in the U.S. military. They would be public officers, but enlisteds. Defense contractors wouldn't be public officers unless they are federal corporations with a domicile in the District of Columbia.
The “Trade or Business” Scam, Section 11
DIRECT LINK: http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/TradeOrBusinessScam.htm[url url=”http://famguardian.o…usinessScam.htm”][/url]
5. The only thing connecting the NRA to a “public office” and a “trade or business” in most cases is the information returns, which are FALSE and FRAUDULENT for the reasons explained below:
Correcting Erroneous Information Returns, Form #04.001
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/CorrErrInfoRtns/CorrErrInfoRtns.pdf
6. The fact that the NRA worked for the federal government doesn't mean they are engaged in a “trade or business” or a public office. Ordinary workers are not so engaged and in all cases we have seen, the information returns are still FALSE because their job desciption doesn't fit all the requirements for holding a public office. Yes, as a contractor for the government the NRA might have earnings from the “United States” which at first glance would be described in 26 U.S.C. 871(a), but:
6.1 If the NRA is not an “individual”, then their earnings are not described in 26 U.S.C. 871(a) because section 871 only pertains to “individuals”. The taxable income mentioned there is earned by “nonresident alien individuals”, not “nonresident aliens” who are NOT “individuals” because not aliens. All “individuals” are aliens and those born within and domiciled within a state of the Union are not “aliens” in relation to the national government.
6.2 The NRA position pamphlet above, form #05.020, Section 13 explains that even those earnings are not taxable because the underlying regs say that even those earnings must be related to a “trade or business” at 26 CFR 1.871-7.
http://edocket.acces…6cfr1.871-7.htm
7. There is not reason and no benefit to being a dual status filer. The 1040NR form has a place for both “trade or business” earnings under 26 USC 871(b) and “non-trade or business” earnings from the government ONLY under 26 USC 871(a). Social security would be under the non-trade or business category, as would military retirement. If any information returns were filed in connection with the SS or retirement earnings, they need to be corrected. Nevertheless, the only entity who can legally file the 1040NR is a “nonresident alien individual”. If one isn't an “individual”, then they can't file EITHER the 1040 or 1040NR without committing perjury, and all “individuals” are aliens pursuant to 26 CFR 1.1441-1(c )(3). Those born anywhere in AMerica and domiciled within the exclusive jurisdiction of a state or the Union are NOT “aliens” under the I.R.C. and therefore can't file either the 1040 or 1040NR without committing perjury under penalty of perjury. This is just proof that people in states of the Union are in fact and indeed not allowed to participate in federal income taxation. This situation has been so since the founding of our country and continues to this day, Sixteenthy Amendment not withstanding.
Therefore, unless one holds public office or is a federal corporation, which is also a public office, it would appear that a human being, as an ordinary worker or contractor not holding a “public office”, could not have “gross income”. The only type of earnings from the “United States” that count as “gross income” even though not expressly identified as “trade or business” earnings is social security. See 26 USC 861(a)(8).
The above is simply an opinion, not a fact, not legal advice, and not admissible as evidence. You should verify all this information for yourself and not trust anything on this website that you haven't verified for yourself to be true.
-
That's true, but we don't want to attract people who will use their knowledge of the law essentially to STEAL houses. This would essentially cause the borrowers to emulate the equally illegal activity of the banks, which we don't approve of or condone. If you are going to abuse knowledge gained in these forums for that sort of predatory purpose, you aren't welcome in these forums and are abusing our materials for unlawful and unauthorized commercial goals.
The information provided above is only intended for DEFENSIVE, not OFFENSIVE purposes in the case of those who have lost their job and are about to lose their house.
-
Bing,
Thanks for your feedback. Megadittos, my friend.
Kola,
We don't take anything personal in these forums and thank you for your feedback.
