ehudmii
Forum Replies Created
Think the best response I may offer to Mr. Adask's articles re. the disparity between the fictional identity and the real identity of a person is this:
what he proposes for use in response to government action is the the very motivation for legislatively mandated non-reputable identities,…i.e., the computer chip in the hand or head.
The mandated identity will close that distinction.
http://iase.disa.mil/ars/cgi-bin/arweb?For…Rqst&Act=Submit
I recommend that you request anything on the theme of “Understanding PKI”.
To say:
?I am going to kill George Bush, because he did X and he did Y, which resulted in Z?
violates WHICH of the Ten Commandments?
Methinks you do ascribe more to the commandments than be there.
For instance:
1.Nothing in the quote may be considered to be falsely witnessing against a neighbor.
2.Nothing in the quote is envy, although the motivation of the speaker might be.
3.Unless one is a son or family member, it's not disrespecting a parent.
4.Nothing in the quote references honoring a false god.
5.Or an image of a god.
6.Nor does the statement refer to God's name.
7.The statement cannot be an action, like stealing.
8.Or adultery.
9.Or working on the Sabbath.
A.Or murder.
Not all killing is murder, and the word in the commandment is murder, not killing.
Moreover, the persons that defend Mr. Bush fulfill their duty when they take the speaker at his word, regardless of any additional statements the speaker may make to counter his original expression of intent.
The expression of an intent, however, does not violate any of the Ten Commandments.
To take action on that intent, MIGHT.
And such as this is exactly the reason why righteous judges have a duty to decide the facts.
Those who do evil, are to receive due for the evil done.
Likewise, those who to good, are to receive due for the good that is done.
Family Guardian's comments regarding Man's Law vs. God's Law are quite appropriate in the context of evaluating,…who is authorized to declare what is good and/or evil, and therefore subject to reward and/or punishment,…and what the duties of judges are regarding law.
A killing is not murder, unless it's God opinion that it is murder.
And the judge that does not regard God at all,…is not likely to regard God's opinions, either.
Thank you for the response.
Although the answer is not the kind of answer I am looking for, I recognize the sense and the wisdom in what you offer.
As for what I am able to provide, by which I may “make ends meet”,
– this list is long enough now that I just have to wonder what to do next!
I can keep on with the employment that I have now.
Or, I can do something else.
Please permit to me the opportunity to describe one decision that required months to decide for certain, and years to prepare for.
On what issue did I have to make a decision?
What am I going to do when my friend in Texas becomes a victim of the tyranny – specifically the tax tyranny – that is easily identified and ubiquitous within the united States?
I have several options.
Some are legal. Some are not.
Some are violent. Some are not.
If only just for the educational value, I am highly motived to gain experience in all of the options available to me. After all, some persons within the tax honesty movement have already experienced the hardship of civil prosecution,…and for this I honor such persons as I honor the men and women that fought King George,…and who gave up their sacred reputations as good citizens for the greater benefit of liberty for themselves and their posterity. I would honor myself to be included in their number. But for me, – this is all and only just words. Valuable words, – but experience counts for more, and for the value in the education that civil prosecution – for a righteous cause – brings, – I have reason to act.
Well, if I am going to act,…what actions have a reasonable chance of success? In the consideration of the resources that my Father has already provided to me, what can I do in my friend's defense that will – possibly – be successful, instead of just a loud noise?
I could shoot my friend, and remove him from the trouble in this world. I didn't invent this idea, but rather I recall to mind the example of the French Resistance fighter that got caught by the Nazis in a resturant. He knew he had only time enough for one shot,…and he also knew what would happen to his wife if she lived,…
I can buy a place for my friend to live that is outside of the notice of the purveyors of this tyranny.
I can keep myself educated in the materials of the tax honesty movement, so as to provide good advice to my friend, as he decides his own fate.
I can organize and fund a prison break, after his prosecution, – although the cost of such an operation is pure speculation for me.
I can do nothing at all.
I can pray, and do nothing at all.
I can take employment with the Justice Department.
Even a clerk can be effective at making his friend's paperwork disappear.
May I offer to you the example of the Chief of Police for Bavaria? How his actions “to file” the cases against the Nazi thugs in the 1920's permitted that party to “grow in influence”?
(Refer to “The Nemesis of Power” by John Wheeler-Bennet.) If he can do this to benefit an group of evil thugs, certainly I can use this technique to save my friend's life. And I don't have to be Chief, either, especially when “the clerk” can be a system administrator for the computers that maintain the records…
I can get an education in law. And I have considered this very seriously.
Let's see,…how many options have I considered, in these years that my friend insists on remaining physically and financially “in the problem”, all the while complaining truthfully? And I do not mean to imply that he has been idle. He is also an active honesty member – and gives me an education for all that he has experienced!
