fg_admin
Forum Replies Created
-
Dear JustAboutMyPolitics,
Thanks for your feedback but we respectfully disagree. Your view of the Old Testament as being repealed by the New testament is severely flawed. This view is rebutted at:
1. Policy Document: Corruption of Modern Christianity, Form #08.012, Section 3.9
http://sedm.org/Forms/PolicyDocs/CorrModernChristianity.pdf
2. Delegation of Authority Order from God to Christians, Form #13.007
http://sedm.org/Forms/SelfFamilyChurchGovn…OfAuthority.pdf
Christ is not the end of the law for the believer. Faith in Him buys us salvation but not reward after we are resurrected. Our reward after resurrection is still dependent on our works, as James indicated. The following pastors also agree with us, and they have studied scripture over 60 years collectively:
1. The Ten Commandments: Nailed to the Cross or Required for Salvation?
http://www.thercg.org/books/syottc.html
2. Rousas Rushdoony, The Chalcedon Foundation:
We are not legalists. We do not believe that works or the law are necessary to achieve basic salvation. We don't claim to be justified by the law or our works of obedience to the law, nor do we imply that such obedience makes us better than any other Christian. We do claim, however, that we will receive a reward commensurate with our works after the resurrection and that the reward each receives will be unequal. Why else would EVERYONE, including Christians, need to appear before the judgment seat of God? If works don't matter, there is no need for final judgment in the case of Christians who are saved, now is there? You contradict yourself, but so do most pagan Christians in this deluded age.
Quote:Faith Without Works Is Dead14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
18 But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without yoururl=”http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=66&chapter=2&version=50#fen-NKJV-30306d”]d[/url works, and I will show you my faith by myurl=”http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=66&chapter=2&version=50#fen-NKJV-30306e”]e[/url works. 19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! 20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?url=”http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=66&chapter=2&version=50#fen-NKJV-30308f”]f[/url 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? 22 Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect? 23 And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.”url=”http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=66&chapter=2&version=50#fen-NKJV-30311g”]g[/urlAnd he was called the friend of God. 24 You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.
25 Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
[James 1:14-26, Bible, NKJV]
We believe that the rewards we receive after the resurrection on the New Earth will be unequal and that Heaven, like nearly every government program, is a franchise whereby our rewards are commensureate with our works AFTER we get there. The Delegation of Authority Order above proves this exhaustively using the Bible. If you have nothing but faith and produce no works, then you'll get the broom closet in the Father's House of Many Mansions. If you add works to the equation, you get the presidential suite. It's your choice, but the law has not been repealed and there are still rewards for obedience beyond basic salvation. For an itemized list of those rewards, see Deut. 28. The nature of such a franchise is exhaustively described in the document below:
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030
http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Franchises.pdf
You don't honestly believe the Jesus, Paul, Daniel, and David are going to get the same room in the House of Many Mansions or the same rewards as you, now do you? That's not only ridiculous, but it's proof that your version of Christianity is nothing but communism and socialism: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. If Heaven is like that, who needs h-e-l-l because it's worst than h-e-l-l. The corrupted view of Christianity that you suffer from is not uncommon, and is also thoroughly debunked in the following article and form 13.007 above:
The Unlimited Liability Universe
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Spirituali…ityUniverse.htm
You quote Romans 13, but you do so presumptuously and incompletely. Presumption is a sin in the Bible. Romans 13 says that all authority comes from God. Governments that disobey God are not Godly governments and therefore have no lawful authority delegated by God and not only should not be obeyed, but should be rebelled against by Christians. This is thoroughly proven in Form 13.007 above, section 4.2. Below is an amplified version of Romans 13 from that section which we retype here to expand upon this point:
