<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | nicodemus | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/chucky/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/chucky/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for nicodemus.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 19:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1fcdeec891354462c42cc23ab777621b</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion &#034;infants&#034; and &#034;births&#034; in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/infants-and-births/#post-15789</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/infants-and-births/#post-15789"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> &#34;infants&#34; and &#34;births&#34;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;An infant is the decedent&#8230;that has yet to receive an SSN&#8221;.Just thinking out loud here&#8230; But if one goes to court and the court asserts you have received a SS Number, that means by their own assertion you are no longer a &#8220;lost&#8221;(decedent) infant, but are reappearing as one who reached the &#8220;age of majority&#8221; and as such can now set up your&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-215"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/infants-and-births/#post-15789" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a6c3dcfd5f46d17268248c5b27d2c534</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15989</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15989"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The Republic will be in &#8220;abeyance&#8221; and suspended until the war effort is over with the people accepting the treaty that was offered. Lincoln made this clear in the liber code. Until someone can show me a presidential proclamation confirming the war effort over and the &#8220;usufruct&#8221; has been completed, All I will hear is blah blah blah and I will&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-501"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15989" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1b85f61479096aef4b02e37501ef045</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Userfruct and Military Occupation in the forum 4.9. Military and War</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/userfruct-and-military-occupation/#post-15834</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 17:54:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/userfruct-and-military-occupation/#post-15834"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Userfruct and Military Occupation</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWXFtUcmUeE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWXFtUcmUeE</a>            This seems to be a peaceful path, I am studying his philosophy and cites&#8230; has anyone else looked at this ? if so, what say you ?  </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">53b83e0348b2dbf805ec83cce1d75eb7</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Who is Tim Turner ? in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/who-is-tim-turner/#post-13829</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:20:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/who-is-tim-turner/#post-13829"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Who is Tim Turner ?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I have reviewed what evidence was available and cannot find the smoking gun, the talkshoe #28 just briefly mentions Mr. Turner but doesn&#039;t address the issues described above. I have heard Mr. Turner say that the RAP was discontinued because some of the people involved with him had an agenda and ulterior motives and they parted ways. I noticed&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2978"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/who-is-tim-turner/#post-13829" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">db0c78701fccba7340767278ee0bd02a</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Titles and Trusts in the forum 7.3. Franchises, Straw men, and Juristic Persons Debate</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/titles-and-trusts/#post-14795</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/titles-and-trusts/#post-14795"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Titles and Trusts</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I WILL read some more,&#8230; but I wasn&#039;t trying to prove the existence. If I am the holder of the original title and they are using it for commercial purposes with an attached number. Why couldn&#039;t the owner show up and use the law of trusts and contracts to either control, or demand compensation for, and/or terminate the authority for its&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7508"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/titles-and-trusts/#post-14795" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b80fa07ed37946d5d14c259895593986</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion How can the forums be improved to encourage greater interest? in the forum 1.5. Member Polls</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14623</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:40:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14623"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How can the forums be improved to encourage greater interest?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Bing,</p>
<p>I especially like suggestion #3,Media Savvy.  I am somewhat new to this,But I have taken every opportunity when discussing certain issues on other social sites like Facebook etc. to post a link directly to a page on these sites to 1) point the &#8220;assumer&#8221; to the law and facts on a subject and 2) raise awareness of these sites in hopes&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1715"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-can-the-forums-be-improved-to-encourage-greater-interest/#post-14623" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a9c7303a70ffc8b664ddc69b6bc3984b</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Citizenship Diagram,pg.9 does not make sense in the forum 7.1.3. Citizenship in laws, forms and in government publications</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14580</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:33:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14580"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Citizenship Diagram,pg.9 does not make sense</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks neo, I was studying on it today and imagining my own diagram in my head from the perspective of only what pertains to me and I think I&#039;m getting it now. Finally !!&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>So my Place of birth (block three) in a state of the Union,sets my nationality status as an American national.per 8 USC §1101(a)(21)?</p>
<p>Then Citizenship (block 5)&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5755"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14580" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfc9a7749e9d5d47e7a44a2762956a5a</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Citizenship Diagram,pg.9 does not make sense in the forum 7.1.3. Citizenship in laws, forms and in government publications</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14578</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:24:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14578"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Citizenship Diagram,pg.9 does not make sense</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I&#039;m studying over the diagrams trying to understand non-citizen national v/s non citizen national of the US.</p>
<p>If I am understanding you correctly, the phrase in 8 USC 1452(:cool: which reads &#8220;A person who claims to be a (national, but not a citizen), of the United States&#8230;&#8221; should be interpreted instead as &#8220;A person who claims to be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5754"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/citizenship-diagrampg-9-does-not-make-sense/#post-14578" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">794a8d394e3544d2b14209dab7265a2c</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Blackmer v. U.S., 284 U.S. 421 (1932) in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/blackmer-v-u-s-284-u-s-421-1932/#post-13609</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:15:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/blackmer-v-u-s-284-u-s-421-1932/#post-13609"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Blackmer v. U.S., 284 U.S. 421 (1932)</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Quote:<br />
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.// 14th amendment sec.1</p>
<p>If they are describing a citizen of US* or US**, according to this you would <b>still </b>be a state citizen also,but the state citizenship seems to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7510"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/blackmer-v-u-s-284-u-s-421-1932/#post-13609" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0225e68f059e45d0eaf3a735704139b8</guid>
				<title>nicodemus replied to the discussion Putting my toes in the water in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/putting-my-toes-in-the-water/#post-12990</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:44:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/putting-my-toes-in-the-water/#post-12990"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Putting my toes in the water</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you.I know with the lord&#039;s help the truth shall set me free and no, I have never been a lawyer.  In fact I have always had a natural dislike for them, but now I find it ironic that by reading man&#039;s laws I wish now I was one!  The only lawyer I ever liked was the fictional one on tv, matlock ha ha ! I was always too much of a gypsy to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2732"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/putting-my-toes-in-the-water/#post-12990" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		