But, for all of the success enjoyed by some persons, for having their arguments and papers in order, – all of that success lies within the determination of the tyrant courts to withhold prosecution. Sufficient evidence exists that the courts do not obey the law, and for this, I hold no confidence that my friend will enjoy success. It's only a matter of time til some prosecutor decides to get motivated and creative, – and the court's decision will be whatever is necessary to increase the tyranny at the expense of my friend's life.
What CAN i do to defend my friend, in these circumstances?
What WILL be effective?
I pray, of course.
“Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed by thy name.
Thy Kingdom come. Thy will be done,…”
And how can I participate in “my Father's work”, in getting his will done on earth, as in heaven?
Is there a clue in Romans 13? 1 Peter 2?
In the eighth grade I began to question my Father about what manner of person I needed to be, or become, in order to be President of the united States. All because my spirit was provoked to ask the question that Solomon asked, “who can rule over this great people of yours?”
For all that the office of President of the United States means today, or any other office that serves to strengthen the tyranny that now exists,…I despise the idea of taking that direction for my life, – even if my friend's life is forfeit by my inaction. I despise the whole process by which the American people are defrauded, and I refuse to have anything to do with it – and I certainly will not offer myself as a representative to and for those people that REALLY decide who will be President, or Senator, or Congressman,…
But since when do my feelings have anything to do with doing my Father's will?
To do with seeing his will done?
Even when it's Christians that give power and honor to the oppressors of themselves and their countrymen?
It's just a little hilarious to speak of such things. Just to admit that I do think about such things is more than enough reason for folks to imagine that I should endure a psych exam. Again.
But the question still remains.
What WILL i do, to defend my friend?
With all that I have been provided by my Father, what WILL i do?
To offer myself as a representive to people like those that participate in this forum, means that I will have to change laws, systems, economies,…it's a very tall order. And as history demonstrates, the figurehead of any “great movement” is the often the one that gets shot.
But,…but I know of a “secret weapon” that exists within the law today that permits me to defend my friend. And for his sake, I have decided that I will be willing to take a bullet. Even if I think he aggrivates me for insisting on remaining “in the problem” rather than getting out of it. Even if, …even if,….even if,….
The decision is merely one that is internal to my soul. The likelihood that I will become governor or President is as remote as meteorites falling to earth. But, I do know one answer to my question. I do know what I can do with all that my Father has provided to me. And I know what can be effective, and even more effective than an attempt at violence.
I just have to be willing to be Governor of Texas, and to be my Father's governor when I am governor. My Father has made me ready, as far as one may answer the personal question “who may rule this great people of yours?” – but quite obviously, if such is his will, he has a lot of details to work out in my regard. I am not even IN Texas,…
Until I discover myself IN Texas, however, and in the bid to represent such persons as those willing to INSIST on liberty in their lifetime, – I must be content to everything else that I am able to do.
Like: asking the question, – who knows of a means to “make ends meet” that does not require one to be an author of religious books, a pastor or other religious leader, or or or – and yet does not require participation in the system that exists? A religious monastery like that enjoyed by Gregor Mendel?
http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/mendeljsp/b…y/biography.jsp
LOTS of accurate clues exist in the Great IRS Hoax book, for the folks to whom the knowledge applies, but given the circumstances I am in now, the application is…neither direct nor immediately feasible. The truth of what is written there has application to me, of course – it's just a matter of getting there from here.
But my concern is not for myself alone. My concern is for all my brothers and sisters in the faith. What exists for them? Sheep farming? Skilled labor on barter? Politics?! What successes now exist, and what is possible/available for the engineer down the hall from me? Does the community of faith HAVE to lose the value of his education, if he is to get himself free of The System? or does he HAVE to give strength to opppressors in the hope that some fraction of his ingenuity and labor will be enjoyed by “his people”?
Lest the direction of the discussion turn from the content suggested by the forum title, I would like to ask again:
who knows of any example in contemporary arguments, – by the National Rifle Association or any other public entity – of an emphasis on the legitimacy of the 2nd Amendment, within the context of one's personal duty to defend one's neighbor?
Of course, the national armed forces of every nation are identified as the defenders of the nation. By it's very nature, of course, the armed forces act on the will of the State.
Even socialist German law MANDATES action by persons in the defense of the victims of a present, observable crime. To fail to act is punishable.
Perversely, German law requires the punishment of the possession of the means to act successfully. (Let's face it, a weak old woman that is at least strong enough to control a gun MAY successfully hinder neo-Nazi thugs, when she observes the thugs in action against her neighbor, but there's no way she can help her friend using her own fists,…)
I have not followed the gun-freedom arguments so closely as to know who is saying what. My perception of the “current theme” has been “built up piecemeal” by the articles I find on the Internet, – and naturally, this is not a complete picture.