Quote:“Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the [righteous but not unrighteous] authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the [godly/righteous] authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist [godly/righteous] will bring judgment on themselves. For [godly/righteous] rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. [But unrighteous rulers encourage, promote, and even subsidize evil.] Do you want to be unafraid of the [godly/righteous] authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he [the godly ruler, not the Satanic ruler] is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil [meaning, violate ONLY God's law], be afraid [of godly/righteous rulers who administer that law]; for he does not bear the sword in vain [unless he is an evil ruler]; for he [the godly/righteous ruler] is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil [violations of God's laws]. Therefore you must be subject [ONLY to godly/righteous laws or rulers, but NOT unrighteous or evil laws or rulers], not only because of wrath but also for conscience' [Holy Spirit's] sake [enlightened by God's Law]. For because of this [righteous rulers administering only God's laws] you also pay taxes, for they are God's ministers attending continually to this very thing. Render therefore to all [godly/righteous rulers] their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor [but do not subsidize or condone evil in your government if it is violating God's Laws].[Romans 13:1-7, Bible, NKJV]
God is perfect and cannot contradict Himself. He cannot command us to disobey His law or to do evil. Therefore He cannot command us to obey civil rulers who rebel against Him or violate His sacred law. God is love, and the essence of love is obedience to God's Law. Love is not a feeling, it is an act of obedience to His holy law, both old and new testment. The essence of what it means to be a “Christian” is that the person recognizes the authority and jurisdiction of God's law over his life and obeys it to the best as they can by allowing the Holy Spirit to control their actions and choices. To be “in Him” as mentioned below means we are God's fiduciaries and trustees under the Bible, which is a trust indenture. God is the “beneficiary” of that trust. The corpus of the trust is the Earth, which He commanded us to have dominiom over as His trustees and agents acting under His authority delegated by the Bible trust indenture. In that sense, we are officials of a foreign government and ambassadors for Christ and we are “public officers” of ONLY God's government on earth and NO OTHER GOVERNMENT:
Quote:“He who has [understands and learns] My commandments [laws in the Bible] and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him.”[John 14:21, Bible, NKJV]
“And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and he who abides in love [obedience to God's Laws] abides in [and is a FIDUCIARY of] God, and God in him.”
[1 John 4:16, Bible, NKJV]
“Now by this we know that we know Him [God], if we keep His commandments. He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him [His fiduciaries]. He who says he abides in Him [as a fiduciary] ought himself also to walk just as He [Jesus] walked.”
[1 John 2:3-6, Bible, NKJV]
Any departure from the above:
1. Is an act of mutiny against God.
2. Turns Christianity into paganism.
3. Turns Jesus into a fire insurance salesman from the wrath of h e l l but not a Sovereign Lord over your life.
4. Turns churches into vain social clubs and not salt or light of the world.
5. Promotes government to the status of pagan godhood, because people no longer have an absolute standard, namely God's laws, to govern their own lives. Law then become relativistic and the “state” , or democratic majority becomes the source of law instead of the true and living and unchanging God. If you want to learn the result of that kind of paganistic thinking, read the Bible book of judges, which our bible describes as “the book of failure”.
Bigots operate upon labels because they can't face the whole truth. One of those labels is “legalist”. You have to dehumanize us and put a label on us so you don't have to face reality. You want insurance, not truth. Those who seek insurance should bow down to great social(ist) insurance company, the government and need not spend any time here.
-
You can still learn about his research. Some of his writings are contained in the SEDM Member Subscription Library. We have read them:
-
1. We didn't write the article. The title at the top says it was written by Kedar Cohen, and no one at this website is that person.
2. We only respond to questions about articles that we wrote and we didn't write it.
3. The case cited is a case that can easily be looked up at any case research site. The Legal Research Sources page below has links to find legal cites:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/LegalRef…alResrchSrc.htm
Don't ask us for help on how to use the above page. You can learn yourself by reading chapter 3 of our Great IRS Hoax book, which you are required to do as a member anyway within the Path the Freedom (http://sedm.org/Forms/Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf) checklist (section 2).