How do you propose to prevent people from abusing their presence on these forums to take but not give back? Few give anything back. They come here to get their question answered, disappear forever, and never seem to care about giving back by answering one question of someone else to return the favor. Is this how we fulfill the biblical mandate to love and protect our neigher, by essentially stealing from him? Doesn't it seem hypocritical that people should come here, expect to be babied and have their issue dealt with directly, but they never come back and do the same for others? The Golden Rule says we can only demand what we are willing to give and that if we don't give, we shouldn't expect to receive. Why should we (the regulars) be the only ones who ever make sacrifices in these forums?
To Everyone:
I propose the following rules for these forums:
1. You can't get a question answered in a non-newbie forum until you have answered someone else's question FIRST in these forums.
2. When you propose a question, you must provide a link in these forums to the answer you provided someone else as proof you are entitled to an answer.
3. When you are given the answer by another forum member, when you respond you must indicate:
3.1 Whether you are following the Path to Freedom, Form #09.015, http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm and what step in the checklist in section 2 of the
document you have achieved so far.
3.2 If you were asked to read something, you should indicate whether you did your homework and read it, and how much of it you read. This is called “due dilligence”.
3.3 Whether your reading assignment and/or the answer addressed your issue.
3.4 If there were any problems with the answer or the reading assignment, indicate what needs to be fixed so it can be improved.
4. Those who don't indicate whether they did their reading assignment or don't respond back with the above answers to the response to their question will not be entitled to ask any more questions in the forums. The Admin will keep track of who is not allowed to ask further questions and members will be able to refer back to the list in the newbie area.
What do you think of these forum rules? They are designed to ensure that everyone:
1. Follows the correct path to freedom.
2. Pulls their own weight. That way moochers and people who are too lazy to use our materials properly or follow directions will stay away. Only those who want to help others will remain.
3. Maximizes involvement, participation, symbiosis, and self-government.
We'll post these to the “Board Guidelines” at the top if everyone agrees. These rules are based on Franklin's suggestions as well as our own experience. A Newbie area will be added and these rules will apply to ALL forums.
-
neo,
You're funny! 😆 Talking about asbestos pants, cheese graters, and the like adds a lot of color and interest to your approach.
Thanks for sharing your honest opinions about this ministry, and we invite everyone to do so. You are correct that SEDM aren FG are separate ministries, but we like the SEDM Path to Freedom so much that we endorse it as a way for new members to quickly come up to speed. We're glad you're looking at it because that is the best place for anyone to start who is new at this game.
We're concerned about your perception that new members get their head rubbed on a cheese grater. This is not an image we wish to portray, and it may explain why the posters on these forums are as sparse as they are, if of course your perceptions are correct. Other reasons that might also explain the sparseness of postings here might be:
1. The information on this site is so complete, so clear, and so self-documenting because of all the hyperlinks it contains that there is no need for questions to explain anything.
2. The type of people who are attracted to this ministry and website are self-motivated and more resourceful than the average joe and don't need the kind of hand-holding found on other newbie websites.
3. The existing members deal with all the issues that most common folk have, and the common folk feel it is duplicative to ask what has already been asked and answered.
4. The postings in these forums deal adequately with the subjects covered here without further questions. For instance, each topic begins with a “Welcome” post that is pinned and which points to all the relevant authorities on this site that deal with the subject.
There is another side of the coin that you don't seem aware of and which we would like an opportunity to explain to all. The problems we are dealing with is that:
1. These forums have been frequented in the past by government moles who want to identify and persecute our members. We must be discerning of new members as a form of “damage control”. We are the shepard and the ignorant newbie sheep who frequent these forums are the flock we seek only to protect and help. Our strong approach is more a product of tough love than disrespect or immaturity. See:
http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showforum=79
2. Most people only TAKE from these forums but don't give. They post their question and after they get an answer, they don't contribute anything to show their appreciation or spread the intellectual wealth. This is a sign of selfishness and we want to scare selfish people away. Government get so big because people don't help each other and don't reciprocate the help they do receive, which leaves the government to step in and make a franchise to help people that destroys their rights. All we do by helping people who don't FIRST demonstrate a tendency to help back is reward and encourage laziness and selfishess and we want to avoid doing that.