However, none of the U.S. soldiers I have spoken to, nor any of the American Christians I have spoken to on this issue, have yet heard of the 2nd Amendment discussed in the context of defending – or having the means to defend – one's neighbor.
Does anyone in this forum have such knowledge of who and when and where?
I am once again reminded that the Puritan example is excellent – for both the positive and negative aspects.
http://www.britannia.com/history/monarchs/mon48.html
Such men and women of faith PROBABLY were good neighbors, and far better countrymen than those who supported a despotic king,…unless one considers the manner of legislation passed by these “faithful saints”.
Maybe, if these people understood the implications of what Family Guardian has provided here on this forum, under the pinned “Welcome” note on the “Man's Law vs. God's Law” forum, – perhaps they would not have oppressed their countrymen. The oppression they established against their own countrymen was not the same as what the king did,…but oppression is never God's will, – even when instituted by God's people.
For instance, the Puritan legislators forbade theater.
Duh,…..where in God's Law may one read that theater is evil, and therefore to be punished by the governor? (Romans 13; 1 Peter 2)
To forbid theater may seem to be a small thing, – but these Puritans demonstrated their love for their neighbors by the legislation they produced, and for this and in this, they also demonstrated what they knew of the Messiah's love. What law was written upon the hearts of those Puritans? Law that forbade theater. Law that declared, by its existence, that the Puritans preferred to see their countrymen punished, and even killed, – than to see their countrymen enjoying a show,…
I would guess that the legislators never considered the question, “Is it my Father's will, according to what we pray in the Lord's Prayer, that my brothers and sisters in the faith, and my neighbors at large,…is it REALLY my Father's will that these people suffer,…for this reason?”
The motivation of these Puritans to remove from their lives the tyranny of the king is excellent, and we in these days do well to accept these historical facts for instruction. Who wants to build a modern “New Model Army”? I am ready to assist you…ideas, technology, and labor. He who would consider this should also consider that genetic technology will soon be a significant strength for those that oppress their countrymen today. One technology may counter another,…but will never grown on its own,…
The failure of these Puritans to establish righteousness and justice after the demonstrated success against tyranny,…this too should be for all of us today one very significant point of instruction. Anyone who will consider defeating tyranny, – should be ready to do better than the Puritans.
What is the “rest of the story” here? Mr. Banister participated in a talk-radio show in January 2004,…so does that mean he was released?
I do not find anything on his website regarding the event mentioning in this thread.
Well! Mr. Hason said “Somebody help this man.” – and your recommendation is help.
I will look into Freedom Force International further.
Danke.
WWWOOOOWWWWWW,……..
And I haven't even read it all yet!
Wow,…VERY interesting.
Humm,….he would have been born as the grandson of persons living at time of the defeat of the Spanish Armada (1588), essentially during that period of time when England could be considered to have risen up as “the dominant nation on earth”.
Of particular importance to us today in one particular fact – ok, sorry – at least TWO important facts that connect to this history of Issac Newton:
#1: http://www.forerunner.com/champion/X0004_3…r_Cromwell.html
#2: http://www.nelsonsnavy.co.uk/broadside7.html
What manner of people were these Puritans that, – essentially, conquered their own country?
What manner of people were the generations that followed, in the light of how “the military draft” was performed by Englishmen on their own countrymen?
Mr. Newton lived in the intervening generation between these two groups of people. His parents would have lived during the reign of Mr. Cromwell, and he himself would have contributed to the English society that followed. What manner of society was that? What manner of Godly/un-Godly character might we today ascribe to that society, after the fashion that many today have imagined American to be “a Christian nation”?
The Press Gangs were nothing more than DEPUTIZED kidnappers.
The English were preyed upon by their own countrymen, as authorized by the State.
(Shall I now refer to Mr. Asskisser as the contemporary example of this?)
But how could that State have held such power over so many?
Especially considering how Mr. Cromwell had overturned the State in his days?
Couldn't anyone else do the same, to protect their family and neighbors from the depredations of the State? Apparently not.
For all of this I am moved to consider how and why Christians deliver into the control of tyrants the very power the tyrants use for oppression. What power? Taxes, of course.
Taxes and Technology.
The Ways and Means, for taxes fund technology research and sale of technology produces taxes.
It's a real bummer of a circumstance, truely, for which scientist can afford to keep his discoveries to himself, when there's a family to feed? And yet, those who receive worldly power through taxes and tech use this power to oppress the scientist, his family, and his countrymen. What's up with that?
What's up is: I see no alternative. But I am looking for one.