4. If you can't find a case referenced on our site in the free links within the above page, you will need to get a paid subscription on one of the following, all of which are referenced at the bottom of the above page:
Westlaw: http://westlaw.com
Versuslaw: http://versuslaw.com
Lexis Nexis: http://lexisnexis.com
5. If you were following the following document as required by all Members, you could have answered the question yourself. Please follow the document below so you can teach yourself how to do legal research. We don't do free research for others, and neither do any lawyers we know:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
-
SEDM Exhibit #08.006:
-
-
1. By creating an entity such as a trust and having the entity contract for the services.
2. By prepaying the services or leaving a deposit with the understanding that service will be terminated if the balance goes to zero.
3. By obtaining a prepaid phone and recharging it periodically.
4. By using a neighbor's wireless internet and sharing the cost with him/her via cash.
5. By having a friend or neighbor contract for you and paying them cash.
6. By using prepaid gift cards to pay for the service so you aren't linked ot an account.
Please use your noggin. That's what God gave it to you for. This is a religious ministry. The least God expects of those who participate in religious ministries is to contribute to their support by giving more than they take. We therefore expect our readers to contribute SOMETHING to the needs of others in every one of their posts as a way of tithing to this ministry of their time and energy. For instance, you could have shared all the ways you came up with on your own to answer the question you posed before presenting it for feedback, and share your experiences trying each option you came up with for the benefit of others.
If you want to be free, you're going to have to get used to thinking WAY outside the box and quit drinking the Jim Jones Koolaid they hand you in the public schools and the media. If you think we're being harsh, then you're also in for a REAL surprise the next time you get into an argument about this with a judge…he will be even less merciful unless you show a lot more initiative. We're trying to prepare you for battle and we hope you appreciate it. These forums are meant to be a “mock court”.
-
Brad W.
1. Our About Us page says members of this fellowship can't ask for or give “legal advice”. Consequently, you aren't allowed to ask for advice, but only information relevant to a hypothetical situation. Members are admonished not to render advice, but only anecdotes about what they might do if in that situation.
http://famguardian.org/aboutus.htm
2. Are you following the following document and are you a “taxpayer” or not? If you are a “taxpayer” or if you are not following the following, then Members are admonished not to render assistance.
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The direct link for the above is:
http://sedm.org/Forms/Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
3. All members of these forums are also cautioned to provide their status whenever they ask for help:
3.1 Whether they are a “taxpayer”.
3.2 Whether they are following the above document.
3.3 What step in the above document they have completed in the checklist in section 2.
These requirement also appear in the “Forum rules” at the top of this forum. Please read these rules and please also advise us of your status prior to proceeding to get your question answered.
-
These forums are not the proper place to provide detailed personal information about specific members or contributors. Anonymity is king here and we aren't going to give the opposition anything that could tie anyone associated with this ministry with a specific name, address, and number.
We don't have such information and even if we had, we couldn't reveal it without compromising the privacy of others. Why don't you do the homework we suggested and share your findings with others here. We can't do everything and we need your help. That is what these forums are for. Are you up to the task?
Freedom is NOT a spectator sport. Why is it that people want a perfect solution that they don't have to even lift a finger for before they will even consider sticking their neck out? Only those who take risks are truly free. Socialists don't take risks and offload all risk and sovereignty to the government. Capitalists do. When are people going to start GIVING to this forum instead of only taking? Are you only here because you want something, or are you going to keep coming back AFTER your problem is solved because you are the kind of caring, giving person who gives as much help as they get or demand?
Quote:Risk..To weep…is to risk appearing sentimental,
To hope…is to risk despair,
To reach out for another…is to risk involvement,
To try…is to risk failure,
To expose feelings…is to risk exposing your true self,
To place your ideas, your dreams before the crowd…is to risk their loss,
To love is to risk…not being loved in return,
To live…is to risk dying,
But risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life,is to risk nothing.