3. Most people are more interested in a quick and easy fix. They want to eliminate the symptoms without curing the problem, which in nearly all cases is fundamental ignorance of the law. They don't want to do the home work or the hard work needed to earn their liberty and so they don't deserve it. They want to be handed the solution instead of creating one themself and using the opportunity to learn and improve. In essence, they are lazy.
Quote:“The hand of the diligent will rule, but the lazy man will be put to forced labor [slavery!].” [Prov. 12:24, Bible, NKJV]4. Even when you hand them a solution, they want all the problems solved in advance so they don't have to contribute anything. In short, they function at an animal level and are difficult to motivate to a higher calling:
4.1 They avoid all risk.
4.2 They seek immediate reward and gratification without sacrifice. In short, they want something for nothing.
4.3 They want others to do all the hard work before they will lift even a finger.
4.4 They are not interested in helping or teaching others as a way to learn a subject thoroughly.
In short, they lack virtue and anything you hand them will be pearls cast before swine that eventually, one way or another, will be trampled under foot.
5. No one wants to hear the truth, because its too painful. They don't want to be told the honest truth that they have a lot to learn, that they should turn off the TV and invest in their own education, that they need to take an active role in fighting the fraud instead of depending on others to do it for them or paying someone else to take the bullets.
We don't want people in these forums who:
1. Are lazy.
2. Prideful or arrogant. They will steal all the credit from those who help them, be too stuborn to admit they are wrong, and make easy targets in front of juries because no one likes arrogant people. Chances are, they will also try to hijack what we have done, corrupt it with falsehoods, and then try to sell it to others.
3. Don't believe in God. This will cause them to try to glorigy themself, not be a team player, and to not be concerned about the other members of the ministry.
4. Want an easy fix
5. Have to be treated with kid gloves because their ego is so fragile.
6. Are presumptuous. See:
Presumption: Chief Weapon for Unlawfully Enlarging Federal Jurisdiction, Form #05.017
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
7. Will use our materials without thinking. Even the best solution in the hands of an ignorant fool will always hurt someone. The plaque outside the U.S. Naval Academy explains why:
Quote:“There is nothing more fearful than watching ignorance in action.”8. Don't have the courage to question ALL authority, including ours.
We don't want these kind of people here because even if you hand them a perfect solution they will mess it up for everyone else because:
1. They don't want to do the hard work needed to both defend it and improve it.
2. They are too lazy to use it properly or follow the directions.
3. They will blame us if it doesn't work AFTER they used it improperly because they are too despicable to even take responsibility for their own choices and decisions.
4. Their lazy implementation of our research or implementation will create case law that will prejudice or interfere with successful use of our materials in the courts in the future.
Both the Bible and military bootcamp take the approach we take here:
Quote:“Wisdom calls aloud outside; she raises her voice in the open squares, she cries out in the chief concourses, at the openings of the gates in the city she speaks her words; how long, you simple [atheist] ones, will you love simplicity? For scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge. Turn at my rebuke; surely I will pour out my spirit on you; I will make my words known to you. Because I have called and you refused, I have stretched out my hand and no one regarded, because you disdained my counsel [and My law: God's law], and would have none of my rebuke, I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your terror [a corrupted WICKED government that is God's competitor rather than His servant] comes. When your terror [corrupted government] comes like a storm, and your destruction comes like a whirlwind, when distress and anguish come upon you. Then they will call on me, but I will not answer; they will seek me diligently, but they will not find me. Because they hated knowledge [and were too lazy and complacent to seek it out], and did not choose the fear of the Lord. They have none of my counsel and despised my every rebuke. Therefore they shall eat the fruit of their own way, and be filled to the full with their own fancies. For the turning away of the simple will slay them. And the complacency of fools will destroy them; but whoever listens to me [God and the wisdom that comes ONLY from God] will dwell safely, and will be secure, without fear of evil.”[Prov. 1:20-33, Bible, NKJV]
If God can do it, shouldn't we? They treat you like dirt in boot camp, and they do it so that you will learn enough humility to respect authority and do your homework so you don't bring reproach or injury to your military unit.