The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, and is nothing. They may avoid suffering and sorrow, but they cannot learn, feel, change, grow, love, and live. Chained by their certitudes, they are a slave, they have forfeited their freedom.Only a person who risks.is free
-
Yes, he's playing in the feds playground because he filed a resident form and thereby fraudulently inferred a domicile in the District of Criminals. The feds are looking the other way on that subject because that is how most people become “taxpayers” and “sponsors” in the first place, but its FRAUD. Anyone who is a citizen or resident has a domicile in that jurisdiction and owes a tax. That is what the supreme Court said in section 2 of the following.
Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Reme…ForTaxation.htm
To quote them again:
Quote:“Thus, the Court has frequently held that domicile or residence, more substantial than mere presence in transit or sojourn, is an adequate basis for taxation, including income, property, and death taxes. Since the Fourteenth Amendment makes one a citizen of the state wherein he resides, the fact of residence creates universally reciprocal duties of protection by the state and of allegiance and support by the citizen. The latter obviously includes a duty to pay taxes, and their nature and measure is largely a political matter. Of course, the situs of property may tax it regardless of the citizenship, domicile, or residence of the owner, the most obvious illustration being a tax on realty laid by the state in which the realty is located.”[Miller Brothers Co. v. Maryland, 347 U.S. 340 (1954)]
Pete is NOT correct. Domicile and citizenship DO matter. Your questions are already dealt with in the following, which has said the same thing for quite some time:
Policy Document: Pete Hendrickson's Trade or Business Approach, Form #08.003
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Let's try to limit this forum to things that are NEW and are not already covered in documents available on this and other websites.
The IRC Subtitle A tax is NOT a direct tax. All direct taxes are taxes on property rather than the fruit of property. The income tax is and always has been a tax on an activity and a franchise and all such taxes are indirect excise taxes. Information returns can only be filed against the activity. 26 USC 6041(a) says they can only be filed for “trade or business”, which is defined as “the functions of a public office”. If there were a direct tax, the tax would be directly against property rather than an activity.
The subject of direct and indirect is covered ad nauseum in the following and its a waste of time to reinvent the wheel here.
1. Section 10 of the The “Trade or Business” Scam article
2. Great IRS Hoax, Section 5.1 et seq.
Please do your homework in the future.
The Lougbough case is irrelevant because:
1. You can't be a “taxpayer” without a domicile.
2. You can't have a domicile without a physical presence in a place either now or at some time in the past.
3. Unless one is also an “Individual” and therefore an “alien”, you cannot lawfully make an election to be treated as a “Resident” under 26 USC 6013(g) and (h).
3. Almost no one who THINKS they are a statutory “taxpayer” has in fact physically lived or even worked in the District of Columbia. Therefore, they can't, as a matter of law, be “taxpayers” in the District of Criminals and are committing fraud to file a resident or “U.S. person” form such as the 1040. See:
Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Reme…ForTaxation.htm
-
The term “nonresident alien” WITHOUT the word “individual” does not in fact appear in 26 USC 7701(b ) (1)( 😎 . It only appears in the title but not the body of that section. According to 26 USC 7806(b ), the title of a section is NOT considered part of the section.
1. I claim the status in the TITLE but not the BODY of 26 USC 7701( :cool:(1)( :cool:.
2. I claim to be a nonresident but not an “individual” or a “person”.
3. The only way I can be a nonresident and still be “subject” to that code section is to make a voluntary election to engage in commerce with the sovereign and thereby:
3.1 Waive sovereign immunity under 28 USC 1605(a)(2).
3.2 Become an “individual” and a “person”.
4. I can’t lawfully become a “person” or “individual” unless I:
4.1 Started out as an alien. All “individuals” are aliens within I.R.C. Subtitle A …AND
4.2 Voluntarily consented to engage in commerce with the government and thereby waived sovereign immunity and became a “public officer”.
5. Only by consent under the civil law can I become a “person” or an “individual”, because:
5.1 I can’t be compelled to contract with the government by engaging in commerce or participating in franchises such as the “trade or business’ franchise. Governments are established, in fact, to protect your right to both contract and NOT contract. See Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, for instance. Therefore, they can’t force me to contract with them by forcing me to participate in a franchise that I don’t consent to participate in or accept the “benefits” of.
5.2 The First Amendment guarantees me a right of freedom from compelled association. How I describe and define MY OWN status is the mechanism by which I choose to associate or disassociate with any political group, including a “state” or a “government”, and I can’t be compelled to associate.
This is covered in:
Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
6. Since I do all the following, then I can’t be anything directly addressed or defined in the code.
6.1 Do not waive sovereign immunity.
6.2 Do not consensually engage in commerce or accept any government “benefit” and thereby become a “public officer”. All “public officers” are people responsible for managing GOVERNMENT property and those in receipt of government “benefits” are in receipt of government property.
6.3 Do not have a domicile on federal territory.
6.4 Identify every commercial benefit they bestow as a gift that creates no obligation. This is the same thing they do to “taxpayers”. Everything you pay to them under employment withholding is a gift. See Great IRS Hoax, Section 5.6.8.
6.5 Notify them that my consent must ONLY be procured in writing in order for me to waive sovereign immunity. See Legal Notice of Change in Domicile/Citizenship and Divorce from the United States, Form #10.001. This is the same thing they do to you: when you want to sue them, you have to produce a statute authorizing a waiver of sovereign immunity. If our government is one of delegated powers, then I must be able to demand the same dignity from them under the concept of equal protection of the law.
7. A “nonresident alien” who isn’t an “individual” is not defined. Therefore, that is the status I claim, which is that of an entity that isn’t directly defined in the code and therefore not subject to it.
“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d 1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.”
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 581]
8. If one wants to avoid all the word games, just call oneself a nonresident and a foreigner but not a “person”, “foreign person”, “individual”, “nonresident alien individual”, “alien individual”, or any other entity described in the code as either having a liability or accepting a “benefit”, or engaging in commerce. To be “sovereign” simply means either:
8.1 You either don’t appear in the code and therefore are “foreign” and not subject to it or the jurisdiction of the government. This is covered in:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015, Section 5
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
8.2 The status you have is in the code but has no obligations associated with it.
It’s all about commerce and the purpose of the code is to facilitate commerce with The Beast, which the Bible says in Rev. 19:19 is the government. The only thing the code can or does talk about are those who consent to contract with the Beast and thereby become “individuals”, “subjects”, “citizens”, and “residents” under the civil law by virtue of that fornication. The sovereign isn’t subject to the law but foreign to it. If you don’t consent to fornicate with or contract with The Beast, then you don’t appear in the code and don’t have any of the statuses in the code, but rather are a “foreign estate” pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(31). All franchises are contracts and “private law” that can only affect the consenting parties, including the “trade or business” franchise that is the heart of the income tax. Contracts such as franchises and the consent they represent are the ONLY way the government can acquire ANY right to your private property and the only way that a civil “statute”, most of which are franchises, can acquire the “force of law”. Otherwise, the property is private property and governments are established to protect private property by keeping it SEPARATE from public property and public franchises.
Consensus facit legem.
Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
[Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856;
SOURCE: http://famguardian.org/Publications/Bouvie…viersMaxims.htm]
The main way that governments protect your PRIVATE property is to protect you from being compelled to convert it into public property or other people”s property. In tax law, this conversion is called converting private property to a public use, public purpose, and a public office. The process of taxation accomplishes this conversion, but only by the consent of the owner in applying for a license to engage in a franchise.