If there is some way to accomplish all the above objectives in a friendlier way, we are all ears. No one has yet shown us how to accomplish all the above objectives without taking the attitude that we do. Our motto is:
Quote:“He has a right to criticize who has a heart to help.” [Abraham Lincoln]If you can't tell us how to do it better, then please avoid criticizing how we do things. We're all ears if you have constructive suggestions on how to do our very challenging job better.
Perhaps a separate beginners forum might help so that newbies don't bet so many barbs and feel more inclined to return here as their knowledge progresses. What do you think, and how should such a forum be organized? These forums are intended to appeal to everyone, including the much more experienced folk who form the backbone of these forums.
-
Ways to get indictments:
1. Look on the DOJ Press Releases Website. Chances are, there is at least one indictment there:
http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/TEN.htm
2. Get an account on Weslaw or Versus law and look up the cases for yourself:
3. Contact Atttorney Larry Becraft yourself and ask him:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/
Good God, do we have to do everything for you? Can't you do any of the leg work yourself? Those who can't do legal research shouldn't even THINK about being sovereign. The ability to do legal research is the starting point for staying out of trouble. Inability to do legal research, in fact, is the main reason people get into all these redemption scams and even the income tax system to begin with: They want an easy way out and a silver bullet without having to get educated about the law FIRST.
If you want to progress to the point where you can learn how to do legal research and be a fully functioning member of this community so you not only don't have to post questions like this, but rather can post ANSWERS that help others, see:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
http://sedm.org/Forms/Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
It's unrealistic to expect others to do the work to protect you and your friends that you can't or won't even try to do yourself first before asking for help. Sovereignty begins with self-government. It can't hurt to ask others, but don't expect or depend on an answer, and anyone who does is naive. Caveat emptor. Sovereignty and freedom are NOT spectator sports. We admire your interest in the truth, but we must remember what the Bible says on this subject:
Quote:“Test all things; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.”[1 Thess. 5:21-22, Bible, NKJV]
“Be diligent to [investigate and expose the truth for yourself and thereby] present yourself [and the public servants who are your fiduciaries and stewards under the Constitution] approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word [and the deeds] of truth. But shun profane babblings url=”http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm”]government propaganda;[/url], tyranny, and [url url=”http://famguardian.org/Publications/FederalUsurpation/FederalUsurpation.pdf”]usurpation[/url for they will increase to more ungodliness. And their message [and their harmful affects] will spread like cancer [to destroy our society and great Republic].”
[2 Tim. 2:15-17, Bible, NKJV]
“…we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, but speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head—Christ.”
[Eph. 4:14, Bible, NKJV]
-
You mentioned the Kondratieff cycle above. Here is another excellent article on the subject:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanki…inArmstrong.pdf
-
Update:
Since being arrested, Joe shut down his website:
This was a condition of his release.
-
Dear sir,
You gave the WRONG link to the page with the problem. It is:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Tr…VehCodeLaws.htm
In the future, at least:
1. Give the correct link to the page containing the problem.
2. Find the correct information to use and tell us what to fix it with. It's not appropriate to only take from the forums. This information is up here also for peer review so that we can get help keeping it updated. It's tremendous effort maintaining all this information without compensation and we need your help. You shouldn't be here if you aren't willing not only to give it, but to volunteer it without being asked.
We used the links on the above page to fix the Codes link and correct the Chapter that the vehicle code is in. We don't know the correct link for insurance but click on the Codes link and find it yourself, the same way we did in building the table. No our problem.