I can be the thing described in the TITLE of a section without being the thing described in the BODY, and the two are not considered subsets of each other per 26 USC 7806. The fact that something is not defined in the code does not mean that it doesn’t exist, but rather means that it isn’t subject and therefore is sovereign and foreign in respect to that body of PRIVATE law. All civil statutory law can only regulate public conduct of public officers. It is considered repugnant to the constitution to regulate private conduct, according to the U.S. Supreme COurt. The “sovereign” they are referring to below is a “nonresident alien” in this case because he is not the subject of the law in question:
“Since in common usage the term `person’ does not include the sovereign, statutes employing that term are ordinarily construed to exclude it.”
[U.S. v. Cooper, 312 U.S. 600, 604, 61 SCt 742 (1941)]
Everything I just said is already covered in:
Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020, Sections 2 and 3
http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf
-
That's a policy issue, not a law issue. Why don't you ask the agency you expect a payment from and post their response here?
26 CFR 301.6109-1 is where the MANDATE to provide a number appears. Those who are “nonresident aliens” but not “individuals” are nowhere listed, and therefore they aren't required to have or use a number. Even among “nonresident alien individuals“, the number is only required if receiving payments connected to a “trade or business”. Furthermore, the payer can't change your status to mean anything other than what you describe it under penalty of perjury. See:
Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/SelfFamilyChurchGovn…oDeclStatus.pdf (OFFSITE LINK)
If they demand a number and you show them the following that proves you not only don't “have one” but aren't eligible, they become accessories to a crime to either ask for such a number or compel its use and you are committing fraud to even apply for one. The number is only available to statutory “U.S. persons” per 26 USC 7701(a)(3) and you aren't one if you are a “nonresident alien” but not an “individual” not domiciled on federal territory and not occupying a public office in the U.S. government:
Why It is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a “taxpayer identification number”, Form #04.205
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/WhyTINIllegal.pdf (OFFSITE LINK)
For further details, see:
About SSNs and TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/AboutSSNsAndTINs.pdf (OFFSITE LINK)
-
Franklin,
Thanks! Posted on the Privacy Page under “Numerical ID and Automated Tracking”:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/PropertyPr…y.htm#Articles0
-
Bing,
You are absolutely correct, and that new republic of which you speak needs to be built on the ashes of the old and is thorougly described in the following fascinating document, which is a recipe for a “government in a box” that readers can implement locally and lawfully on their own, one county at a time. THIS is the republic Bob Schulz should be spending his time building, and it fixes all the obvious defects of which you speak to make itself incorruptible. This will restore choice and competition to government, which is the heart of the problem. All we have now is one big corporation run by a priesthood, cartel, and cabal of indiividuals representing satan called the American Bar Association and which is nothing more than Enron greed and corruption to the tenth power:
Self Government Federation: Articles of Confederation, Form #13.002
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The direct link is:
http://sedm.org/Forms/SelfFamilyChurchGovn…ArtOfConfed.pdf
-
Kola
We anticipate that most will at least begin by having the same problem you do with reading legal language. That is why we recommend following:
Path to Freedom, Form #09.015
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
If you folllow the checklist in that document faithfully, you will learn legal language because you will have to read chapter 3 of the Great IRS Hoax, which gives you background on legal language and doing legal research.
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatI…reatIRSHoax.htm
You are only having trouble because you aren't following the whole curricula and have ended up putting the cart before the horse. It's not hard and don't get discouraged, because anyone can learn it without going to law school. We started out with your problem less than ten years ago so its not new and nothing to be ashamed of. It's only shameful when one has been told how to fix it and they don't take action because they would rather waste away their years in front of a boob tube than enlighten and empower themselves with knowledge and truths found here and elsewhere. Even old dogs can learn this new trick, and we're proof of that. 🙂
If this is any incentive, one of the most important things you will ever learn is legal language, or should we say legal abbreviations. That is the only way you will ever learn how to supervise your public servants in running the government and how to be truly free and empowered. If that ain't a good incentive to learn, I don't know what is.
-
Neo
You are getting smiley faces because you have “emoticons” turned on in your post. I turned them off. Legal writing reuses the same symbols that the smiley faces use. Uncheck the box when you post legal writing. That's how this forum software works.